Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
3 - Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides a description of the basic interpersonal clause system in Khorchin Mongolian – i.e., MOOD. The categories in the traditional description of Khorchin Mongolian clause grammar are mostly defined notionally and are not grammatically motivated. In contrast, the description in this chapter motivates the clause classes in the MOOD system in terms of their structural configurations based on unmonitored conversational data. The functions of Predicator, Positioner, Interrogator and Inquirer are used to distinguish the general types of [indicative] and [imperative] and the more delicate systems they make available. The MOOD systems are then characterised in relation to their functions in exchanges in terms of the structural configurations that realise options in NEGOTIATION in discourse semantics. The description in this chapter makes significant contributions to (i) the unified description of Khorchin Mongolian clause types and structures, and (ii) the characterisation of grammatical patterns in terms of discourse semantics.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpersonal GrammarSystemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description, pp. 64 - 95Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bayancogtu, (2002). [Horcin aman ayalgun u sudulul, A Study of Khorchin Dialect]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 120–45.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981b). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. Mimeo (a longer version of Berry, 1981a).Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981c). Polarity, Ellipticity and Propositional Development, Their Relevance to the Well-Formedness of an Exchange (A Discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s Classes of Move). The Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10(1), 36–63.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981d). Towards Layers of Exchange Structure for Directive Exchanges. Network, 2, 23–31.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Caganhada, (1995). 蒙古语科尔沁土语研究 [Menggu yu keerqin tuyu yanjiu, A Study of Khorchin Mongolian Dialect]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cenggeltei, (1999). [Odo ʉye in monggol helen u jʉi (nemen zasagsan heblel, A Grammar of Modern Mongolian (A Revised Edition)]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People Publishing House.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Some Notes on ‘Deep’ Grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1),57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic-Functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R., Halliday, M.A.K., Lamb, S. and Makkai, A., eds., The Semiotics of Culture and Language. Vol. 1 of Language as Social Semiotic. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed., London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Methods – Techniques – Problems. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 59–86.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hao, J. (2020). Analysing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018). Introduction – Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspectives. Functions of Language, 25(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2018). Interpersonal Grammar of Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 54–96.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., Wang, Pin & Zhu, Y. (in press). Systemic Functional Grammar: Another Step into the Theory – Grammatical Description. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2018). The Notion of Multilingual Meaning Potential: A Systemic Exploration. In Sellami-Baklouti, A. and Fontaine, L., eds., Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 90–120.Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, I.N., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Akerejola, E. S. (2018). A System-Based Typology of mood in Niger-Congo Languages. In Agwuele, A. and Bodomo, A., eds., The Routledge Handbook of African Linguistics. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
Na-Gancigsurung, , Gardi, , Wa-Secin, & Cinggeltu, , eds., (2005). [Helen u šinzilel un nere tomiya, Terms in Linguistics]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Education Press.Google Scholar
Nasunbayar, , Haserdeni, , Tʉrgen, , Cogtu, , Tawadagba, , Naranbatu, & Secen, . (1982). [Orcin cag un monggul hele, Modern Mongolian]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Education Press.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2013). The Interpersonal and Experiential Grammar of Chilean Spanish: Towards a Principled Systemic-Functional Description Based on Axial Argumentation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meanings: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2018). Sister, Shall I Tell You? Enacting Social Relations in a Kinship Community. Functions of Language, 25(1), 97–134.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U., Patpong, P., & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of mood: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional View. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective. London: Equinox Publishing, pp. 859–920.Google Scholar
Tiemei, (2015). [Monggol helen u horcin aman ayalgun u abiyan u dagun uhagan u zadalulta, Acoustic Phonetics of Khorchin Mongolian]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Inner Mongolia University.Google Scholar
Tserenpil, D. & Kullman, R. (2008). Mongolian Grammar, 4th revised ed., Ulaanbaater: Admon.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1988). The Logical Relations in Exchanges. In Benson, J. D. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
Wang, Penglin. (1983). 关于蒙古语族“格附加成分”的问 [Guanyu menggu yuzu “ge fujia chengfen” de wenti, On case marking in Mongolic languages]. Minority Languages of China 1, 41–64. Weblink: https://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/34292030/guan_yu_meng_gu_yu_zu__ge_fu_jia_cheng_fen__de_wen.htm.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, Pin. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, 73–101.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2020a). Axial Argumentation below the Clause: The Verbal Group in Khorchin Mongolian. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 35–72.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2020b). Negotiating Interpersonal Meaning in Khorchin Mongolian: Discourse and Grammar. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22835Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by