Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:09:30.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Homophobic Space–Times

Lexicogrammatical and Discourse–Semantic Aspects of the Softscapes of Hate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

By
David Peterson
Edited by
Natalia Knoblock
Natalia Knoblock
Affiliation:
Saginaw Valley State University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores how speakers use MOOD^RESIDUE clause features and discourse–semantic resources to configure space-times homophobically, focusing on mass-media reported statements from Wyoming (USA) residents in response to the 2005 release of Brokeback Mountain. Using Systemic–Functional grammatical analysis, both interpersonal and representational lexicogrammatical features are examined, identifying: who is ‘in’ the lexicogrammatical/semantic space (speaker, addressee, non–interactants); speech function (proposition/proposal) and the interlocutors’ assigned roles (giving/receiving, offering/accepting, demanding/giving); clause participants’ location within free, bound, and embedded clauses; and clause participants– semantic content, querying the extent to which they index normative gender–sexuality or non-normative gender–sexuality. Mapping these features onto the MOOD^RESIDUE structure reveals how speakers seek to delimit the possibilities of negotiating or contesting their configurations of space and time by locating homophobic ideations within bound and embedded clauses, with an additional preference of placing such ideations with the Residue, thereby further curtailing negotiability.

Keywords

homophobic language useInterpersonal grammarRepresentational grammarnormativityspace-times
Type
Chapter
Information
The Grammar of Hate
Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse
 , pp. 262 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, H. (2006). Cowboy chic – it’s heading our way. DailyTelegraph (UK), 23 Jan, www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/trendspotting/3349077/Cowboy-chic---its-heading-our-way.htmlGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Harold (2006). Overemphasis on ‘message’ films brings Hollywood a thumbs-down. Omaha World Herald, 5 Feb, 9B.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Elsworth, C. (2005). Wyoming’s macho image challenged by film story of two gay cowboys. Daily Telegraph (UK), 9 Nov, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1502571/Wyomings-macho-image-challenged-by-film-story-of-two-gay-cowboys.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fals Borda, O. (2000). Peoples’ spacetimes in global processes: The response of the local. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6(3), 624–634.Google Scholar
Fone, B. (2000). Homophobia: A History. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Graves, D. S. (2005). Release of ‘Brokeback Mountain’ creates a buzz. Casper Star-Tribune, 31 Oct, casperstartribune.net/articles/2005/11/01/news/wyoming/06c2ae836d988c5d872570aa00211854.txtGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, J. (2005). In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond ‘homophobia’: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leap, W. (2011). Introduction to the special issue. Gender and Language, 4(2), 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. (Dir.) (2005). Brokeback Mountain. Focus Features.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Donald Nicholson-Smith, trans. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (1999). Space-time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3), 261–279.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (2001). Talking of space-time. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler, 86B(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. & Thrift, N. (2001). Timespace: Geographies of Temporality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrish, L. (2011). Situating and resisting homophobic discourse: Response to Leap, Junge, Peterson and Provencher. Gender and Language, 4(2), 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. A. B., ed. (2009). Homophobias: Lust and Loathing across Time and Space. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On the trail to ‘Brokeback’ (2006). Daily News, 31 Jan, New York: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
Parry, R. (2006). The real rhinestone cowboys: True life story of growing up gay on Brokeback mountain. The Mirror (UK), Jan. 9, www.mirror.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Perkins, J. (1992). Up the trail from Dixie: Animosity toward sheep in the culture of the U.S. West. Australasian Journal of American Studies, 11(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. (2010). ‘Everything built on that’: Queering western space in Proulx’s ‘Brokeback Mountain’. In Scherer, Burkhard, ed., Queering Paradigms. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 281–298.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. (2011a). The ‘basis for a just, free, and stable society’: Institutional homophobia and governance at the Family Research Council. Gender and Language, 4(2), 257–286.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. (2011b). Neoliberal homophobic discourse: Heteronormative human capital and the exclusion of queer citizens. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(6–7), 742–757.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. J. (2016). Homophobic grammar: The role of transitivity and phoricity in homophobic formation. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 5(1), 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharr, S. (1988). Homophobia: A Weapon of Sexism. Inverness, CA: Chardon Press.Google Scholar
Polly, J. (2006). The real gay cowboys: The hard punches of ‘Brokeback Mountain’ aren’t just a Hollywood creation. Just ask the real cowboys who’ve lived to tell, 26 Jan, www.pridesource.com/article.shtml?article=17286Google Scholar
Proulx, A. (1999). Close Range: Wyoming Stories. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Proulx, A. (2005). Getting movied. In Proulx, A., McMurtry, L., and Ossana, D., eds., Brokeback Mountain: Story to Screenplay. New York: Scribner, pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
Provencher, D. (2016). Farid’s impossible ‘je’: Unequal access to flexible language in the queer Maghrebi French diaspora. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 5(1), 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, C. (2006). Make yourself at home on the range. Daily Telegraph, 3 Feb, www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/northamerica/usa/midwest/734473/Make-yourself-at-home-on-the-range.htmlGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. L. (2019). The Discursive Ecology of Homophobia: Unraveling Anti-LGBTQ Speech on the European Far Right. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sherwell, P. (2006). John Wayne made real movies. There ain’t no queer in cowboy. Daily Telegraph, 1 Jan. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1506756/John-Wayne-made-real-movies.-There-aint-no-queer-in-cowboy.htmlGoogle Scholar
Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Trebay, G. (2005). Cowboys, just like in the movie. The New York Times, 18 Dec, section 9, page 1. New York: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1, 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1997). The time of space and the space of time: The future of social science. Papers of the Fernand Braudel Center. www2.binghamton.edu/fbc/archive/iwtynesi.htmGoogle Scholar
What real cowboys think of ‘Brokeback Mountain’ (2005). ABC News, 25 Nov. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/print?id=1395158Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2005). Out on the range. The Guardian (UK), 25 Nov. www.guardian.co.uk/film/2005/nov/25/gayrights.usa.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 1, 1-13.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2013). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 3rd edn. London: Sage, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×