Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:06:51.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Work stress, coping, and gender: implications for health and well-being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

Eva Torkelson
Affiliation:
Lund University, Sweden
Tuija Muhonen
Affiliation:
National Institute for Working Life, Sweden
Katharina Naswall
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Johnny Hellgren
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Magnus Sverke
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

Stressful working conditions and their implications for health are important topics in occupational health psychology today (Paoli and Merllié, 2001; Spielberger and Reheiser, 2005). Studies show that increasing demands in the workplace have induced negative stress among employees (Lidwall and Skogman-Thoursie, 2001), and especially among women (Lundberg, 2002; Lundberg and Gonäs, 1998; Matuszek, Nelson, and Quick, 1995). Although both women and men report work-related stressors, such as role ambiguity, downsizing, and time pressure, women are confronted with additional stressors (Nelson and Burke, 2002). Jobs dominated by women have lower status, are less well paid, and have limited opportunities for personal and career development (Alexanderson and Östlin, 2001; Greenglass, 2002; Lundberg and Gonäs, 1998; Nelson and Burke, 2002). Women are often exposed to role conflicts and conflicts between work and family responsibilities (Burke and Greenglass, 1999; Greenglass, 2002; Lundberg, 1998), as well as sex discrimination and underutilization of skills (Greenglass, 2002). Women also experience more psychological and physical symptoms (Alexanderson and Östlin, 2001; Matuszek et al., 1995; Väänänen, Toppinen-Tanner, Kalimo, Mutanen, Vahtera, and Peiró, 2003). In a longitudinal study, Bildt and Michélsen (2002) identified more occupational risk factors predicting poor mental health for women than for men, suggesting that these findings mirror the gender-segregated labor market. Bildt (2001) concluded that several aspects at today's workplaces are harmful for many female employees’ mental health.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexanderson, K. and Östlin, P. (2001). Work and ill-health among women and men in Sweden. In Marklund, S. (ed.), Worklife and health in Sweden 2000 (pp. 119–34). Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.Google Scholar
Bäckman, O. and Edling, C. (2001). Work environment and work-related health problems in the 1990s. In Marklund, S. (ed.), Worklife and health in Sweden 2000 (pp. 101–17). Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.Google Scholar
Banyard, V. L. and Graham-Bermann, S. A. (1993). Can women cope?Psychology of Women Quarterly 17: 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagat, R. S., Allie, S. M., and Ford, D. L. Jr. (1991). Organizational stress, personal life stress and symptoms of life strain: an inquiry into the moderating role of styles of coping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6: 163–84.Google Scholar
Bildt, C. (2001). Working conditions and mental health among women. In Bildt, C. and Karlquist, L. (eds.), Women's conditions in working life (pp. 73–82). Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.Google Scholar
Bildt, C. and Michélsen, H. (2002). Gender differences in the effects from working conditions on mental health: a 4-year follow-up. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 75: 252–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billings, A. G. and Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 877–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R. J. and Greenglass, E. R. (1999). Work–family conflict, spouse support, and nursing staff well-being during organizational restructuring. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 4: 327–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., and Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 267–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. C. and Racioppo, M. W. (2000). Never the twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American Psychologist 55: 655–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. L. and Livingstone, H. A. (2001). Chronic and acute stressors among military personnel: do coping styles buffer their negative impact on health?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6: 348–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., and Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science 19: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewe, P. (2000). Measures of coping with stress at work: a review and a critique. In Dewe, P., Leiter, M., and Cox, T. (eds.), Coping, health and organizations (pp. 3–28). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Folkman, S. and Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 21: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortes-Ferreira, L., Peiró, J. M., González-Morales, G., and Martín, I. (2006). Work-related stress and well-being: the role of direct action coping and palliative coping. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 47: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, V. and Kelemen, M. (2001). The crafting of community: recoupling discourses of management and womanhood. Gender, Work and Organization 8: 267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graumann, C. F. and Kruse, L. (1990). The environment: social construction and psychological problems. In Himmelweit, H. T. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), Societal psychology (pp. 212–29). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Greenglass, E. R. (2002). Work stress, coping, and social support: implications for women's occupational well-being. In Nelson, D. L., and Burke, R. J. (eds.), Gender, work stress, and health (pp. 85–96). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, J. (1995). Rethinking stress: seeing the collective. In Newton, T., Handy, J., and Fineman, S. (eds.), Managing stress: emotion and power at work (pp. 85–96). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hare-Mustin, R. T. and Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference. Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist 43: 455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., Dunahoo, C., Ben-Porath, Y., and Monnier, J. (1994). Gender and coping: the dual axis model of coping. American Journal of Community Psychology 22: 49–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E., Geller, P., and Dunahoo, C. (2003). Women's coping: communal versus individualistic orientation. In Schabracq, M. J., Winnubst, J. A. M., and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), Handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 239–57). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hurst, T. E. and Hurst, M. H. (1997). Gender differences in mediation of severe occupational stress among correctional officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice 22: 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karambayya, R. (2002). Women and corporate restructuring: sources and consequences of stress. In Nelson, D. L. and Burke, R. J. (eds.), Gender, work stress, and health (pp. 55–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasek, R. and Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. and McIntyre, D. (2005). Constructions of occupational stress: nuisances, nuances or novelties? In Antoniou, A.-S. G. and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), Research companion to organizational health psychology (pp. 20–58). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, T. S. (2001). A new tool for assessing psychosocial work environment factors: the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. In Hagberg, M., Knave, B., Lillienberg, L., and Westberg, H. (eds.), X2001 exposure assessment in epidemiology and practice: arbete och hälsa (vol. 10, pp. 210–13). Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.Google Scholar
Länsisalmi, H., Peiró, J. M., and Kivimäki, M. (2000). Collective stress and coping in the context of organizational culture. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9: 527–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latack, J. C. and Havlovic, S. J. (1992). Coping with job stress: a conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Leka, S., Griffiths, A., and Cox, T. (2005). Work-related stress: the risk management paradigm. In Antoniou, A.-S. G. and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), Research companion to organizational health psychology (pp. 174–87). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwall, U. and Skogman-Thoursie, P. (2001). Sickness absence during the last decades. In Marklund, S. (ed.), Worklife and health in Sweden 2000 (pp. 81–100). Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.Google Scholar
Long, B. C. and Cox, R. C. (2000). Women's way of coping with employment stress: a feminist contextual analysis. In Dewe, P., Leiter, M., and Cox, T. (eds.), Coping, health and organizations (pp. 109–23). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Lundberg, O. and Gonäs, L. (1998). Trends in women's psychosocial work environment and health, and structural changes on the labor market. In Orth-Gomér, K., Chesney, M., and Wenger, N. K. (eds.), Women, stress, and heart disease (pp. 57–72). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lundberg, U. (1998). Work and stress in women. In Orth-Gomér, K., Chesney, M., and Wenger, N. K. (eds.), Women, stress, and heart disease (pp. 41–56). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lundberg, U.(2002). Gender, multiple roles and physiological reactions. In Wamala, S. P. and Lynch, J. (eds.), Gender and social inequities in health (pp. 123–57). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Maddock, S. (1999). Challenging women: gender, culture and organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences 37: 1401–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuszek, P. A., Nelson, D. L., and Quick, J. C. (1995). Gender differences in distress. Are we asking the right questions?Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10: 99–120.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. M. and Korabik, K. (1991). Sources of stress and ways of coping among male and female managers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6: 185–98.Google Scholar
Mickelson, K., Lyons, R. F., Sullivan, M. J. L., and Coyne, J. C. (2001). Yours, mine, ours: the relational context of communal coping. In Sarason, B. R. and Duck, S. (eds.), Personal relationships: implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 181–200). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Muhonen, T. and Torkelson, E. (2001). A Swedish version of the COPE inventory. Lund Psychological Reports 2.Google Scholar
Narayanan, L., Menon, S., and Spector, P. E. (1999). Stress in the workplace: a comparison of gender and occupations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20: 63–73.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. L. and Burke, R. J. (2002). A framework for examining gender, workstress, and health. In Nelson, D. L. and Burke, R. J. (eds.), Gender, work stress, and health (pp. 3–14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, T. (1995). Introduction: agency, subjectivity and the stress discourse. In Newton, T., Handy, J., and Fineman, S. (eds.), Managing stress: emotion and power at work (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Paoli, P. and Merllié, D. (2001). Third European Survey on Working Conditions 2000. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. www.eurofound.eu.int/publications/files/EF0121EN.pdf.
Parkes, K. P. (1990). Coping, negative affectivity, and the work environment: additive and interactive predictors of mental health. Journal of Applied Psychology 75: 399–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peiró, J. (2001). Stressed teams in organizations: a multilevel approach to the study of stress in work units. Proceedings of the Third European Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, Barcelona, Spain, 24–27 October 2001.
Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., and Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 25: 551–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., and Dodge, K. L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with stress: when stressors and appraisals do not differ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 421–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugliesi, K. (1999). Gender and work stress: differential exposure and vulnerability. Journal of Gender, Culture and Health 4: 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist 47: 730–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. and Reheiser, E. C. (2005). Occupational stress and health. In Antoniou, A.-S. G. and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), Research companion to organizational health psychology (pp. 441–54). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., and Näswall, K. (2002). No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7: 242–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., and Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review 6: 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next?Journal of Health and Social Behavior 35: 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torkelson, E. and Muhonen, T. (2003). Coping strategies and health symptoms among women and men in a downsizing organisation. Psychological Reports 92: 899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torkelson, E. and Muhonen, T.(2004). The role of gender and level in coping with occupational stress. Work and Stress 18: 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, A., Toppinen-Tanner, S., Kalimo, R., Mutanen, P., Vahtera, J., and Peiró, J. M. (2003). Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Social Science and Medicine 57: 807–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinnicombe, S. (2000). The position of women in management in Europe. In Davidson, M. J. and Burke, R. J. (eds.), Women in management: current research issues (vol. II, pp. 9–25). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×