Bibliography

Michael Wade Martin; Jason A. Whitlark

doi:10.1017/9781108554763.011

Allen, David M. “Who, What, Why? The Worship of the Firstborn in Hebrews 1:6.” Pages 159–75 in Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism: Essays in Honor of Larry Hurtado. Edited by Keith, Chris and Roth, Dieter. The Library of New Testament Studies 528. London: T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar

Aletti, Jean-Noël. “La présence d’un modèle rhétorique en Romains: Son role et son importance.” Biblica 71 (1990): 1–24.Google Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. “Quid Athenis et Hierosdolymis? Rabbinic Midrash and Hermeneutics in the Graeco-Roman World.” Pages 97–115 in A Tribute to Géza Vermès: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History. Edited by Davies, Philip R. and White, Richard T.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 100. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Amador, J. D. H. “Revisiting 2 Corinthians: Rhetoric and the Case of Unity.” New Testament Studies 46 (2000): 92–111.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kevin L. Hebrews: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. “Paraenesis in a Homily (λόγος παρακλήσεως): The Possible Location of, and Socialization in, the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’” Semeia 50 (1990): 211–226.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. “The Psalms in Hebrews.” Pages 197–212 in The Psalms in the New Testament. Edited by Moyise, Steve and Menken, Maarten J. J.. New Testament and the Scriptures of Israel. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Aune, David E. “The Use and Abuse of Enthymeme in New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 49 (2003): 299–320.CrossRef Google Scholar

Backhaus, Knut. Der Hebräerbrief. Regensburger Neues Testament. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 2009.Google Scholar

Backhaus, Knut. “How to Entertain Angels: Ethics in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 149–175 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods – New Insights. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005.Google Scholar

Backhaus, Knut. Der Neue Bund und das Werden der Kirche: die Diatheke-Deutung des Hebräerbrief im Rahmen der frühchristlichen Theologiegeschichte. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen 29. Münster: Aschendorff, 1996.Google Scholar

Barclay, John. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora: From Alexander to Trajan 323 BCE–117 CE. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.Google Scholar

Barnard, Jody A. “Anti-Jewish Interpretations of Hebrews: Some Neglected Factors.” Melilah 11 (2014): 29–34.Google Scholar

Barnard, Jody A. The Mysticism of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/331. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “The Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 15–36 in The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Edited by Bauckham, R., Driver, Daniel R., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Baugh, S. M. “Hyperbaton and Greek Literary Style in Hebrews.” Novum Testamentum 59 (2017): 194–213.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H., and Erskine, Andrew. “Form and Function.” Pages 1–17 in Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Edited by Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. “The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians.” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 353–379.Google Scholar

Black, C. Clifton II. “The Rhetorical Form of the Hellenistic Jewish and Early Christian Sermon: A Response to Lawrence Wills.” Harvard Theological Review 81 (1988): 1–18.Google Scholar

Boccaccini, Gabriele. “The Evilness of Human Nature in 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Paul, and 4 Ezra: A Second Temple Jewish Debate.” Pages 63–79 in Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch: Reconstruction after the Fall. Edited by Henze, Matthias and Boccaccini, Gabriele. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 164. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. “Das Bekenntnis im Hebräerbrief.” Pages 188–203 in Studien zu Antike und Urchristentum: Gesammelte Aufsätze, Volume 2. Edited by Bornkamm, Günther. Beiträge zur evangelischen Theologie 28. Munich: Kaiser, 1963.Google Scholar

Bovon, François. “Names and Number in Early Christianity.” New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 267–288.Google Scholar

Brauw, Michael de. “The Parts of the Speech.” Pages 187–202 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

Bruce, Frederick F. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar

Büschel, F. “Hebräerbrief.” Pages 1669–1673 in vol. 2 of Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Handwörterbuch für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft. Edited by Gunkel, H. and Zscharnack, L.. 2nd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1928.Google Scholar

Byron, John. “Living in the Shadow of Cain: Echoes of a Developing Tradition in James 5:1–6.” Novum Testamentum 48 (2006): 261–274.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caird, George B. “Son by Appointment.” Pages 73–81 in vol. 1 of The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke. Edited by Weinrich, W. C.. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Caneday, Ardel B. “The Eschatological World Already Subjected to the Son.” Pages 28–39 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Catto, Stephen K. Reconstructing the First-Century Synagogue: A Critical Analysis of Current Research. The Library of New Testament Studies 363. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar

Cockerill, Gareth Lee. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar

Conley, Thomas A. “Philo of Alexandria.” Pages 695–713 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Conley, Thomas A. “The Enthymeme in Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 166–187.Google Scholar

D’Angelo, Mary. Moses in the Letter to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 42. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Daube, David. “Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric.” Hebrew Union College Annual 22 (1979): 239–64.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, Reinhard. Gotteshymnus und Christushymnus in der frühen Christenheit. Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967.Google Scholar

DeSilva, David. A. Despising Shame: Honor Discourse and Community Maintenance in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 152. Atlanta: Scholars, 1995.Google Scholar

DeSilva, David. A. Perseverance in Gratitude: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Epistle “to the Hebrews”. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

Duff, Tim. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Eisenbaum, Pamela. Jewish Heroes of Christian History: Hebrews 11 in Literary Context. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 156. Atlanta: Scholars, 1997.Google Scholar

Ellingworth, Paul. The Epistle to the Hebrews: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar

Ellis, E. E. The Old Testament in Early Christianity: Canon and Interpretation in the Light of Modern Research. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1991.Google Scholar

Erbse, Hartmut. “Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs.” Hermes 84 (1956): 398–424.Google Scholar

Eskola, Timo. Messiah and the Throne. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/142. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar

Esler, Philip. “Collective Memory and Hebrews 11: Outlining a New Investigative Framework.” Pages 151–171 in Memory, Tradition and Text: The Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Edited by Kirk, Alan and Thatcher, Tom. Semeia Studies 52. Leiden, Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Filson, Floyd V. “Yesterday”: A Study of Hebrews in the Light of Chapter 13. Studies in Biblical Theology 4. Naperville: Allenson, 1967.Google Scholar

Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. “Creation and Salvation in Hebrews.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 280–303.Google Scholar

Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. The Identity of God’s People and the Paradox of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/400. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar

Filtvedt, Ole Jakob, and Wessbrandt, Martin. “Exploring the High Priesthood of Jesus in Early Christian Sources.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 96–114.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. A. “Aristotle on the Period.” The Classical Quarterly 32 (1982): 89–99.Google Scholar

France, R. T. “The Writer of Hebrews as Biblical Expositor.” Tyndale Bulletin 47 (1996): 246–276.Google Scholar

Frankowski, Janusz. “Early Christian Hymns Recorded in the New Testament: A Reconsideration of the Question in Light of Heb 1, 3.” Biblische Zeitschrift 27 (1983): 183–194.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gäbel, Georg. Die Kulttheologie des Hebräerbriefes: Eine exegetisch-religionsgeschichtliche Studie. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/212. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar

Geiger, Joseph. “Nepos and Plutarch: From Latin to Greek Political Biography.” Illinois Classical Studies 13 (1988): 245–256.Google Scholar

Gelardini, Gabriella. “From ‘Linguistic Turn’ and Hebrews Scholarship to Anadiplosis Iterata: The Enigma of Structure.” Harvard Theological Review 102 (2009): 51–72.Google Scholar

Gelardini, Gabriella. “Hebrews, Homiletics, and Liturgical Scripture Interpretation.” Pages 121–144 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar

Gelardini, Gabriella. “Rhetorical Criticism in Hebrews Scholarship: Avenues and Aporias.” Pages 213–236 in Method and Meaning: Essays on New Testament Interpretation in Honor of Harold W. Attridge. Edited by McGowan, Andrew B. and Richards, Kent Harold. Resources for Biblical Study 67. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar

Gelardini, Gabriella. “Verhärtet eure Herzen nicht”: Der Hebräer, eine Synagogenhomilie zu Tischa Be-Aw. Biblical Interpretation Series 83. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher. “The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism.” The Classical Quarterly (1984): 149–166.Google Scholar

Goodspeed, Edgar J. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New York: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar

Gräbe, Peter “The New Covenant and Christian Identity in Hebrews.” Pages 118–127 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Gräßer, Erich. An die Hebräer: Hebr 1–6. Evangelische-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 17/1. Zürich: Benziger Verlag/Neukirchener Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jonathan I. Hebrews and Divine Speech. The Library of New Testament Studies 507. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar

Grillo, Luca. Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Guthrie, George H. “Hebrews in Its First-Century Contexts: Recent Research.” Pages 413–443 in The Face of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research. Edited by McKnight, Scot and Osborne, Grant R.. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar

Guthrie, George H. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 73. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar

Guzmán, Ron, and Martin, Michael W.. “Is Hebrews 5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?” Novum Testamentum 57 (2015): 295–310.Google Scholar

Gyllenberg, Rafael. “Die Komposition des Hebräerbriefs.” Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 22–23 (1957–1958): 137–147.Google Scholar

Hahn, Scott. “A Broken Covenant and the Curse of Death: A Study of Hebrews 9:15–22.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66 (2004): 416–436.Google Scholar

Hearing, Theodor. “Gedankengang und Grundgedanken des Hebräerbriefs.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 18 (1917–1918): 145–164.Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm. “Codifications of Rhetoric.” Pages 59–74 in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm. “Invention.” Pages 89–119 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm. “Theon and the Progymnasmata.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 43 (2002): 129–160.Google Scholar

Heil, John Paul. Hebrews: Chiastic Structures and Audience Response. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 46. Washington D. C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2010.Google Scholar

Highet, Gilbert. The Speeches of Vergil’s Aeneid. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Horton, Fred L. The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society for the Study of the New Testament Monograph Series 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Horrell, David H. “Ethnicisation, Marriage, and Early Christian Identity: Critical Reflections on 1 Corinthians 7, 1 Peter 3 and Modern New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 439–460.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hughes, Philip E. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar

Huizenga, Leroy A. The New Isaac: Tradition and Intertextuality in the Gospel of Matthew. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 131. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Hurst, L. D. “The Christology of Hebrews 1 and 2.” Pages 151–164 in The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird. Edited by Hurst, L. D. and Wright, N. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.CrossRef Google Scholar

Isaacs, Marie E. Reading Hebrews and James: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Macon: Smyth and Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar

Jamieson, R. B. “Hebrews 9.23: Cult Inauguration, Yom Kippur and the Cleansing of the Heavenly Tabernacle.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 569–587.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jipp, Joshua W. “The Son’s Entrance into the Heavenly World: The Soteriological Necessity of the Scriptural Catena in Hebrews 1.5–14.” New Testament Studies 56 (2010): 557–575.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. Hebrews: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006.Google Scholar

Joslin, Barry C. “Can Hebrews Be Structured? An Assessment of Eight Approaches.” Currents in Biblical Research 6 (2007): 99–129.Google Scholar

Karrer, Martin. Der Brief an die Hebräer: Kapitel 5,11–13,25. Ökumenischer Taschenbush-Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 20/2. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2008.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A. Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A. “Historical Survey of Rhetoric.” Pages 3–41 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: SBL, 2003.Google Scholar

Koester, Craig R. Hebrews: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 36. New York: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar

Koester, Craig R. “Hebrews, Rhetoric, and the Future of Humanity.” Pages 99–120 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atalnta: SBL, 2011.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kraus, Manfred. “Theories and Practice of Enthymeme in the First Centuries B.C.E. and C.E.” Pages 95–111 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar

Kümmel, W. G. Introduction to the New Testament. Translated by Kee, H. C.. Nashville: Abingdon, 1975.Google Scholar

Laansma, Jon. “I Will Give You Rest”: The Rest Motif in the New Testament with Special Reference to MT 11 and Heb 3–4. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/98. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.Google Scholar

Lampe, Peter. “Rhetorical Analysis of Pauline Texts—Quo Vadit?” Pages 3–24 in Paul and Rhetoric. Edited by Sampley, J. Paul and Lampe, Peter. New York: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Landgraf, Paul David. “The Structure of Hebrews: A Word of Exhortation in Light of the Day of Atonement.” Pages 19–27 in A Cloud of Witnesses: A Theology of Hebrews in its Ancient Contexts. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Lane, William L. Hebrews 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991.Google Scholar

Larmour, David H. J. “Making Parallels: Synkrisis and Plutarch’s ‘Themistocles and Camillus’.” ANRW 33.6: 4154–4200. Part 2, Principat, 33.6. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York: de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Edited by Orton, David and Anderson, R. Dean. Translated by Bliss, Matthew, Jansen, Annemiek, and Orton, David. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar

Lehne, Susanne. The New Covenant in Hebrews. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 44. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Levenson, Jon D. The Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son: The Transformation of Child Sacrifice in Judaism and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Andrew. Hebrews: A Guide. London: T&T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar

Lindars, Barnabas. “The Rhetorical Structure of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 35 (1989): 382–406.Google Scholar

Lindsay, William. Lectures on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Edinburgh: William Oliphant, 1867.Google Scholar

Loader, William R. G. Sohn und Hoherpriester: Eine traitionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Christologie des Hebräerbriefes. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 53. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1981.Google Scholar

Löhr, Hermut. “Reflections of Rhetorical Terminology in Hebrews.” Pages 199–210 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods—New Insights. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Atlanta: SBL, 2005.Google Scholar

Long, Frederick J. Ancient Rhetoric and Paul’s Apology: The Compositional Unity of 2 Corinthians. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Longenecker, Richard N. Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975.Google Scholar

Lünnemann, Gottlieb. Handbuch über den Hebräerbrief. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1864.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. Judas and the Rhetoric of Syncrisis in the Fourth Gospel. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. “The Poetry of the Lord’s Prayer: A Study in Poetic Device.” Journal of Biblical Literature 134 (2015): 347–372.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. “Progymnastic Topic Lists: A Compositional Template for Luke and Other Bioi?” New Testament Studies 54 (2008): 18–41.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael, and Nash, Bryan. “Philippians 2:6–11 as Subversive Hymnos: A Study in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Theory.” Journal of Theological Studies 66 (2015): 90–138.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 58 (2012): 379–400.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “The Encomiastic Topics of Syncrisis as the Key to the Structure and Argument of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 57 (2011): 415–439.Google Scholar

Martin, Troy W., ed. Genealogies of New Testament Rhetorical Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar

Martin, Troy W., ed. “Invention and Arrangement in Recent Pauline Studies: A Survey of the Practices and the Problems.” Pages 48–118 in Paul and the Ancient Letter Form. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A.. Pauline Studies 6. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Mason, Eric F. “You Are a Priest Forever”: Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 74. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Meier, J. P. “Symmetry and Theology in the Old Testament Citations in Heb 1,5–14.” Biblica 66 (1985): 504–533.Google Scholar

Michel, Otto. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Übersetzt und erklärt. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Alan C. Hebrews. Sacra Pagina 13. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Moffatt, James. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1979.Google Scholar

Moffitt, David M. Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 141. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Moffitt, David M. “But We Do See Abel: Hebrews and the Depiction of Abel’s Sacrifice in Some Mosaics of Ravenna.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar

Murphy, James Jerome. Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. Paul the Letter Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills. Good News Studies 41. Collegeville: Michael Glazier, 1995.Google Scholar

Nauck, Wolfgang. “Zum Aufbau des Hebräerbriefes.” Pages 199–206 in Judentum, Urchristentum, Kirche, Festschrift für Joachim Jeremias. Edited by Eltester, Walter. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 26. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1960.Google Scholar

Neeley, Linda L. “A Discourse Analysis of Hebrews.” Occasional Papers in Translation and Textlinguistics 3–4 (1987): 1–146.Google Scholar

Neyrey, Jerome H. “Encomion Versus Vituperation: Contrasting Portraits of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007): 529–552.Google Scholar

Nissilä, Keijo. Das Hohepriestermotiv im Hebräerbrief: Eine Exegetische Untersuchung. Schriften der Finnischen Exegetischen Gesellschaft 33. Helsinki: Oy Liiton Kirjapaino, 1979.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Peter. The Letter to the Hebrews. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

Olbricht, Thomas H. “Anticipating and Presenting the Case for Christ as High Priest in Hebrews.” Pages 355–372 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar

Olbricht, Thomas H. “Hebrews as Amplification.” Pages 375–387 in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Oliver, J. H. “The Ruler Power: A Study of the Roman Empire in the Second Century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43/4 (1953): 871–1003.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C. Acts. Paideia. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar

Pelling, Christopher. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. London: Duckworth, 2002.Google Scholar

Perlman, S. “The Historical Example, Its Use and Importance as Political Propaganda in the Attic Orators.” Pages 150–166 in Studies in History. Edited by Fuks, Alexander and Halpern, Israel. Scripta Hierosolymitana 7. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961.Google Scholar

Perry, Peter S. The Rhetoric of Digressions: Revelation 7:1–17 and 10:1–11:13 and Ancient Communication. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/268. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Peterson, David. Hebrews and Perfection: An Examination of the Concept of Perfection in the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’ Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pierce, Madison N. “Intra-Divine Discourse and the New Covenant in Hebrews: Subtext(s) in Hebrews 8–10.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar

Rissi, Mathias. Die Theologie des Hebräerbriefs: Ihre Verankerung in der Situation des Verfassers und seiner Leser. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 41. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar

Robertson, John C. The Gorgianic Figures in Early Greek Prose. Baltimore: Friedenwald, 1893.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Clare K. Hebrews as Pseudepigraphon: The History and Significance of the Pauline Attribution of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/235. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. Plutarch. New York: Charles Scribner’s Son, 1973.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. “On Reading Plutarch’s Lives.” Pages 73–98 in Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Edited by Scardigli, B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Sanders, Jack T. The New Testament Christological Hymns: Their Historical Religious Background. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 15. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1971.Google Scholar

Schaff, Philip, ed. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. 14 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1889.Google Scholar

Schenck, Kenneth L. “A Celebration of the Enthroned Son: The Catena of Hebrews 1.” Journal of Biblical Literature 120 (2001): 469–485.Google Scholar

Schenck, Kenneth L. Cosmology and Eschatology in Hebrews: The Settings of Sacrifice. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schenck, Kenneth L. “Keeping His Appointment: Creation and Enthronement in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 66 (1997): 91–117.Google Scholar

Schenck, Kenneth L. “The Worship of Jesus among Early Christians: The Evidence from Hebrews.” Pages 114–126 in Jesus and Paul: Global Perspectives in Honor of James D. G. Dunn on His 70^th Birthday. Edited by Oropeza, B. J., Robertson, C. K., and Mohrmann, Douglas C.. The Library of New Testament Studies 414. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Schnelle, Udo. “Das frühe Christentum und die Bildung.” New Testament Studies 61 (2015): 113–143.Google Scholar

Schunack, Gerd. Der Hebräerbrief. Zürcher Bibelkommentare Neuen Testament 14. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2002.Google Scholar

Seid, Timothy W. “Synkrisis in Hebrews 7: Rhetorical Structure and Analysis.” Pages 322–347 in The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture: Essays from the 1996 Malibu Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Stamps, Dennis L.. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Siegert, Folker. “Homily and Panegyrical Sermon.” Pages 421–443 in Handbook of Classic Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Sheerin, Daniel. “Rhetorical and Hermeneutic Synkrisis in Patristic Typology.” Pages 22–39 in Nova & Vetera Patristic Studies in Honor of Thomas Patrick Halton. Edited by Petruccione, John. Washington D. C.: Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Small, Brian C. The Characterization of Jesus in the Book of Hebrews. Biblical Interpretation Series 128. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” American Journal of Philology 62 (1941): 35–50, 169–190.Google Scholar

Son, Kiwoong. Zion Symbolism in Hebrews: Hebrews 12:18–24 as a Hermeneutical Key to the Epistle. Paternoster Biblical Monographs. Milton Keys: Paternoster, 2005.Google Scholar

Spicq, Ceslas. L’Épître aux Hébreux. 2 vols. Echter Bibel. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1952-1953.Google Scholar

Standaert, Benoît. L’évangile selon Marc: Composition et genre littéraire. Nijmegen: Stichting Studentenpers, 1978.Google Scholar

Stanley, Steve. “The Structure of Hebrews from Three Perspectives.” Tyndale Bulletin 45 (1994): 245–71.Google Scholar

Steel, Catherine. “Divisions of Speech.” Pages 77–91 in A Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Stegemann, Ekkehard W., and Stegemann, Wolfgang. “Hebrews and the Discourse of Judeophobia.” Pages 357–69 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Stegner, William Richard. “The Ancient Jewish Synagogue Homily.” Pages 51–69 in Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament. Edited by Aune, David E.. Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study 21. Atlanta: Scholars, 1988.Google Scholar

Stermberger, Günter. “Response.” Pages 45–48 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Stermberger, Günter. “The Derashah in Rabbinic Times.” Pages 7–21 Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. From Prophecy to Preaching: A Survey for the Origins of the Christian Homily. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 59. Leiden: Brill, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. The Lamb’s High Feast: Melito, Peri Pascha and the Quartodeciman Paschal Liturgy at Sardis. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 42. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar

Svartvik, Jesper. “Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? On the Reception History of Hebrews 8:13.” Pages 316–342 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Swetnam, James. Jesus and Isaac: A Study of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Light of the Aqedah. Analecta Biblica 94. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1981.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. Reading Corinthians: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Rev. ed. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. Reading John: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles. Rev. ed. Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2005.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. Romans. Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. “The Way of the Lukan Jesus: Dimensions of Lukan Spirituality.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 9 (1982): 237–49.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H., and Whitlark, Jason. Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Thiessen, Matthew. “Hebrews 12.5–13, the Wilderness Period, and Israel’s Discipline.” New Testament Studies 55 (2009): 366–379.Google Scholar

Thompson, James W. “Argument and Persuasion in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 39 (2012): 361–377.Google Scholar

Thompson, James W. The Beginnings of Christian Philosophy: The Epistle to the Hebrews. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 13. Washington D.C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1982.Google Scholar

Thompson, James W. Hebrews. Paideia. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar

Thurén, Lauri. “The General New Testament Writings.” Pages 587–607 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Thyen, Hartwig. Der Stil der jüdisch-hellenistischen Homilie. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1955.Google Scholar

Übelacker, Walter G. Der Hebräerbrief als Appell: Untersuchungen zu exordium, narratio, und postscriptum (Hebr 1–2 und 13, 22–25). Coniectanea Biblica: New Testament Series 21. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1989.Google Scholar

Übelacker, Walter G. “Hebrews and the Implied Author’s Rhetorical Ethos.” Pages 316–334 in Rhetoric, Ethic, and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse: Essays from the 2002 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Olbricht, Thomas H. and Eriksson, Anders. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 11. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Usher, Stephen. “Symbouleutic Oratory.” Pages 220–235 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

Vaganay, Leon. “La plan de l’Épître aux Hébreux.” Pages 269–277 in Memorial Lagrange. Edited by Vincent, L.-H.. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1940.Google Scholar

Vanhoye, Albert. A Structured Translation of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Translated by Swetnam, James. Biblica, Subsidia 12. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1964.Google Scholar

Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épître aux Hébreux. 2nd ed. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1976.Google Scholar

Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épitre aux Hébreux. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1963.Google Scholar

Visotzky, Burton L. “Midrash, Christian Exegesis and the Hellenistic Hermeneutic.” Pages 111–131 in Current Trends in the Study of Midrash. Edited by Bakhos, C.. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 106. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

von Soden, Hermann. Hebräerbrief, Briefe des Petrus, Jakobus, Judas. Hand-Commentar zum neuen Testament 3. Tubingen: Mohr, 1899.Google Scholar

von Stockhausen, Annette. “Christian Perception of Jewish Preaching in Early Christianity?” Pages 49–70 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. Plutarch’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Wedderburn, A. J. M. “The ‘Letter’ to the Hebrews and Its Thirteenth Chapter.” New Testament Studies 50 (2004): 390–405.Google Scholar

Weiss, Hans-Friedrich. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 15. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991.Google Scholar

Westfall, Cynthia L. A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning. The Library of New Testament Studies 297. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Whitfield, Bryan J. Joshua Traditions and the Argument of Hebrews 3 and 4. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 194. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. “Cosmology and the Perfection of Humanity in Hebrews.” Pages 117–130 in Interpretation and the Claims of the Text: Resourcing New Testament Theology. Edited by Whitlark, Jason A., Longenecker, Bruce W., Novakovic, Lidija, and Parsons, Mikeal C.. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. Enabling Fidelity to God: Perseverance in Hebrews in Light of the Reciprocity Systems of the Ancient Mediterranean World. Paternoster Biblical Mongraphs. Milton Keyes: Paternoster Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. “Fidelity and New Covenant Enablement in Hebrews.” Pages 72–91 in Talbert, Charles H. and Whitlark, Jason A., Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. “The God of Peace and His Victorious King: Hebrews 13:20–21 and Its Roman Imperial Context.” Pages 155–178 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Attridge, Harold W. and Gelardini, Gabriella. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. Resisting Empire: Rethinking the Purpose of the Letter to “the Hebrews.” The Library of New Testament Studies 484. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar

Whitlark, Jason A. “The Warning against Idolatry: An Intertextual Examination of Septuagintal Warnings in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2012): 382–401.Google Scholar

Wills, Lawrence. “The Form of the Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity.” Harvard Theological Review 77 (1984): 277–283.Google Scholar

Windisch, Hans. Der Hebräerbrief: Handbuch zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1931.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben. Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James, and Jude. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben. The Indelible Image: The Theological and Ethical Thought World of the New Testament, Vol. 2: The Collective Witness. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Wuellner, Wilhelm. “Arrangement.” Pages 51–87 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Heinrich. Das Bekenntnis der Hoffnung: Tradition und Redaktion im Hebräerbrief. Boner biblische Beiträge. Koeln: Peter Hanstein Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar

Zoido, Juan Carlos Iglesias. “The Battle Exhortation in Ancient Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 25 (2007): 141–158.Google Scholar