Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:32:46.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Gheorghe Tecuci
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
David A. Schum
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Dorin Marcu
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Mihai Boicu
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

BOOK PURPOSE

This textbook has been written for those studying the process of drawing conclusions from masses of evidence resulting from extensive investigations in a variety of contexts, including intelligence analysis, cybersecurity, criminal investigations, and military and business inferences and decisions. Many universities now offer undergraduate and graduate courses concerning these activities. These courses are offered in order to provide introductory preparation for persons contemplating future work in these contexts. These courses have also been of interest to persons having various levels of past experience in these activities, but who are seeking additional knowledge concerning matters their current work requires.

As you see, our book's subtitle is a frequently used metaphor: Connecting the Dots. This metaphor seems appropriate in characterizing the evidential and inferential matters discussed in our book. The metaphor may have gained its current popularity following the terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2001. It was frequently said that the intelligence services did not connect the dots appropriately in order to have possibly prevented the catastrophes that occurred. Since then, we have seen and heard this metaphor applied in the news media to inferences in a very wide array of contexts in addition to the aforementioned intelligence, legal, military, and business contexts. For example, we have seen it applied to allegedly faulty medical diagnoses; to allegedly faulty conclusions in historical studies; to allegedly faulty or unpopular governmental decisions; and in discussions involving the conclusions reached by competing politicians. What is also true is that the commentators on television and radio, or the sources of written accounts of inferential failures, never tell us what they mean by the phrase “connecting the dots.” A natural explanation is that they have never even considered what this phrase means and what it might involve.

Our major objective in this book is to provide accurate, useful, and extensive information about the evidential and inferential issues encountered by persons whose tasks require them to “connect the dots” to draw conclusions from masses of different kinds of evidence that come from a variety of different sources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Preface
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Preface
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Preface
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.001
Available formats
×