Bashshur, R.L., Krupinski, E.A., Weinstein, R.S., Dunn, M.R., Bashshur, N. (2017). The empirical foundations of telepathology: evidence of feasibility and intermediate effects. Telemed e-Health, 23, 155–191.Google Scholar

Beebe, H.G., Salles-Cunha, S.X., Scissons, R.P., et al. (1999). Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging: a direct approach to stenosis measurement. J Vasc Surg, 29, 838–844.Google Scholar

Bertram, R., Helle, L., Kaakinen, J.K., Svedstrom, E. (2013). The effect of expertise on eye movement behavior in medical image perception. PLoS One, 8, e66169.Google Scholar

Bertram, R., Kaakinen, J., Bensch, F., Helle, L., Lantto, E., Niemi, P., Lundbom, N. (2016). Eye movements of radiologists reflect expertise in CT study interpretation: a potential tool to measure resident development. Radiology, 281, 805–815.Google Scholar

Bird, R.E., Wallace, T.W., Yankaskas, B.C. (1992). Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology, 184, 613–617.Google Scholar

Blaivas, M. (2002). Color Doppler in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the emergency department: is there anything beyond a mass and fluid? J Emerg Med, 22, 379–384.Google Scholar

Blume, H. (1996). Members of ACR/NEMA Working Group XI: the ACR/NEMA proposal for grey-scale display function standard. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 2707, 344–360.Google Scholar

Bruckheimer, E., Rotschild, C., Dagan, T., Amir, G., Kaufman, A., Gelman, S., Birk, E. (2016). Computer-generated real-time digital holography: first time use in clinical medical imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag, 17, 845–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buetti, S., Cronin, D.A., Madison, A.M., Wang, Z., LLeras, A. (2016). Towards a better understanding of parallel visual processing in human vision: evidence for exhaustive analysis of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen, 145, 672–707.Google Scholar

Chaparro, A., Stromeyer, C.F., Huang, E.P., et al. (1993). Colour is what the eyes see best. Nature, 361, 348–350.Google Scholar

Chesterman, F., Manssens, H., Morel, C., Serrell, G., Piepers, B., Kimpe, T. (2017). Interpretation of the rainbow color scale for quantitative medical imaging: perceptually linear color calibration (CSDF) versus DICOM GSDF. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 10136, 101360R.Google Scholar

Chi, C.F., Lin, F.T. (1998). A comparison of seven visual fatigue assessment techniques in three data-acquisition VDT tasks. Hum Factors, 40, 577–590.Google Scholar

Clarke, E.L., Treanor, D. (2017). Colour in digital pathology: a review. Histopathol, 70, 153–163.Google Scholar

Crowley, R.S., Naus, G.J., Stewart, J., et al. (2003). Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathology: an information-processing study. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 10, 39–51.Google Scholar

Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J. (1993). Age differences in the performance of computer-based work. Psychol Aging, 8, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Faria, J.W.V., Teixeira, M.J., de Moura Sousa, L., Otoch, J.P., Figueiredo, D.E.G. (2016). Virtual and stereoscopic anatomy: when virtual reality meets medical education. J Neurosurg, 125, 1105–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas, D.B., Boone, J.M., Petricoin, E., Liotta, L., Wilson, E. (2016). Augmented reality imaging system: 3D viewing of a breast cancer. J Nat Sci, 2, e215.Google Scholar

Drew, T., Evans, K., Vo, M.L.H., Jacobson, F.L., Wolfe, J.M. (2013). Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? RadioGraphics, 33, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emre, C.M., Alp, A.Y., Stoecker, W.V., et al. (2007). Unsupervised border detection in dermoscopy images. Skin Res Technol, 13, 454–462.Google Scholar

Evanoff, M.G., Roehrig, H., Giffords, R.S., et al. (2001). Calibration of medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tube displays for the purpose of board examinations. J Digit Imag, 14, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farahani, N., Post, R., Duboy, J., et al. (2016). Exploring virtual reality technology and the Oculus Rift for the examination of digital pathology slides. J Pathol Inform, 7, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Food and Drug Administration. (2017). FDA allows marketing of first whole slide imaging system for digital pathology. www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm552742.htm (accessed June 3, 2018).Google Scholar

Forrester, J., Dick, A., McMenamin, P., et al. (1996). The Eye: Basic Sciences in Practice. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar

Getty, D.J. (2007). Improved accuracy of lesion detection in breast cancer screening with stereoscopic digital mammography. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, November 25–30, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Granger, E.M., Heurtley, J.C. (1973). Visual chromaticity modulation transfer function. J Opt Soc Am, 63, 1173–1174.Google Scholar

Groth, D.S., Bernatz, S.N., Fetterly, K.A., et al. (2001). Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays. Radiographics, 21, 719–732.Google Scholar

Haber, R.N. (1969). Information-Processing Approaches to Visual Perception. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Hong, L., Burgess, A.E. (1997). Evaluation of signal detection performance with pseudocolor display and lumpy backgrounds. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 3036, 143–149.Google Scholar

Hu, C.H., Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., et al. (1994). Searching for bone fractures: a comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Acad Radiol, 1, 25–32.Google Scholar

Johnston, R.E., Zimmerman, J.B., Rogers, D.C., et al. (1985). Perceptual standardization. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 536, 44–49.Google Scholar

Junk, A.K., Haskal, Z., Worgul, B.V. (2004). Cataract in interventional radiology – an occupational hazard? Invest Ophthal Visual Sci, 45, 388.Google Scholar

Kather, J.N., Weidner, A., Attenberger, U., et al. (2017). Color-coded visualization of magnetic resonance imaging multiparametric maps. Sci Rep, 7, 41107.Google Scholar

King, F., Jayender, J., Bhagavatula, S.K., et al. (2016). An immersive virtual reality environment for diagnostic imaging. J Med Robotics Res, 1, 1640003.Google Scholar

Kok, E.M., de Bruin, A.B.H., Leppnik, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Robben, S.G.F. (2015). Case comparisons: an efficient way of learning radiology. Acad Radiol, 22, 1226–1235.Google Scholar

Komorowski, M., Celi, L.A. (2017). Will artificial intelligence contribute to overuse in healthcare? Crit Care Med, 45, 912–913.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A. (1996). Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol, 3, 137–144.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy and visual search efficiency: single 8 MP vs. dual 5 MP displays. J Digit Imag, 30, 144–147.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Lund, P.J. (1997). Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs with monitor and film viewing. Acad Radiol, 4, 177–182.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Roehrig, H. (2000). The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol, 7, 8–13.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Weinstein, R.S., Rozek, L.S. (1996). Experience-related differences in diagnosis from medical images displayed on monitors. Telemed J, 2, 101–108.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L. (1998). Enhancing recognition of lesions in radiographic images using perceptual feedback. Opt Eng, 37, 813–818.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., LeSueur, B., Ellsworth, L., et al. (1999a). Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J, 5, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krupinski, E.A., Roehrig, H., Furukawa, T. (1999b). Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol, 6, 411–418.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E., Nypaver, M., Poropatich, R., et al. (2002). Telemedicine/telehealth: an international perspective. Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed J E Health, 8, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krupinski, E.A., Tillack, A.A., Richter, L., et al. (2006). Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience. Human Pathol, 37, 1543–1556.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Chao, J., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., Morrison, L., Curiel-Lewandrowski, C. (2014). Understanding visual search patterns of dermatologists assessing pigmented skin lesions before and after online training. J Digit Imag, 27, 779–785.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L. (1975). Peripheral vision, structured noise and film reader error. Radiology, 114, 269–273.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F. (1975). Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 116, 527–532.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D.P. (1978). Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary tumor detection. Invest Radiol, 13, 175–181.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A. (1989). Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol, 24, 472–478.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Toto, L. (1991). Searching for lung nodules: the guidance of visual scanning. Invest Radiol, 26, 777–781.Google Scholar

Larue, R.T.H.M., Defraene, G., De Ruysscher, D., Lambin, P., van Elmpt, W. (2016). Quantitative radiomics studies for tissue characterization: a review of technology and methodological procedures. Br J Radiol, 90, 20160665.Google Scholar

Lee, J.J., English, J.C. (2018). Teledermatology: a review and update. Am J Clin Dermatol, 19, 253–260.Google Scholar

Lee, C.S., Nagy, P.G., Weaver, S.J., Newman-Toker, D.E. (2013). Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. Am J Roentgenol, 201, 611–617.Google Scholar

Lee, J.G., Jun, S., Cho, Y.W., Lee, H., Kim, G.B., Seo, J.B., Kim, N. (2017) Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J Radiol, 18, 570–584.Google Scholar

Levkowitz, H., Herman, G.T. (1992). Color scales for image data. IEEE Comp Graphics and Applic, 12, 72–80.Google Scholar

Li, Q., Nishikawa, R.M. (2015). Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Medical Imaging. New York, NY: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Thomas, E., Lansdown, E.L. (1963). Visual search patterns of radiologists in training. Radiology, 81, 288–291.Google Scholar

Locher, P., Krupinski, E.A., Mello-Thoms, C., Nodine, C.F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spat Vis, 21, 55–77.Google Scholar

McKoy, K., Antoniotti, N.M., Armstrong, A., et al. (2016). Practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed eHealth, 22, 981–990.Google Scholar

Mete, M., Xu, X., Fan, C.Y., et al. (2007). Automatic delineation of malignancy in histopathological head and neck slides. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, S17.Google Scholar

Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X, Dudley, J.T. (2017). Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, bbx044, https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx044.Google Scholar

Moll, T., Douek, P., Finet, G., et al. (1998). Clinical assessment of a new stereoscopic digital angiography system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 21, 11–16.Google Scholar

Muhm, J.R., Miller, W.E., Fontana, R.S., et al. (1983). Lung cancer detection during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology, 148, 609–615.Google Scholar

Mullen, K.T. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. J Physiol, 359, 381–400.Google Scholar

Murakami, S., Verdonschot, R.G., Kreiborg, S., Kakimoto, N., Kawaguchi, A. (2017). Stereoscopy in dental education: an investigation. J Dent Educ, 81, 450–457.Google Scholar

Murata, A., Uetake, A., Otsuka, M., et al. (2001). Proposal of an index to evaluate visual fatigue induced during visual display terminal tasks. Int J Hum Comput Interact, 13, 305–321.Google Scholar

Mutti, D.O., Zadnik, K. (1996). Is computer use a risk factor for myopia? J Am Optom Assoc, 67, 521–530.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L. (1987). Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics, 7, 1241–1250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L., Toto, L.C., et al. (1992). Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 24, 475–485.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C., Kundel, H.L., et al. (2002). Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 179, 917–923.Google Scholar

Ogura, A., Kakamura, A., Kaneko, Y., Kitaoka, T., Hayashi, N., Taniguchi, A. (2017). Comparison of grayscale and color-scale renderings of digital medical images for diagnostic interpretation. Radiol Physics Tech, 10, 359–363.Google Scholar

OSHA (2017). www.osha.gov/SLTC/computerworkstation/index.html (accessed September 14, 2017).Google Scholar

Parr, L.F., Anderson, A.L., Glennon, B.K., et al. (2001). Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors. J Digit Imag, 14, 22–26.Google Scholar

Pizer, S.M. (1981a). Intensity mappings to linearized displays. Comput Graphics Image Process, 17, 262–268.Google Scholar

Pizer, S.M. (1981b). Intensity mapping: linearization, image-based, user-controlled. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 271, 21–27.Google Scholar

Quaghebeur, G., Bhattacharya, J.J., Murfitt, J. (1997). Radiologists and visual acuity. Eur Radiol, 7, 41–43.Google Scholar

Rathi, S., Tsui, E., Mehta, N., Zahid, S., Schuman, J.S. (2017). The current state of teleophthalmology in the United States. Ophthalmology, 124, 1729–1734.Google Scholar

Rechichi, C., Demoja, C.A., Scullica, L. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XXXVI. Visual discomfort and different types of work at videodisplay terminals. Percept Mot Skills, 82, 935–938.Google Scholar

Recht, M., Bryan, R.N. (2017). Artificial intelligence: threat or boon to radiologists? J Am Coll Radiol, 14, 1476–1480.Google Scholar

Rehm, K., Strother, S.C., Anderson, J.R., et al. (1994). Display of merged multimodality brain images using interleaved pixels with independent color scales. J Nucl Med, 35, 1815–1821.Google Scholar

Reinhold, J., Wen, G., Lo, J.Y., Markey, M.K. (2017). Lesion detectability in stereoscopically viewed digital breast tomosynthesis projection images: a model observer study with anthropomorphic computational breast phantoms. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 10136, 101360W.Google Scholar

Robinson, P.J.A. (1997). Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the roentgen image. Br J Radiol, 70, 1085–1098.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, J.H., Fraile, F.J.C., Conde, M.J.R., Llorente, P.L.G. (2016). Computer aided detection and diagnosis in medical imaging: a review of clinical and educational applications. Proc TEEM ‘16 Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 517–524.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, A.E., Huda, W., Lieberman, K.A., et al. (2000). Binocular three-dimensional perception through stereoscopic generation from rotating images. Acad Radiol, 7, 21–26.Google Scholar

Saito, K., Hosokawa, T. (1991). Basic study of the VRT (visual reaction time): the effects of illumination and luminance. Int J Hum Comput Interact, 3, 311–316.Google Scholar

Sanchez-Roman, F.R., Perez-Lucio, C., Juarez-Ruiz, C., et al. (1996). Risk factors for asthenopia among computer terminal operators. Salud Publica Mex, 38, 189–196.Google Scholar

Shen, D., Wu, G., Suk, H.I. (2017). Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Med Image Anal, 19, 221–248.Google Scholar

Siegal, D., Stratchko, L.M., DeRoo, C. (2017). The role of radiology in diagnostic error: a medical malpractice claims review. Diagnosis, 4, 125–131.Google Scholar

Siegel, E.L., Reiner, B.I., Hooper, F., et al. (2001). The effect of monitor image quality on the soft-copy interpretation of chest CR images. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 4323, 42–46.Google Scholar

Sotoyama, M., Jonai, H., Saito, S., et al. (1996). Analysis of ocular surface area for comfortable VDT workstation layout. Ergonomics, 39, 877–884.Google Scholar

Sowden, P.T., Davies, I.R., Roling, P. (2000). Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults’ visual sensitivity? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 26, 379–390.Google Scholar

Spoehr, K.T., Lehmkuhle, S.W. (1982). Visual Information Processing. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.Google Scholar

Takahashi, K., Sasaki, H., Saito, T., et al. (2001). Combined effects of working environmental conditions in VDT work. Ergonomics, 44, 562–570.Google Scholar

Taylor, G.A. (2017). Perceptual errors in pediatric radiology. Diagnosis, 4, 141–147.Google Scholar

Taylor, C.R., Merin, L.M., Salunga, A.M., et al. (2007). Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill study. Diabetes Care, 30, 574–578.Google Scholar

Tuddenham, W.J., Calvert, W.P. (1961). Visual search patterns in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology, 76, 255–256.Google Scholar

Turville, K., Psihogios, J., Ulmer, T., et al. (1998). The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15” and 40” recommendation. Appl Ergon, 29, 239–246.Google Scholar

Tyrrell, R.A., Leibowitz, H.W. (1990). The relation of vergence effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near work. Hum Factors, 32, 341–357.Google Scholar

Van der Gijp, A., Ravesloot, C.J., Jarodzka, H., van der Schaaf, M.F., van der Schaik, J.P.J., ten Cate, T.J. (2017). How visual search relates to diagnostic performance: a narrative systematic review of eye-tracking research in radiology. Adv Health Sci Ed, 22, 765–787.Google Scholar

Waite, S., Scott, J., Legasto, A., Kolla, S., Gale, B., Krupinski, E.A. (2017a). Systematic error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol, 209, 629–639.Google Scholar

Waite, S., Scott, J., Gale, B., Fuchs, T., Kolla, S., Reede, D. (2017b). Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol, 208, 739–749.Google Scholar

Watten, R.G., Lie, I., Birketvedt, O. (1994). The influence of long-term visual near-work on accommodation and vergence: a field study. J Hum Ergol, 23, 27–39.Google Scholar

Weinstein, R.S., Descour, M.R., Liang, C., et al. (2004). An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study. Hum Pathol, 35, 1303–1314.Google Scholar

Weinstein, R.S., Graham, A.R., Richter, L.C., et al. (2009). Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol, 40, 1057–1069.Google Scholar

Wolfe, J.M., Horowitz, T.S. (2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Hum Behav, 1, 0058.Google Scholar

Yankeelov, T.E., Mankoff, D.A., Schwartz, L.H., et al. (2016). Quantitative imaging in cancer clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res, 22, 284–290.Google Scholar

Yunfang, L., Wenjing, W., Bingshuang, H., et al. (2000). Visual strain and working capacity in computer operators. Homeost Health Dis, 40, 27–29.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Caldwell, R.T., Schartz, K.M., Thompson, B.H., Franken, E.A. (2007). Does CAD for lung tumors change satisfaction of search in chest radiography? Acad Radiol, 14, 1069–1076.Google Scholar

Beutel, J., Kundel, H.L., Van Metter, R.L. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Medical Imaging. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.Google Scholar

Bracamonte, E., Gibson, B.A., Klein, R., Krupinski, E.A., Weinstein, R.S. (2016). Communicating uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: a survey of staff physicians and residents at an academic medical center. Acad Pathol, 3, 1–7.Google Scholar

Bryant, G., Norman, G. (1980). Expressions of probability. Words and numbers. N Engl J Med, 302, 411.Google Scholar

Chang, P.J. (1989) Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist’s survival guide. AJR, 152, 721–727.Google Scholar

Chen, P., Mohan, S., Cook, T., Nasrallah, I., Bryan, R., Botzolakis, E. (2016). Development of a novel Bayesian network interface for radiology diagnosis support and education. Radiological Society of North America 2016 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 27 - December 2, 2016, Chicago IL. www.archive.rsna.org/2016/16010460.html (accessed December 1, 2016).Google Scholar

Donovan, T.., Manning, D. (2007). The radiology task: Bayesian theory and perception. Br J Radiol, 80, 389–391.Google Scholar

Donovan, T., Manning, D., Phillips, P., Higham, S., Crawford, T. (2005). The role of peripheral vision in a fracture detection task. Paper presented at the Medical Image Perception Society XI Conference, Lake Windermere, England.Google Scholar

Eddy, D. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine. In: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds.) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–259.Google Scholar

Elkins, J. (1996). The Object Stares Back. On the Nature of Seeing. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Ellis, A., Young, A. (1996). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Textbook with Readings. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Esserman, L., Cowley, H., Eberle, C., Kirkpatrick, A., Chang, S., Berbaum, K., Gale, A. (2002). Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst, 94, 369–375.Google Scholar

Evans, K.K., Haygood, T.M., Cooper, J., Culpand, A.M., Wolfe, J.M. (2016). A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113, 10292–10297.Google Scholar

Frith, C. (2007). Making up the Mind – How the Brain Creates our Mental World. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Graber, M.L., Franklin, N., Gordon, R. (2005). Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med, 165, 1493–1499.Google Scholar

Gunderman, R. (2009). Biases in radiologic reasoning. AJR, 192, 561–564.Google Scholar

Gunderman, R., Williamson, K., Fraley, R., Steele, J. (2001). Expertise: implications for radiological education. Acad Radiol, 8, 1252–1256.Google Scholar

Herring, W. (2007). Learning Radiology. Recognizing the Basics. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier.Google Scholar

Hobby, J., Tom, B., Todd, C., Bearcroft, P., Dixon, A. (2000). Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports. Br J Radiol, 73, 999–1001.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kundel, H. (2000). Visual search in medical images. In: Buetel, J., Kundel, H., Van Metter, R. (eds.) Handbook of Medical Imaging. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, pp. 129–138.Google Scholar

Kundel, H. (2006). History of research in medical image perception. J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 402–408.Google Scholar

Kundel, H., Nodine, C. (1975). Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 116, 527–532.Google Scholar

Kundel, H., Nodine, C. (1983). A visual concept shapes image perception. Radiology, 146, 363–368.Google Scholar

Lee, C.S., Nagy, P.G., Weaver, S.J., Newman-Toker, D.E. (2013). Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR, 201, 611–617.Google Scholar

Lesgold, A.M., Rubinson, H., Feltovitch, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., Farr, M.J. (eds.) The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 311–342.Google Scholar

Litchfield, D., Donovan, T. (2016). Worth a quick look? Initial scene previews can guide eye movements as a function of domain-specific expertise but can also have unforeseen costs. J Exp Psych: Human Percep Perfor, 7, 982–994.Google Scholar

Manning, D., Ethell, S., Donovan, T. (2004). Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the PA chest radiograph. Br J Radiol, 77, 231–235.Google Scholar

Manning, D., Gale, A., Krupinski, E. (2005). Perception research in medical imaging. Br J Radiol, 78, 683–685.Google Scholar

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Maxwell, C. (1978). Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physics classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharm, 6, 15–24.Google Scholar

McCormack, H., Horne, D., Sheather, S. (1988). Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med, 18, 1007–1019.Google Scholar

Nodine, C., Krupinski, E.A. (1998). Perceptual skill, radiology expertise and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO. Acad Radiol, 5, 603–612.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L. (1987). Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics, 7, 1241–1250.Google Scholar

Nodine, C., Mello-Thoms, C. (2000). The nature of expertise in radiology. In: Buetel, J., Kundel, H., Van Metter, R. (eds.) Handbook of Medical Imaging. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, pp. 859–894.Google Scholar

Philips, P.W. (2010). Eye-tracking the interpretation of CT colonography. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar

Phillips, C. (1995). Logic in Medicine. London, England: BMJ Publishing.Google Scholar

Pinto, A., Brunese, L. (2010). Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol, 2, 377–383.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. (2003). BBC Reith lectures. The emerging mind. www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/ (accessed December 1, 2016).Google Scholar

Ratwani, R.M., Trafton, J.G., Boehm-Davis, D.A. (2008). Thinking graphically: connecting vision and cognition during graph comprehension. J Exp Psychol Appl, 1, 36–49.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1989). Lung scintigraphy – doubt and uncertainty in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol, 40, 557–560.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1997). Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the roentgen image. Br J Radiol, 70, 1085–1098.Google Scholar

Samei, E. (2006). Why medical image perception? Editorial. J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 400–401.Google Scholar

Smoker, W., Berbaum, K.S., Luebke, N., Jacoby, C. (1984). Spatial perception testing in diagnostic radiology. Am J Radiol, 143, 1105–1109.Google Scholar

Suleiman, W.I., Lewis, S.J., Georgian-Smith, D., Evanoff, M.G., McEntee, M.F. (2014). Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity. J Med Imag, 1, 015503.Google Scholar

Swenson, R., Hessel, S., Herman, P. (1985). The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. Invest Radiol, 20, 100–107.Google Scholar

Van Der Helm, P.A. (2000). Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: from surprisals to precisals. Psych Bull, 126, 770–800.Google Scholar

Weaver, S.J., Newman-Toker, D.E., Rosen, M.A. (2010). Cognitive skill decay and diagnostic error: best practices for continuing education in healthcare. J Contin Educ Health Prof, 30, 208–220.Google Scholar

Wood, B. (1999). Decision making in radiology. Radiology, 211, 601–603.Google Scholar

Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley, pp. 244–245, 249–250.Google Scholar

Anbari, M.M., West, O.C. (1997). Cervical spine trauma radiography: sources of false-negative diagnoses. Emerg Radiol, 4, 218–224.Google Scholar

Beam, C.A., Krupinski, E.A., Kundel, H.L., Sickles, E.A., Wagner, R.F. (2006). The place of medical image perception in 21st-century health care. J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 409–412.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr. (2006). Commentary: does clinical history affect perception? Acad Radiol, 13, 402–403.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Schartz, K.M. (2013). One parameter contaminated binormal model (CBM) for analysis of difficult-to-fit ROC data. Proc SPIE, 8673, 86730C.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1986). Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. Invest Radiol, 21, 532–539.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., El-Khoury, G.Y., Franken, E.A., Jr., et al. (1988a). Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology, 168, 507–511.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., Barloon, T.J. (1988b). Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. Invest Radiol, 23, 48–55.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Dorfman, D.D., Franken, E.A., Jr. (1989a). Measuring observer performance by ROC analysis: indications and complications. Invest Radiol, 24, 228–233.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., El-Khoury, G.Y. (1989b). Impact of clinical history on radiographic detection of fractures: a comparison of radiologists and orthopedists. Am J Roentgenol, 153, 1221–1224.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1990). Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol, 25, 133–140.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1991). Time-course of satisfaction of search. Invest Radiol, 26, 640–648.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Anderson, K.L., et al. (1993). The influence of clinical history on visual search with single and multiple abnormalities. Invest Radiol, 28, 191–201.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., El-Khoury, G.Y., Franken, E.A., Jr., et al. (1994a). Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect. Emerg Radiol, 1, 242–249.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., Lueben, K.R. (1994b). Influence of clinical history on perception of abnormalities in pediatric radiographs. Acad Radiol, 1, 217–223.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1996). The cause of satisfaction of search effects in contrast studies of the abdomen. Acad Radiol, 3, 815–826.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A. Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1998). Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiology. Acad Radiol, 5, 9–19.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Dorfman, D.D., Franken, E.A., Jr., Caldwell, R.T. (2000a). Proper ROC analysis and joint ROC analysis of the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Acad Radiol, 7, 945–958.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A. Jr., Dorfman, D.D., Caldwell, R.T., Krupinski, E.A. (2000b). Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Acad Radiol, 7, 1098–1106.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Brandser, E.A., Franken, E.A., Jr., et al. (2001). Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. Acad Radiol, 8, 304–314.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Dorfman, D.D., Caldwell, R.T., Lu, C.H. (2005). Can order of report prevent satisfaction of search in abdominal contrast studies? Acad Radiol, 12, 74–84.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A., Jr., Caldwell, R.T., Schartz, K.M. (2006). Can a checklist reduce SOS errors in chest radiography? Acad Radiol, 13, 296–304.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., El-Khoury, G.Y., Ohashi, K., et al. (2007a). Satisfaction of search in multi-trauma patients: severity of detected fractures. Acad Radiol, 14, 711–722.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Caldwell, R.T., Schartz, K.M., Thompson, B.H., Franken, E.A., Jr. (2007b). Does computer-aided diagnosis for lung tumors change satisfaction of search in chest radiography? Acad Radiol, 14, 1069–1076.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Schartz, K.M., Caldwell, R.T., et al. (2012). Satisfaction of search for subtle skeletal fractures may not be induced by more serious skeletal injury. J Am Coll Radiol, 9, 344–351.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Schartz, K.M., Caldwell, R.T., et al. (2013). Satisfaction of search from detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography of the chest. Acad Radiol, 20, 194–201.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Krupinski, E.A., Schartz, K.M., et al. (2015). Satisfaction of search in chest radiography 2015. Acad Radiol, 22, 1457–1465.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Krupinski, E.A., Schartz, K.M., et al. (2016). The influence of a vocalized checklist on detection of multiple abnormalities in chest radiography. Acad Radiol, 23, 413–420.Google Scholar

Berlin, L. (1996). Malpractice issues in radiology: perceptual errors. Am J Roentgenol, 167, 587–590.Google Scholar

BMDP2V release: 8.0. (1993). BMDP Statistical Software, Inc. Statistical Solutions, Cork, Ireland (www.statsol.ie).Google Scholar

Bruning, J.L., Kintz, B.L. (1987). Computational Handbook of Statistics, 3rd edn. Glenview, IL: Harper Collins, pp. 272–275.Google Scholar

Chakraborty, D.P., Winter, L.H.L. (1990). Free-response methodology: alternative analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology, 174, 873–881.Google Scholar

Christensen, E.E., Murry, R.C., Holland, K., et al. (1981). The effect of search time on perception. Radiology, 138, 361–365.Google Scholar

Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The Nature of Explanation. London: Cambridge University Press, p. 81.Google Scholar

Dixon, W.J. (1992). BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Vol 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 155–174; 201–227; 521–564.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Alf, E., Jr. (1969). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals – rating method data. J Math Psychol, 6, 487–496.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S. (1986). RSCORE-J: pooled rating method data: a computer program for analyzing pooled ROC curves. Behav Res Methods Instrument, 18, 452–462.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S. (1995). Degeneracy and discrete ROC rating data. Acad Radiol, 2, 907–915.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S. (2000a). A contaminated binormal model for ROC data. II. A formal model. Acad Radiol, 7, 427–437.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S. (2000b). A contaminated binormal model for ROC data. III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data. Acad Radiol, 7, 438–447.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S., Metz, C.E. (1992). Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol, 27, 723–731.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S., Metz, C.E., et al. (1997). Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model. Acad Radiol, 4, 138–149.Google Scholar

Ericcson, K.A., Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev, 87, 215–251.Google Scholar

Ericcson, K.A., Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fidler, J.L., Fletcher, J.G., Johnson, C.D., et al. (2004). Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol, 11, 750–756.Google Scholar

Franken, E.A., Jr., Berbaum, K.S., Lu, C.H., et al. (1994). Satisfaction of search in detection of plain film abnormalities in abdominal contrast examinations. Invest Radiol, 29, 403–409.Google Scholar

Gale, A.G., Worthington, B.S. (1983). The utility of scanning strategies in radiology. In: Eye Movements and Psychological Functions: International Views. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 169–191.Google Scholar

Gale, A.G., Johnson, F., Worthington, B.S. (1979). Psychology and radiology. In: Research in Psychology and Medicine, Vol 1. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Green, D.M., Swets, J.A. (1962). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 86–116.Google Scholar

Halsted, M.J., Kumar, H., Paquin, J.J., et al. (2004). Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol, 34, 331–336.Google Scholar

Hillis, S.L., Berbaum, K.S., Metz, C.E. (2008). Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol, 15, 647–661.Google Scholar

Hochberg, J. (1970). Attention, organization and consciousness. In: Attention: Contemporary Theory and Analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. (1970). Continuous Univariate Distributions. 1: Distributions in Statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 186–187.Google Scholar

Kinard, R.E., Orrison, W.W., Brogdon, B.G. (1986). The value of a worksheet in reporting body-CT examinations. Am J Roentgenol, 147, 848–849.Google Scholar

Kirk, R.E. (1982). Experimental Design, 2nd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp. 75; 429–455; 531–548.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S., Schartz, K.M., Caldwell, R.T., Madsen, M.T. (2017a). The impact of fatigue on satisfaction of search in chest radiography. Acad Radiol, 24, 1058–1063.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Schartz, K.M., Van Tassell, M.S., Madsen, M.T., Caldwell, R.T., Berbaum, K.S. (2017b). Effect of fatigue on reading computed tomography examination of the multiply injured patient. J Med Imag, 4, 035504.Google Scholar

Kuhn, G.J. (2002). Diagnostic errors. Acad Emerg Med, 9, 740–750.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L. (2006). History of research in medical image perception. J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 402–408.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., LaFollette, P.S. (1972). Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology, 103, 523–528.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D. (1978). Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol, 13, 175–181.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Thickman, D., Toto, L. (1987). Searching for lung nodules: a comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models. Invest Radiol, 22, 417–422.Google Scholar

Lev, M.H., Rhea, J.T., Bramson, R.T. (1999). Avoidance of variability and error in radiology. Lancet, 354, 272.Google Scholar

MacMahon, H., Engelmann, R., Behlen, F.M., et al. (1999). Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test. Radiology, 213, 723–726.Google Scholar

Madsen, M.T., Berbaum, K.S., Ellingson, A.N., Thompson, B.H., Mullan, B.F., Caldwell, R.T. (2006). A new software tool for removing, storing, and adding abnormalities to medical images for perception research studies. Acad Radiol, 13, 305–312.Google Scholar

McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological Statistics, 4th edn. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar

Metz, C.E. (1987). Current problems in ROC analysis. In: Proceedings of the Chest Imaging Conference 1987. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, pp. 315–336.Google Scholar

Most, S.B., Scholl, B.J., Clifford, E.R., Simons, D.J. (2005). What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychol Rev, 112, 217–242.Google Scholar

Nakamura, K., Yoshida, H., Engelmann, R., et al. (2000). Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. Radiology, 214, 823–830.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Newell, A., Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L. (1987). Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics, 7, 1241–1250.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C., Weinstein, S.P., et al. (2001). Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis. Radiology, 221, 122–129.Google Scholar

Nuñez, D.B. Jr., Quencer, R.M. (1998). The role of helical CT in the assessment of cervical spine injuries. Am J Roentgenol, 171, 951–957.Google Scholar

Pesce, L.L., Metz, C.E. (2007). Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of “proper” binormal ROC curves. Acad Radiol, 14, 814–829.Google Scholar

Rasband, W.S. (1997–2006). ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar

Renfrew, R.L., Franken, E.A., Berbaum, K.S., Weigelt, F.H., AbuYousef, M.M. (1992). Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology, 183, 145–150.Google Scholar

Rogers, LF. (1982). Radiology of Skeletal Trauma. New York, NY: Churchill-Livingstone, p. 1.Google Scholar

Rogers, L.F. (1984). Common oversights in the evaluation of the patient with multiple injuries. Skelet Radiol, 12, 103–111.Google Scholar

Rogers, L.F., Hendrix, R.W. (1990). Evaluating the multiply injured patient radiologically. Orthop Clin North Am, 21, 437–447.Google Scholar

Samei, E. (2006). Why medical image perception? J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 400–401.Google Scholar

Samuel, S., Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Toto, L.C. (1995). Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology, 94, 895–902.Google Scholar

Samuelson, F. (2011). The single-parameter power law for modeling data from observer experiments in medical imaging. Medical Image Perception Conference XIV, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Schartz, K.M., Berbaum, K.S., Caldwell, R.T., Madsen, M.T. (2009). WorkstationJ as ImageJ plugin for medical image studies. Annual Meeting of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) – 9th Annual SIIM Research and Development Symposium, Charlotte, NC, June 6, 2009. www.siimweb.org/assets/FCBE219A-C30B-4003-9892-FACA9230AB91.pdf.Google Scholar

Schartz, K.M., Berbaum, K.M., Madsen, M.T., et al. (2013). Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest. Br J Radiol, 86, 20110799, Erratum in: Br J Radiol, 86, 20139001.Google Scholar

Schartz, K.M., Madsen, M.T., Kim, J., et al. (2016). Trauma in CT: the role of severe injury on satisfaction of search revised. J Am Coll Radiol, 13, 973–978.Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In: Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar

Sistrom, C. (2006). Radiology checklists, satisfaction of search, and the talking template concept. Acad Radiol, 13, 922–923.Google Scholar

Sistrom, C.L., Langlotz, C.P. (2005) A framework for improved radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol, 2, 61–67.Google Scholar

Smith, M.J. (1967). Error and Variation in Diagnostic Radiology. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, p. 27.Google Scholar

Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 146–147.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G. (1988). The effects of clinical information on film interpretation: another perspective. Invest Radiol, 23, 56–61.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G. (1996). Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. Med Phys, 23, 1709–1725.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Theodore, G.H. (1990). Search and nonsearch protocols for radiographic consultation. Radiology, 177, 851–856.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Hessel, S.J., Herman, P.G. (1977). Omissions in radiology: faulty search or stringent reporting criteria? Radiology, 123, 563–567.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Hessel, S.J., Herman, P.G. (1979). Detection performance and the nature of the radiologist’s search task. In Symposium on the Optimization of Chest Radiography (Bureau of Radiological Health). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Hessel, S.J., Herman, P.G. (1982). Radiographic interpretation with and without search: visual search aids the recognition of chest pathology. Invest Radiol, 17, 145–151.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Hessel, S.J., Herman, P.G. (1985). The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. Invest Radiol, 20, 100–114.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., King, J.L., Gur, D. (2001). A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation. Med Phys, 28, 1597–1609.Google Scholar

Swets, J.A., Pickett, R.M. (1982). Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tuddenham, W.J. (1962). Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis: studies of the psychophysiology of roentgen image perception. Radiology, 78, 694–704.Google Scholar

Tuddenham, W.J. (1963). Problems of perception in chest roentgenology: facts and fallacies. Radiol Clin N Am, 1, 227–289.Google Scholar

von Helmholtz, H. (1867, 1963). Handbook of Physiological Optics. New York, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Voytovich, A., Rippey, R., Suffredini, A. (1985). Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning. J Med Educ, 60, 302–307.Google Scholar

Xu, X.W., Doi, K., Kobayashi, T., MacMahon, H., Giger, M.L. (1997). Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys, 24, 1395–1403.Google Scholar

Ahissar, M., Hochstein, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 457–464.Google Scholar

Anderson, J.R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 4th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Antes, J.R., Penland, J.G. (1981). Picture context effects on eye movement patterns. In: Fisher, D.F., Monty, R.A., Senders, J.W. (eds.) Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar

Baghdady, M., Carnahan, H., Lam, E.W.N., Woods, N.N. (2014). Dental and dental hygiene students diagnostic accuracy in oral radiology: effect of diagnostic strategy and instructional method. J Dent Educ, 78, 1279–1285.Google Scholar

Bar, M., Kassam, K.S., Ghuman, A.S., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 103, 449–454.Google Scholar

Barlow, W.E., Chi, C., Carney, P.A., et al. (2004). Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 1840–1850.Google Scholar

Bass, J.C., Chiles, C. (1990). Visual skill: correlation with detection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Invest Radiol, 25, 994–998.Google Scholar

Beam, C.A., Conant, E.F., Sickles, E.A. (2003). Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst, 95, 282–290.Google Scholar

Berbaum, K.S., Franken, E.A. Jr., Dorfman, D.D., et al. (1990). Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol, 25, 133–140.Google Scholar

Berlin, L. (2003). Malpractices issues in radiology – breast cancer, mammography, and malpractice litigation: the controversies continue. Am J Roentgenol, 180, 1229–1237.Google Scholar

Beutel, J., Van Metter, R., Kundel, H (eds.) (2001). Handbook of Medical Imaging. Vol. 1: Physics and Psychophysics. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, P.C., Trieu, P.D., Tapia, K., Ryan, J., Mello-Thoms, C., Lee, W. (2014) BREAST: a novel strategy to improve the detection of breast cancer. Proc 12th Int Workshop on Breast Imaging. Springer LNCS: 8539.Google Scholar

Carpenter, G.A., Grossberg, S. (1993). Normal and amnesic learning: recognition memory by a neural model of cortico-hyppocampal interactions. Trends Neurosci, 16, 131–137.Google Scholar

Carpenter, G.A., Grossberg, S., Lesher, G.W. (1998). The what-and-where filter. A spatial mapping neural network for object recognition and image understanding. Comp Vis Image Underst, 69, 1–22.Google Scholar

Cave, K.R., Batty, M.J. (2006). From searching for features to searching for threat: drawing the boundary between preattentive and attentive vision. Vis Cogn, 14, 629–646.Google Scholar

Charlin, B. (1998). Script questionnaires: their use for assessing diagnostic knowledge in radiology. Med Teach, 20, 567–571.Google Scholar

Charness, N., Krampe, R., Mayr, U. (1996). The role of practice and coaching in entrepreneurial skill domains: an international comparison of life-span chess skill acquisition. In: Ericsson, K.A. (ed.) The Road to Excellence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar

Charness, N., Reingold, E.M., Pomplun, M., et al. (2001). The perceptual aspects of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements. Mem Cognit, 29, 1146–1152.Google Scholar

Chase, W.G., Simon, H. (1973a). The mind’s eye in chess. In: Chase, W.G. (ed.) Visual Information Processing. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 215–281.Google Scholar

Chase, W.G., Simon, H.A. (1973b). Perception in chess. Cognit Psychol, 4, 86–112.Google Scholar

Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In: Sternberg, R. (ed.). Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 17–76.Google Scholar

Christensen, E.E., Murry, R.C., Holland, K., et al. (1981). The effect of search time on perception. Radiology, 138, 361–365.Google Scholar

Croskerry, P. (2009a). A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med, 84, 1222–1228.Google Scholar

Croskerry, P. (2009b). Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual processing model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ, 14, 27–35.Google Scholar

Croskerry, P., Petrie, D.A., Reilly, J.B., Tait, G. (2014). Deciding about fast and slow decisions. Acad Med, 89, 197–200.Google Scholar

Crowley, R.S., Naus, G.J., Steward, J. III, Friedman, C.P. (2003). Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathology: an information-processing study. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 10, 39–51.Google Scholar

Custers, E.J.F.M. (2015). Thirty years of illness scripts: theoretical origins and practical applications. Med Teach, 37, 457–462.Google Scholar

de Groot, A.D. (1978). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar

de Groot, A.D., Gobet, F. (1996). Perception and Memory in Chess. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorum.Google Scholar

Donovan, T., Litchfield, D. (2013). Looking for cancer: expertise related differences in searching and decision making. Appl Cognit Psychol, 27, 43–49.Google Scholar

Drew, T., Vo, M.L.H., Olwal, A., Jacobson, F., Seltzer, S.E., Wolfe, J.M. (2013). Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J Vision, 13, 1–13.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dulaney, C.L., Marks, W. (2007). The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing. Acta Psychol, 125, 203–220.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K.A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance. In: Ericsson, K.A. (ed.) The Road to Excellence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K.A., Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychol Rev, 102, 211–245.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., et al. (2006). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esserman, L., Cowley, H., Carey, E., et al. (2002). Improving accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst, 94, 369–375.Google Scholar

Estes, W.K. (1994). Classification and Cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, K.K., Haygood, T.M., Cooper, J., Culpan, A.-M., Wolfe, J.M. (2016). A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113, 10292–10297.Google Scholar

Evered, A., Walker, D., Watt, A.A., Perham, N. (2014). Untutored discrimination training on paired cell images influences visual learning in cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol, 122, 200–210.Google Scholar

Feltovitch, P.J., Barrows, H.S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In: Schmidt, H.G., de Volder, M.L. (eds.) Tutorials in Problem Based Learning. Assen/Maastrich, The Nertherlands: Van Gorcum, pp. 128–142.Google Scholar

Fenton, J.J., Taplin, S.H., Carney, P.A., et al. (2007). Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med, 356, 1399–1409.Google Scholar

Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., et al. (1996). Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature, 382, 626–628.Google Scholar

Gale, A.G., Walker, G.E. (1991). Design for performance: quality assessment in a national breast screening programme. In: Lovesay, E.J. (ed.) Ergonomics-Design for Performance. London, England: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Gale, A.G., Vernon, J., Millar, K., Worthington, B.S. (1983). Interpreting radiographs in a single glance. Radiology, 149, 253.Google Scholar

Gibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gibson, J.J., Gibson, E.J. (1955). Perceptual learning: differentiation or enrichment? Psychol Rev, 62, 32–41.Google Scholar

Gobet, F. (2016). Understanding Expertise: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. London, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Goldstone, R.L., de Leeuw, J.R., Landy, D.H. (2015). Fitting perception in and to cognition. Cognition, 135, 24–29.Google Scholar

Gordon, S.E. (2016). Implications of cognitive theory for knowledge acquisition. In: Hoffman, R.R. (ed.) The Psychology of Expertise: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar

Gregory, R.L. (1970). The Intelligent Eye. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gregory, R.L. (2001). Analog or digital? In: Parks, T.E. (ed.) Looking at Looking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 115–118.Google Scholar

Gregory, R.L., Gombrich, E.H. (1973). The confounded eye. In: Gregory, R.L. (ed.) Illusion in Nature and Art. London, England: Duckworth, pp. 49–95.Google Scholar

Grill-Spector, K., Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychol Sci, 16, 152–160.Google Scholar

Gunderman, R.B. (2000). Illuminating the “black boxes” of learning and recall. Acad Radiol, 7, 641–646.Google Scholar

Gunderman, R.B. (2001). Is technical school a good model for radiology residency? Am J Roentgenol, 177, 1005–1007.Google Scholar

Gunderman, R.B., Williamson, K.B., Frank, M., et al. (2003). Learner-centered education. Radiology, 227, 15–17.Google Scholar

Gur, D., Sumkin, J.H., Rockette, H.E., et al. (2004). Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96,185–190.Google Scholar

Haider, H., Frensch, P.A. (1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cogn Psychol, 30, 304–337.Google Scholar

Haider, H., Frensch, P.A. (1999). Eye movement during skill acquisition: more evidence for the information reduction hypothesis. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn, 25, 172–190.Google Scholar

Haller, S., Radue, E.W. (2005). What is different about a radiologist’s brain? Radiology, 236, 983–989.Google Scholar

Harries, C., Evans, J.S.B.T., Dennis, I. (2000). Measuring doctors’ self-insight into their treatment decisions. Appl Cognit Psychol, 14, 455–477.Google Scholar

Herzog, M.H., Cretenoud, A.F., Grzeczkowski, L. (2017). What is new in perceptual learning? J Vision, 17, 23.Google Scholar

Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Pfeffer, M.G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cogn Sci, 28, 127–138.Google Scholar

Hochberg, J.E. (1978) Perception, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Jacobs, R.A. (2010) Integrated approaches to perceptual learning. Topics Cogn Sci, 2, 182–188.Google Scholar

Johnson, A., Proctor, R.W. (2017). Skill Acquisition and Training: Achieving Expertise in Simple and Complex Tasks. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Joseph, G-M., Patel, V.L. (1990). Domain knowledge and hypothesis generation in diagnostic reasoning. Med Dec Mak, 10, 31–46.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farra, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educ Psychol, 38, 23–31.Google Scholar

Kellman, P.J. (2002) Perceptual learning. In: Gallistel, R. (ed.) Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 3, Learning, Motivation and Emotion. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 259–299.Google Scholar

Kellman, P.J. (2013). Adaptive and perceptual learning technologies in medical education and training. Milit Med, 178, 98–106.Google Scholar

Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M., Son, J. (2010). Perceptual learning modules in mathematics: enhancing students’ pattern recognition, structure extraction, and fluency. Topics Cogn Sci, 2, 285–305.Google Scholar

Kok, E.M., de Bruin, A.B.H., Robben, S.G.F., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2012). Looking in the same manner but seeing it differently: bottom-up and expertise effects in radiology. Appl Cognit Psychol, 26, 854–862.Google Scholar

Kok, E.M., van Geel, K., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Robben, S.G.F. (2017). What we do and do not know about teaching medical image interpretation. Frontiers Psychol, 8, 309.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A. (1996). Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol, 3, 137–144.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Int Encycloped Unif Sci, 2(2).Google Scholar

Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L.R., Norman, G.R. (2004). Using comprehensive feature lists to bias medical diagnosis. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cog, 30, 563–572.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L. (2007). How to minimize perceptual error and maximize expertise in medical imaging. Proc SPIE Med Imag: Image Perc, Obs Perf Tech Assess, 6515, 651508-1–651508-11.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., LaFollette, P.S. (1972). Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology, 103, 523–528.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F. (1975). Interpreting chess radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 108, 527–532.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Wright, D.J. (1969). The influence of prior knowledge on visual search strategies during viewing of chest radiographs. Radiology, 2, 315–320.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D.P. (1978). Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol, 13, 175–181.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Conant, E.F., Weinstein, S.P. (2007). Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology, 242, 396–402.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A., Mello-Thoms, C. (2008). Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Acad Radiol, 15, 881–886.Google Scholar

Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., et al. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi, M., Glaser, R., Farr, M. (eds.) The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 311–342.Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Thomas, E., Lansdown, E.L. (1963). Visual search patterns of radiologists in training. Radiology, 1, 288–292.Google Scholar

Lu, Z-L., Lin, Z., Dosher, B.A. (2016). Translating perceptual learning from the laboratory to applications. Trends Cogn Sci, 20, 561–563.Google Scholar

Mackworth, N.H., Morandi, A.J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perc Psychophys, 2, 547–552.Google Scholar

Mello-Thoms, C., Dunn, S., Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L., Weinstein, S.P. (2002). The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol, 9, 1004–1012.Google Scholar

Mello-Thoms, C., Hardesty, L., Sumkin, J., et al. (2005). Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading. Acad Radiol, 12, 830–840.Google Scholar

Mello-Thoms, C., Ganott, M., Sumkin, J., et al. (2008). Different search patterns and similar decision outcomes: how can experts agree in the decisions they make when reading digital mammograms? In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) Int Work Digital Mammo, Lecture Notes on Computer Science 5116. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 212–219.Google Scholar

Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits to our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev, 63, 81–97.Google Scholar

Monsky, W.L., Levine, D., Mehta, T.S., et al. (2002). Using a sonographic simulator to assess residents before overnight call. Am J Roentgenol, 178, 35–39.Google Scholar

Moravec, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mueller, D., Georges, A., Vashow, D. (2007). Cooperative learning as applied to resident instruction in radiology reporting. Acad Radiol, 14, 1577–1583.Google Scholar

Myles-Worsley, M., Johnston, W.A., Simons, M.A. (1988). The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. J Exp Psychol, 14, 553–557.Google Scholar

Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees. The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol, 9, 353–383.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Newell, A., Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A. (1998). Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO. Acad Radiol, 5, 603–612.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C. (2000). The nature of expertise in radiology. In: Beutel, J., Kundel, H.L., Van Metter, R.L. (eds.) Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1: Physics and Psychophysics. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, pp. 859–893.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L., Mello-Thoms, C., et al. (1999). How experience and training influence mammography expertise. Acad Radiol, 1, 575–585.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C., Kundel, H.L., et al. (2001). Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis. Radiology, 221, 122–129.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C., Kundel, H.L., Weinstein, S.P. (2002). Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Am J Roentgenol, 179, 917–923.Google Scholar

Norman, G.R., Brooks, L.R., Colle, C.L., Hatala, R.M. (2000). The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning: experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cogn Instruct, 17, 433–448.Google Scholar

Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In: Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., Hoffman, R.R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 339–353.Google Scholar

Norman, G., Sherbino, J., Dore, K., et al. (2014). The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med, 89, 277–284.Google Scholar

Olshausen, B.A., Field, D.J. (2000). Vision and the coding of natural images. Am Scientist, 88, 238–245.Google Scholar

Peterson, M.A., Rhodes, G. (2003). Perception of Faces, Objects and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., et al. (2005). Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med, 353, 1773–1783.Google Scholar

Puri, A.M., Wojciulik, E. (2008). Expectation both helps and hinders object perception. Vision Res, 48, 589–597.Google Scholar

Rackow, P.L., Spitzer, V.M., Hendee, W.R. (1987). Detection of low-contrast signals: a comparison of observers with and without radiology training. Invest Radiol, 22, 311–314.Google Scholar

Raufaste, E., Eyrolle, H., Marine, C. (1998). Pertinence generation in radiological diagnosis: spreading activation and the nature of expertise. Cogn Sci, 22, 517–546.Google Scholar

Ross, P.E. (2006). The expert mind. Scientific Am, 295, 64–71.Google Scholar

Sagi, D. (2011). Perceptual learning in vision research. Vision Res, 51, 1552–1566.Google Scholar

Schmidt, H.G., Rikers, R.M.J. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ, 41, 1133–1139.Google Scholar

Siamecki, N., Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. J Exp Psychol: Human Learn Mem, 4, 592–604.Google Scholar

Smith-Bindman, R., Chu, P., Migloretti, D.L., et al. (2005). Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst, 97, 358–367.Google Scholar

Sowden, P.T., Davies, I.R.L., Roling, P. (2000). Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvement in adults’ visual sensitivity? J Exp Psychol: Human Percep Perf, 26, 379–390.Google Scholar

Swensson, R.G., Hessel, S.J., Herman, P.G. (1982). Radiographic interpretation with and without search: visual search aids the recognition of chess pathology. Invest Radiol, 17, 145–151.Google Scholar

Taylor, P.M. (2007). A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training. Acad Radiol, 14, 1252–1263.Google Scholar

Tuddenham, W.J., Calvert, W.P. (1961). Visual search patterns in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology, 76, 255–256.Google Scholar

van der Gijp, A., van der Schaaf, M.F., van der Schaaf, I.C., Huige, J.C.B.M., Ravesloot, C.J., Schaik, J.P.J., ten Cate, T.J. (2014). Interpretation of radiological images: towards a framework of knowledge and skills. Adv Health Sci Educ, 19, 565–580.Google Scholar

van der Gijp, A., Ravesloot, C.J., van der Schaaf, M.F., et al. (2015). Volumetric and two-dimensional image interpretation show different cognitive processes in learners. Acad Radiol, 22, 632–639.Google Scholar

van der Gijp, A., Webb, E.M., Naeger, D.M. (2017). How radiologists think: understanding fast and slow thought processing and how it can improve our teaching. Acad Radiol, 24, 768–771.Google Scholar

Venjakob, A.C., Mello-Thoms, C. (2016). Review of prospects and challenges of eye tracking in volumetric imaging. J Med Imag, 3, 011002.Google Scholar