Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:26:18.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease

from Section 3 - Antenatal Care: Fetal Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

By
Victoria Jowett  and
Julene S. Carvalho
Edited by
Philip J. Steer  and
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Philip J. Steer
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Affiliation:
Royal Brompton Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Heart Disease and Pregnancy , pp. 84 - 95
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hoffman, JI, et al. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow up. Am J Cardiol, 1978. 42(4):641–7.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol, 1995. 16(4):155–65.Google Scholar
Carvalho, JS, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): Sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 41(3):348–59.Google Scholar
Khairy, P, et al. Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010. 56(14):1149–57.Google Scholar
Allan, LD, et al. Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Heart, 1998. 79(4):371–3.Google Scholar
Bonnet, D, et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation, 1999. 99(7):916–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, O, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity. Heart, 2002. 87(1):67–9.Google Scholar
Tworetzky, W, et al. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation, 2001. 103(9):1269–73.Google Scholar
Kumar, RK, et al. Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally. Am J Cardiol, 1999. 83(12):1649–53.Google Scholar
Mahle, WT, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics, 2001. 107(6):1277–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahado-Singh, RO, et al. Elevated first-trimester nuchal translucency increases the risk of congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 192(5):1357–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bull, C. Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. British Paediatric Cardiac Association. Lancet, 1999. 354(9186):1242–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, KJ, et al. Noninherited risk factors and congenital cardiovascular defects: Current knowledge: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation, 2007. 115(23):2995–3014.Google Scholar
Friedman, DM, et al. Utility of cardiac monitoring in fetuses at risk for congenital heart block: The PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) prospective study. Circulation, 2008. 117(4):485–93.Google Scholar
Cuneo, BF, et al. Spontaneous rupture of atrioventricular valve tensor apparatus as late manifestation of anti-Ro/SSA antibody-mediated cardiac disease. Am J Cardiol, 2011. 107(5):761–6.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, E, et al. The importance of the level of maternal anti-Ro/SSA antibodies as a prognostic marker of the development of cardiac neonatal lupus erythematosus a prospective study of 186 antibody-exposed fetuses and infants. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010. 55(24):2778–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, JI. Congenital heart disease: Incidence and inheritance. Pediatr Clin North Am, 1990. 37(1):25–43.Google Scholar
Blue, GM, et al. Congenital heart disease: Current knowledge about causes and inheritance. Med J Aust, 2012. 197(3):155–9.Google Scholar
Gill, HK, et al. Patterns of recurrence of congenital heart disease: An analysis of 6,640 consecutive pregnancies evaluated by detailed fetal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003. 42(5):923–9.Google Scholar
Rowland, TW, et al. Congenital heart disease in infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr, 1973. 83(5):815–20.Google Scholar
Wren, C, et al. Cardiovascular malformations in infants of diabetic mothers. Heart, 2003. 89(10):1217–20.Google Scholar
Lenke, RR, et al. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia. An international survey of the outcome of untreated and treated pregnancies. N Engl J Med, 1980. 303(21):1202–8.Google Scholar
Prick, BW, et al. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia in pregnancy: Pregnancy complications and neonatal sequelae in untreated and treated pregnancies. Am J Clin Nutr, 2012. 95(2):374–82.Google Scholar
Ionescu-Ittu, R, et al. Prevalence of severe congenital heart disease after folic acid fortification of grain products: Time trend analysis in Quebec, Canada. BMJ, 2009. 338:b1673.Google Scholar
Bailey, LB, et al. Folic acid supplementation and the occurrence of congenital heart defects, orofacial clefts, multiple births, and miscarriage. Am J Clin Nutr, 2005. 81(5):1213S-1217S.Google Scholar
Hyett, J, et al. Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10–14 weeks of gestation: Population based cohort study. BMJ, 1999. 318(7176):81–5.Google Scholar
Carvalho, JS, The fetal heart or the lymphatic system or …? The quest for the etiology of increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 25(3):215–20.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, et al. Increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11–14 weeks. Prenat Diagn, 2002. 22(4):308–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copel, JA, et al. Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: Associations and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1986. 154(5):1121–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, RD, et al. Cardiovascular abnormalities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics, 1976. 57(1):92–7.Google Scholar
Song, MS, et al. Extracardiac lesions and chromosomal abnormalities associated with major fetal heart defects: Comparison of intrauterine, postnatal and postmortem diagnoses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 33(5):552–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferencz, C, et al. Congenital cardiovascular malformations associated with chromosome abnormalities: An epidemiologic study. J Pediatr, 1989. 114(1):79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornberger, LK, et al. Left heart obstructive lesions and left ventricular growth in the midtrimester fetus. A longitudinal study. Circulation, 1995. 92(6):1531–8.Google Scholar
Hornberger, LK, et al. In utero pulmonary artery and aortic growth and potential for progression of pulmonary outflow tract obstruction in tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995. 25(3):739–45.Google Scholar
Fishman, NH, et al. Models of congenital heart disease in fetal lambs. Circulation, 1978. 58(2):354–64.Google Scholar
Cohn, HE, et al. Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia and acidemia in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1974. 120(6):817–24.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, GL. Patterns of prenatal growth among infants with cardiovascular malformations: Possible fetal hemodynamic effects. Am J Epidemiol, 1996. 143(5):505–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahle, WT, et al. An MRI study of neurological injury before and after congenital heart surgery. Circulation, 2002. 106(12 Suppl 1):I109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, RE, et al. Outcome after preterm delivery of infants antenatally diagnosed with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr, 2006. 148(2):213–6.Google Scholar
Costello, JM, et al. Birth before 39 weeks’ gestation is associated with worse outcomes in neonates with heart disease. Pediatrics, 2010. 126(2):277–84.Google Scholar
Morris, SA, et al. Prenatal diagnosis, birth location, surgical center, and neonatal mortality in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation, 2014. 129(3):285–92.Google Scholar
Jowett, VC, et al. Foetal congenital heart disease: Obstetric management and time to first cardiac intervention in babies delivered at a tertiary centre. Cardiol Young, 2014. 24(3):494–502.Google Scholar
Friedman, DM, et al. Prospective evaluation of fetuses with autoimmune-associated congenital heart block followed in the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Study. Am J Cardiol, 2009. 103(8):1102–6.Google Scholar
Reynolds, RM. Glucocorticoid excess and the developmental origins of disease: Two decades of testing the hypothesis–2012 Curt Richter Award Winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2013. 38(1):1–11.Google Scholar
Freud, LR, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty for evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Postnatal outcomes of the first 100 patients. Circulation, 2014. 130(8):638–45.Google Scholar
Carvalho, JS, et al. First-trimester transabdominal fetal echocardiography. Lancet, 1998. 351(9108):1023–7.Google Scholar
Pike, JI, et al. Early fetal echocardiography: Congenital heart disease detection and diagnostic accuracy in the hands of an experienced fetal cardiology program. Prenat Diagn, 2014. 34(8):790–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliescu, D, et al. Improved detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using an extended examination protocol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 42(3):300–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, ME, et al. Functional assessment of the fetal heart: A review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 39(2):131–44.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×