Abraham-Frois, Gilbert and Lendjel, Emeric. 2006. “Father Potron’s Early Contributions to Input–Output Analysis,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumol, William. 2000. “Leontief’s Great Leap Forward,” Economic Systems Research, 12, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjerkholt, Olav and Kurz, Heinz D.. 2006. “Introduction: the History of Input–Output Analysis, Leontief’s Path and Alternative Tracks,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 331–333.Google Scholar

Cantillon, Richard. 1755. Essay on the Nature of General Commerce. Reprinted, edited, and translated into English by Higgs, H.. London: Macmillan, 1931.Google Scholar

Davenant, Charles. 1699. An Essay upon the Probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Balance of Trade. London: James Knapton.Google Scholar

DeBresson, Christian. 2004. “Some Highlights in the Life of Wassily Leontief – An Interview with Estelle and Wassily Leontief,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dmitriev, Vladimir K. 1974. Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility, 1898–1902. Edited with introduction by Nuti, D. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, W. Duane and Hoffenberg, Marvin. 1952. “The Interindustry Relations Study for 1947,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 34, 97–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Alexander. 1931. The Development of Economic Doctrine. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Isnard, Achille-Nicolas. 1781. Traite des Richesses (2 Volumes). London: F. Grasset.Google Scholar

Kaliadina, Svetlana A. and Pavlova, Natal’ia Iu. 2006. “The Family of W. W Leontief in Russia” (translated into English by Wittich, Claus), Economic Systems Research, 18, 335–345.Google Scholar

Klein, Judy L. 2001. “Reflections on the Age of Measurement,” in Klein, Judy L. and Morgan, Mary S. (eds.), The Age of Economic Measurement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 111–136.Google Scholar

Kohli, Martin C. 2001. “The Leontief-BLS Relationship: A New Framework for Measurement,” Monthly Labor Review, 124 , 29–37.Google Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D. 2011. “Who is Going to Kiss Sleeping Beauty? On the ‘Classical’ Analytical Origins and Perspectives of Input–Output Analysis,” Review of Political Economy, 23, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2000a. ‘“Classical Roots’ of Input–Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory,” Economic Systems Research, 12 , 153–179.Google Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2000b. “Piero Sraffa’s Contributions to Economics: A Brief Survey,” in Kurz, Heinz D. (ed.), Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa’s Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. (eds.). 2003. The Legacy of Piero Sraffa, Vols. 1 and 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2006. “Input–Output Analysis from a Wider Perspective: A Comparison of the Early Works of Leontief and Sraffa,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 373–390.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1937. National Income and Capital Formation, 1919–1935, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1973. “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections,” American Economic Review, 63(3) 247–258.Google Scholar

Landefeld, J. Steven and McCulla, Stephanie H.. 1999. “Wassily Leontief and His Contributions to Economic Accounting,” Survey of Current Business, 79 (March), 9–11.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1928. “The Economy as a Circular Flow” (in German), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 60, 577–623. Reprinted and translated into English in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2 (1991), 181–212.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1936. “Quantitative Input–Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1941. The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1951. The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929 (Second Edition, revised and enlarged). New York: Oxford University Press. Reprint. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1966a. Essays in Economics: Theories and Theorizing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1966b. Input–Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press. (Second Edition, 1986.)Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1974. “Structure of the World Economy,” American Economic Review, 64, 823–834.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily, Chenery, Hollis B., Clark, Paul G., Duesenberry, James S., Ferguson, Allen R., Grosse, Anne P., Grosse, Robert N., Holzman, Mathilda, Isard, Walter and Kisten, Helen. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press. (Reprint. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 1976.)Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1894. Das Kapital, Vol. III, edited by Engels, F.. Hamburg: Meissner. (English translation. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1959.)Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1905. A History of Economic Theories. Edited by Kautsky, Karl, Translated by Terence McCarthy. New York: The Langland Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Meade, Douglas S. 2017. “Early Days of the Input–Output Table,” in Ten Raa, Thijs (ed.), Handbook of Input–Output Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 7–40.Google Scholar

Meek, Ronald L. 1965. “Problems of the Tableau Economique,” in Gherity, James (ed.), Economic Thought: A Historical Anthology. New York: Random House, pp. 115–149.Google Scholar

Mirabeau, M. 1766. Philosophie Rurale ou Economic Generate et Politique de L’agriculture Pour Servir a L’ami des Hommes. Amsterdam: Chez Les Libraires Associes.Google Scholar

Sir Petty, William. 1690. Discourse on Political Arithmetick. Reprinted in Hull, Charles H. (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899 (two volumes).Google Scholar

Sir Petty, William. 1691. “Verbum Sapienti,” in Political Anatomy of Ireland. London: Brown and Rodgers. Reprinted in Charles H. Hull (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899 (two volumes).Google Scholar

Phillips, Almarin. 1955. “The Tableau Economique as a Simple Leontief Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 137–144.Google Scholar

Polenske, Karen R. 1999. “Wassily W. Leontief, 1905–1999,” Economic Systems Research, 11 , 341–348.Google Scholar

Polenske, Karen R. 2004. “Leontief’s ‘Magnificent Machine’ and Other Contributions to Applied Economics,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar

Pyatt, Graham. 2000. “Review of Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences, 1650–1900 by Richard Stone,” Economic Systems Research, 12, 425–426.Google Scholar

Quesnay, Francois. 1759. Le Tableau Économique. Archival versions: “First” 1758 Edition (accompanied by Remarques sur les variations de la distribution des revenus annuels d’une nation; manuscript); “Second” 1759 Edition (accompanied by Extrait des economies royales de M. de Sully); and “Third” 1759 Edition (accompanied by Explication du tableau economique and an expanded and footnoted Extrait des économies royales de M. de Sully). Also, edited and translated to English by Marguerite Kuczynski and Ronald L. Meek. London: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar

Rose, Adam and Miernyk, William. 1989. “Input–Output Analysis: The First Fifty Years,” Economic Systems Research, 1, 229–271.Google Scholar

Routh, Guy, 1975. The Origin of Economic Ideas. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 2004. “A Portrait of the Master as a Young Man,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 2005. “Abram Bergson, Economist, April 21, 1914–April 23, 2003,” The Economic Journal, 115, F130–F133.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Reprinted in The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1998. “Rereading The Structure of the American Economy,” Economic Systems Research, 10, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soule, George. 1952. Ideas of the Great Economists. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Sraffa, Piero (ed.). 1951–1973.The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 1810–1824. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11 volumes.Google Scholar

Sraffa, Piero 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steenge, Albert E. and van den Berg, Richard. 2007. “Transcribing the Tableau Économique: Input–Output Analysis à la Quesnay,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29, 331–358.Google Scholar

Stone, Richard. 1961. Input–Output and National Accounts. Paris: Organization for European Economic Co-operation.Google Scholar

Stone, Richard. 1973. “A System of Social Matrices,” Review of Income and Wealth, 19, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Richard. 1984. “Where Are We Now? A Short Account of Input–Output Studies and Their Present Trends,” in United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Input–Output Techniques. New York: United Nations, pp. 439–459. Reprinted in Ira Sohn (ed.), Readings in Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar

Stone, Richard. 1997. “The Accounts of Society” (Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 8, 1984),” American Economic Review, 87, 17–29.Google Scholar

Taylor, Overton. 1960. A History of Economic Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Torrens, Robert. 1820. An Essay on the Influence of the External Corn Trade upon the Production and Distribution of National Wealth (Second Edition). London: Hatchard.Google Scholar

Torrens, Robert. 1821. An Essay on the Production of Wealth. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown. Reprinted and edited by Joseph Dorfman. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar

von Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus. 1906, 1907. “Value and Price in the Marxian System” (in German), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 23 (1906), 1–50; 25 (1907), 1–51 and 445–488. Reprinted and translated into English in International Economic Papers, 2, 5–60.Google Scholar

Walras, Leon. 1874. Elements of Pure Economics. Paris: Guillaumin & Cie. English translation by William Jaffé. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954.Google Scholar