Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T10:45:34.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Changing Behavior Using Control Theory

from Part I - Theory and Behavior Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2020

Martin S. Hagger
Affiliation:
University of California, Merced
Linda D. Cameron
Affiliation:
University of California, Merced
Kyra Hamilton
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Nelli Hankonen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Taru Lintunen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä
Get access

Summary

Application of control theory to predict human behavior is largely based on Powers’s (1973) work, which can be traced indirectly through Carver and Scheier’s (1982) self-regulation theory and directly through interventions in areas of child development, mental health, education, and organizational psychology. Control theory proposes that behavior changes from moment to moment to keep perceived aspects of the self and world close to desired reference values – a person’s goals, standards, or ideals. Control is achieved through actions that help the individual meet their standards. Individuals can change their behavior to either cooperate or conflict with their attempts to control the same perceived aspect of the world (e.g., money, food, alcohol, drugs, medicine). Control theory is a “building blocks” theory from which working models can be built and tested and sets a new standard for empirical testing of psychological theory. This chapter reviews the evidence for each component of control theory. It describes how behavior change emerges for many different reasons, each of which can be modeled and tested. The chapter also questions whether “behavior change” itself is an appropriate, or efficient, objective. Finally, the chapter summarizes evidence for behavior change interventions informed by control theory and provides suggestions for future research and interventions using the theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a Brain. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bird, T., Mansell, W., Wright, J., Gaffney, H., & Tai, S. (2018). Manage Your Life Online: A web-based randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a problem-solving intervention in a student sample. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46, 570582. https://doi.org10.1017/S1352465817000820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourbon, W. T., & Powers, W. T. (1999). Models and their worlds. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, 445461. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1998.0263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Ojeda, C., & Mansell, W. (2018). Do perceptual instructions lead to enhanced performance relative to behavioral instructions? Journal of Motor Behavior, 50, 312320.Google Scholar
Carey, T. A. (2006). The Method of Levels: How to Do Psychotherapy without Getting in the Way. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems Publishing.Google Scholar
Carey, T. A. (2008). Conflict, as the Achilles heel of perceptual control, offers a unifying approach to the formulation of psychological problems. Counselling Psychology Review, 23, 516.Google Scholar
Carey, T. A. (2012). Control in the Classroom: An Adventure in Learning and Achievement. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems Publishing.Google Scholar
Carey, T. A. (2017). Patient-Perspective Care: A New Paradigm for Health Systems and Services. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, T. A., & Bourbon, W. T. (2006). Is countercontrol the key to understanding chronic behavior problems? Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 513. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060420010201Google Scholar
Carey, T. A., Carey, M., Mullan, R. J., Spratt, C. G., & Spratt, M. B. (2009). Assessing the statistical and personal significance of the method of levels. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 311324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809005232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2008). Evaluating the method of levels. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 21, 247256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070802396012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, T.A., Tai, S.J. & Stiles, W.M. (2013). Effective and efficient: Using patient-led appointment scheduling in routine mental health practice in remote Australia. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 405414. https://doi.org10.1037/a0035038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocklin, A. A., Mansell, W., Emsley, R. et al. (2017). Client perceptions of helpfulness in therapy: A novel video-rating methodology for examining process variables at brief intervals during a single session. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45, 647660. https://doi.org10.1017/S1352465817000273Google Scholar
Ferguson, J., Keyworth, C., & Tully, M. P. (2018). “If no-one stops me, I’ll make the mistake again”: Changing prescribing behaviors through feedback; A Perceptual Control Theory perspective. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14, 241247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.001Google Scholar
Ford, E. E. (1997). Discipline for Home and School. Scottsdale, AZ: Brandt Publications.Google Scholar
Forssell, D. (2008). Management and Leadership: Insight for Effective Practice. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems Publications.Google Scholar
Gaffney, H., Mansell, W., Edwards, R., & Wright, J. (2014). Manage Your Life Online (MYLO): A pilot trial of a conversational computer-based intervention for problem solving in a student sample. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42, 731746. https://doi.org10.1017/S135246581300060XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasser, W. (1981). Stations of the Mind: New Directions for Reality Therapy. New York, USA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Good, F. (2010). A Connected School: Improving Schools and Communities from the Inside Out. www.pctweb.org/Connected.pdfGoogle Scholar
Good, E. P., Grumley, J., & Roy, S. (2003). A Connected School. Chapel Hill, NC: New View Publications.Google Scholar
Grawe, K. (2004). Psychological Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
Grawe, K. (2007). Neuropsychotherapy: How the Neurosciences Inform Effective Psychotherapy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Halper, L. R., Vancouver, J. B., & Bayes, K. A. (2018). Self-efficacy does not appear to mediate training’s effect on performance based on the moderation-of-process design. Human Performance, 31, 216237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2018.1509343Google Scholar
Healey, A., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2017). An experimental test of the role of control in spider fear. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 49, 1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.03.005Google Scholar
Kelly, R. E., Mansell, W., & Wood, A. M. (2015). Goal conflict and well-being: A review and hierarchical model of goal conflict, ambivalence, self-discrepancy and self-concordance. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 212229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.011Google Scholar
Madden, B. J. (2014). Reconstructing Your Worldview. Naperville, IL: LearningWhatWorks.Google Scholar
Mansell, W. (2012). The transdiagnostic approach: The importance of formulating interpersonal and intrapersonal control. In Dryden, W. (Ed.), Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (pp. 261283). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mansell, W., & Huddy, V. (2018). The assessment and modeling of perceptual control: A transformation in research methodology to address the replication crisis. Review of General Psychology, 22, 305320. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marken, R. (1982). Intentional and accidental behavior: A control theory analysis. Psychological Reports, 50, 647650. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.50.2.647Google Scholar
Marken, R. (2002). Looking at behavior through control theory glasses. Review of General Psychology, 6, 260270.Google Scholar
Marken, R. S. (2013). Taking purpose into account in experimental psychology: Testing for controlled variables. Psychological Reports, 112, 184201. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.49.PR0.112.1.184-201Google Scholar
Marken, R. S., & Mansell, W. (2013). Perceptual control as a unifying concept in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 190195. HTTPS://DOI.ORG10.1037/a0032933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, K. (2004). The collective control of perceptions: Constructing order from conflict. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 6599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, P., Eden, J., Morris, L., & Mansell, W. (2016). Dementia: Towards a perceptual control theory perspective. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 17, 229238. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-03-2015-0013Google Scholar
Morris, L., Lovell, K., McEvoy, P. et al. (2019). A brief transdiagnostic group (the Take Control Course) compared to individual low-intensity CBT for depression and anxiety: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Morris, L., Mansell, W., & McEvoy, P. (2016). The Take Control Course: Conceptual rationale for the development of a transdiagnostic group for common mental health problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, K., & Mansell, W. (2018). What is avoidance and when is it a problem? A control theory approach to approach-avoidance conflict in spider fears using a force-feedback joystick paradigm. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manchester. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19390.38724Google Scholar
Paulssen, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2006). Goal hierarchies as antecedents of market structure. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 689709. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., & Allen, D. (1995). A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 227244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00023-UGoogle Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1973/2005). Behavior: The Control of Perception. New York: Hawthorne.Google Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review, 85, 417435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.417Google Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1992). Living Control Systems II: Selected Papers of William T. Powers. Gravel Switch, KY: The Control Systems Group.Google Scholar
Powers, W. T. (2008). Living Control Systems III: The Fact of Control. New York: Benchmark Publications.Google Scholar
Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K., & McFarland, R. L. (1960). A general feedback theory of human behavior: Part I. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 7188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinovich, Z., & Jennings, N. R. (2010). A hybrid controller based on the egocentric perceptual principle. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58, 10391048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2010.05.002Google Scholar
Robertson, R. J., & Glines, L. A. (1985). The phantom plateau returns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 5564. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.1.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynberg, A. D. (2016). Using RTP (responsible thinking process) as a lever for improving school culture: A case study of an alternative secondary school’s implementation of RTP. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
Sadurní, M., Burriel, M. P., & Plooij, F. X. (2010). The temporal relation between regression and transition periods in early infancy. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 112126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600003711CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soldani, J. (1989). Effective personnel management: An application of perceptual control theory. Advances in Psychology, 62, 515529. http://ww.livingcontrolsystems.com/intro_papers/personnel_mgmt.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Twijnstra, M. H., & Plooij, F. X. (2011). Oei, ik groei! voor managers [Oops, I’m Growing! for Managers]. Utrecht: Kosmos Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Vancouver, J. B. (2005). The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 3852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vancouver, J. B., Gullekson, N. L., Morse, B. J., & Warren, M. A. (2014). Finding a between-person negative effect of self-efficacy on performance: Not just a within-person effect anymore. Human Performance, 27, 243261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.913593Google Scholar
Vancouver, J. B., & Purl, J. D. (2017). A computational model of self-efficacy’s various effects on performance: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 599616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000177Google Scholar
Vancouver, J. B., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2008). Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14, 122. https://doi.org10.1007/s10588-008-9021-7Google Scholar
van de Rijt-Plooij, H., & Plooij, F. X. (1993). Distinct periods of mother-infant conflict in normal development: Sources of progress and germs of pathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 229245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb00981.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Rijt-Plooij, H., van der Stelt, J. & Plooij, F. (1996). Hordenlopen: Een preventieve oudercursus voor de eerste anderhalf jaar [Hurdling: A Preventive Parent Course for the First Year and a Half]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Webb, T. L., Sniehotta, F. F., & Michie, S. (2010). Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours. Addiction, 105, 18791892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03028.xGoogle Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics and Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.Google Scholar
Willett, A., Marken, R. S., Parker, M., & Mansell, W. (2017). Control blindness: Why people can make incorrect inferences about the intentions of others. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 841849. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1268-3Google Scholar
Young, R. (2017). A general architecture for robotics systems: A perception-based approach to artificial life. Artificial Life, 23, 236286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×