Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T11:23:21.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Simulated turn-taking and development of styles of motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

By
Takashi Ikegami  and
Hiroyuki Iizuka
Edited by
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv  and
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Takashi Ikegami
Affiliation:
Department of General Systems Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan
Hiroyuki Iizuka
Affiliation:
Department of General Systems Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Get access

Summary

Intersubjectivity and turn-taking

We introduce a simulation study designed to develop a “synthetic psychology” (Braitenberg, 1984). Instead of studying real human/animal behavior, we study autonomous behavior of mobile agents that have virtual sensors to “see” the world and move around with virtual “wheels.” The autonomous behavior is synthesized by the agent's internal dynamics, which evolve using a genetic algorithm. A purpose of synthetic psychology is to create a new concept in order to understand an essential psychological phenomenon. Therefore, the simulation framework has to use models sufficiently simple to analyze the behavior, but sufficiently complex to provide a theory to understand the psychological experiments.

As an example of synthetic psychology, we describe a simulation study of turn-taking using coupled dynamical recognizers. Studying turn-taking phenomena in robot experiments (e.g. Brooks et al., 1999; Dautenhahn, 1999; Steels and Kaplan, 2001; Miyake et al., in press) stresses the importance of embodiment and situatedness. In particular, MIT AI Lab's well-designed face robot, Kismet (Kismet project, 2000), can make use of human social protocols to stimulate natural emotions and social responses in humans. Even conversational turn-taking is established with a human subject. To do this, Kismet relies on subtle cues of human expression and interaction dynamics. Dautenhahn et al. used a mobile robot and a small humanoid robot to investigate the use of robotic toys in therapy and education of children with autism (Dautenhahn et al., 2002; AuRoRA project, 2005). These robots engage in playing a game with autistic children to elicit turn-taking and imitation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions
 , pp. 301 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AuRoRA project (2005). See http://www.aurora-project.com/.
Blair, A. D. and Pollack, J. B. (1997). Analysis of dynamical recognizers. Neural Computation, 9(5), 1127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. A., Breazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B. and Williamson, M. M. (1999). The Cog Project: building a humanoid robot. In Nehaniv, C. L. (ed.), Computation for Metaphor, Analogies and Agents, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1562, 52–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (1999). Embodiment and interaction in socially intelligent life-like agents. In Nehaniv, C. L. (ed.), Computation for Metaphor, Analogies and Agents, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1562,102–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In Port, R. and Gelder, T. (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 195–223.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. (2002). The Cradle of Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Igari, I. (2000). Coevolution of Mind and Language. PhD thesis, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Iizuka, H. and Ikegami, T. (2003). Adaptive coupling and intersubjectivity in simulated turn-taking behaviour. In Banzhaf, W., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J. T. and Ziegler, J. (eds.), ECAL, vol. 2801 of Lecture Note in Computer Science. London, UK: Springer, 336–45.Google Scholar
Iizuka, H. and Ikegami, T. (2004). Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behavior. Artificial Life, 10(4), 361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikegami, T. and Morimoto, G. (2003). Chaotic itinerancy in coupled dynamical recognizers. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 13(3), 1133–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikegami, T. and Taiji, M. (1999). Imitation and cooperation in coupled dynamical recognizers. In ECAL '99: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Advances in Artificial Life. London, UK: Springer Verlag, 545–54.Google Scholar
Ikegami, T. (1998). Structures of possible worlds in a game of players with internal models. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 91, 83–92.Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., Werry, I., Rae, J., Dickerson, P., Stribling, P. and Ogden, B. (2002). Robotic playmates: analysing interactive competencies of children with autism playing with a mobile robot. In Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A., Cañamero, L. and Edmonds, B. (eds.), Socially Intelligent Agents – Creating Relationships with Computers and Robotics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kismet project (2000). See e.g. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/kismet/kismet.html.
Miyake, Y., Miyagawa, T. and Tamura, Y. (in press). Man–machine interaction as co-creation process. Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers.Google Scholar
Murray, L. and Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interaction between two-month-olds and their mothers. In Field, T. and Fox, N. (eds.), Social Perception in Infants. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 101–25.Google Scholar
Nadel, J. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In Meltzoff, A. and Prinz, W. (eds.), The Imitative Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, J. (2003). Private communication.
Nadel, J. and Revel, A. (2003). How to build an imitator. In K. Dautenhahn, , and Nehaniv, (eds.), Proceedings of the AISB'03 Second International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Behaviour, 120–4.Google Scholar
Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D. and Rsérbat-Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science, 2(2), 164–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. and Dissanayake, C. (2003). Synchronic imitation as pre-linguistic social interaction. In Dautenhahn, K. and Nehaniv, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the AISB'03 Second International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Behaviour, 131–7.Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B. (1991). The induction of dynamical recognizers. Machine Learning, 7, 227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (2001). AIBO's first words: the social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication, 4(1), 3–32.Google Scholar
Taiji, M. and Ikegami, T. (1999). Dynamics of internal models in game players. Physica D, 134(2), 253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, J. (1996). Model based learning for mobile robot navigation from the dynamical systems perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics B, 26(3), 421–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevarthen, C. (1980). The foundations of intersubjectivity: development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. In Olson, D. (ed.), The Social Foundation of Language and Thought. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: the psychology of an infant communicating. In Neisser, U. (ed.), The Perceived Self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 121–73.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: evidence from human psychology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae: Rhythms, Musical Narrative and the Origins of Human Communication. Liége: European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, 155–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uno, R. and Ikegami, T. (2003). Joint attention/prediction and language: a mechanism of sharing the internationality. Studies in Cognitive Linguistics No.2, 231–74, in Japanese, the English version will be published elsewhere.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×