Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- 28 Optimization of 2D and 3D Radiographic Imaging Systems
- 29 Display Optimization from a Physics Perspective
- 30 Display Optimization from a Perception Perspective
- 31 Perception and Training
- 32 Ergonomics 2.0: Fatigue in Medical Imaging
- 33 Perception Issues in Pathology
- 34 Medical Image Perception from a Clinical Perspective
- 35 Future of Medical Image Perception
- Index
- References
29 - Display Optimization from a Physics Perspective
from Part VI - Applied Perception
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2018
Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- 28 Optimization of 2D and 3D Radiographic Imaging Systems
- 29 Display Optimization from a Physics Perspective
- 30 Display Optimization from a Perception Perspective
- 31 Perception and Training
- 32 Ergonomics 2.0: Fatigue in Medical Imaging
- 33 Perception Issues in Pathology
- 34 Medical Image Perception from a Clinical Perspective
- 35 Future of Medical Image Perception
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , pp. 440 - 451Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
ACR. (2017). ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic pratice of medical imaging. www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/standards/ElectronicPracticeMedImg.pdf (accessed October 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Badano, A. (2009). Effect of slow display on detectabilty when browsing large image datasets. J Soc Inform Display, 17(11), 891–896.Google Scholar
Badano, A., Fifadara, D. (2004). Goniometric and conoscopic measurements of angular AMLCD contrast. Med Phys, 31(12), 3452–3460.Google Scholar
Badano, A., Wang, J., Boynton, P., et al. (2016). Technical note: gray tracking in medical color displays – a report of task group 196. Med Phys, 43(7), 4017–4022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barten, P.G.J. (2009). Contrast Sensitivity of the Human Eye and its Effects on Image Quality. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.Google Scholar
Bevins, N., Flynn, M., Silosky, M. et al. (2018). Display quality assurance: a report of AAPM task group 270. (anticipated release late 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M., Wolf, E. (1999). Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bushberg, J.T. (2012). The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
CIE. (2004). International Commission on Illumination. CIE 15:2004: Colorimetry. 3rd edition. Available at: www.cie.co.at/publ/abst/15-2004.html.Google Scholar
Eizo. (2015). Advantages of anti reflection (AR) treatment. Eizo white paper, 14-002 revision A, Q15B014-AS-10001. Available at: www.eizoglobal.com/support/db/files/technical_information/WP14-002.pdf (accessed January 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Elze, T., Tanner, T.G. (2012). Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments. PLoS One, 7, e44048.Google Scholar
Elze, T., Taylor, C., Bex, P.J. (2013). An evaluation of organic light emitting diode monitors for medical applications: great timing, but luminance artifacts. Med Phys, 40 (9), 092701.Google Scholar
Flynn, M. (2013). mRGB: AAPM TG196 progress. 2013 ICC Meeting, Medical Imaging Working Group, Vancouver, BC. Available at: www.color.org/groups/medical/Flynn.pdf (accessed October 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Hsieh, D. (2016). Oxide is the most cost-effective TFT LCD display technology for tablet PCs. Available at: http://blog.ihs.com/oxide-is-the-most-cost-effective-tft-lcd-display-technology-for-tablet-pcs (accessed January 4, 2018).Google Scholar
ICC. (2016). Visualization of medical content on color display systems. ICC white paper, 44. Available at: www.color.org/whitepapers/ICC_White_Paper44_Visualization_of_colour_on_medical_displays.pdf (accessed January 4, 2018).Google Scholar
IEC. (1999). IEC 61966-2-1 Multimedia systems and equipment – colour measurement and management – part 2-1: colour management – default RGB colour space – sRGB. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/6169#additionalinfo,Google Scholar
IEC. (2013). IEC 62341-5-3:2013 Organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays – part 5-3: measuring methods of image sticking and lifetime. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/6878.Google Scholar
IEC. (2017). IEC 62341-6-1:2017. Organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays – part 6-1: measuring methods of optical and electro-optical parameters. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/28881.Google Scholar
Kimpe, T., Xthona, A., Matthijs, P., De Paepe, L. (2005). Solution for nonuniformities and spatial noise in medical LCD displays by using pixel-based correction. J Digit Imag, 18(3), 209–218.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-H., Ho, Y.-H., Chen, K.-Y., et al. (2008). Efficiency improvement and image quality of organic light-emitting display by attaching cylindrical microlens arrays. Opt Exp, 16(26), 21184–21190.Google Scholar
Mertens, R. (2017). Sony may be JOLED’s first customer for its 21.6″ 4K medical OLED monitors. Available at: www.oled-info.com/sony-may-be-joleds-first-customer-its-216-4k-medical-oled-monitors (accessed January 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Okutani, S., Kobayashi, M., Ibaraki, N. (2006). Quantitative evaluation of display characteristics of AMOLED displays. J Soc Inform Display, 14(12), 1119–1125.Google Scholar
Ruuge, A., Mahmood, U., Erdi, Y. E. (2016) The assessment and characterization of the built-in internal photometer of primary diagnostic monitors. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 18(2), 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samei, E., Badano, A., Chakraborty, D., et al. (2005). Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. Online only report no. OR03 – report of AAPM task group 18, 2005. Available at: www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03.pdf (accessed January 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Silosky, M., Marsh, R.M. (2013). Constancy of built-in luminance meter measurements in diagnostic displays. Med Phys, 40(12), 121902.Google Scholar
Walz-Flannigan, A., Stekel, S., Weber, H., et al. (2011) Aging and quality control of color LCDs for radiologic imaging. J Digit Imag, 24(5): 828–832.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, A. (2013). image quality characteristics of handheld display devices for medical imaging. PLoS One, 8, e79243.Google Scholar