Bartsch, Cornelia, ‘Fanny Hensels einziges Streichquartett – ein Problemfall? Fanny Hensels Streichquartett zwischen Zuweisungen und Aneignung’, in von Braunmühl, Claudia (ed.), Etablierte Wissenschaft und feministische Theorie im Dialog (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2003), pp. 135–58.Google Scholar

Bartsch, Cornelia, Fanny Hensel, geb. Mendelssohn: Musik als Korrespondenz (Kassel: Furore, 2007).Google Scholar

Borchard, Beatrix and Schwarz-Danuser, Monika (eds.), Fanny Hensel geb. Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Komponieren zwischen Geselligskeitsideal und romantischer Musikästhetik (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1999).Google Scholar

Cadenbach, Rainer, ‘“Die weichliche Schreibart”, “Beethovens letzte Jahre” und “ein gewisses Lebensprinzip”: Perspektiven auf Fanny Hensels spätes Streichquartett (1834)’, in Borchard, Beatrix and Schwarz-Danuser, Monika (eds.), Fanny Hensel geb. Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Komponieren zwischen Geselligskeitsideal und romantischer Musikästhetik (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1999), pp. 141–64.Google Scholar

Cai, Camilla, ‘Fanny Hensel’s “Songs for Pianoforte” of 1836–37: Stylistic Interaction with Felix Mendelssohn’, Journal of Musical Research, 14 (1994), 66–73.Google Scholar

Head, Matthew, ‘Genre, Romanticism and Female Authorship: Fanny Hensel’s “Scottish” Sonata in G Minor (1843)’, Nineteenth-Century Music Review, 4/2 (2007), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig-Unruh, Renate, ‘Zur Entstehung von Fanny Hensels Streichquartett in Es-Dur (1829/34)’, in Borchard, Beatrix and Schwarz-Danuser, Monika (eds.), Fanny Hensel geb. Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Komponieren zwischen Geselligskeitsideal und romantischer Musikästhetik (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1999), pp. 121–40.Google Scholar

Helmig, Martina (ed.), Fanny Hensel, geb. Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Das Werk (Munich: edition text+kritik, 1997).Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Tagebücher, ed. Klein, Hans-Günter and Elvers, Rudolf (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 2002).Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, The Letters of Fanny Hensel to Felix Mendelssohn, Collected, Edited and Translated with Introductory Essays and Notes, ed. and trans. Citron, Marcia (Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon, 1987).Google Scholar

Hensel, Sebastian, Die Familie Mendelssohn 1729–1847: Nach Briefen und Tagebüchern, 3 vols. (Berlin: B. Behr, 1879), English translation as The Mendelssohn Family (1729–1847): From Letters and Journals, trans. Carl Klingemann [d.J.], 2 vols. (London: Sampson Low, 1882).Google Scholar

Huber, Annegret, ‘Das Konzept der Montage als analytische Kategorie: Fanny Hensels Metaphernspiel um “Jugend/Altersschwäsche” in neuem Licht’, in Digitale Festschrift für Beatrix Borchard zum 65. Geburtstag, 2016. https://mugi.hfmt-hamburg.de/BeatrixBorchard/index.html%3Fp=59.html. Last accessed 9 May 2021.Google Scholar

Huber, Annegret, ‘Zerschlagen, zerfließen oder erzeugen? Fanny Hensel und Felix Mendelssohn im Streit um musikalische Formkonzepte nach “Beethovens letzter Zeit”’, in Brand, Betina and Helmig, Martina (eds.), Maßstab Beethoven? Komponistinnen im Schatten des Geniekults (Munich: edition text+kritik, 2001), pp. 120–44.Google Scholar

Kimber, Marian Wilson, ‘Fanny Hensel’s Seasons of Life: Poetic Epigrams, Vignettes, and Meaning in Das Jahr’, Journal of Musicological Research, 27 (2008), 359–95.Google Scholar

Kimber, Marian Wilson, ‘From the Concert Hall to the Salon: Piano Music of Clara Wieck Schumann and Fanny Mendelssohn Hensel’, in Todd, R. Larry (ed.), Nineteenth-Century Piano Music, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2003), pp. 316–55.Google Scholar

Kimber, Marian Wilson, ‘The “Suppression” of Fanny Mendelssohn: Rethinking Feminist Biography’, 19th-Century Music, 26/2 (2002), 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mace [Christian], Angela R., ‘Fanny Hensel, Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy, and the Formation of the Mendelssohnian Style’, PhD diss., Duke University, 2013.Google Scholar

Mace Christian, Angela, ‘Sibling Love and the Daemonic: Contradictions in the Relationship between Felix and Fanny Mendelssohn’, in Taylor, Benedict (ed.), Rethinking Mendelssohn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 140–57.Google Scholar

Nubbemeyer, Annette, ‘Die Klaviersonaten Fanny Hensels: Analytische Betrachtungen’, in Borchard, Beatrix and Schwarz-Danuser, Monika (eds.), Fanny Hensel geb. Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Komponieren zwischen Geselligskeitsideal und romantischer Musikästhetik (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1999), pp. 90–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, Tyler, ‘“You Too May Change”: Tonal Pairing of the Tonic and Subdominant in Two Songs by Fanny Hensel’, in Rodgers, Stephen (ed.), The Songs of Fanny Hensel (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021), pp. 113–28.Google Scholar

Reich, Nancy B., ‘The Power of Class: Fanny Hensel’, in Todd, R. Larry (ed.), Mendelssohn and His World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), pp. 86–99.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Christopher A., Motives for Allusion: Context and Content in Nineteenth-Century Music (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Rodgers, Stephen, ‘Fanny Hensel’s Schematic Fantasies: or, The Art of Beginning’, in Parsons, Laurel and Brenda, Ravenscroft (eds.), Analytical Essays on Music by Women Composers (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 151–74.Google Scholar

Rodgers, Stephen, ‘Fanny Hensel’s Sechs Lieder, Op. 9: A Brother’s Elegy’, in Taylor, Benedict (ed.), Rethinking Mendelssohn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 454–73.Google Scholar

Rodgers, Stephen (ed.), The Songs of Fanny Hensel (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, Stephen and Osborne, Tyler, ‘Prolongational Closure in the Lieder of Fanny Hensel’, Music Theory Online, 26/3 (2020), https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.20.26.3/mto.20.26.3.rodgersosborne.html.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Thomas Christian, Die ästhetischen Grundlagen der Instrumentalmusik Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdys (Stuttgart and Weimar: M & P, 1996).Google Scholar

Steinberg, Michael P. (ed.), ‘Culture, Gender, and Music: A Forum on the Mendelssohn Family’, Musical Quarterly, 77 (1993), 648–748.Google Scholar

Sumner Lott, Marie, The Social Worlds of Nineteenth-Century Chamber Music (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Taylor, Benedict, Mendelssohn, Time and Memory: The Romantic Conception of Cyclic Form (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tillard, Françoise, Fanny Mendelssohn, trans. Camille Naish (Portland, OR: Amadeus Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Todd, R. Larry, Fanny Hensel: The Other Mendelssohn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Todd, R. Larry, ‘On Stylistic Affinities in the Works of Fanny Hensel and Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy’, in Cooper, John Michael and Prandi, Julie D. (eds.), The Mendelssohns: Their Music in History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 245–61.Google Scholar

Wollenberg, Susan (ed.), ‘“Fanny Hensel (née Mendelssohn Bartholdy) and Her Circle”: Proceedings of the Bicentenary Conference, Oxford, July 2005’, Nineteenth-Century Music Review, 4/2 (2007), 3–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Autograph score of String Quartet in E flat (1834), Staatsbibliothek Berlin, MA Ms 43.Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Autograph score of unfinished Piano Sonata in E flat (1829), Staatsbibliothek Berlin, DB-SB, MA Depos. Lohs 4, 73–6.Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Streichquartett Es-dur (Kammermusik-Bibliothek 2255), ed. Marx, Günter (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1988).Google Scholar

Hensel-Mendelssohn, Fanny, Streichquartett Es-Dur (fue 121), ed. Eggebrecht-Kupsa, Renate (Kassel: Furore, 1989, 2nd rev. ed. 1997).Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Autograph score of String Quartet in E flat (1834), Staatsbibliothek Berlin, MA Ms 43.Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Autograph score of unfinished Piano Sonata in E flat (1829), Staatsbibliothek Berlin, DB-SB, MA Depos. Lohs 4, 73–6.Google Scholar

Hensel, Fanny, Streichquartett Es-dur (Kammermusik-Bibliothek 2255), ed. Marx, Günter (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1988).Google Scholar

Hensel-Mendelssohn, Fanny, Streichquartett Es-Dur (fue 121), ed. Eggebrecht-Kupsa, Renate (Kassel: Furore, 1989, 2nd rev. ed. 1997).Google Scholar