Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:24:50.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Use of International Jurisprudence by Israel’s Supreme Court

from Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2018

By
Yaël Ronen
Edited by
Marlene Wind
Marlene Wind
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the practice of the Israeli Supreme Court in referencing the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals when interpreting the international law by which Israel is bound. It notes the paucity of such referencing and examines its uses. While international jurisprudence has a limited role in guiding the Court’s own interpretative enterprise, it serves the Court in enhancing the legitimacy of its decisions in the eyes of both domestic and international audiences.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Courts and Domestic Politics , pp. 296 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barak, A. (2002). Some Reflections on the Israeli Legal System and Its Judiciary. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 6.Google Scholar
Barak-Erez, D. (2004). The International Law of Human Rights and Constitutional Law: A Case Study of an Expanding Dialogue. International Journal of Constitutional Law, (2), 611–632.Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, M. (1995). The Reception by National Courts of Decisions of International Tribunals. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 28, 45–64.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E. (1993). Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts. European Journal of International Law, 4, 159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E. (2008). Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts. American Journal of International Law, 102, 241–74.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E. (2009). The Effect of the ECHR on the Italian Legal Order: Direct Effect and Supremacy. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 19, 171–185.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2010). Strategies of Domestic Justice: Domestic Courts Response to International Criticism. In Stern, Y., ed., My Justice, Your Justice – Justice across Cultures, Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center/Israel Democracy Institute, p. 483 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Elias, O. (2000). General International Law in the European Court of Justice: From Hypothesis to Reality? Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 31, 3–34.Google Scholar
ILA International Human Rights Law and Practice Committee. (2004). Final Report on the Impact of Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies.Google Scholar
Grady Schwartz, O. (2011). International Law in Domestic Judges’ Decisions: The Relationship between Broad Role-Perception and a Strong Internationalist Inclination. Tel-Aviv University Law Review, 34, 475–523 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Gross, M., Haris, R. & Shachar, Y. (1996). References Patterns of the Supreme Court in Israel – Quantitative Analysis. Mishpatim, 26, 119–217 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Jabareen, H. (2008). The Rise of Transnational Lawyering for Human Rights. Law and Social Change, 1, 137–51 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Jarmul, H. D. (1995). The Effect of Decisions of Regional Human Rights Tribunals on National Courts. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 28, 311–66.Google Scholar
Kanetake, M. (2014). The Interfaces between the National and International Rule of Law: A Framework Paper. Social Science Research Network, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2480965, papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2480965 (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Knop, K. (1999). Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32, 501–35.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, D. (2009). International Law in Domestic Courts: Israel. In Sloss, D., ed., The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273–325.Google Scholar
Krisch, N. (2008). The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law. Modern Law Review, 71, 183–216.Google Scholar
Navot, S. (2013). Israel: Creating a Constitution – The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994–2010). In Groppie, T. & Ponthoreau, M., eds., The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, London: Hart, pp. 129–54.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. (2009). The Effect of the ECHR and Judgments of the ECtHR on National Law – Comments on the Paper of Enzo Cannizzaro. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 19, 189–97.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. (2014). Conversations among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudiators. In Romano, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 523–49.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. & van Alebeek, R. (2012). The Legal Status of Decisions by Human Rights Treaty Bodies in National Law. In Keller, H. & Ulfstein, G., eds., Human Rights Treaty Bodies, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 356–413.Google Scholar
Porat, I. (2013). The Use of Foreign Law in Israeli Constitutional Adjudication. In Sapir, G. et al., eds., Israeli Constitutional Law in the Making, Oxford: Hart, pp. 151–72.Google Scholar
Schreuer, C. H. (1974). The Authority of International Judicial Practice in Domestic Courts. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 23, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Y. (2008). The Reference Practices of the Israeli Supreme Court 1950–2004. Hapraklit, 50, 29–69 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Reilly, D. M. & Ordonez, S. (1995). Effect of the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice on National Courts. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 28, 435–84.Google Scholar
Ronen, Y. (2013a). Silent Enim Leges Inter Arma – but Beware the Background Noise: Domestic Courts as Agents of Development of the Law on the Conduct of Hostilities. Leiden Journal of International Law, 26, 591–614.Google Scholar
Ronen, Y. (2013b). Blind in Their Own Cause: The Military Courts in the West Bank. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2, 738–62.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2000). The Politics and Incentives of Legal Transplantation. In Nye, J. S. & Donahue, J. D., eds., Governance in a Globalizing World, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar
Schreuer, C. H. (1974). The Authority of International Judicial Practice in Domestic Courts. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 23, 681–708.Google Scholar
Shany, Y. (2005). Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? European Journal of International Law, 16, 907–40.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A. (2003). A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, 44, 191–220.Google Scholar
Trapani, A. (2011). Assessing the Impact of the International Ad-Hoc Tribunals on the Domestic Courts of the Former Yugoslavia, DOMAC/11, www.domac.is/media/domac/Domac-11-BAlkan-AT-Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A. & Venzke, I. (2012). In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification. European Journal of International Law, 23, 7–41.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A. & Venzke, I. (2014). The Spell of Precedents: Lawmaking by International Courts and Tribunals. In Romano, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 503–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×