Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T06:46:48.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Human dignity in Israeli constitutional law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Aharon Barak
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya
Get access

Summary

Articles 2 and 4 of the Basic Law

Articles 2 and 4 of Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty recognize human dignity as a constitutional right. Section 2 of the Basic Law states:

The life, body, or dignity of a person, as a human being, is not to be limited.

Article 4 of the Basic Law adds:

Every person is entitled to protection of his life, his body and his dignity.

These articles have undergone comprehensive judicial interpretation. They have been employed by scores of judgments in various areas of law. These judgments share the approach that human dignity is not solely a constitutional value. It is also a constitutional right. The Israeli Supreme Court discussed this in one case:

[T]he Basic Law does not merely declare “policy” or “ideals” (cf. art. 20(1) of the Basic Law of Germany). The Basic Law does not merely delineate a “plan of operation” or a “purpose” for the organs of government (cf. art. 27(2) of the constitution of South Africa; art. 39 of the constitution of India). It does not merely provide an “umbrella concept” with interpretive application … Sections 2 and 4 of the Basic Law provide a right – a right that guarantees human dignity. This right corresponds with the duty of the organs of government to respect it (s. 11).

Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty recognizes a number of independent freestanding constitutional rights. In addition to these is the constitutional right to engage in any occupation, profession or trade (freedom of occupation), which is enshrined in Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation. The rights determined in these two Basic Laws do not comprise the comprehensive list of the constitutional rights in Israel. The other Basic Laws also contain constitutional rights. Thus, for example, Basic Law: The Knesset contains provisions regarding the right to vote and run for office. The provisions on this matter are not considered merely “institutional,” but rather grant election rights pursuant to the conditions set out in the provisions, such as equality. Another example is the provision in Basic Law: The Judiciary, according to which “[a] court shall sit in public.” This is not only an institutional provision, but also an individual right for which there is a corresponding state duty. All these constitutional rights are at an equal constitutional level.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Dignity
The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right
, pp. 280 - 307
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations, Doron Kalir trans. (Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Less Drastic Means and the First Amendment’ (1969) 78 Yale Law Journal464
The First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine’ (1970) 83 Harvard Law Review844
Shaman, Jeffrey M., ‘Cracks in the Structure: The Coming Breakdown of the Levels of Scrutiny’ (1984) 45 Ohio State Law Journal161Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., American Constitutional Law, 2nd edition (New York: Foundation Press, 1988) 832Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene, ‘Freedom of Speech, Permissible Tailoring and Transcending Strict Scrutiny’ (1996) 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review2417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian, ‘Narrow Tailoring’ (1996) 43 UCLA Law Review1781Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, ‘Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts’ (2006) 59 Vanderbilt Law Review793Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H., ‘Strict Judicial Scrutiny’ (2007) 54 UCLA Law Review1267Google Scholar
White, Robin C. A. and Ovey, Clare, Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, 5th edition (Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eissen, Marc-Andre, ‘The Principle of Proportionality in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, in Macdonald, Ronald, Metscher, Franz and Petzold, Herbert (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993)Google Scholar
Sachs, Michael, GG Verfassungsrecht II. Grundrechte (Berlin: Springer, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Julian Rivers trans. (Oxford University Press, 2002) 188Google Scholar
Rautenbach, I. M., General Provisions of the South African Bill of Rights (Durban: Butterworths, 1995) 83Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review in Germany’, in Beatty, David M. (ed.), Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 267Google Scholar
Van der Schyff, Gerhard, Limitation of Rights: A Study of the European Convention and the South African Bill of Rights (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005) 127Google Scholar
Rautenbach, I. M. and Malherbe, E. F. J., Constitutional Law, 4th edn (Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004) 315Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Implications in Language, Law and the Constitution’, in Lindell, Geoffrey (ed.), Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law (Sydney: Federation Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Kirk, Jeremy, ‘Constitutional Interpretation and a Theory of Evolutionary Originalism’ (1999) 27 Federal Law Review323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Matthew, ‘Using Constitutional Realism to Identify the Complete Constitution: Lessons from an Unwritten Constitution’ (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Clarifying, Creating, and Changing Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal1279Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon, Interpretation in Law, Vol. 2: Statutory Interpretation (Jerusalem: Nevo, 1993) 457Google Scholar
Gavizon, Ruth, ‘On the Relationship Between Civic-Political Rights and Socio-Economic Rights’, in Rabin, Yotam and Shany, Yuval (eds.,), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Israel (Tel Aviv: Ramot, 2004) 25Google Scholar
Shalev, Carmel, Health and Human Rights in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv: Ramot, 2003)Google Scholar
Seidman, Guy I. and Shaham, Erez, ‘Symposium: Law and Medicine’ (2007) 6 Law and Business9Google Scholar
Koch, Ida, Human Rights as Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009) 59Google Scholar
Tobin, John, The Right to Health in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Karp, Judith, ‘Matching Human Dignity with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child’, in Ronen, Ya’ir and Greenbaum, Charles W. (eds.), The Case of the Child: Towards a New Agenda (Intersentia, 2008)Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Amnon and Medina, Barak, The Constitutional Law in the State of Israel, 6th edn (Jerusalem: Shocken, 2005)Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation, 2nd edn (New York: Harper Collins, 1990)Google Scholar
Bilchitz, David, ‘Moving Beyond Arbitrariness: The Legal Personhood and Dignity of Non-human Animals’ (2009) 25 South African Journal on Human Rights38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Feyter, Koen and Pavlakos, George (eds.), The Tension Between Group Rights and Human Rights: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Dignity of Groups’ (2008) Acta Juridica66Google Scholar
Newman, Dwight, Community and Collective Rights: A Theoretical Framework for Rights Held by Groups (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001) 166Google Scholar
Scolnicov, Anat, The Right to Religious Freedom in International Law: Between Group Rights and Individual Rights (London: Routledge, 2011) 24Google Scholar
Lerner, Natan, Group Rights and Discrimination in International Law, 2nd edn (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003)Google Scholar
Wheatley, Steven, Democracy, Minorities and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabello, Alfredo Mordechai and Sercevic, Petar (eds.), Freedom of Contracts and Constitutional Law (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1998)
English, Rosalind and Havers, Philip (eds.), An Introduction to Human Rights and the Common Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)
Friedmann, Daniel and Barak-Erez, Daphne (eds.), Human Rights in Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Sajo, Andras and Uitz, Renata (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2005)
Barkhuysen, Tom and Lindenbergh, Siewert D. (eds.), Constitutionalisation of Private Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006)CrossRef
Ziegler, Katja (ed.), Human Rights and Private Law: Privacy as Autonomy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
Oliver, Dawn and Fedtke, Jörg (eds.), Human Rights and The Private Sphere: A Comparative Study (New York: Routledge, 2007)
Mak, Chantal, Fundamental Rights in European Contract Law: A Comparison of the Impact of Fundamental Rights on Contractual Relationships in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and England (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008)Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias and Comella, Victor Ferreres, ‘What Is So Special About Constitutional Rights in Private Litigation? A Comparative Analysis of the Function of State Action Requirement and Indirect Horizontal Effect’, in Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2005) 241Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine, ‘Dignity, Democracy, Civilisation’ (2012) 33 Liverpool Law Review263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×