Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:43:20.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Globalisation and the sustainability of agricultural landscapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Jørgen Primdahl  and
Simon Swaffield
Edited by
Jørgen Primdahl  and
Simon Swaffield
Jørgen Primdahl
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Simon Swaffield
Affiliation:
Lincoln University, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

The primary agent: two farmers in the same global space

When the young Danish dairy farmer, Svend Petersen, completed the last round of his large cowshed on a dark November night in 2007, New Zealand farmer Gordon Grey of the same age had just started his working day by checking the operation of his centre pivot irrigator. The two farmers are, as individuals and as members of two distinct societies, of course different. At this particular point in time their immediate situations were also quite different – Petersen was working indoors with dark, cold and wet weather outside, whereas Grey was enjoying an early spring morning.

Despite these practical differences the two farmers shared a number of common conditions. They both had smiles on their faces, as milk prices on the open global market had risen over the previous year and they had each received substantial increases in payments per kilogram of milk. Both farmers deliver their milk to dairy cooperatives which are among the largest multinational dairy corporations in the world. They are part of a global food network driven by corporate marketing strategies and benefit from economies of scale, but neither farmer has any influence on how their milk will be processed. At this moment in time they are also competitors, but it is quite possible that they may become partners, as the two companies are cooperating and may merge in the future.

Type
Chapter
Information
Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes
Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries
 , pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Urban and Landscape Planning, 67, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foods, Arla (2007). Arla Farm Quality Assurances Programme. 2nd version. Available on: http://www.weblogs.arla.dk/APPL/HJ/HJ201AFD/HJ201CFG.NSF/764d628f04477174c1256ce800448d27/80d8f9fb7f1c8449c1257395004c2138/$FILE/Arlagaarden_broschyr_GB_sept_2007_small.pdf
Brandt, J., Primdahl, J. and Reenberg, A. (1999). Rural land-use and landscape dynamics – analysis of driving forces in space and time. In Land-use Changes and their Environmental Impact in Rural Areas in Europe (ed.) Krönert, R., Baudry, J., Bowler, I., Reenberg, A.. Paris: Parthenon, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
Brouwer, F., Rheenen, T. and Dhillion, S. S. (2008). Emerging perspectives on changing land management practices. In Sustainable Land Management. Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture (ed.) Brouwer, F., Rheenen, T. v., Dhillion, S. S. and Elgersma, A. M.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 237–246.Google Scholar
Bürgi, M., Hersperger, A. M. and Schneeberger, N. (2004). Driving forces of landscape change – current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 19, 857–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busck, A., Kristensen, S. P., Præstholm, S., Reenberg, A. and Primdahl, J. (2006). Land system changes in the context of urbanisation: examples from the peri-urban area of Greater Copenhagen. Danish Journal of Geography, 106, 2, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S. J., Vickery, J. A. and Norris, K. (2007). Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science, 315, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clapp, J. and Dauverge, P. (2005). Paths to a Green World. The Political Economy of the Global Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
,European Environmental Agency (2004). High Nature Value Farmland. Characteristics, Trends and Policy Challenges. EEA-Report 1/2004. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
,European Environmental Agency (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe. The Ignored Challenge. Characteristics, Trends and Policy Challenges. EEA-Report 10/2006. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1998). Feeding the Ten Billion. Plants and Population Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. (2008). Feeding the Ten Billion. The World Today, June, 4–6.
Fearne, A. (1997). The history and development of the CAP 1945–1990. In The Common Agricultural Policy (ed.) Ritson, C. and Harvey, D., 2nd edition. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. (1961). Megalopolis. The Urbanized North-eastern Seaboard of the United States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2002). False Dawn. The Delusions of Global Capitalism. 2nd edition. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (2002). Urban and Regional Planning. 4th edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999). Global Transformation. Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report. An assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available on: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
Jones, M. (1988). Land-tenure and landscape change in fishing communities on the outer coast of Central Norway, c. 1800 to the present. Methodological approaches and modes of explanations. Geografiska Annaler, B1, 197–204.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2005). Law and landscape – some historical-geographical studies from northern Europe. In Landscape, Law and Justice (ed.) Peil, T. and Jones, M.. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R.et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 298, 641–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998). Contested Natures. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Marsden, T. (2003). The Condition of Rural Sustainability. Assen: Royal van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (1991). A global sense of place. Marxism Today, June, 24–29.Google Scholar
Meeus, J. H., Wijermans, M. P. and Vroom, M. J. (1990). Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 18, 289–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, H. (2006). Urban containment strategies: a case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, Canadian, and British cities. Land Use Policy, 23, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D. (2001). The lure of the local: landscape studies at the end of a troubled century. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 2, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K., Marsden, T. and Murdoch, J. (2007). Worlds of Food: Place, Power and Provenance in the Food Chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olwig, K. R. (2002). Landscape, Nature and the Body Politic. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). Environmental Indicators for Agriculture. Methods and Results. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (2002). Civic science and the sustainability transition. In Community and Sustainable Development. Participation in the Future (ed.) Warburton, D.. London: Earthscan Publications, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. and Voisey, H. (1998). The political economy of the sustainability transition. In The Transition to Sustainability: The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe (ed.) O'Riordan, T. and Voisey, H.. London: Earthscan Publications, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar
Pinto-Correia, T. and Mascarenhas, J. (1999). Contribution for the extensification/intensification debate: what is happening to the Portuguese Montado?Landscape and Urban Planning, 46, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potschin, M. and Haines-Young, R. (2006). ‘Rio +10’, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoate, C., Boatman, N. D., Borralho, R. J.et al. (2001). Ecological aspects of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 96, 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaffield, S. R. and Primdahl, J. (2006). Spatial concepts in landscape analysis and policy: some implications of globalization. Landscape Ecology, 21, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. and Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, M. and Goodman, D. (1997). Agrian questions. Global appetite, local metabolism: nature, culture, and industry in fin-de-siècle agro-food systems. In Globalising Food. Agrian Questions and Global Restructuring (ed.) Goodmann, D. and Watts, M.. London: Routledge, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
,World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlotnik, H. (2004). World urbanisation: trends and prospects. In New Forms of Urbanisation. Beyond the Urban-Rural Dichotomy (ed.) Champion, T. and Hugo, G.. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×