Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:06:25.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The local dimension of energy

from Part III - Social dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Tooraj Jamasb
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Michael G. Pollitt
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

More than half of the world's population lives in urban centres and this is projected to reach two-thirds by the middle of this century (OECD 2009, p. 21). Cities alone consume about two-thirds of the world's total energy production and account for more than 70 per cent of global CO2 emissions through heating, transport and electricity use (IEA, 2008c, p. 179). Many urban centres are now making strides to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and take control over energy consumption and generation. In this chapter, we postulate that some of the best opportunities for reducing energy demand and carbon emissions are through stronger involvement and leadership from local government. We show that local government can and does have a significant impact on both energy production and energy consumption and is an important participant for the implementation of distributed energy.

While the theory of free-riding goes some way to explain the difficulties in getting local governments to unilaterally cut carbon emissions, it neglects to account for many of the co-benefits of implementing such policies. For instance, the costs and the benefits of carbon mitigation are difficult to measure and thus introduce large uncertainty about the aggregate economic and welfare impacts different policies may have. Such uncertainty leads to inefficient decision making and to councils adopting a ‘wait and see’ policy rather than deriving direct benefit from more immediate implementation. While such a strategy may seem rational from a unilateral perspective, in aggregate it leads to inefficient outcomes where the majority of players choose to ‘wait and see’ rather than ‘acting now’. Councils which choose not to adopt carbon-mitigation strategies are therefore ‘free-riding’ and benefiting from the knowledge and implementation strategies created by other first movers. While free-riders adopting status quo policies derive some secondary benefits from first movers, we show that first movers who have self-imposed and targeted local energy strategies do indeed derive direct benefit from self-imposed implementation strategies. In addition, local governments which work with and include local business and residents in carbon-mitigation strategies have a larger impact and a greater probability of success. Not only are synergies created and direct benefits derived for the climate but these partnerships are often financially rewarding to local government, business and the residents who participate in them.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Electricity Demand
Customers, Citizens and Loads
, pp. 249 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfsen, K.H. 2000 www.cicero.uio.no/media/558.pdf
Allman, LFleming, PWallace, A 2004 The progress of English and Welsh local authorities in addressing climate changeLocal Environment 9 271Google Scholar
Audit Commission 2009 www.audit-commission.gov.uk
BERR 2007 Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on EnergyLondonStationery Officewww.berr.gov.uk/files/file39387.pdf
BERR 2008 www.berr.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/strategy/page43356.html
Biffaward and C-Tech 2003 www.massbalance.org/downloads/projectfiles/1826–00237.pdf
Bouffard, FKirschen, D.S. 2008 Centralised and distributed electricity systemsEnergy Policy 36 4504Google Scholar
Brundtland, G. 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: ‘Our Common FutureNew YorkUnited Nations
Bulkeley, HBetsill, M 2003 Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental GovernanceLondonRoutledge
Bulkeley, HBetsill, M 2005 Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate changeEnvironmental Politics 14Google Scholar
Bulkeley, HKern, K 2006 Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UKUrban Studies 43 2237Google Scholar
Burton, JHubacek, K 2007 Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governmentsEnergy Policy 35 6402Google Scholar
Carbon Trust 2004 www.carbontrust.co.uk/energy
Chatterton, P 2001 Putting sustainable development into practice? The role of local policy partnership networksLocal Environment 6 439Google Scholar
Coenen, FMenkveld, M 2002 The role of local authorities in a transition towards a climate-neutral societyGlobal Warming and Social Innovation: The Challenge of a Climate Neutral SocietyLondon, Sterling, VAEarthscan
Collier, U 1996 The European Union's climate change policy: limiting emissions or limiting powersJournal of European Public Policy 3Google Scholar
Collier, ULöfstedt, R.E. 1997 Think globally, act locally?: Local climate change and energy policies in Sweden and the UKGlobal Environmental Change 7 25Google Scholar
Communities and Local Government 2009 National Indicators for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnerships: Handbook of DefinitionsLondonCommunities and Local Government
Communities and Local Government 2009 www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/localregional/localcommunity/wellbeingpower/
DECC 2009 www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/source/total/total.aspx
DECC 2009 http://hes.decc.gov.uk/
DECC 2009 http://tinyurl.com/2v4e5ee
Defra 2007 www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/uk/energy/pdf/action-plan-2007.pdf
Defra 2008 Waste Strategy for Englandwww.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/strategy/strategy07/documents/waste07-strategy.pdf
Defra 2009 www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/index.htm
DTI 2003 Our energy future: creating a low carbon economyLondonStationery Officewww.dti.gov.uk/files/file10719.pdf
DTI 2007 www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38674.pdf
DTI 2007 www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39387.pdf
Energy Future Solutions 2005 www.berr.gov.uk/files/file21141.pdf
Energy Saving Trust 2008 www.est.org.uk/housingbuildings/servicepackages
Environment UnitBrowne, M 2008 www.kirklees.gov.uk/community/environment/green/greenliving/home/re-charge.shtml
Environmental Services Association 2009 www.esauk.org/publications/briefings/energy_from_waste.asp
Insight, EU 2009 http://tinyurl.com/2vr2s7j
Franchini, MRial, MBuiatti, EBianchi, F 2004 Health effects of exposure to waste incinerator emissions: a review of epidemiological studiesAnnali dell’ Istituto superiore di sanità 40 101Google Scholar
Greenpeace 2004 www.greenpeace.org.uk/MultimediaFiles/Live/FullReport/3809.pdf
Guy, S 2006 Designing urban knowledge: competing perspectives on energy and buildingsEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 645http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0607jGoogle Scholar
Harker, PChatterton, J 2009
Government, HM 2000 Local Government Act 2000: Chapter 22LondonThe Stationery Office
Government, HM 2006 www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/uk/ukccp/pdf/ukccp06-all.pdf
Government, HM 2007 Sustainable Communities Act 2007: Chapter 23LondonThe Stationery Office
Hoffman, S.M.High-Pippert, A 2005 Community energy: a social architecture for an alternative energy futureBulletin of Science Technology Society 25 387http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467605278880Google Scholar
Hopkins, R 2008 The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local ResilienceTotnesGreen Books
ICLEI 2002 www.iclei.org/documents/Global/la21summary.pdf
IEA 2008 www.iea.org/G8/CHP/profiles/Finland.pdf
IEA 2008 Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050: in support of the G8 Plan of ActionParisOECD/IEA
IEA 2008 World Energy Outlook 2008ParisOCDE/IEA
IEA 2009 www.iea.org/G8/CHP/profiles.asp
Kelly, SPollitt, M 2009 The economic competitiveness of combined heat and power (CHP-DH) networks in the UK: a comparative approachUniversity of Cambridgewww.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/eprg09251.pdf
Kirklees, Council 2007 www.kirklees.gov.uk/you-kmc/kmc-policies/environmentvision.pdf
2009 www.kirklees.gov.uk/you-kmc/kmc-policies/environmentvision.shtml
Council, Kirklees 2010 www.kirklees.gov.uk
Kousky, CSchneider, S.H 2003 Global climate policy: will cities lead the wayClimate Policy 3 359Google Scholar
Lovins, A.B. 1979 Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable PeaceCambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing
Ministry of Petroleum and Energy 2007 www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/oed/Subject/Energy-in-Norway/Owners-and-organisation-in-the-power-sec.html?id=444386
Mitchell, KNagrial, MRizk, J 2009 Network benefits of embedded solar systems: a case study from western SydneyRenewable Energy 34 2592Google Scholar
MURE Network 2002 www.mure2.com/doc/MURE_Backcasting.pdf
Odgaard, O 2009 www.ens.dk/en-us/supply/heat/district_heating_plants/Sider/Forside.aspx
OECD 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218830433146
Peterborough Council 2010 Peterborough City Council home pageAvailable atwww.peterborough.gov.uk
Pollitt, M 2009 www.ofgem.gov.uk/Networks/rpix20/forum/Documents1/Telecoms%20Pollitt.pdf
Schumacher, E 1973 Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People MatteredNew YorkHarper & Row
Scottish Environment Protection Agency 2009 www.sepa.org.uk/waste/waste_regulation/energy_from_waste.aspx
Shun'ichi, F 2003 21
Smith, C 2007 Making ESCOS WorkLondon
TNEI 2008 www.micropower.co.uk/publications/esco.pdf
Torchio, M.F.Genon, GPoggio, APoggio, M 2007 34
Torriti, JHassan, M.G.Leach, M 2010 Demand response experience in Europe: policies, programmes and implementationEnergy 35 1575Google Scholar
United Nations 1992
Jeroen C.J.M, van den Bergh 2002 Handbook of Environmental and Resource EconomicsEdward Elgar Publishing
Walker, G 2008 Community renewable energy: What should it meanEnergy Policy 36 497Google Scholar
Walker, G 2008 What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and useEnergy Policy 36 4401Google Scholar
Werner, S 2008 www.euroheat.org
Woodman, BBaker, P 2008 Regulatory frameworks for decentralised energyEnergy Policy 36 4527Google Scholar
Yagi, K 2004 Decentralization in JapanPolicy and Governance Working Paper Series 30Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×