Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as Principled Argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Abelson, R. P. & Prentice, D. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 2: 315–328.Google Scholar

Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Algina, J. & Keselman, H. J. (1997). Detecting repeated measures effects with univariate and multivariate statistics. Psychological Methods, 2: 208–218.Google Scholar

Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done? Psychological Science, 15: 616–622.Google Scholar

Amodio, D. M. & Bartholow, B. D. (2011). Event-related-potential methods in social cognition. In Klauer, C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (eds.), Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 303–339). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Arruda, J. E., McGee, H. A., Zhang, H., & Stanny, C. J. (2011). The effects of EEG data transformations on the solution accuracy of principal component analysis. Psychophysiology, 48: 370–376.Google Scholar

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.Google Scholar

Berntson, G. G., Bigger, J. Jr., Eckberg, D. L., Grossman, P., Kaufmann, P. G., Malik, M., … & van der Molen, M. W. (1997). Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34: 623–648.Google Scholar

Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., Quigley, K. S., & Fabro, V. T. (1994a). Autonomic space and physiological response. Psychophysiology, 31, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berntson, G. G., Quigley, K. S., Lang, J. F., & Boysen, S. T. (1990). An approach to artifact identification: application to heart period data. Psychophysiology, 27: 586–598.Google Scholar

Berntson, G. G., Uchino, B. N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1994b). Origins of baseline variance and the law of initial value. Psychophysiology, 31: 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, T. D., Cuthbert, B. N., Gilion, D. L., Hackley, S., Lipp, O. V., & van Boxtel, A. (2005). Committee report. Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. Psychophysiology, 42: 1–15.Google Scholar

Borenstein, M., Cohen, J., & Rothstein, H. (1997). Power and Precision. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C., Grimnes, S., Ben-Shakhar, G., Roth, W. T., Dawson, M. E., & Filion, D. L. (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 49: 1017–1034.Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P. (1954). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: I. Effects of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25: 290–302.Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P. & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.Google Scholar

Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101: 147–158.Google Scholar

Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113: 566–579.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (1990). Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. American Psychologist, 45: 16–28.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Fridlund, A. J. (1990). The skeletomotor system. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology: Physical, Social, and Inferential Elements (pp. 325–384). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cary, N. C. (1989). SAS/IML Software: Usage and Reference, Version 6. SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Cary, N. C. (1996). SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11. SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Casella, G. (1985). An introduction to empirical Bayesian data analysis. American Statistician, 39: 83–87.Google Scholar

Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81: 1–8.Google Scholar

Cheung, M. N. (1981). Detection of and recovery from errors in cardiac interbeat intervals. Psychophysiology, 18: 341–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chi, E. M. & Reinsel, G. C. (1989). Models of longitudinal data with random effects and AR-1 errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84: 452–459.Google Scholar

Chow, S. L. (1996). Statistical Significance: Rationale, Validity, and Utility. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The Elements of Graphing Data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, rev. edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 155–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49: 997–1003.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cole, J. W. L. & Grizzle, J. E. (1966). Application of multivariate analysis of variance to repeated measures experiments. Biometrics, 22: 810–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind–brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26: 251–269.Google Scholar

Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26: 69–89.Google Scholar

Cook, E. W. & Miller, G. A. (1992). Digital filtering: background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. Psychophysiology, 29: 350–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, R. D. & Weisberg, S. (1994). An Introduction to Regression Graphics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. J. (2012). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, vol 1: Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: why and how. Psychological Science, 25: 7–29.Google Scholar

Cumming, G. & Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61: 532–574.Google Scholar

Curtin, J. J., Lozano, D. L., & Allen, J. J. B (2007). The psychophysiology laboratory. In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (eds.), The Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp. 398–425). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Amico, E. J., Neilands, T. B., & Zambarano, R. (2001). Power analysis for multivariate and repeated measures designs: a flexible approach using the SPSS MANOVA procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33: 479–484.Google Scholar

Darlington, R. B. (1990). Regression and Linear Models. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Davidson, R. J. (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In Davidson, R. J. & Hugdahl, K. (eds.), Brain Asymmetry (pp. 361–388). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Naatanen, R., … & Van Petten, C. (2009). Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120: 1883–1908.Google Scholar

Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1991). Statistical data analysis in the computer age. Science, 253: 390–395.Google Scholar

Elmes, D. G., Kantowitz, B. H., & Roedinger, H. L. III (2012). Research Methods, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39: 175–191.Google Scholar

Fluchêre, F., Deveaux, M., Burle, B., Vidal, F., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Witjas, T., … & Hasbroucq, T. (2015). Dopa therapy and action impulsivity: subthreshold error activation and suppression in Parkinson’s disease. Psychopharmacology, 232: 1735–1746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1: 379–390.Google Scholar

Fridlund, A. J. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23: 567–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gianaros, P. J., Quigley, K. S., Muth, E. R., Levine, M. E., Vasko, R. C. J., & Stern, R. M. (2003). Relationship between temporal changes in cardiac parasympathetic activity and motion sickness severity. Psychophysiology, 40: 39–44.Google Scholar

Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., Elkin, I., Waternaux, C., Kraemer, H. C., Greenhouse, J. B., … & Watkins, J. T. (1993). Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data: application to the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program Dataset. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50: 739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., Waternaux, C., & Davis, J. M. (1988). Random regression models: a comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric date. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 24: 438–443.Google Scholar

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 55: 468–484.Google Scholar

Greenen, R. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1993). A simple test of the law of initial values. Psychophysiology, 30: 525–530.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, J. B. & Junker, B.W. (1992). Exploratory statistical methods, with applications to psychiatric research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17: 423–441.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Gonzalez, R., Harris, R. H., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and p-values: what should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33: 175–183.Google Scholar

Gueorguieva, R. & Krystal, J. H. (2004). Move over anova: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data andits reflection in papers published in the archives of general psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61: 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Harris, R. J. (1991). Significance tests are not enough: the role of effect size estimation in theory corroboration. Theory and Psychology, 1: 375–382.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41: 924–936.Google Scholar

Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics. Orlando, FL: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Hedeker, D. & Gibbons, R. D. (2006). Longitudinal Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Hintze, J. (2004). NCSS PASS. Retrieved from www.ncss.com/pass.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal Analysis: Modeling Within-Person Fluctuation and Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Howell, G. T. & Lacroix, G. L. (2012). Decomposing interactions using GLM in combination with the COMPARE, LMATRIX and MMATRIX subcommands in SPSS. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8: 1–22.Google Scholar

Huster, R. J., Debener, S., Eichele, T., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012). Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: an introductory review. Journal of Neuroscience, 32: 6053–6060.Google Scholar

Huynh, H. & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65: 1582–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huynh, H. & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1: 69–82.Google Scholar

Jaccard, J., Becker, M. A., & Wood, G. (1984). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 96: 589–596.Google Scholar

Jackson, A. F. & Bolger, D. J. (2014). The neurophysiological basis of EEG and EEG measurement: a review for the rest of us. Psychophysiology, 51: 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacob, R. G., Thayer, J. F., Manuck, S. B., Muldoon, M. F., Tamres, L. K., Williams, D. M., … & Gatsonis, C. (1999). Ambulatory blood pressure responses and the circumplex model of mood: a 4-day study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61: 319–333.Google Scholar

Jacoby, W. G. (1997). Statistical Graphics for Univariate and Bivariate Data: Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 38: 324–329.Google Scholar

James, G. S. (1954). Tests of linear hypotheses in univariate and multivariate analysis when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 41: 19–43.Google Scholar

Janicki-Deverts, D. & Kamarck, T. W. (2008). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. In Luecken, L. J. & Gallo, L. C. (eds.), Handbook of Physiological Research Methods in Health Psychology (pp. 159–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R. (1986). Bodily changes during attending. In Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Porges, S. W. (eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes and Applications (pp. 268–289). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R., Berg, W. K., Hutcheson, J. S., Obrist, P., Porges, S. W., & Turpin, G. (1981). Publication guidelines for heart rate studies in men. Psychophysiology, 18: 226–231.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R., Kamarck, T., Stewart, C., Eddy, M., & Johnson, P. (1992). Alternate cardiovascular baseline assessment techniques: vanilla or resting baseline? Psychophysiology, 29: 742–750.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R. & McKnight, J. D. (1994). Inferring vagal tone from heart rate variability. Psychosomatic Medicine, 56: 194–196.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R. & Wood, C. C. (1976). The epsilon-adjusted procedure for repeated measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology, 13: 277–278.Google Scholar

Johnson, P. O. & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1: 57–93.Google Scholar

Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Smith, E. R. (1996). Testing treatment by covariate interactions when treatment varies within participants. Psychological Methods, 1: 366–378.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Jennings, J. R., Debski, T. W., Glickman-Weiss, E., Eddy, M. J., & Manuck, S. B. (1992). Reliable measures of behaviorally-evoked cardiovascular reactivity from a PC-based test battery: results from student and community samples. Psychophysiology, 29: 17–28.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Schwartz, J. E., Janicki, D. L., Shiffman, S., & Raynor, D. A. (2003). Correspondence between laboratory and ambulatory measures of cardiovascular reactivity: a multilevel modeling approach. Psychophysiology, 40: 675–683.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Schwartz, J. E., Shiffman, S., Muldoon, M. F., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., & Janicki, D. L. (2005). Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular risk: what is the role of daily experience? Journal of Personality, 73: 1749–1774.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Shiffman, S., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Muldoon, M. F., & Tepper, P. (2012). Daily psychological demands are associated with 6-year progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: the Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Project. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74: 432–439.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Shiffman, S., & Wethington, E. (2011). Measuring psychosocial stress using ecological momentary assessment methods. In Contrada, R. J. & Baum, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health (pp. 597–617). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kamen, R. (1987). Introduction to Signals and Systems. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghofer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., … & Yee, C. M. (2014). Committee report. Publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology, 51: 1–21.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and Causality. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Keppel, G. (1991). Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Keppel, G. & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kerlinger, F. N. L. & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th edn. New York: Harcourt College.Google Scholar

Keselman, H. J., Carriere, K. C., & Lix, L. M. (1993). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18: 305–319.Google Scholar

Keselman, H. J., Keselman, J. C., & Lix, L. M. (1995). The analysis of repeated measurements: univariate tests, multivariate tests, or both? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48: 319–338.Google Scholar

Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., & Wilcox, R. R. (2000). Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53: 175–191.Google Scholar

Keselman, H. J., Rogan, J. C., Mendoza, J. L., & Breen, L. J. (1980). Testing the validity conditions of repeated measures F tests. Psychological Bulletin, 87: 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keselman, J. C. & Keselman, H. J. (1990). Analyzing unbalanced repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43: 265–282.Google Scholar

Khatree, R. & Naik, D. N. (1995). Applied Multivariate Statistics with SAS Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Krantz, D. S. & Manuck, S. B. (1984). Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: a review and methodologic critique. Psychological Bulletin, 96: 435–464.Google Scholar

Kristjansson, S. D., Kircher, J. C., & Webb, A. K. (2007). Multilevel models for repeated measures research designs in psychophysiology: an introduction to growth curve modeling. Psychophysiology, 44: 728–736.Google Scholar

Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38: 963–974.Google Scholar

Lavori, P. (1990). ANOVA, MANOVA, my black hen: comments on repeated measures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47: 775–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Law, L. N., Levey, A. B., & Martin, I. (1980). Response detection and measurement. In Martin, I. & Venables, P. H. (eds.), Techniques in Psychophysiology (pp. 629–663). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Levey, A. B. (1980). Measurement units in psychophysiology. In Martin, I. & Venables, P. H. (eds.), Techniques in Psychophysiology (pp. 597–628). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Levey, M. N. (1977). Parasympathetic control of the heart. In Randall, W. C. (ed.), Neural Regulation of the Heart (pp. 95–129). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levey, M. N. & Martin, P. (1984). Parasympathetic control of the heart. In Randall, W. C. (ed.), Nervous Control of Cardiovascular Function (pp. 68–94). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lippold, O. C. J. (1967). Electromyography. In Venables, P. H. & Martin, I. (eds.), A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods (pp. 246–297). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Lix, L. M. &Keselman, H. H. (1995). Approximate degrees of freedom tests: a unified perspective on testing for mean equality. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 547–560.Google Scholar

Llabre, M. M., Spitzer, S. B., Saab, P. G., Ironson, G. H., & Schneiderman, N. (1991). The replicability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology, 28: 701–711.Google Scholar

Loewenfeld, I. E. (1993). The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Loftus, G. R. M. (1994). Why psychology will never be a real science until we change the way that we analyze data. Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar

Loftus, G. R. M. & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1: 476–490.Google Scholar

Lykken, D. T. (1972). Range correction applied to heart rate and GSR data. Psychophysiology, 9: 373–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maxwell, S. E. & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113: 181–200.Google Scholar

Maxwell, S. E. & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Approach, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Meyers, D. L. (1991). Misinterpretation of interaction effects: a reply to Rosnow and Rosenthal. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 571–573.Google Scholar

Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: a clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100: 398–407.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110: 40–48.Google Scholar

Moriarty, J., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2011). Starting slow: the effects of response-switching frequency on patterns of cardiovascular reactivity. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 16: 12–18.Google Scholar

Mortensen, J. A., Lehn, H., Evensmoen, H. R., & Haberg, A. K. (2015). Evidence for an antagonistic interaction between reward and punishment sensitivity on striatal activity: a verification of the joint subsystems hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 74: 214–219.Google Scholar

Muller, K. E. & Barton, C. N. (1989). Approximate power for repeated measures ANOVA lacking sphericity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84: 549–555.Google Scholar

Muller, K. E. & Barton, C. N. (1991). Correction to “Approximate power for repeated measures ANOVA lacking sphericity.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86: 255–256.Google Scholar

Muller, K. E., LaVange, L. M., Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (1992). Power calculations for general linear multivariate models including repeated measures applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87: 1209–1226.Google Scholar

Myers, N. D., Brincks, A. M., Ames, A. J., Prado, G. J., Penedo, F. J., & Benedict, C. (2012). Multilevel modeling in psychosomatic medicine research. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74: 925–936.Google Scholar

Myrtek, M. & Foerster, F. (1986). The law of initial value: a rare exception. Biological Psychology, 22: 227–237.Google Scholar

Nicol, A. A. M. & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Displaying Your Findings: A Practical Guide for Creating Figures, Posters, and Presentations, 6th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, E. M. (2015). Categorical and Nonparametric Data Analysis: Choosing the Best Statistical Technique. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Brien, R. G. & Muller, K. E. (1993). Unified power analysis for t-tests through multivariate hypotheses. In Edwards, L. K. (ed.), Applied Analysis of Variance in the Behavioral Sciences (pp. 297–344). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McKinnon, R. (1997). Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biological Psychology, 46: 143–168.Google Scholar

Overall, J. E. & Tonidandel, S. (2010). The case for use of simple difference scores to test the significance of differences in mean rates of change in controlled repeated measurements designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45: 806–827.Google Scholar

Petrinovich, L. & Widaman, K. F. (1984). An evaluation of statistical strategies to analyze repeated-measures data. In Peeke, H. V. S. & Petrinovich, L. (eds.), Habituation, Sensitivation, and Behavior (pp. 105–201). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R. Jr., … & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37: 127–152.Google Scholar

Pivik, R. T., Broughton, R. J., Coppola, R., Davidson, R. J., Fox, N., & Nuwer, M. R. (1993). Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. Psychophysiology, 30: 547–548.Google Scholar

Porges, S. W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage – a polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology, 32: 301–318.Google Scholar

Porges, S. W. & Bohrer, R. E. (1990). The analysis of periodic processes in psychophysiological research. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology (pp. 708–753). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poulton, E. C. (1973). Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 80: 113–121.Google Scholar

Poulton, E. C. (1982). Influential companions: effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 91: 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulton, E. C. & Edwards, R. S. (1979). Asymmetric transfer in within-participants experiments on stress interaction. Ergonomics, 22: 945–961.Google Scholar

Poulton, E. C. & Freeman, P. R. (1966). Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 66: 1–8.Google Scholar

Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36: 717–731.Google Scholar

Quigley, K. S. & Berntson, G. G. (1990). Autonomic interactions and chronotropic control of the heart: heart period versus heart rate. Psychophysiology, 33: 605–611.Google Scholar

Ritz, T., Dahme, B., Dubois, A. B., Folgering, H., Fritz, G. K., Harver, A., … & Van de Woestijne, K. P. (2002). Guidelines for mechanical lung function measurements in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 39: 546–567.Google Scholar

Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92: 726–748.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1989a). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105: 143–146.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1989b). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44: 1276–1284.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1991). If you’re looking at the cell means, you’re not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero). Psychological Bulletin, 110: 574–576.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Some things you learn aren’t so: Cohen’s paradox, Asch’s paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6: 3–9.Google Scholar

Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57: 416–428.Google Scholar

Russell, D. W. (1990). The analysis of psychophysiological data: multivariate approaches. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology (pp. 775–801). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schroeder, L. D., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stephan, P. E. (1986). Understanding Regression Analysis: An Introductory Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Selig, J. P. & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6: 144–164.Google Scholar

Shapiro, D., Lane, J. D., Light, K. C., Myrtek, M., Suwada, Y., & Steptoe, A. (1996). Blood pressure publication guidelines. Psychophysiology, 33: 1–12.Google Scholar

Sherwood, A., Allen, M. T., Fahrenberg, J., Kelsey, R. M., Lovallo, W. R., & van Doornen, L. J. P. (1990). Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology, 27: 1–23.Google Scholar

Sidani, S. & Lynn, M. R. (1993). Examining amount and pattern of change: comparing repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis. Nursing Research, 42: 283–286.Google Scholar

Siegal, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Stearns, S. D. & David, R. A. (1993). Signal Processing Algorithms in Fortran and C. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Stemmler, G. & Fahrenberg, J. (1989). Psychophysiological assessment: conceptual, psychometric, and statistical issues. In Turpin, G. (ed.), Handbook of Clinical Psychophysiology (pp. 71–104). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Stern, R. M., Ray, W. J., & Quigley, K. S. (2001). Psychophysiological Recording, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Stiratelli, R., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1984). Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics, 40: 961–971.Google Scholar

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Cleaning up your act. In Tabachick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S., Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn. (pp. 93–152). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

Thede, L. (1996). Analog and Digital Filter Design Using C. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1998). Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30: 87–102.Google Scholar

van Boxtel, G. J. M., van den Boogaart, B., & Brunia, C. H. M. (1993). The contingent negative variation in a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 7: 11–23.Google Scholar

van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C. M. A., Kolle’e, L. A. A., Hopman, J. C. W., Stoelinga, G. B. A., & van Geijn, H. P. (1993). Heart rate variability. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118: 463–447.Google Scholar

Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1981). Graphical data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 32: 191–241.Google Scholar

Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1993). Graphical data analysis. In Keren, G. & Lewis, C. (eds.), A Handbook for Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences: Statistical Issues (pp. 391–457). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Ware, J. H. (1985). Linear models for the analysis of longitudinal studies. The American Statistician, 39: 95–101.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. B. & Bockenholt, U. (1989). Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 26: 208–221.Google Scholar

Weiss, S. (2014). The fault in our stats. Observer, 27: 29–30.Google Scholar

Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29: 350–362.Google Scholar

Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika, 38: 330–336.Google Scholar

White, T. L. & McBurney, D. H. (2013). Research Methods, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Wilder, J. (1958). Modern psychophysiology and the law of initial value. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 12: 199–221.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. S. (1967). Analysis of autonomic reaction patterns. Psychophysiology, 4: 125–142.Google Scholar

Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72: 2031–2046.Google Scholar

Xhyheri, B., Manfrini, O., Mazzolini, M., Pizzi, C., & Bugiardini, R. (2012). Heart rate variability today. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 55: 321–331.Google Scholar

Zahn, T. P. & Kreusi, M. J. P. (1993). Autonomic activity in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Psychophysiology, 30: 605–614.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H. S., Zuckerman, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Contemporary issues in the analysis of data. Psychological Sciences, 4: 49–53.Google Scholar

Algina, J. & Penfield, R. D. (2009). Classical test theory. In Millsap, R. E. & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology (pp. 93–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C., Grimnes, S., Ben-Shakhar, G., Roth, W. T., Dawson, M. E., & Filion, D. L. (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 49: 1017–1034.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of Generalizability Theory, rev. edn. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. L. (1995). The conventional wisdom about group mean scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32: 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. L. (ed.) (2006). Educational Measurement, 4th edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. L., Gao, X., & Colton, D. A. (1995). Generalizability analyses of work keys listening and writing tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55: 157–176.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. L. & Kane, M. T. (1977). An index of dependability for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14: 277–289.Google Scholar

Burgess, A. P. & Gruzelier, J. H. (1996). The reliability of event-related desynchronisation: a generalisability study analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23: 163–169.Google Scholar

Burt, K. B. & Obradović, J. (2013). The construct of psychophysiological reactivity: statistical and psychometric issues. Developmental Review, 33: 29–57.Google Scholar

Bush, N. R., Alkon, A., Obradović, J., Stamperdahl, J., & Boyce, W. T. (2011). Differentiating challenge reactivity from psychomotor activity in studies of children’s psychophysiology: considerations for theory and measurement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110: 62–79.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (1990a). Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. American Psychologist, 45: 16–28.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. & Tassinary, L. G. (eds.) (1990b). Principles of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105.Google Scholar

Campbell, N. R. (1957). Foundations of Science: The Philosophy of Theory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Cardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2009). Applying Generalizability Theory Using EduG. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cardinet, J., Tourneur, Y., & Allal, L. (1976). The symmetry of generalizability theory: application to educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13: 119–135.Google Scholar

Cardinet, J., Tourneur, Y., & Allal, L. (1981). Extension of generalizability theory and its application in educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18: 183–204.Google Scholar

Clayson, P. E. & Larson, M. J. (2013). Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 50: 1209–1219.Google Scholar

Coan, J. A., Allen, J. J. B., & McKnight, P. E. (2006). A capability model of individual differences in frontal EEG asymmetry. Biological Psychology, 72: 198–207.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cole, D. A., Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1981). Effects of mono- versus multiple-operationalization in construct validation efforts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49: 395–405.Google Scholar

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Independence, KY: Cengage.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 292–334.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability of Scores and Profiles. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52: 281–302.Google Scholar

de Ayala, R. J. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Di Nocera, F., Ferlazzo, F., & Borghi, V. (2001). G theory and the reliability of psychophysiological measures: a tutorial. Psychophysiology, 38: 796–806.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Fahrenberg, J., Foerster, F., Schneider, H. J., Müller, W., & Myrtek, M. (1986). Predictability of individual differences in activation processes in a field setting based on laboratory measures. Psychophysiology, 23: 323–333.Google Scholar

Feldt, L. S. & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In Lin, R. L. (ed.), Educational Measurement, 3rd edn. (pp. 105–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fiske, D. W. (1987). Construct invalidity comes from method effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47: 285–307.Google Scholar

Gao, X. & Harris, D. J. (2012). Generalizability theory. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. J. (eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, vol. 1: Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics (pp. 661–681). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Garćia-Vera, M. & Sanz, J. (1999). How many self-measured blood pressure readings are needed to estimate hypertensive patients’ “true” blood pressure? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22: 93–113.Google Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar

Guion, R. M. (1978). Scoring of content domain samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 449–506.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., & Grassia, J. (1986). Generalizing over conditions by combining the multitrait–multimethod matrix and the representative design of experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 100: 257–269.Google Scholar

Hecimovich, M. D., Peiffer, J. J., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of a post exercise exhaustion scale utilizing the Rasch measurement model. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 15: 569–579.Google Scholar

Hoyt, W. T. (2000). Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it? Psychological Methods, 5: 64–86.Google Scholar

Kamarck, T. W., Debski, T. T., & Manuck, S. B. (2000). Enhancing the laboratory-to-life generalizability of cardiovascular reactivity using multiple occasions of measurement. Psychophysiology, 37: 533–542.Google Scholar

Kane, M. T. & Brennan, R. L. (1977). The generalizability of class means. Review of Educational Research, 47: 267–292.Google Scholar

Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of Educational Measurements. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A. (1995). The multitrait–multimethod matrix: design, analysis, and conceptual issues. In Shrout, P. E. & Fiske, S. T. (eds.), Personality, Research, Methods, and Theory: A Festschrift Honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 111–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Llabre, M. M., Ironson, G. H., Spitzer, S. B., Gellman, M. D., Weidler, D. J. & Schneiderman, N. (1988). How many blood pressure measurements are enough? An application of generalizability theory to the study of blood pressure reliability. Psychophysiology, 25: 97–106.Google Scholar

Llabre, M. M., Spitzer, S. B., Saab, P. G, Ironson, G. H., & Schneiderman, N. (1991). The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology, 28: 701–711.Google Scholar

Marcoulides, G. A. (1994). Selecting weighting schemes in multivariate generalizability studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54: 3–7.Google Scholar

Marcoulides, G. A. & Goldstein, Z. (1990). The optimization of generalizability studies with resource constraints. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50: 761–768.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W. & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait–multimethod data. In Hoyle, R. H. (ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 117–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Maxwell, S. E. & Delaney, H. D. (2003). Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1981). Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 89: 575–588.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (ed.), Educational Measurement, 3rd edn. (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Myers, J. E., Well, A. D., & Lorch, R. F. Jr. (2010). Research Design and Statistical Analysis, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, A. (1984). Multivariate generalizability theory in educational measurement: an empirical study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8: 219–230.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W. (1982). The Psychology of Physical Symptoms. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Pickering, T. G., Harshfield, G. A., Kleinert, H. D., Blank, S., & Laragh, J. H. (1982). Blood pressure during normal daily activities, sleep, and exercise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 247: 992–996.Google Scholar

Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2010). Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sarter, M., Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience: toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. American Psychologist, 51: 13–21.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1: 199–223.Google Scholar

Schwerdtfeger, A. R., Schienle, A., Leutgeb, V., & Rathner, E. M. (2014). Does cardiac reactivity in the laboratory predict ambulatory heart rate? Baseline counts. Psychophysiology, 51: 565–572.Google Scholar

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Shavelson, R. J. & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability Theory: A Primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44: 922–932.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 5th edn. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Strube, M. J. (1989). Assessing subjects’ construal of the laboratory situation. In Schneiderman, N., Weiss, S. M., & Kaufman, P. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine (pp. 527–542). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. L., Brown, G. G., Thompson, W. K., Voyvodic, J., Greve, D. N., Turner, J. A., … & Potkin, S. G. (2013). An application of item response theory to fMRI data: prospects and pitfalls. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 212: 167–174.Google Scholar

Thurston, R. C., Hernandez, J., Del Rio, J. M., & De La Torre, F. (2010). Support vector machines to improve physiologic hot flash measures: applications to the ambulatory setting. Psychophysiology, 48: 1015–1021.Google Scholar

Torrents-Rodas, D., Fullana, M. A., Bonillo, A., Andion, O., Molinuevo, B., Caseras, X., & Torrubia, R. (2014). Testing the temporal stability of individual differences in the acquisition and generalization of fear. Psychophysiology, 51: 697–705.Google Scholar

Vanleeuwen, D. M. & Mandabach, K. H. (2002). A note on the reliability of ranked items. Sociological Methods & Research, 31: 87–105.Google Scholar

Webb, N. M. & Shavelson, R. J. (1981). Multivariate generalizability of general educational development ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18: 13–22.Google Scholar

Westen, D. & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 608–618.Google Scholar

Whitley, B. E. Jr. & Kite, M. E. (2012). Principles of Research in Behavioral Science, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, W. K., Edinger, J. D., Fins, A. I., & Sullivan, R. J. Jr. (1999). How many nights are enough? The short-term stability of sleep parameters in elderly insomniacs and normal sleepers. Psychophysiology, 36: 233–244.Google Scholar

Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In Marcoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (eds.), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques (pp. 7–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Youngstrom, E. A. & De Los Reyes, A. (2015). Commentary. Moving toward cost-effectiveness in using psychophysiological measures in clinical assessment: validity, decision making, and adding value. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44: 352–361.Google Scholar

Zillmann, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W., & Kidd, R. F. (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research, vol. 2 (pp. 335–368). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Barrett, G., Shibasaki, H., & Neshige, R. (1986). Cortical potentials preceding voluntary movement: evidence for three periods of preparation in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 63: 327–339.Google Scholar

Basar, E., Basar-Eroglu, C., Karakas, S., & Schurmann, M. (1999). Are cognitive processes manifested in event-related gamma, alpha, theta and delta oscillations in the EEG? Neuroscience Letters, 259: 165–168.Google Scholar

Ben-Shakhar, G. (1985). Standardization within individuals: a simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. Psychophysiology, 22: 292–299.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1991). Startle and emotion: lateral acoustic probes and the bilateral blink. Psychophysiology, 28: 285–295.Google Scholar

Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10: 186–198.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. & Dorfman, D. D. (1987). Waveform moment analysis in psychophysiological research. Psychological Bulletin, 102: 421–438.Google Scholar

Catani, M. & de Schotten, M. T. (2008). A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex, 44: 1105–1132.Google Scholar

Chauveau, N., Franceries, X., Doyon, B., Rigaud, B., Morucci, J. P., & Celsis, P. (2004). Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model. Human Brain Mapping, 21: 86–97.Google Scholar

Cherry, S. R. & Phelps, M. E. (1996). Imaging brain function with positron emission tomography. In Toga, A. W. & Mazziotta, J. C. (eds.), Brain Mapping: The Methods (pp. 191–222). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chiarelli, A. M., Maclin, E. L., Low, K. A., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2015). A comparison of procedures for coregistering scalp-recording locations to anatomical MRI images. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 20: 016009.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. S. (1996). Rapid MRI and functional applications. In Toga, A. W. & Mazziotta, J. C. (eds.), Brain Mapping: The Methods (pp. 223–258). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cook, E. W. & Miller, G. A. (1992). Digital filtering: background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. Psychophysiology, 29: 350–367.Google Scholar

De Martino, F., Valente, G., Staeren, N., Ashburner, J., Goebel, R., & Formisano, E. (2008). Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns. NeuroImage, 43: 44–58.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 5: 303–305.Google Scholar

Demiralp, T., Yordanova, J., Kolev, V., Ademoglu, A., Devrim, M., & Samr, V. J. (1999). Time-frequency analysis of single-sweep event-related potentials by means of fast wavelet transform. Brain and Language, 66: 129–145.Google Scholar

Donchin, E. (1969). Discriminant analysis in average evoked response studies: the study of single trial data. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 27: 311–314.Google Scholar

Donchin, E. & Heffley, E. (1978). Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: a tutorial review. In Otto, D. (ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Brain Potential Research (EPA-600/9-77-043) (pp. 555–572). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Donchin, E. & Herning, R. I. (1975). A simulation study of the efficacy of stepwise discriminant analysis in the detection and comparison of event related potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 38: 51–68.Google Scholar

Dorfman, D. D. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Waveform moment analysis: topographical analysis of nonrhythmic waveforms. In Tassinary, L. G. & Cacioppo, J. T. (eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology (pp. 661–707). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elui, R. (1969). Gaussian behavior of the EEG: changes during performance of mental tasks. Science, 164: 328–331.Google Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53: 133–140.Google Scholar

Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S. R., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (1993). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (pp. 1813–1817). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar

Evans, A. C., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Collins, L., Worsley, K., Dai, W., … & Bub, D. (1992). Anatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space. NeuroImage, 1: 43–53.Google Scholar

Fabiani, M., Gordon, B. A., Maclin, E. L., Pearson, M., Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., … & Gratton, G. (2014). Neurovascular coupling in normal aging: a combined optical, ERP and fMRI study. NeuroImage, 1: 592–607.Google Scholar

Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Corballis, P., Cheng, J., & Friedman, D. (1998). Bootstrap assessment of the reliability of maxima in surface maps of brain activity of individual subjects derived with electrophysiological and optical methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30: 78–86.Google Scholar

Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1987). Definition, identification, and reliability of measurement of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. In Ackles, P. K., Jennings, J. R., & Coles, M. G. (eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology, vol. 2 (pp. 1–78). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Farwell, L. A., Martinerie, J. M., Bashore, T. R., Rapp, P. E., & Goddard, P. H. (1993). Optimal digital filters for long-latency components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 30: 306–315.Google Scholar

Fischl, B. (2012). FreeSurfer. NeuroImage, 62: 774–781.Google Scholar

Fortgens, C. & de Bruin, M. P. (1983). Removal of eye movement and ECG artifacts from the non-cephalic reference EEG. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 56: 90–96.Google Scholar

Fox, P. T. & Raichle, M. E. (1984). Stimulus rate dependence of regional cerebral blood flow in human striate cortex, demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neurophysiology, 51: 1109–1120.Google Scholar

Friston, K. J. (1996). Statistical parametric mapping and other analyses of functional imaging data. In Toga, A. W. & Mazziotta, J. C. (eds.), Brain Mapping: The Methods (pp. 363–388). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connectivity, 1: 13–36.Google Scholar

Gordon, B. A., Tse, C.-H., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2014). Spread of activation and spread of inhibition: does age matter? Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6: 288.Google Scholar

Gratton, G. (1997). Attention and probability effects in the human occipital cortex: an optical imaging study. NeuroReport, 8: 1749–1753.Google Scholar

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 55: 468–484.Google Scholar

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1989a). A procedure for using multi-electrode information in the analysis of components of the event-related potential: vector filter. Psychophysiology, 26: 222–232.Google Scholar

Gratton, G., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1989b). Simulation studies of latency measures of components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 26: 233–248.Google Scholar

Gratton, C., Sreenivasan, K. K., Silver, M. A., & D’Esposito, M. (2013). Attention selectively modifies the representation of individual faces in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 33: 6979–6989.Google Scholar

Hackley, S. A. & Johnson, L. N. (1996). Distinct early and late subcomponents of the photic blink reflex: response characteristics in patients with retrogeniculate lesions. Psychophysiology, 33: 239–251.Google Scholar

Herrmann, C. S., Rach, S., Vosskuhl, J., & Strüber, D. (2014). Time-frequency analysis of event-related potentials: a brief tutorial. Brain Topography, 27: 438–450.Google Scholar

Himberg, J., Hyvarinen, A., & Esposito, F. (2004). Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. NeuroImage, 22: 1214–1222.Google Scholar

Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195: 215–243.Google Scholar

Huberty, C. J. & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105: 302–308.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R., Kamarck, T., Stewart, C., Eddy, M., & Johnson, P. (1992). Alternate cardiovascular baseline assessment techniques: vanilla or resting baseline. Psychophysiology, 29: 742–750.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R., van der Molen, M. W., Somsen, R. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (1991). Graphical and statistical techniques for cardiac cycle time (phase) dependent changes in interbeat interval. Psychophysiology, 28: 596–606.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. R. & Wood, C. C. (1976). Letter. The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology, 13: 277–278.Google Scholar

Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111: 1745–1758.Google Scholar

Karis, D., Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1984). “P300” and memory: individual differences in the von Restorff effect. Cognitive Psychology, 16: 177–216.Google Scholar

Karniski, W., Blair, R. C., & Snider, A. D. (1994). An exact statistical method for comparing topographic maps, with any number of subjects and electrodes. Brain Topography, 6: 203–210.Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. J. (1983). Analyzing Qualitative Data: Introductory Log-Linear Analysis for Behavioral Research. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Lacey, J. I., Kagan, J., Lacey, B. C., & Moss, H. A. (1963). The visceral level: situational determinants and behavioral correlates of autonomic response patterns. In Knapp, P. H. (ed.), Expression of the Emotions in Man (pp. 161–196). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Lachaux, J.-P., Lutz, A., Rudrauf, D., Cosmelli, D., Le Van Quyen, M., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signal: an introduction to wavelet coherence. Clinical Neurophysiology, 32: 157–174.Google Scholar

Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8: 194–208.Google Scholar

Lamothe, R. & Stroink, G. (1991). Orthogonal expansions: their applicability to signal extraction in electrophysiological mapping data. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 29: 522–528.Google Scholar

Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001). Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13: 534–546.Google Scholar

Maier, J., Dagnelie, G., Spekreijse, H., & van Dijk, B. W. (1987). Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Research, 27: 165–177.Google Scholar

Makeig, S., Jung, T. P., Bell, A. J., Ghahremani, D., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94: 10979–10984.Google Scholar

Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295: 690–694.Google Scholar

Mathewson, K., Beck, D., Ro, T., Maclin, E. L., Low, K. A., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2014). Dynamics of alpha control: fronto-parietal modulators of preparatory alpha oscillations revealed with combined EEG and event-related optical signals (EROS). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26: 2400–2415.Google Scholar

Mathewson, K., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Beck, D., & Ro, A. (2009). To see or not to see: pre-stimulus alpha phase predicts visual awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 29: 2725–2732.Google Scholar

Mattout, J., Phillip, C., Penny, W. D., Rugg, M. D., & Friston, K. J. (2006). MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework. NeuroImage, 30: 753–767.Google Scholar

McCallum, W. C. & Curry, S. H. (1984). A comparison of early event-related potentials in two target detection tasks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425: 242–249.Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 62: 203–208.Google Scholar

Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35: 99–115.Google Scholar

Möcks, J. (1986). The influence of latency jitter in principal component analysis of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 23: 480–484.Google Scholar

Möcks, J. (1988). Decomposing event-related potentials: a new topographic components model. Biological Psychology, 26: 199–215.Google Scholar

Möcks, J., Köhler, W., Gasser, T., & Pham, D. T. (1988). Novel approaches to the problem of latency jitter. Psychophysiology, 25: 217–226.Google Scholar

Möcks, J. & Verleger, R. (1985). Nuisance sources of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22: 674–688.Google Scholar

Monk, T. H. (1987). Parameters of the circadian temperature rhythm using sparse and irregular sampling. Psychophysiology, 24: 236–242.Google Scholar

Monk, T. H. & Fookson, J. E. (1986). Circadian temperature rhythm power spectra: is equal sampling necessary? Psychophysiology, 23: 472–479.Google Scholar

Nitsche, M. A. & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Physiology, 527: 633–639.Google Scholar

Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006). Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10: 424–430.Google Scholar

Parks, N. A., Maclin, E. L., Low, K. A., Beck, D. M., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2012). Examining cortical dynamics and connectivity with concurrent simultaneous single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and fast optical imaging. NeuroImage, 59: 2504–2510.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, A., Valls-Sole, J., Wassermann, E. M., & Hallett, M. (1994). Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain, 117: 847–858.Google Scholar

Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Esslen, M., Kochi, K., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): review, new comparisons, and new validation. Japanese Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 30: 81–94.Google Scholar

Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1994). Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18: 49–65.Google Scholar

Pereira, F., Mitchell, T., & Botvinick, M. (2009). Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial review. NeuroImage, 45: S199–S209.Google Scholar

Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M. H., & Echallier, J. F. (1987). Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 66: 75–81.Google Scholar

Pfurtscheller, G. & Neuper, C. (1992). Simultaneous EEG 10 Hz desynchronization and 40 Hz synchronization during finger movements. NeuroReport, 3: 1057–1060.Google Scholar

Power, J. D., Cohen, A. L., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Barnes, K. A., Church, J. A., … & Petersen, S. E. (2011). Functional organization of the human brain. Neuron, 72: 665–678.Google Scholar

Quigley, K. S. & Berntson, G. G. (1996). Autonomic interactions and chronotropic control of the heart: heart period versus heart rate. Psychophysiology, 33: 605–611.Google Scholar

Roach, B. J. & Mathalon, D. H. (2008). Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34: 907–926.Google Scholar

Ruchkin, D. S., Sutton, S., & Stega, M. (1980). Emitted P300 and slow wave event-related potentials in guessing and detection tasks. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 49: 1–14.Google Scholar

Rykhlevskaia, E., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2006). Lagged covariance structure models for studying functional connectivity in the brain. NeuroImage, 30: 1203–1218.Google Scholar

Rykhlevskaia, E., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). Combining structural and functional neuroimaging data for studying brain connectivity: a review. Psychophysiology, 45: 173–187.Google Scholar

Samar, V. J., Bopardikar, A., Rao, R., & Swartz, K. (1999). Wavelet analysis of neuroelectric waveforms: a conceptual tutorial. Brain and Language, 66: 7–60.Google Scholar

Scherg, M. & von Cramon, D. (1986). Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 65: 344–360.Google Scholar

Serences, J. T., Saproo, S., Scolari, M., Ho, T., & Muftuler, T., (2009). Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions. NeuroImage, 44: 223–231.Google Scholar

Siegel, M., Engel, A. K., & Donner, T. H. (2011). Cortical network dynamics of perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5: 00021.Google Scholar

Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: an example from children’s addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116: 250–264.Google Scholar

Skrandies, W. & Lehmann, D. (1982). Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 54: 662–667.Google Scholar

Smulders, F. T., Kenemans, J. L., & Kok, A. (1996). Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. Psychophysiology, 33: 194–205.Google Scholar

Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1997). Temporal-spatial analysis of the late positive components of the ERP. Psychophysiology, 34: S6.Google Scholar

Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1999). Componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36: 409–414.Google Scholar

Squires, K. C. & Donchin, E. (1976). Beyond averaging: the use of discriminant functions to recognize event related potentials elicited by single auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 41: 449–459.Google Scholar

Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 38: 387–401.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, R., Nunez, P. L., Tucker, D. M., Silberstein, R. B., & Cadusch, P. J. (1996). Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline laplacians to estimate cortical potentials. Brain Topography, 8: 355–366.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, H., Furst, G., & Meyer, B.-U. (1989). Craniocerebral topography within the international 10–20 system. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 72: 499–506.Google Scholar

Stemmler, G. (1987). Standardization within subjects: a critique of Ben-Shakhar’s conclusions. Psychophysiology, 24: 243–246.Google Scholar

Stiber, B. Z. & Sato, S. (1997). Visualization of EEG using time-frequency distributions. Methods of Information in Medicine, 36: 298–301.Google Scholar

Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-Planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar

Tallon-Buadry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1996). Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. Journal of Neuroscience, 16: 4240–4249.Google Scholar

Tomoda, H., Celesia, G. G., & Toleikis, S. C. (1991). Effect of spatial frequency on simultaneous recorded steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 80: 81–88.Google Scholar

Van Essen, D. C., Drury, H. A., Joshi, S., & Miller, M. I. (1998). Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95: 788–795.Google Scholar

Vasey, M. W. & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24: 479–486.Google Scholar

Wainer, H. (1991) Adjusting for differential base rates: Lord’s Paradox again. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 147–151.Google Scholar

Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: an electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203: 380–384.Google Scholar

Wang, J. Z., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1992). Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39: 665–675.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. & Bockenholt, U. (1989). Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 26: 208–221.Google Scholar