P. G. Abir-Am, “Synergy or clash: disciplinary and marital strategies in the career of mathematical biologist Dorothy Wrinch,” in P. G. Abir-Am and D. Outram, eds., Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979 (New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers Univ. Press, 1987)

P. G. Abir-Am, “Dorothy Maud Wrinch (1894–1976),” in L. S. Grinstein et al., eds., Women in Chemistry and Physics (New York: Greenwood, 1993)

K. Alder, “A revolution to measure: the political economy of the metric system in France,” in Wise, 1995

J. Aldrich, R. A. Fisher and the Making of Maximum Likelihood, 1912–22 (Department of Economics, University of Southampton, 1995)

G. Allen, Life Science in the Twentieth Century (New York: Wiley, 1975)

A. J. Ayer, “Still more of my life,” in The Philosophy of A. J. Ayer, ed. L. E. Hahn (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1992)

Barnard, G. A., “Fisher's contributions to mathematical statistics,”J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 126, 162–166 (1963)Google Scholar

Barnard, G. A., “R. A. Fisher – a true Bayesian?”Internat. Stat. Rev. 55, 183–189 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard, G. A., Reply to S. L. Zabell, Stat. Sci. 4, 258–260 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard, G. A., “Fisher: a retrospective,”Chance 3, 22–28 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard, G. A., “Neyman and the Behrens-Fisher problem – an anecdote,”Prob. and Math. Stat. 15, 67–71 (1995)Google Scholar

G. A. Barnard and R. L. Plackett, “Statistics in the United Kingdom, 1939–45,” in A. C. Atkinson and S. E. Fienberg, eds., A Celebration of Statistics”: the ISI Centenary Volume (New York: Springer, 1985)

B. Barnes, D. Bloor, and J. Henry, Scientific Knowledge: a Sociological Analysis (Chicago: U.C.P., 1996)

Bartlett, M. S., “Probability and chance in the theory of statistics,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 141, 518–534 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, M. S., “The present position of mathematical statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 103, 1–29 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, M. S., “R. A. Fisher and the first fifty years of statistical methodology,”Jou. Am. Stat. Ass. 60, 395–409 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. S. Bartlett, “Chance and change,” in The Making of Statisticians, ed., J. Gani (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982); reprinted in Bartlett 1989

M. S. Bartlett, Selected Papers of M. S. Bartlett, 3 vols. (Winnipeg, Canada: Charles Babbage Research Centre, 1989)

Bayes, T., “An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lon. 53, 370–418 (1764); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C. Bazerman, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (Madison: Univ. Wisc. Press, 1988)

J. H. Bennett, ed., Natural Selection, Heredity, and Eugenics: including Selected Correspondence of R. A. Fisher with Leonard Darwin and Others (Oxford: O.U.P., 1983)

J. H. Bennett, ed., Statistical Inference and Analysis: Selected Correspondence of R. A. Fisher (Oxford: O.U.P., 1990)

Bhat, P. C., Prosper, H. B., and Snyder, S. S., “Bayesian analysis of multi-source data,”Phys. Lett. B 407, 73–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. Bibby, Notes Towards a History of Teaching Statistics (Edinburgh: John Bibby, 1986)

D. Bloor, Science and Social Imagery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976; second edition, 1991)

Bolt, B. A., “Sir Harold Jeffreys and geophysical inverse problems,”Chance 4, 15–17 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonacina, L. C. W., “Relativity, space, and ultimate reality”; “‘Space’ or ‘aether’”; “The physical continuity of ‘space,’”Nature 107, 171–2; 234; 300 (1921)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

P. J. Bowler, Evolution: the history of an idea (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)

P. J. Bowler, The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinism Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1992)

J. F. Box, R. A. Fisher: the Life of a Scientist (New York: Wiley, 1978)

Brakel, J., “The possible influence of the discovery of radio-active decay on the concept of physical probability,”Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 31, 369–85 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, C. D., “On the relation between induction and probability (part 1),”Mind 27, 389–404 (1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, C. D., “On the relation between induction and probability (part 2),”Mind 29, 11–45 (1920)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, C. D., Review of Keynes's A Treatise on Probability, Mind 31, 72–85 (1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. Bromberg, The Laser in America (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1991)

Brush, S., “Prediction and theory evaluation: the case of light bending,”Science 246, 1124–29 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

S. Brush, Nebulous Earth: the Origin of the Solar System and the Core of the Earth from Laplace to Jeffreys (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996)

J. Buchwald, The Creation of Scientific Effects: Heinrich Hertz and electric waves (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)

W. H. L. E. Bulwer, France: Social, Literary, Political (London, 1834)

, L. Cameron and Forrester, J., “Tansley's psychoanalytic network: An episode out of the early history of psychoanalysis in England,”Psychoanalysis and History 2, 189–256 (2000)Google Scholar

N. R. Campbell, Physics: the Elements (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1919)

A. Carabelli, On Keynes's Method (London: Macmillan, 1988)

R. Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950)

N. Cartwright, “Response of American physicists,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan 1987

Church, A., “On the concept of a random sequence,”Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 130–135 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, W. G., Review of Van Deuren's La Théorie de Probabilités, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 99, 169–70 (1936)Google Scholar

W. Coleman, Biology in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Wiley, 1971)

H. Collins, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (London: Sage, 1985)

Conniffe, D., “Keynes on probability and statistical inference and the links to Fisher,”Cam. Jou. Econ. 16, 475–89 (1992)Google Scholar

Connor, L. R., Review of J. B. Scarborough's Numerical Mathematical Analysis, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 94, 442–3 (1931)Google Scholar

J. M. Converse, Survey Research in the United States, 1890–1960 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987)

Cook, A., “Sir Harold Jeffreys,”Biog. Mem. Fell. Roy. Soc. 36, 301–333 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. L. Coolidge, An Introduction to Mathematical Probability (Oxford: O.U.P., 1925)

Cottrell, A., “Keynes's theory of probability and its relevance to his economics,”Econ. Phil. 9, 25–51 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. I. Dale, A History of Inverse Probability: From Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991)

K. Danziger, “Research practice in American psychology,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

Daston, L., “D'Alembert's critique of probability theory,”Historia Mathematica 6, 259–79 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

L. Daston, “The domestication of risk: mathematical probability and insurance, 1650–1830,” in L. Krüger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 1987

L. Daston, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)

, L. Daston and Galison, P., “The image of objectivity,”Representations 40, 81–128 (1992)Google Scholar

F. N. David, Games, Gods and Gambling: A History of Probabilistic and Statistical Ideas (London: Charles Griffin, 1962)

A. Desmond and J. Moore, Darwin (New York: Warner Books, 1991)

H. Dingle, Science and Human Experience (London: Williams and Norgate, 1931)

H. Dingle, Through Science to Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1937)

P. A. M. Dirac, Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930)

Doob, J. L., “Kolmogorov's early work on convergence theory and foundations,”Annals of Probability 17, 815–21 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorling, J., “Bayesian personalism, the methodology of scientific research programmes, and Duhem's problem,”Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 10, 177–187 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. Earman, Bayes or Bust? (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1992)

Eddington, A., “Notes on the method of least squares,”Proc. Phys. Soc. 45, 271–282 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Eddington, New Pathways in Science (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1935)

A. Eddington, The Philosophy of Physical Science (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1939)

Edgeworth, F. Y., “Applications of probabilities to economics,”Econ. Jou. 20, 284–301; 441–465 (1910)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. W. F. Edwards, Likelihood (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1972; revised ed. Johns Hopkins, 1992)

Edwards, A. W. F., “The history of likelihood,”Int. Stat. Rev. 42, 9–15 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. W. F., “Fiducial probability,”The Statistician, 25, 15–35 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

W. M. Elsasser, Memoirs of a Physicist in the Atomic Age (New York: Science History Publications, 1978.)

R. A. Epstein, The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1967 [1977])

S. E. Fienberg, “Statistical developments in World War II: an international perspective,” in A. C. Atkinson and S. E. Fienberg, eds., A Celebration of Statistics: the ISI Centenary Volume (New York: Springer, 1985)

T. L. Fine, Theories of Probability (New York: Academic Press, 1973)

Finetti, B., “Cambridge probability theorists,”Manchester School 53, 347–363 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “On an absolute criterion for fitting frequency curves,”Messeng. Math. 41, 155–60 (1912)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Some hopes of a eugenist,”Eugenics Rev. 5, 309–15 (1914)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population,”Biometrika 10, 507–21 (1915)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “The correlation between relative on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance,”Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. 52, 399–433 (1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “On the probable error of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample,”Metron 1, 1–32 (1921)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lon. A 222, 309–68 (1922a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., Review of Keynes's A Treatise on Probability, Eugenics Rev. 14, 46–50 (1922b)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Theory of statistical estimation,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 22, 700–25 (1925a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1925b)

Fisher, R. A., “The arrangement of field experiments,”Jou. Ministry Agriculture Great Britain 33, 503–513 (1926)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Inverse probability,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 26, 528–535 (1930a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. A. Fisher, The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford: Clarendon, 1930b)

Fisher, R. A., “Inverse probability and the use of likelihood,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 28, 257–261 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “The concepts of inverse probability and fiducial probability referring to unknown parameters,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 139, 343–348 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Probability likelihood and quantity of information in the logical of uncertain inference,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 146, 1–8 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. A. Fisher, The Design of Experiments (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1935a)

Fisher, R. A., “The Logic of Inductive Inference,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 98, 39–82 (1935b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “The fiducial argument in statistical inference,”Annals Eugenics 6, 391–398 (1935c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Uncertain inference,”Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 71, 245–258 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., “Student,”Annals Eugenics 9, 1–9 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1956)

Fisher, R. A., “The nature of probability,”Centennial Review 2, 261–274 (1958)Google Scholar

Forman, P., “Weimar culture, causality, and quantum theory, 1918–1927: Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual milieu,”Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 3, 1–115 (1971)Google Scholar

P. Forman, “The reception of an acausal quantum mechanics in Germany and Britain,” in The Reception of Unconventional Science, ed. S. H. Mauskopf (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1979)

Forman, P., “Inventing the maser in postwar America,”Osiris 7, 105–134 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D. W. Forrest, Francis Galton: the Life and Works of a Victorian Genius (New York: Taplinger, 1974)

P. Galison, How Experiments End (Chicago: 1987)

F. Galton, Natural Inheritance (London: Macmillan, 1889)

S. Geisser, “The contributions of Sir Harold Jeffreys to Bayesian inference,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)

G. Gigerenzer, “Probabilistic thinking and the flight against subjectivity,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

G. Gigerenzer, Z. Swijtink, T. Porter, L. Daston, J. Beatty, and L. Krüger, The Empire of Chance (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1989)

Glenday, R., “The use and measure of economic statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 98, 497–505 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

I. J. Good, Probability and the Weighing of Evidence (London: Charles Griffin, 1950)

Good, I. J., Review of Jeffreys's Theory of Probability, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 125, 487–489 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

I. J. Good, The Estimation of Probabilities (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965)

I. J. Good, “The contributions of Jeffreys to Bayesian statistics,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)

I. J. Good, Good Thinking (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983)

G. Gooday, “The morals of energy metering: constructing and deconstructing the precision of the Victorian electrical engineer's ammeter and voltmeter,” in M. Wise 1995

Gordon, A. P. L., “The statistics of totalisator betting,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 94, 31–76 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

S. J. Gould, The Panda's Thumb (New York: Norton, 1980)

I. Grattan-Guinness, ed., Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences (London: Routledge, 1994)

Greenwood, M., Review of H. Westergaard's Contributions to the History of Statistics, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 95, 720–2 (1932)Google Scholar

Greenwood, M., “On the value of Royal Commissions in sociological research, with special reference to the birth-rate,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 100, 396–401 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. R. Grimmett and D. R. Stirzaker, Probability and Random Processes (Oxford: O.U.P., 1982 [1992])

I. Hacking, The Emergence of Probability: a Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference (London: C.U.P., 1975)

I. Hacking, The Taming of Chance (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1990)

I. Hacking, “The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences,” in A. Pickering ed., Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: U.C.P., 1992)

A. Hald, A History of Probability and Statistics and their Applications before 1750 (New York: Wiley, 1990)

Haldane, J. B. S., “A note on inverse probability,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 28, 55–61 (1932a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S., “Determinism,”Nature 129, 315–6 (1932b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S., “Karl Pearson, 1857–1957,”Biometrika 44, 303–313 (1957); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. H. Hansen and W. G. Madow, “Some important events in the historical development of sample surveys,” in Owen, 1976

B. Harshbarger, “History of the early developments of modern statistics in America (1920–44),” in Owen, 1976

J. Heilbron, “The earliest missionaries of the Copenhagen spirit,” in E. Ullmann-Margalit, ed., Science in Reflection, BSPS 110 (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988)

J. Heilbron and R. Seidel, Lawrence and His Laboratory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)

Hendry, J., “Weimar culture and quantum causality,”Hist. Sci. 18, 155–180 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, A. B., “The enumeration of population of the meetings of the society,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 99, 162–164B (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, I. D., “Statistical Society of London – Royal Statistical Society, the first 100 years: 1834–1934,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 147, 130–9 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, B. K., “The Chevalier de Méré and the power of excessive gambling,”Chance 4, 5 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Holmes, The Age of the Earth (London: Harper, 1913)

R. A. Horváth, “The rise of macroeconomic calculations in economic statistics,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

Hotelling, H., Review of Fisher's Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Jou. Am. Stat. Soc. 22, 411–2 (1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B. F. Howell, An Introduction to Seismological Research: History and Development (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1990)

Howson, C., “On the consistency of Jeffreys's Simplicity Postulate, and its role in Bayesian inference,”Phil. Quart. 38, 68–83 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C. Howson and P. Urbach, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach (Chicago: Open Court, 1993)

B. Hunt, “Rigorous discipline: Oliver Heaviside versus the mathematicians,” in P. Dear, ed., The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical studies (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991a)

B. Hunt, The Maxwellians (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991b)

V. S. Huzurbazar, “Bayesian inference and invariant prior probabilities,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)

Huzurbazar, V. S., “Sir Harold Jeffreys: recollections of a student,”Chance 4, 18–21 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, J. O., “Recent advances in mathematical statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 97, 114–54 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, J. O. (with Cochran, W. G., Fieller, E. C., and Stevens, W. L.), “Recent advances in mathematical statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 99, 714–69 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, J. O., Review of Jeffreys's Theory of Probability, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 104, 59–64 (1941)Google Scholar

Isserlis, L., “Inverse probability,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 99, 130–7 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

E. Jaynes, “Probability theory as logic,” in P. Fougère, ed., Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990)

Jeffreys, B., “Harold Jeffreys: some reminiscences,”Chance 4, 22–23, 26 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, B., “Reminiscences and discoveries: Harold Jeffreys from 1891 to 1940,”Notes. Rec. R. Soc. Lon. 46, 301–8 (1992)Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “On the crucial tests of Einstein's theory of gravitation,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 80, 138–154 (1919)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Tidal friction in shallow seas,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lon. A 221, 239–64 (1920)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “The concept of space in physics,”Nature 107, 267–8; “The physical status of space,”Nature 107, 394 (1921a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Uniform motion in the aether,”Nature 107, 7467; 108, 80 (1921b)Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “The age of the Earth,”Nature 108, 284, 370 (1921c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Relativity and materialism,”Nature 108, 568–9 (1921d)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., Review of Keynes's A Treatise on Probability, Nature 109, 132–3 (1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “The Pamir earthquake of 1911 Feb. 18 in relation to the depths of earthquake foci,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Geophys. Suppl. 1, 22–31 (1923a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., Review of Campbell's Physics, the Elements, Phil. Mag. 46, 1021–5 (1923b)Google Scholar

H. Jeffreys, The Earth: Its Origin, History, and Physical Constitution (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1924)

H. Jeffreys, “The evolution of the Earth as a planet,” in Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge (London: Blackie and Son, 1925)

Jeffreys, H., “The rigidity of the Earth's central core,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Geophys. Suppl. 1, 371–83 (1926)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

H. Jeffreys, Operational Methods in Mathematical Physics (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1927)

Jeffreys, H., Review of Bridgman's The Logic of Modern Physics, Nature 121, 86–7 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “The planetismal hypothesis,”Observatory 52, 173–7 (1929)Google Scholar

H. Jeffreys, Scientific Inference (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1931; reissued with addenda, 1937)

Jeffreys, H., “An Alternative to the Rejection of Observations,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 137, 78–87 (1932a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “On the theory of errors and least squares,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 138, 48–54 (1932b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “On the prior probability in the theory of sampling,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 29, 83–7 (1932c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Probability, statistics, and the theory of errors,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 140, 523–535 (1933a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “On Gauss's proof of the normal law of errors,”Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 29, 231–4 (1933b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Probability and scientific method,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 146, 9–16 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “On some criticisms of the theory of probability,”Phil. Mag. 22, 337–359 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Modern Aristotelianism: contribution to discussion,”Nature 139, 1004–5 (1937)Google Scholar

H. Jeffreys and K. E. Bullen, Seismological Tables (British Association: the Gray-Milne Trust, 1940)

Jeffreys, H., “Probability and quantum theory,”Phil. Mag. 33, 815–31 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “An invariant form of the prior probability in estimation problems,”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 186, 453–61 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939; second edition 1948; third edition 1961)

Jeffreys, H., Review of Savage, L. J., ed., The Foundations of Statistical Inference, Technometrics 5, 407–10 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H., “Fisher and inverse probability,”Int. Stat. Rev. 42, 1–3 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

H. Jeffreys, “Some general points in probability theory,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)

Johnson, W. E., “Probability,”Mind 41, 1–16; 281–96; 409–23 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, D. C. and Clark, C. G., “Housing in Liverpool: a survey by sample of present conditions,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 93, 489–537 (1930)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. Jorland, “The Saint Petersburg paradox,” in L. Krüger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 1987

Kendall, M. G. and Smith, B. B., “Randomness and random sampling numbers,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 101, 147–66 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, M. G., Review of von Mises's Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik, und Wahrheit, Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 102, 87–9 (1939)Google Scholar

Kendall, M. G., “George Udny Yule, 1871–1951,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 115A, 156–61 (1952); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970Google Scholar

M. G. Kendall and R. L. Plackett, eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability: Vol. 2 (London: Griffin, 1977)

Kennet of the Dere, Lord [i.e., Young, E. H.], “The consumption of statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 100, 1–17 (1937)Google Scholar

D. Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985)

J. M. Keynes, Treatise on Probability (London: Macmillan, 1921; reprinted 1973)

J. M. Keynes, Essays in Biography (London: Macmillan, 1933; revised edition, ed. G. Keynes, New York: Norton, 1963)

J. M. Keynes, Two Memoirs: Dr Melchior, a Defeated Enemy, and My Early Beliefs (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1949)

Knopoff, L., “Sir Harold Jeffreys: The Earth: Its Origin, History, and Physical Constitution,”Chance 4, 24–26 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Koestler, The Case of the Mid-Wife Toad (London: Hutchinson, 1971)

R. E. Kohler, Lords of the Fly (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994)

A. N. Kolmogorov, Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Ergehisse der Mathematik 2, 196–262 (1933); translated by N. Morrison as Foundations of the Theory of Probability (New York: Chelsea Publishing Co., 1950)

L. Krüger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 1: Ideas in History (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1987)

L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, and M. Morgan, eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 2: Ideas in the Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1987)

T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: U.C.P., 1962; second ed. 1970)

D. A. Lane, “Fisher, Jeffreys, and the nature of probability,” in R. A. Fisher: An Appreciation (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980)

Lapwood, E. R., “Contributions of Sir Harold Jeffreys to theoretical geophysics,”Math. Scientist 7, 69–84 (1982)Google Scholar

L. Laudan, Science and Relativism (Chicago: U.C.P., 1990)

D. V. Lindley, “Jeffreys's contribution to modern statistical thought,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)

D. V. Lindley, “On re-reading Jeffreys,” in Francis, ed., Proceedings of the Pacific Statistical Congress (North-Holland, 1986)

Lindley, D. V., in “Fisher: a retrospective,”Chance 3, 31–2 (1990)Google Scholar

Lindley, D. V., “Sir Harold Jeffreys,”Chance 4, 10–14, 21 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

T. Loredo, “From Laplace to supernova Sn 1987A: Bayesian inference in astrophysics,” in P. Fougère, ed., Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990)

D. MacKenzie, Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981)

Macrosty, H. W., “Memorial on earnings and cost of living,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 99, 360–3 (1936); reply from T. W. Phillips, 556–7; response from Macrosty, 557–8Google Scholar

W. F. Maunder, “Sir Arthur Lyon Bowley (1869–1957),” in Kendall and Plackett, 1977

D. Mayo, Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (Chicago: C.U.P., 1996)

E. Mayr and W. B. Provine, The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980; paperback edition 1998)

J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg, The Historical Development of Quantum Mechanics (New York: Springer, 1982–1987)

C. Ménard, “Why was there no probabilistic revolution in economic thought,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

R. Merton, Sociology of Science (Chicago: U.C.P., 1983)

K. H. Metz, “Paupers and numbers: the statistical argument for social reform in Britain during the period of industrialization,” in L. Krüger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 1987

J. S. Mill, A System of Logic (London: John W. Parker, 1843)

R. von Mises, Probability, Statistics, and Truth (New York: Allen and Unwin, trans. 1957)

R. Monk, Ludwig Wittgenstein: the Duty of Genius (London: Cape, 1990)

R. Monk, Bertrand Russell: the Spirit of Solitude (London: Cape, 1996)

M. Morgan, “The probabilistic revolution in economics – an overview,” and “Statistics without probability and Haavelmo's revolution in econometrics,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, trans. R. T. Berger (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1955)

Neyman, J., “On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 97, 558–625 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neyman, J., “Statistical problems in agricultural experimentation,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Suppl. 2, 107–180 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

, J. Neyman and Pearson, E. S., “On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria,”Biometrika 20A, 175–240 (1928)Google Scholar

, J. Neyman and Pearson, E. S., “The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori,”Cam. Phil. Soc. 29, 492–510 (1933)Google Scholar

J. Neyman, Lectures and Conferences on Mathematical Statistics (Washington, D.C.: Graduate School of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1938)

N. Nicolson, ed., The Diaries of Virginia Woolf, Volume II: 1912–1922 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976)

Norton, B. J., “Karl Pearson and statistics: the social origins of scientific innovation,”Soc. Stud. Sci. 8, 3–34 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Obserchall, “The two empirical roots of social theory and the probability revolution,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan, 1987

K. M. Olesko, “The meaning of precision: the exact sensibility in early nineteenth-century Germany,” in Wise, 1995

Olkin, I., “A conversation with Maurice Bartlett,”Stat. Sci. 4, 151–163 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D. B. Owen, ed., On the History of Statistics and Probability (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1976)

Pearson, E. S., “Statistical method in the control and standardization of the quality of manufactured products,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 96, 21–75 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, E. S., “Some incidents in the early history of biometry, 1890–94,”Biometrika 52, 3–18 (1965); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

E. S. Pearson, “The Neyman–Pearson story: 1926–34,” in Festschrift for J. Neyman (New York: John Wiley, 1966); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970

Pearson, E. S., “Some early correspondence between W. S. Gosset, R. A. Fisher, and Karl Pearson, with notes and comments,”Biometrika 55, 445–57 (1968); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970Google Scholar

Pearson, E. S., “Memories of the impact of Fisher's work in the 1920s,”Int. Stat. Rev. 42, 5–8 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

E. S. Pearson and M. G. Kendall, eds, Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability (London: Charles Griffin, 1970)

E. S. Pearson, eds. R. L. Plackett and G. A. Barnard, ‘Student:’ a Statistical Biography of William Sealy Gosset (Oxford: O.U.P., 1990)

K. Pearson, The Grammar of Science (London: Walter Scott, 1892; second edition, 1900; third edition, London: Adam and Charles Black, 1911)

Pearson, K., “The fundamental problem of practical statistics,”Biometrika 13, 1–16 (1920a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, K., “Notes on the history of correlation,”Biometrika 13, 25–45 (1920b); reprinted in Pearson and Kendall, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, K., “Further note on the χ2 goodness of fit,”Biometrika 14, 418 (1922)Google Scholar

K. Pearson, The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries, ed. E. S. Pearson (London: Charles Griffin, 1978)

D. Pestre and J. Krige, “Some thoughts on the early history of CERN,” in P. Galison and B. Hevly, Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1992)

Pickering, A., “Editing and epistemology: three accounts of the discovery of the weak neutral current,”Knowledge and Society 8, 217–32 (1989)Google Scholar

A. Pickering and A. Stephanides, “Constructing quaternions: on the analysis of conceptual practice,” in A. Pickering, ed., Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: U.C.P., 1992)

Plackett, R. L., “Royal Statistical Society, the last 50 years: 1934–1984,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 147, 140–50 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plackett, R. L., Reply to S. L. Zabell, Stat. Sci. 4, 256–258 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. von Plato, Creating Modern Probability: Its Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1994)

H. Poincaré, Science and Hypothesis (London: Walter Scott, 1905; New York: Dover, 1952)

T. Porter, The Rise of Statistical Thinking (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986)

T. Porter, Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1995)

W. B. Provine, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971)

S. Press, Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications (New York: Wiley, 1989)

F. P. Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, ed. R. B. Braithwaite (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1931)

Redhead, M. L. G., “A Bayesian reconstruction of the methodology of scientific research programmes,”Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 11, 341–347 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C. Reid, Neyman – From Life (Springer: New York, 1982)

Rhodes, E. C., “The construction of an index of business activity,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 100, 18–66 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D. Ross, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1991)

A. Rusnock, “Quantification, precision, and accuracy: determination of population in the Ancien Régime,” in Wise, 1995

L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley, 1954; Dover 1972)

Savage, L. J., “On re-reading R. A. Fisher,” (with discussion)Ann. Statist. 3, 441–500 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

L. J. Savage, “Reading note, 1960,” in A. I. Dale, A History of Inverse Probability: From Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991)

S. Schaffer, “Accurate measurement is an English science,” in Wise, 1995

S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985)

S. Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)

W. A. Shewart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Products (New York: Van Nostrand, 1931)

D. S. Sivia, Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial (Oxford: O.U.P., 1996)

C. W. Smith and M. N. Wise, Energy and Empire: a Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1989)

A. Sokal and J. Bricmont, Intellectual Impostures (London: Profile, 1998)

Soper, H. E., Young, A. W., Cave, B. M., Lee, A., and Pearson, K., “A cooperative study. On the distribution of the correlation coefficient in small samples. Appendix to the papers of ‘Student’ and R. A. Fisher,”Biometrika 11, 328–413 (1917)Google Scholar

Soper, H. E., “Sampling moments of n units each drawn from an unchanging sampled population, for the point of view of semi-invariants,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 93, 104–114 (1930)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterling, T. D., “Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance – or vice versa,”Jou. Am. Stat. Soc. 54, 30–4 (1959)Google Scholar

S. Stigler, History of Statistics (Harvard Univ. Press, 1986)

J. Strachey and A. Strachey, in P. Meisel and W. Kendrick, eds., Bloomsbury/Freud, The Letters of James and Alix Strachey 1924–1925 (New York: Basic Books, 1986)

‘Student’ [i.e., Gosset, W. S.], “The probable error of a mean,”Biometrika 6, 1–25 (1908)Google Scholar

Z. Switjink, “The objectification of observation: measurement and statistical methods in the nineteenth century,” in L. Krüger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 1987

Synge, E. H., “Uniform motion in the aether,”Nature 107, 747; 108, 80 (1921)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

I. Todhunter, History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability (London: Macmillan, 1865)

S. Traweek, Beamtimes and Lifetimes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988)

J. R. G. Turner, “Random genetic drift, R. A. Fisher, and the Oxford School of ecological genetics,” in Krüger, Gigerenzer, and Morgan 1987

J. Venn, The Logic of Chance (London: Macmillan, 1866; New York: Chelsea, 1962)

A. Wald, Sequential Analysis (New York: Wiley, 1947)

Warwick, A., “Cambridge mathematics and Cavendish physics: Cunningham, Campbell and Einstein's relativity 1905–1911, Part I: The uses of theory,”Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 23, 625–56 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warwick, A., “Cambridge mathematics and Cavendish physics: Cunningham, Campbell and Einstein's relativity 1905–1911, Part II: Comparing traditions in Cambridge physics,”Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 24, 1–25 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. Weber, Historical Aspects of the Bayesian Controversy (Tucson, Arizona: Division of Economic and Business Research, 1973)

R. L. Weber, Random Walks in Science (London: Institute of Physics, 1973)

Wilson, E. B., “Boole's challenge problem,”Jou. Am. Stat. Soc. 29, 301–4 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. N. Wise, ed., The Values of Precision (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1995)

Wishart, J., “Statistics in agricultural research,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Suppl. 1, 26–61 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wishart, J., “Some aspects of the teaching of statistics,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 103, 532–564 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wisniewski, J., “A note on inverse probability,”Jou. Roy. Stat. Soc. 100, 418–20 (1937)Google Scholar

L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C. K. Ogden and F. P. Ramsey (London: Routledge, 1922)

Wright, S., “Evolution in Mendelian populations,”Genetics 16, 97–159 (1931)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “On some aspects of the theory of probability,”Phil. Mag. 38, 715–731 (1919)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “On certain fundamental principles of scientific inquiry,”Phil. Mag. 42, 369–90 (1921a)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “The relationship between geometry and Einstein's theory of gravitation,”Nature 106, 806–809 (1921b)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “On the seismic waves from the Oppau explosion of 1921 Sept. 21,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Geophys. Suppl. 1, 15–22 (1923a)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “On certain fundamental principles of scientific inquiry (second paper),”Phil. Mag. 45, 368–374 (1923b)Google Scholar

, D. Wrinch and Jeffreys, H., “The theory of mensuration,”Phil. Mag. 46, 1–22 (1923c)Google Scholar

Yates, F., “The influence of ‘Statistical Methods for Research Workers’ on the development of the science of statistics,”Jou. Am. Stat. Ass. 46, 19–34 (1951)Google Scholar

, F. Yates and Mather, K., “Ronald Aylmer Fisher,”Biog. Mem. Fell. Roy. Soc. 9, 91–129 (1963)Google Scholar

, G. U. Yule and Filon, L. N. G., “Karl Pearson, 1857–1936,”Obit. Not. Fell. Roy. Soc. 2, 73–110 (1936)Google Scholar

Zabell, S. L., “W. E. Johnson's ‘Sufficientness’ Postulate,”Annals of Statistics 10, 1091–99 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zabell, S. L., “The Rule of Succession,”Erkenntnis 31, 283–321 (1989a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zabell, S. L., “R. A. Fisher on the history of Inverse Probability,”Stat. Sci. 4, 247–263 (1989b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zabell, S. L., “Ramsey, truth, and probability,”Theoria 57, 211–238 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zabell, S. L., “R. A. Fisher and the fiducial argument,”Stat. Sci. 7, 369–387 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Zellner, “Introduction,” in A. Zellner, ed., Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980)