Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-l6pkv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-04T16:33:49.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The triumph of tactics over strategy: 6 to 21 July

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

T. G. Otte
T. G. Otte
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

There, in Kakania, this misunderstood and since disappeared state, yet in so many ways exemplary without being so recognized, there was also tempo, just not too much tempo.

ROBERT MUSIL

The talks at Potsdam and Berlin on 5 and 6 July marked an important turning point during the events of the summer of 1914. In securing the ‘blank cheque’, the suave hawk Hoyos and the faux ‘gypsy’ ambassador Szögyény had achieved a remarkable diplomatic triumph, albeit one for entirely undiplomatic ends and one that was to remain well-concealed until war was imminent. The promise of unconditional German support gave the Ballhausplatz the assurance it had sought before any firm action against Serbia could be contemplated. For Berchtold the ‘blank cheque’ opened the road towards a swift and decisive move against the intractable southern neighbour. Its speed and decisiveness, and the specific circumstances of the Sarajevo regicide, created the chance of deterring intervention by the other Powers. Above all it offered the hope of circumscribing Russia’s room for interference, as German support had done in the Bosnian annexation crisis in 1908–9. Berlin’s support thus ought to ensure that the contemplated move against Serbia would not escalate into a wider conflict. If it did, then Germany would provide cover along the Monarchy’s long and vulnerable Galician frontier in the north. As was seen earlier, the notion of ‘settling accounts’ with Serbia set the tone of the discussions at Vienna in the days immediately after Sarajevo. The ‘blank cheque’ reinforced the belligerent attitude of senior Habsburg officials. It guaranteed that Austria-Hungary’s final reckoning with Serbia would be a military one. A diplomatic solution was now the least favoured option for Vienna.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
July Crisis
The World's Descent into War, Summer 1914
 , pp. 102 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Musil, R., Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften (2 vols., Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1987) i, 32.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. R., Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War (London, 1991), 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad von Hötzendorf, F., Aus meiner Dienstzeit , Der Ausgang des Balkankrieges und die Zeit bis zum Fürstenmord in Sarajevo (Vienna, 1922), app. 5, 730–1Google Scholar
Sondhaus, L., Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf: Architect of the Apocalypse (Boston and Leiden, 2000), 131–4.Google Scholar
Conrad von Hötzendorf, F., Aus meiner Dienstzeit , Die politischen und militärischen Vorgänge vom Fürstenmord in Sarajevo bis zum Abschluss der ersten und bis zum Beginn der zweiten Offensive gegen Serbien und Russland (Vienna, 1923), 39–40Google Scholar
Maurer, J. H., ‘Field Marshal Conrad von Hötzendorf and the Outbreak of the First World War’, Otte, T. G. and Pagedas, C. A. (eds.), Personalities, War and Diplomacy: Essays in International History (London, 1997), 44–5.Google Scholar
Giesl, W., Zwei Jahrzehnte im Nahen Orient. Aufzeichnungen, ed. von Steinitz, E. (Berlin, 1927), 256Google Scholar
Berchtold, , ‘Die ersten Tage nach dem Attentat vom 28. Juni’, as quoted in Hantsch, H., Leopold Graf Berchtold. Grandseigneur und Staatsmann (2 vols., Graz and Vienna, 1963) ii, 575–6.Google Scholar
Halperin, P. G., Anton Haus. Österreich-Ungarns Grossadmiral (Graz, 1998), 141–3.Google Scholar
Komjáthy, M. (ed.), Protokolle des Gemeinsame Ministerrates der Österreich-Ungarischen Monarchie (1914–1918) (Budapest, 1966)Google Scholar
Rauchensteiner, M., Der Tod des Doppeladlers. Österreich-Ungarn und der Erste Weltkrieg (Graz, 1993), 73–5Google Scholar
Vermes, G., István Tisza: The Liberal Vision and Conservative Statecraft of a Magyar Nationalist (New York, 1985), 222–3.Google Scholar
Regele, O., Generalstabschefs aus Vier Jahrhunderten. Das Amt des Chefs des Generalstabs in der Donaumonarchie. Seine Träger und Organe von 1529 bis 1918 (Vienna, 1966), 66.Google Scholar
Angelow, J., Kalkül und Prestige. Der Zweibund am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges (Vienna, 2000), 454.Google Scholar
Stone, N., ‘Hungary and the Crisis of July 1914’, JCH i, 1 (1966), 153–70Google Scholar
Bridge, F. R., From Sadowa to Sarajevo: The Foreign Policy of Austria-Hungary, 1866–1914 (London, 1972), 375.Google Scholar
Leslie, R., ‘Österreich-Ungarn vor dem Kriegsausbruch. Der Ballhausplatz in Wien im Juli 1914 aus der Sicht eines österreichisch-ungarischen Diplomaten’, Melville, R., Scharf, C., Vogt, M. and Wengenroth, U. (eds.), Deutschland und Europa in der Neuzeit. Festschrift für Karl Otmar von Aretin (Stuttgart, 1988), 679.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, H., Der Dreibund. Europäische Grossmacht- und Allianzpolitik vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg (Vienna, 2002), 218–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diószegi, I., Hungarians in the Ballhausplatz: Studies on the Austro-Hungarian Common Foreign Policy (Budapest, 1983), 237–8.Google Scholar
Diószegi, I., ‘Aussenminister Stephan Graf Burián. Biographie und Tagebuchstellen’, Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae. Sectio Historica viii (1966), 205
Leslie, R., ‘Österreich-Ungarn vor dem Kriegsausbruch. Der Ballhausplatz in Wien im Juli 1914 aus der Sicht eines österreichisch-ungarischen Diplomaten’, Melville, R., Scharf, C., Vogt, M. and Wengenroth, U. (eds.), Deutschland und Europa in der Neuzeit. Festschrift für Karl Otmar von Aretin (Stuttgart, 1988), 664.Google Scholar
Galántai, J., Die österreichisch-ungarische Monarchie und der Weltkrieg (Budapest, 1979), 261–2.Google Scholar
Lieven, D. C. B., Empire: The Russian Empire and its Rivals from the Sixteenth Century to the Present (London, 2003 (pb)), 182–98.Google Scholar
Neilson, K., ‘Russia’, in Wilson, K. M. (ed.), Decisions for War 1914 (London, 1995), 97–120Google Scholar
Rieber, A. J., ‘Persistent Factors in Russian Foreign Policy: An Interpretative Essay’, Ragsdale, H. (ed.), Imperial Russian Foreign Policy (Cambridge, 1993), 322–9Google Scholar
Gatrell, P., Government, Industry and Rearmament in Russia, 1900–1914: The Last Argument of Tsarism (Cambridge, 1994), 161–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. R., Russian National Income, 1895–1913 (Cambridge, 1982), 153–65.Google Scholar
Korelin, A. P. (for Rossiskaya Akademiʹia Rossiskoi Istoriʹi) (ed.), Rossiʹia 1913 god. Statistiko-dokumental’nyi Spravochnik (St Petersburg, 1995), here 152–65.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Clive’s felicitous phrase, in his The Industrialization of the Continental Powers, 1780–1914 (London, repr. 1994), 281.Google Scholar
Mosse, W. E., An Economic History of Russia, 1856–1914 (London, 1996 (pb)), 249–65.Google Scholar
Miller, M., The Economic Development of Russia, 1905–1914, with Special Reference to Trade, Industry and Finance (London, repr. 1967), 132–6.Google Scholar
Dowler, W., Russia in 1913 (De Kalb, IL, 2010), 44–9.Google Scholar
Stone, N., The Eastern Front, 1914–1917 (London, 1975), 24–36Google Scholar
Stevenson, D., Armaments and the Coming of the War, 1904–1914 (Oxford, 1996), 315–23Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. W., All the Tsar’s Men: Russia’s General Staff and the Fate of the Empire, 1898–1914 (Baltimore, MD, 2010), 184–9.Google Scholar
Herrmann, D. G., The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War (Princeton, NJ, 1996), 195–8.Google Scholar
Bobroff, R. P., Roads to Glory: Late Imperial Russia and the Turkish Straits (London, 2006), 76–85Google Scholar
Aksakal, M., The Ottoman Road to War in 1914: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War (Cambridge, 2008), 42–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumpener, U., ‘Liman von Sanders and the German-Ottoman Alliance’, JCH i, 4 (1966), 179–92Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. A., Shattering Empires: The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908–1918 (Cambridge, 2011), 40–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekin, S., The Russian Origins of the First World War (Cambridge, MA, 2011), 31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazonov, D., Fateful Years, 1909–1916 (London, 1928), 128–32.Google Scholar
Geyer, D., Russian Imperialism: The Interaction of Domestic and Foreign Policy, 1860–1914 (Leamington Spa, 1987), 293–317Google Scholar
Rosen, R. R., Forty Years of Diplomacy (2 vols., London, 1922) ii, 149Google Scholar
Lieven, D. C. B., Russia’s Rulers under the Old Regime (New Haven, CT, 1989), 184–5.Google Scholar
von Taube, M., Der grossen Katastrophe entgegen. Die russische Politik der Vorkriegszeit und das Ende des Zarenreiches (1904–1914) (Berlin, 1929), 225.Google Scholar
Jelavich, B., Russia’s Balkan Entanglements, 1806–1914 (Cambridge, repr. 1993), 225–6.Google Scholar
Gordon-Lennox, (ed.), The Diary of Lord Bertie of Thame, 1914–1918 (2 vols., London, 1924) i, 206.Google Scholar
Soroka, M., Britain, Russia and the Road to the First World War: The Fateful Embassy of Count Aleksandr Benckendorff, 1903–1916 (Farnham and Burlington, VT, 2011), 243–5.Google Scholar
Jelavich, B., ‘Official Russia and the Balkan Slavic Communities’, Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism XVI, 1–2 (1989), 209–26Google Scholar
Thaden, E. C., Russia and the Balkan Alliance of 1912 (University Park, PA, 1965), 86–92Google Scholar
Lieven, D. C. B., Russia and the Origins of the First World War (London, 1983), 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shebeko, N., Souvenirs. Essai historique sur les origines de la guerre de 1914 (Paris, 1936), 203–5Google Scholar
Otte, T. G., ‘“Outdoor Relief for the Aristocracy”?: European Nobility and Diplomacy’, Mösslang, M. and Riotte, T. (eds.), The Diplomats’ World: A Cultural History of Diplomacy, 1815–1914 (Oxford, 2008), 41–3 [23–58].Google Scholar
Mayeur, J.-M., La vie politique sous la Troisième République (Paris, 1984), 220–4Google Scholar
Sternhell, Z., La droite révolutionnaire. Les origines françaises du fascisme, 1885–1914 (Paris, 1978), 385–400.Google Scholar
Krumeich, G., Armaments and Politics in France on the Eve of the First World War: The Introduction of Three-Year Conscription, 1913–1914 (Leamington Spa, 1984), 103–17 and 181–93.Google Scholar
Caillaux, J., Mes Mémoires (3 vols., Paris, 1942–7) iii, 133–7Google Scholar
Allain, J. C., Caillaux (2 vols., Paris, 1981) ii, 403–43Google Scholar
Krumeich, G., ‘Raymond Poincaré et l’affaire du “Figaro”’, RH 264, 3 (1980), 365–73.Google Scholar
Hayne, M. B., The French Foreign Office and the First World War, 1898–1914 (Oxford, 1993), 274Google Scholar
Paléologue, M., Au Quai d’Orsay à la veille de la tourmente. Journal, 1913–1914 (Paris, 1947), 302.Google Scholar
Auffray, B., Pierre de Margerie (1861–1942) et la vie diplomatique de son temps (Paris, 1976), 256–8.Google Scholar
Paléologue, M., La Russie des Tsars pendant la grande guerre (3 vols., Paris, 1921) i, 17.Google Scholar
Miquel, P., Poincaré (Paris, 1984), 34.Google Scholar
Hayne, M. B., ‘The Quai d’Orsay and Influences on the Formation of French Foreign Policy, 1898–1914’, FH ii, 4 (1988), 431–2.Google Scholar
Ralston, D. B., The Army of the Republic: The Place of the Military in the Political Evolution of France, 1871–1914 (Cambridge, MA, 1967), 319–71.Google Scholar
Keiger, J. F. V., France and the Origins of the First World War (London, 1983), 55–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stieve, F., Isvolsky and the World War (London, 1926), 54.Google Scholar
Becker, J.-J., ‘La guerre était-elle inévitable?’, Prost, A. (ed.), 14–18: Mourir pour la patrie (Paris, 1992), 52.Google Scholar
von Schoen, W., Erlebtes. Beiträge zur politischen Geschichte der neueren Zeit (Stuttgart, 1921), 144–5Google Scholar
Clark, C., The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (London, 2012), 293–301Google Scholar
Callwell, C. E., Field-Marshal Sir Henry Wilson: His Life and Diaries (2 vols., London, 1927) i, 122.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S., Frankreichs Aussenpolitik in der Julikrise 1914. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Ausbruchs des Ersten Weltkrieges (Munich, 2009), 66–7.Google Scholar
Churchill, W. S., The World Crisis, 1911–14 (2 vols., London, 1923) i, 178Google Scholar
Rowland, P., The Last Liberal Governments: Unfinished Business, 1911–1914 (London, 1971), 277–345Google Scholar
Bernstein, G. L., Liberalism and Liberal Politics in Edwardian England (Boston, MA, 1986), 135–65Google Scholar
Clarke, P. F., Liberals and Social Democrats (Cambridge, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, K. R., ‘Britain in the Summer of 1914’, in his Politicians, Diplomacy and War in Modern British History (London, 1994), 175–88.Google Scholar
Broin, L. O., The Chief Secretary: Augustine Birrell in Ireland (London, 1969), 99–102Google Scholar
Mansergh, N., The Unresolved Question: The Anglo-Irish Settlement and its Undoing, 1912–1972 (New Haven, CT, 1991), 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, D., ‘His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition’: The Unionist Party in Opposition, 1905–1915 (Liverpool, 1992), 226–37Google Scholar
Jalland, P. and Stubbs, J., ‘The Irish Question after the Outbreak of War in 1914: Some Unfinished Party Business’, EHR xcvi, 4 (1981), 778–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlehurst, C., Politicians at War, July 1914 to May 1915: A Prologue to the Triumph of Lloyd George (London, 1971), 27.Google Scholar
Horne, A., Macmillan , 1894–1956 (London, 1988), 27.Google Scholar
Neilson, K., ‘“My Beloved Russians”: Sir Arthur Nicolson and Russia, 1906–1916’, IHR ix, 4 (1987), 546–8.Google Scholar
Otte, T. G., The Foreign Office Mind: The Making of British Foreign Policy, 1865–1914 (Cambridge, 2011), 369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otte, T. G., ‘“Knavery or Folly”: The British “Official Mind” and the Habsburg Monarchy, 1856–1914’, in Otte, T. G. and Höbelt, L. (eds.), A Living Anachronism? European Diplomacy and the Habsburg Monarchy. Festschrift für F. R. Bridge zum 70. Geburtstag (Vienna, 2010), 153–5.Google Scholar
Howard, C. H. D. (ed.), The Diary of Edward Goschen, 1900–1914 (London, 1980), 290.Google Scholar
Robbins, K., Sir Edward Grey: A Biography of Lord Grey of Fallodon (London, 1971), 13.Google Scholar
[E.] Viscount Grey of Fallodon, Fly Fishing (London, rev. edn repr. 1947 [1st edn 1899]), 18–20.Google Scholar
Neilson, K., ‘“Control the Whirlwind”: Sir Edward Grey as Foreign Secretary, 1906–1916’, Otte, T. G. (ed.), The Makers of British Foreign Policy: From Pitt to Thatcher (Basingstoke and New York, 2002), 128–49Google Scholar
Otte, T. G., ‘“Almost a Law of Nature”: Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Office and the Balance of Power, 1905–1912’, Goldstein, E. and McKercher, B. J. C. (eds.), Power and Stability: British Foreign Policy, 1865–1965 (London, 2003), 77–118Google Scholar
Wilson, Keith (ed.), British Foreign Secretaries and Foreign Policy: From Crimean War to First World War (London, 1987), 172–97Google Scholar
Williamson, P. (ed.), The Modernisation of Conservative Politics: The Diaries and Letters of William Bridgeman, 1904–1935 (London, 1988), 81.Google Scholar
Lloyd George, D., War Memoirs (2 vols., London, 1938) i, 55–60.Google Scholar
Philippi, H., ‘Das deutsche Diplomatische Korps, 1871–1914’, Schwabe, K. (ed.), Das Diplomatische Korps, 1871–1945 (Boppard, 1985), 62 [41–80]Google Scholar
Lichnowsky, K. M., Auf dem Weg zum Abgrund. Londoner Berichte, Erinnerungen und sonstige Schriften (2 vols., Dresden, 1927) i, 121.Google Scholar
Young, H. F., Prince Lichnowsky and the Great War (Athens, GA, 1977), 32–48Google Scholar
Cecil, L., The German Diplomatic Service, 1871–1914 (Princeton, NJ, 1976), 35–8.Google Scholar
Schöllgen, G., Imperialismus und Gleichgewicht. Deutschland, England und die orientalische Frage, 1871–1914 (Munich, 1992), 404–9.Google Scholar
Otte, T. G., ‘Grey Ambassador: The Dreadnought and British Foreign Policy’, Blyth, R. J., Lambert, A. and Rüger, J. (eds.), The Dreadnought and the Edwardian Age (Farnham and Burlington, VT, 2011), 73–6.Google Scholar
Witt, P. C., Die Finanzpolitik des Deutschen Reiches, 1903–1913 (Lübeck, 1970)Google Scholar
Schottelius, H. and Deist, W. (eds.), Marine und Marinepolitik im kaiserlichen Deutschland, 1871–1914 (Düsseldorf, 1972), 146–77.Google Scholar
Kiessling, F., Gegen den ‘grossen Krieg’? Entspannung in den internationalen Beziehungen, 1911–1914 (Munich, 2002), 224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Z. S., The Foreign Office and Foreign Policy, 1898–1914 (Cambridge, 1969), 14 and 51–2Google Scholar
Corp, E. T., ‘Sir William Tyrrell: The Eminence Grise of the British Foreign Office, 1912–1915’, HJ xxv, 4 (1982), 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, H., Sir Arthur Nicolson, Bart., First Lord Carnock: A Study in the Old Diplomacy (London, 1930), 327–8.Google Scholar
von Kühlmann, Richard of the German embassy offered a very similar vignette in his Die Diplomaten (Berlin, 1939), 68Google Scholar
Klein, I., ‘The Anglo-Russian Convention and the Problem of Central Asia, 1907–1914’, JBS xi, 1 (1971), 142–5.Google Scholar
Kronenbitter, G., ‘Krieg im Frieden’. Die Führung der k.u.k. Armee und die Grossmachtpolitik Österreich-Ungarns, 1906–1914 (Munich, 2003), 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Macchio, K., ‘Momentbilder aus der Julikrise 1914’, BMH xiv, 10 (1936), 771.Google Scholar
von Wertheimer, E. (ed.), Graf Stefan Tisza. Briefe (1914–1918) (2 vols., Berlin, 1928) i, 39Google Scholar
Sieghart, , Die letzten Jahrzehnte einer Grossmacht. Menschen, Völker, Probleme des Habsburger-Reichs (Berlin, 1932), 173.Google Scholar
Kiszling, R., ‘Kriegspläne und Aufmärsche der k.u.k. Armeen sowie der Feindheere im Sommer 1914’, Institut für Österreichkunde (ed.), Österreich am Vorabend des ersten Weltkrieges (Graz, 1965), 83–96Google Scholar
Tunstall, G. A., Planning for War against Russia and Serbia: Austro-Hungarian and German Military Strategies, 1871–1914 (Boulder, CO, 1993), 159–88.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. R., ‘Confrontation with Serbia: The Consequences of Vienna’s Failure to Achieve Surprise in July 1914’, MÖStA xliii (1993), 168–77
Watt, D. C., ‘The British Reactions to the Assassination at Sarajevo’, ESR i, 3 (1971), 241.Google Scholar
Schuster, P., Henry Wickham Steed und die Habsburgermonarchie (Vienna, 1970), 162–4Google Scholar
E. U. Cormons [pseud. E. Urbas], Schicksale und Schatten. Eine österreichische Autobiographie (Salzburg, 1951), 124.Google Scholar
Spender, J. A., Life, Journalism and Politics (2 vols., London, 1927) ii, 9–10Google Scholar
Pribram, A. F., Austria-Hungary and Great Britain, 1908–1914 (London, 1951), 222.Google Scholar
Fellner, F. (ed.), Schicksalsjahr Österreichs, 1908–1919. Das Politische Tagebuch Josef Redlichs (2 vols., Graz and Cologne, 1953) ii, 43.Google Scholar
Martin, R., Jahrbuch des Vermögens und Einkommens der Millionäre in Preussen (2 vols., Berlin, 1912) i, 15 and 38.Google Scholar
Görlitz, W. (ed.), Der Kaiser. Aufzeichnungen des Chefs des Marinekabinetts Admiral Georg von Müller über die Aera Wilhelms II (Göttingen, 1965), 121Google Scholar
Graf zu Stolberg-Wernigerode, O., Die unentschiedene Generation. Deutschlands konservative Führungsschicht am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges (Munich, 1968), 299–302.Google Scholar
von Bülow, B., Denkwürdigkeiten (4 vols., Berlin, 1930) iii, 124.Google Scholar
Asquith, H. H., The Genesis of the War (London, 1923), 104–5.Google Scholar
Otte, T. G., ‘“The Winston of Germany”: The British Foreign Policy Elite and the Last German Emperor’, CJH xxxvi, 4 (2001), 471–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Fritz speculates that Jagow’s response was written following consultation with Bethmann: see his Juli 1914. Wir sind nicht hineingeschlittert. Das Staatsgeheimnis um die Riezler-Tagebücher (Reinbek, 1983), 91Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×