Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:49:18.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Ethnic diversity at work: an overview of theories and research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

Wido G. M. Oerlemans
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Netherlands
Maria C. W. Peeters
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Netherlands
Wilmar B. Schaufeli
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Netherlands
Katharina Naswall
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Johnny Hellgren
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Magnus Sverke
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

Ethnic diversity in the workforce is a subject of growing interest for western organizations. In EU countries, continuous immigration flows of post-war guest workers and their family members, ex-colonial immigrants, political refugees, and highly educated workers have led to an increase of people with a foreign nationality (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2003). However, foreign population percentages vary significantly between EU countries. For instance, Luxemburg (39.9%), Austria (10.3%), Germany (9.5%), and Belgium (9.1%) have relatively high rates, whereas the lowest rates, of about 2%, are found in Greece, Finland, Portugal, Spain, and Italy. Other EU countries fall somewhere in between these two extremes, such as the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, the UK, and France, with percentages ranging from 4.3 to 6% (OECD, 2003). In the future, ethnic diversity in many EU countries is likely to increase even further as demographic figures indicate that net-migration flows (immigration minus emigration) are larger than the natural growth of national populations (Ekamper and Wetters, 2005; OECD, 2003).

The increase in ethnic diversity, along with accompanying demographic developments, have had a significant impact on the composition of the workforce. About fifty years ago, the demographic features of most work organizations were fairly homogeneous (Williams and O'Reilly, 1998). Many employees shared a similar ethnic background, were male, and worked for the same employer throughout their working lives. Nowadays, managers are confronted with teams and departments that are more diverse in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, organizational tenure, functional background, educational background, and so on.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amason, P., Allen, M. W., and Holmes, S. A. (1999). Social support and acculturative stress in the multicultural workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research 27: 310–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology 46: 5–34.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., and Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology: An International Review 38: 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y., Moise, L. C., Perreault, S., and Senécal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: a social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology 32: 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cashmore, E. (1996). Dictionary of race and ethnic relations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cox, T. H. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.Google Scholar
Cox, T. H. and Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive 5: 45–56.Google Scholar
Cox, T. H., Lobel, S., and McLeod, P. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on group task. Academy of Management Journal 34: 827–47.Google Scholar
Ekamper, P. and Wetters, R. (2005). First EU demographic estimates for 2004. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from www.nidi.knaw.nl/en/publications/2004.
Ely, R. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25: 755–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J. and Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 229–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinoza, J. and Garza, R. (1985). Social group salience and inter-ethnic cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garza, R. and Santos, S. (1991). Ingroup/outgroup balance and interdependent inter-ethnic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27: 124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., and Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluation, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 33: 64–86.Google Scholar
Grossman, R. J. (2000). Is diversity working?HR Magazine 45: 46–50.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., and Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review 49: 319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (1994). Affirmative action: some unintended consequences for working women. Research in Organizational Behaviour 16: 125–69.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., and Lucas, J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology 77: 436–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Rivero, J. C., and Brett, J. F. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: effects of sex based preferential selection on task choices of women and men. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E. (1985). The effect of race-ratio composition on the frequency of organizational communication. Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G.(1989). Organising for cultural diversity. European Management Journal 7: 390–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G.(1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., and Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management 29: 801–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., and Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In Guzzo, R. A. and Salas, E. (eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 741–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larkey, L. K. (1996). Toward a theory of communicative interactions in culturally diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Review 21: 464–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Race as a factor in job placement: serendipitous findings of “ethnic drift.”Personnel Psychology 47: 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnehan, F. and Konrad, A. M. (1999). Diluting diversity: implications for intergroup inequality in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry 8: 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugtenberg, M. and Peeters, M. C. W. (2004). Acculturatievisies van allochtone en autochtone werknemers: is er een verband met welbevinden op het werk?De Psycholoog September: 417–24.Google Scholar
Luijters, K., van der Zee, K. I., and Otten, S. (2004). Acculturation in organizations: when a dual identity is evaluated most positively. Paper presented at the Werkgemeenschap van Onderzoekers in de Arbeid- en Organisatie Psychologie (WAOP) conference, Utrecht, 2004.
Maznevski, M. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations 47: 531–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, P. and Lobel, S. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Paper presented at the Annual Academy of Management Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Mullen, B., Brown, R. J., and Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: an integration. European Journal of Social Psychology 22: 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (eds.), Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory (pp. 117–41). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., and Barsade, S. G. (1998). Group demography and innovation: does diversity help? In Mannix, E. and Neale, M. (eds.), Research in the management of groups and teams (vol. 1, pp. 183–207). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., and Barsade, S. G.(1999). The impact of relational demography on teamwork: when majorities are in the minority. Research paper no. 1551. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003). Trends in international migration: SOPEMI 2002 edition. Paris: OECD Paris Centre.
Pelled, L. H. (1993). Team diversity and conflict: a multivariate analysis. Working paper, School of Business Administration, University of Southern California.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., and Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, R., Linton, R., and Herkovits, M. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist 38: 149–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijsman, J. B. (1997). Social diversity: a social psychological analysis and some implications for groups and organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 6: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, C. M. and Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: an empirical examination of relational demography within work-units. Journal of Applied Psychology 82: 342–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P., DuBois, C., and Noe, A. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: the effects of work representation on male–female and black–white differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The future of occupational health psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review 53: 502–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell (2006). Shell and diversity. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=royal-en&FC2=&FC3=/royal-en/html/iwgen/who_we_are/shell_and_diversity/shell_and_diversity.html.
Smith, A. D. (1991). The ethnic basis of national identity. In Smith, A. D. (ed.), National identity (pp. 19–42). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. and Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd edn). Bath: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussions. In Worchel, S., Wood, W., and Simpson, J. A. (eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., and Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 27: 27–36.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. M. and Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: international and social psychological perspectives (2nd edn). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., and O'Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 549–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C.(1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. In Lawler, E. J. (ed.), Advances in group processes (vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., and Oakes, P. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. and Phalet, K. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: the role of acculturation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 53: 215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Jong, W., and Masson, C. N. (1993). Job satisfaction among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology: An International Review 42: 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, E., Johnson, L., and Zgourides, G. D. (2002). The influence of ethnic diversity on leadership, group process, and performance: an examination of learning teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 26: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., and Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal 36: 590–602.Google Scholar
Williams, K. Y. and O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organisations: a review of 40 years of research. In Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wittenbaum, G. and Stasser, G. (1996). Management and information in small groups. In Nye, J. and Brower, M. (eds.), What's social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×