Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:03:04.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Collective Hegemony after Decolonization

Persistence despite Delegitimation

from Part I - The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2023

By
Thomas Müller
Edited by
Klaus Schlichte  and
Stephan Stetter
Klaus Schlichte
Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Stephan Stetter
Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the effects of decolonization on the collective hegemony of the great powers in international society. The chapter contributes to research on the interplay of hierarchies by analysing the two modes of historicity that shaped this interplay: complex temporalities and the structuring effects of history. The first form of collective hegemony, the Concert of Europe, was established when parts of the world were already colonized, others in the process of decolonization and still others yet to be colonized. As the decolonized states were the chief opponents of collective hegemony, the successive decolonization of international society led to an increasing level of contestation. Collective hegemony, though, has persisted. The powerful states were able to perpetuate this practice both by benefiting from path-dependencies in formal governance institutions (UN Security Council) and by side-stepping the consent of smaller states through informal forms of collective hegemony (G7 and G20).

Keywords

collective hegemonygreat powersdecolonizationhierarchieslegitimacy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Historicity of International Politics
Imperialism and the Presence of the Past
 , pp. 66 - 83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, A. (2014). Who Are the Norm Makers? The Asian-African Conference in Bandung and the Evolution of Norms, Global Governance, 20(3), 405–17.Google Scholar
Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badie, B. (2013). La diplomatie de connivence: Les dérives oligarchiques du système international, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, T. & Burton, A. (2012). Imperien und Globalität, in Rosenberg, E. S. (ed.). Weltmärkte und Weltkriege, 287–432, München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, A. (2014). Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bosco, D. L. (2009). Five to Rule Them All: The Security Council and the Making of the Modern World, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, B. (2009). The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Idea, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovansky, M., Clark, I., Eckersley, R., Price, R. M., Reus-Smit, C. & Wheeler, N. (2012). Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (1980). The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World Order, International Journal, 35(3), 437–47.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (2002). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A. (eds.). (1984). The Expansion of International Society, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, I. (2011). Hegemony in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. F. & Pouliot, V. (2015). How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice, Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. D. (1975). The United States and the Second Hague Peace Conference: American Diplomacy and International Organization 1899–1914, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, T. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.). (2017). The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, P. I. (2007). The G8 System and the G20: Evolution, Role and Documentation, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics, International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, E. (2014). The Standard of ‘Civilization’, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-century International Social Space, Millennium, 42(3), 651–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. (2006). The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mazower, M. (2009). No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, T. (2017). Governance by the Few in International Society: A History of the Institution of Great Powers (PhD Dissertation), Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1961). Belgrade Declaration of Non-Aligned Countries. Retrieved from http://cns.miis.edu/nam/documents/Official_Document/1st_Summit_FD_Belgrade_Declaration_1961.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1970). Lusaka Declaration on Peace, Independence, Development, Co-operation and Democratisation of International Relations, Lusaka. Retrieved from http://cns.miis.edu/nam/documents/Official_Document/3rd_Summit_FD_Lusaka_Declaration_1970.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1983). Final Document of the Seventh Conference of Head of State or Government of Non-Aligned Countries, held at New Delhi from 7 to 12 March 1983: A/38/132, S/15675. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N83/085/56/pdf/N8308556.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Nullmeier, F., Geis, A. & Daase, C. (2012). Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, in Geis, A., Nullmeier, F. & Daase, C. (eds.). Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, 11–38, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2009a). Kolonialismus. Geschichte, Formen, Folgen, München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2009b). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, München: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, J. L. (2017). Defending Empire at the United Nations: The Politics of International Colonial Oversight in the Era of Decolonisation, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 45(3), 525–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, S. (2015). The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plesch, D. (2016). The South and Disarmament at the UN, Third World Quarterly, 37(7), 1203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, V. (2016). International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, V. & Thérien, J.-P. (2015). The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security, Review of International Studies, 41(2), 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, S. C. (2004). Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations, Cambridge: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, M. (2012). ‘Defenders of the Right?’ Diplomatic Practice and International Law in the 19th Century, in Nuzzo, L. & Vec, M. (eds.). Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, 251–75, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. (ed.). (1920). The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Official Texts, The Conference of 1907, Vol. I: Plenary Meetings of the Conference, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. (ed.). (1921). The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Official Texts, The Conference of 1907, Vol. II: Meetings of the First Commission, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sédouy, J.-A. (2009). Le concert européen: aux origines de l’Europe, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
SFB 700. (2009). Grundbegriffe der Governanceforschung: Ein Beitrag aus dem Teilprojekt A1, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series. Berlin.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strydom, H. (2007). The Non-Aligned Movement and the Reform of International Relations, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 11, 1–46.Google Scholar
UN. (2004). A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (1971). Letter Dated 24 November 1971 from the Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General (A/8536 and S/10397), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005a). Reform of the Security Council: Draft Resolution (A/59/L.67), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005b). Official Records: Fifty-Ninth Session, 112nd Plenary Meeting (A/59/PV.112), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005c). Official Records: Fifty-Ninth Session, 111st Plenary Meeting (A/59/PV.111), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005d). Security Council Reform (A/59/L.64), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Information Organization. (ed.). (1945). Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, San Francisco, 1945, Vol. XI: Commission III Security Council, London and New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Walters, F. P. (1969). A History of the League of Nations, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Zarakol, A. (ed.). (2017). Hierarchies in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×