Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T16:34:52.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Stuck in the Mud: Fossil Fuels That Fail to Flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Alan R. Carroll
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

The oil and gas deposits that powered the 20th century can be elegantly summarized in a single word: mobility. Fluid hydrocarbons move freely through rock layers beneath the Earth's surface and under the right conditions can travel long distances to natural traps. Once trapped they readily flow to a well bore, making oil and gas relatively easy to transport to the surface. They can then be pumped across continents through pipelines or carried across the globe on tanker ships. Refined products flow easily though internal combustion engines, which have in turn revolutionized human mobility across the land, sea, or air.

The mobility of fluid hydrocarbons might be compared to vehicular traffic on a system of interstate highways or motorways. Just as high-speed roads transport people quickly between cities, certain porous and permeable rock types allow oil and gas to flow quickly (in geologic terms) toward underground traps. But what if there were no such subterranean superhighways? Or alternatively, what if the oil were simply too thick and sluggish to accelerate to highway speeds? Fluid hydrocarbons might then be forced to travel instead on the geologic equivalent of country lanes, gravel tracks, and muddy back roads, perhaps never reaching their destination at all.

In fact, much of the oil and natural gas that has been generated from source rocks in the Earth's crust has never moved very far. Some of it is retained within the source rocks themselves, which constitute less permeable, organic-rich mudstone, and some has migrated tens to hundreds of meters into adjacent beds that are only slightly more permeable. The relative immobility of such hydrocarbons means they do not become highly concentrated in localized traps; instead they remain spread out across large areas of sedimentary basins, just as coal is spread out across the Powder River Basin (see Chapter 8).

The U.S. Geological Survey describes these immobile oil and gas accumulations as “continuous,” because of the observation that they lack the well-defined spatial boundaries imposed by conventional petroleum traps (see Chapter 9).

Type
Chapter
Information
Geofuels
Energy and the Earth
, pp. 189 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, 2013, Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: An Update: National Energy Technology Laboratory, 79 p.
Bruner, K. R., and Smosna, R., 2011, A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin: U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory Report 2011/1478, 106 pp.Google Scholar
Cathles, L. M., Brown, L., Taam, M., and Hunter, A., 2012, A commentary on “The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations” by R. W., Howarth: Climatic Change, v. 113, p. 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, M. E., Ambrose, R. J., Sondergeld, C. H., and Rai, C. S., 2010, Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro-and Nano-Scales: Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas/Society of Petroleum Engineers Conference Paper 137693, 15 p.
DiGiulio, D. C., Wilkin, R. T., Miller, C., and Oberley, G., 2011, Investigation of Ground Water Contamination Near Pavillion, Wyoming: EPA Draft Report 600/R-00/000, 121 p.Google Scholar
Duggan-Haas, D., Ross, R. M., and Allmon, W. D., with Cronin, K. E., Smrecak, T. A., and Auer Perry, S., 2013, The Science beneath the Surface: A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale: Paleontological Research Institution Special Publication 43, Ithaca, New York, 252 p.Google Scholar
Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R. W., and Ingraffea, A., 2011, Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations: Climatic Change, DOI: 10.1007/s10584–011-0061-5.CrossRef
Loucks, R. G., and Ruppel, S. C., 2007, Mississippian Barnett Shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 91, p. 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loucks, R. G., Reed, R. M., Ruppel, S. C., and Hammes, U., 2012, Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 96, p. 1071–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molofsky, L. J., Connor, J. A., Wylie, A. S., Wagner, T., and Farhat, S. K., 2013, Evaluation of methane sources in groundwater in northeastern Pennsylvania: Groundwater, v. 51, p. 333–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, G. H. Jr., 1968, Quantitative fracture study – Sanish Pool, McKenzie County, North Dakota: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 52, p. 57–65.Google Scholar
Osborn, S. G., Vengosh, A., Warner, N. R., and Jackson, R. B., 2011, Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 108, p. 8172–8176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Sullivan, F., and Paltsev, S., 2012, Shale gas production: potential vs. actual greenhouse gas emissions: Environmental Research Letters, v. 7, 6 p.Google Scholar
Pollastro, R. M., Cook, T. A., Roberts, L. N. R., Schenk, C. J., Lewan, M. D., Anna, L. O., Gaswirth, S. B., Lillis, P. G., Klett, T. R., and Charpentier, R. R., 2008, Assessment of undiscovered oil resources in the Devonian-Mississippian Bakken Formation, Williston Basin Province, Montana and North Dakota, 2008: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet2008–3021, 2 p.Google Scholar
Potter, P. E., Maynard, J. B., and Depetris, P. J., 2005, Mud and Mudstones – Introduction and Overview:Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 297 p.Google Scholar
Price, L. C., and LeFever, J. A., 1992, Does Bakken Horizontal Drilling Imply a Huge Oil-Resource Base in Fractured Shales?, in Schmoker, J. W., and Coalson, E. B., and Brown, C. A., eds, Geological Studies Relevant to Horizontal Drilling: Examples from Western North America:Denver, CO, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, p. 199–214.Google Scholar
Zoback, M., Kitasei, S., and Copithorne, B., 2010, Addressing the Environmental Risks from Shale Gas Development:Washington, D.C., Worldwatch Institute Briefing Paper, 18 p.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×