Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbkpb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T16:19:09.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

Suri Ratnapala
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Jurisprudence , pp. 358 - 365
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, MH 1989, ‘Construing and deconstructing’, in Rajnath, A (ed.), Deconstruction: a critique, Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Adelstein, RP 1981, ‘Institutional function and evolution in the institutional process’, 76 Northwestern University Law Review, 1–99.Google Scholar
Adelstein, RP 1998, ‘American institutional economics and the legal system’, in The New Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, vol. 1, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Alchian, AA 1950, ‘Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory’, 58 Journal of Political Economy, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, D 1928, Di corso di diritto internazionale, Athenaeum, Rome.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T St 1947, Summa theologica (literally translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province; with synoptical charts), vols 1–3, Burns & Oates, London.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1905 (350 BC), The politics, tr. Jowett, B, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1968 (350 BC), The metaphysics, tr. Tredennick, H, Heinemann & Co., London.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1972 (350 BC), De partibus animalium (Parts of animals), tr. Peck, AL, W Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1976 (350 BC), The ethics of Aristotle: the Nicomachean ethics, tr. Thomson, JAK, Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
Austin, J 1869, Lectures in jurisprudence or the philosophy of positive law, 3rd edn, Murray, J, London.Google Scholar
Austin, J 1995 (1832), The province of jurisprudence determined, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R 1990, The evolution of cooperation, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
Bakewell, CM 1907, Source book in ancient philosophy, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B 1989, A treatise on social justice, vol. 1, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London.Google Scholar
Becker, GS 1962, ‘Irrational behavior and economic theory’, 70 Journal of Political Economy, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, BL 1989, ‘Spontaneous evolution of commercial law’, 55 Southern Economic Journal, 644–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, BL 1990, The enterprise of law: justice without the state, Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Benson, BL 1992, ‘Customary law as a social contract’, 2 Constitutional Political Economy, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, BL 1998, ‘Evolution of commercial law’, in The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, vol. 1, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Bentham, J 1970a (1782), Of laws in general, The Athlone Press, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Bentham, J 1970b (1789), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, The Athlone Press, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Bentham, J 1998, Legislator of the world: writings on codification, law, and education, ed. Scholfield, P & Harris, J, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, L 1992, ‘Opting out of the legal system: extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry’, 21 Journal of Legal Studies, 115–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, P 2000, ‘Rights, wrongs and remedies’, 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, W 1977, ‘Coase and Demsetz on private property rights’, 1(2) Journal of Libertarian Studies, 111–15.Google Scholar
Blue, JC 1992, ‘High Noon revisited: commands of assistance by peace officers in the age of the Fourth Amendment’, 101 The Yale Law Journal, 1475–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J 1987, ‘Thomas Hobbes and the invented tradition of positivism: reflections on language, power and essentialism’, 135 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 383–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, B 1996, ‘Connecting the Hohfeldian boxes: towards a technical definition of liberty’, in Ratnapala, S & Moens, GA (eds), Jurisprudence of liberty, Butterworths, Sydney.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JM 1980, ‘Reform in the rent-seeking society’, in Buchanan, JM, Tollison, RD & Tullock, G (eds), Toward a theory of rent seeking society, Texas A & M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JM & Tullock, G 1962, The calculus of consent, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, WW 1963, A text book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cain, PA 1990, ‘Feminism and the limits of equality’, 24 Georgia Law Review, 803–47.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G & Melamed, AD 1972, ‘Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: one view of the cathedral’, 85 Harvard Law Review, 1089–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, DT 1965, ‘Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution’, in Barringer, HR, Blanksten, GI & Mack, RW (eds), Social change in developing areas: a re-interpretation of evolutionary theory, Schenkman Publishing Co., Cambridge MA, 13–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, DT 1987a, ‘Evolutionary epistemology’, in Radnitzy, G & Bartley, WW (eds), Evolutionary epistemology, theory of rationality and sociology of knowledge, Open Court, La Salle IL, 47–89.Google Scholar
Campbell, DT 1987b, ‘Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes’, in Radnitzy, G & Bartley, WW (eds), Evolutionary epistemology, theory of rationality and sociology of knowledge, Open Court, La Salle IL, 91–114.Google Scholar
Campbell, T 1988, Justice, Macmillan Education, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardozo, BN 1928, The paradoxes of legal science, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carlyle, RW & Carlyle, AJ 1903–38, A history of medieval political theory in the West, vol. 1, Blackwood, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Chroust, A-H 1944, ‘The philosophy of law of St Augustine’, 53(2) The Philosophical Review, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, MT 1928 (54–51 BC), De republica de legibus, tr. Keyes, CW, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Coase, RH 1937, ‘The nature of the firm’, 4(16) Economica, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, RH 1960, ‘The problem of social cost’, III The Journal of Law and Economics, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commons, JR 1924, Legal foundations of capitalism, Kelley, AM, CliftonNJ.Google Scholar
Commons, JR 1974, Legal foundations of capitalism (reprinted with preface by Dorman, Joseph), Kelley, AM, Clifton NJ.Google Scholar
Comte, A 1975 (1830–42), Cours de philosophie positive, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
Cornell, D 1990, ‘The doubly-prized world: myth, allegory and the feminine’, 75 Cornell Law Review, 643–99.Google Scholar
D'Entrèves, AP 1951, Natural law: an introduction to legal philosophy, Hutchinson's University Library, London.Google Scholar
Darwin, C 1985 (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, Penguin Classics, London.Google Scholar
Davies, H & Holdcroft, D 1991, Jurisprudence: texts and commentary, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H 1967, ‘Towards a theory of property rights’, 57(2) American Economic Review, 347–59.Google Scholar
Dennett, DC 1995, Darwin's dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London.Google Scholar
Dennett, DC 1996, Kinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Derrida, J 1972, ‘Structure, sign and play in the discourses of the human sciences’, in Macksey, R & Donato, E (eds), The structuralist controversy: the languages of criticism and the sciences of man, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 247–72.Google Scholar
Derrida, J 1976, Of grammatology, tr. Spivak, GC, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Derrida, J 1981, Positions, Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Derrida, J 1992, ‘Force of law: “The mystical foundation of authority”’, in Cornell, D, Rosenfeld, M & Carlson, DG (eds), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, Routledge, New York, 3–67.Google Scholar
Dias, RWM 1976, Jurisprudence, 4th edn, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Draetta, U, Lake, RB & Nanda, VP 1992, Breach and adaptation of international contracts: an introduction to lex mercatoria, Butterworths, Salem NH.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E 1964, The division of labour in society, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R 1977, Taking rights seriously, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R 1998, Law's empire, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E 1936, Fundamental principles of the sociology of law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Elliot, ED 1997, ‘Law and biology: the new synthesis?’, 41 Saint Louis Law Journal, 595–624.Google Scholar
Epstein, RA 1993, ‘Holdouts, externalities and the single owner: one more salute to Ronald Coase’, 36 Journal of Law and Economics, 553–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, RA 1995, Simple rules for a complex world, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J 1963, ‘Justice and personal desert’, Nomos, VIJustice, Atherton Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A 1966 (1767), An essay on the history of civil society, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Finley, L 1988, ‘Nature of domination and the nature of women: reflections on Feminism unmodified’, 82 Northwestern University Law Review, 352–86.Google Scholar
Finnis, J 1972, ‘Some professorial fallacies about rights’, The Adelaide Law Review, 377–88.Google Scholar
Finnis, J 1980, Natural law and natural rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fish, S 1989, Doing what comes naturally, Duke University Press, Durham NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J 1949, Courts on trial: myth and reality in American justice, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Frank, WA 1997, Duns Scotus on the will and morality, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Freeman, MDA 2001, Lloyd's introduction to jurisprudence, Sweet & Maxwell, London.Google Scholar
Friedman, M 1953, Essays in positive economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Part I: ‘The methodology of positive economics’.Google Scholar
Friedman, M 1962, Capitalism and freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ch. 6: ‘Role of government in education’, 85–98.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL 1958, ‘Positivism and fidelity to law: A Reply to Professor Hart’, 71(4) Harvard Law Review, 630–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, LL 1964, The morality of law, Yale University Press, New Haven CT and London.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL 1969, The morality of law, rev. edn, Yale University Press, New Haven CT and London.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL 1981, The principles of social order, Duke University Press, Durham NC.Google Scholar
Gable, P 1980, ‘Reification in legal reasoning’, 3 Research in Law and Sociology, 25–46.Google Scholar
Gaius, 1905 (130–180) Institutes of Roman law by Gaius, tr. Poste, E, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M 1995, The quark and the jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex, Abacus, London.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C 1982, In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M 1967, The judicial process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Gould, JP 1973, ‘The economics of legal conflicts’, 2 Journal of Legal Studies, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, SJ 1982, ‘Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory’, 216 Science, 380–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, JC 1909, Nature and sources of law, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Grotius, H 1927 (1625), De jure belli ac pacis, tr. Kelsey, FW, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Grotius, H 1957 (1625), Prolegomena to the law of war and peace, tr. Kelsey, FW, Liberal Arts Press, New York.Google Scholar
Guetzkow, H 1961, ‘Organizational leadership in task oriented groups’, in Bass, B & Petrullo, L (eds), Leadership and interpersonal behavior, Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc., New York, 187–200.Google Scholar
Gurvitch, G 1947, Sociology of law, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J, Stroup, R & Lee, D 2005, Common sense economics: what everyone should know about wealth and prosperity, St Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K 1996, Natural law and moral philosophy: from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerström, A 1953, Inquiries into the nature of law and morals, tr. Broad, CD, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hahlweg, K 1989, ‘A systems view of evolution and evolutionary epistemology’, in Hahlweg, K & Hooker, CA (eds), Issues in evolutionary epistemology, State University of New York Press, New York, 45–78.Google Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew 1971 (1713), The history of the common law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hardin, G 1968, ‘The tragedy of the commons’, 162 Science, 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, JW 1980, Legal philosophies, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Hart, HLA 1958, ‘Positivism and the separation of law and morals’, 71(4) Harvard Law Review, 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA 1961, The concept of law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hart, HLA 1965, ‘Book review of Morality of law by Lon Fuller’, 78 Harvard Law Review, 1281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA 1973, ‘Bentham on legal rights’, in Simpson, AWB (ed.), Oxford essays in jurisprudence. Second series, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 171–201.Google Scholar
Hart, HLA 1983, Essays on jurisprudence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA 1997, The concept of law, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hart, HLA 1998, ‘Kelsen's doctrine of the unity of law’, in Paulsen, SL & Paulsen, BL (eds), Normativity and norms: critical perspectives on Kelsenian themes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 553–81.Google Scholar
Hayek, FA 1973, Rules and order, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, FA 1978, New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, FA 1982, Law, legislation and liberty, 3 vols, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M 1993, Basic writings: from ‘Being and time’ 1927, to ‘The task of thinking’ 1964, ed. Krell, DF, with general introduction and introductions to each selection, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T 1946 (1651), Leviathan or the matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, WN 2001, Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning, ed. Campbell, D & Thomas, P, Ashgate Dartmouth, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Holmes, OW Jr 1871, ‘Book notices’, 6 American Law Review, 723–5.Google Scholar
Holmes, OW Jr 1897, ‘The path of the law’, 10 Harvard Law Review, 457–78.Google Scholar
Holmes, OW Jr 1963 (1881), The common law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Holmström-Hintikka, G 1997, ‘Rights and responsibilities’, Rights: Proceedings of the 17th world congress of the International Association of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 45–55.Google Scholar
Honore, AM 1970, ‘Social justice’, in Summers, RS (ed.), Essays in legal philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hooker, R 1977, ‘Of the laws of ecclesiastical polity’, in The Folger Library edition of the works of Richard Hooker, vol. 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Hume, D 1947 (1779), Dialogues concerning natural religion, Bobbs-Merril Co., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hume, D 1975 (1748), Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning the principles of morals, 3rd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D 1978 (1739–40), A treatise of human nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hume, D 1985 (1742), Essays moral, political and literary, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, JC 1929, ‘The judgment intuitive: the function of the hunch in judicial decision’, 14 Cornell Law Quarterly, 274–88.Google Scholar
Jones, O 1999, ‘Law, emotions and behavioural biology’, 39 Jurimetrics, 283–9.Google Scholar
Jones, O and Goldsmith, T 2005, ‘Law and behavioural biology’, 105 Columbia Law Review, 405–502.Google Scholar
Justinian, 1904 (529–34), The digest of Justinian, vol. 1, tr. Monro, CH, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kant, I 1883 (1783), Prolegomena and metaphysical foundations of natural science, Bell, London.Google Scholar
Kant, I 1930, Critique of pure reason, G Bell & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Kant, I 1947, The moral law, or Kant's groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, tr. Paton, HJ, Hutchinson's University Library, London.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S 1995, At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self-organisation and complexity, Viking, London.Google Scholar
Kelman, M 1987, A guide to critical legal studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H 1935, ‘The pure theory of law: its method and fundamental concepts, Part II’, 51 Law Quarterly Review, 517–35.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H 1945, General theory of law and state, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H 1967, Pure theory of law, 2nd edn, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H 1998 (1923), ‘Foreword to the second printing of “Main problems in the theory of public law”, in Paulsen, SL & Paulsen, BL (eds), Normativity and norms: critical perspectives on Kelsenian themes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1976, ‘Form and substance in private law adjudication’, 89 Harvard Law Review, 1685–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D 1978, ‘The structure of Blackstone's Commentaries’, 28 Buffalo Law Review, 205–382.Google Scholar
Kern, F 1970, Kingship and law in the Middle Ages: studies, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Kirzner, IM 1962, ‘Rational action and economic theory’, 70 Journal of Political Economy, 380–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, IM 1997, How markets work: disequilibrium, entrepreneurship and discovery, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.Google Scholar
Landes, WM 1971, ‘An economic analysis of the courts’, 14 Journal of Law and Economics, 61–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, WM & Posner, R 1979, ‘Adjudication as a private good’, 8 Journal of Legal Studies, 235–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E 1977, Custom, law and terrorist violence, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Levy, S 1992, Artificial life: the quest for a new creation, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Lew, JDM 1978, Applicable law in international commercial arbitration: a study in commercial arbitration awards, Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry NY.Google Scholar
Lewis, CT 2000, Elementary Latin dictionary, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K 1960 (1930), The bramble bush: on our law and its study, Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry NY.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K 1962, Jurisprudence: realism in theory and practice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Locke, J 1960 (1690), Two treatises of government, ed. Laslett, P, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, AA & Sedley, DN 1987, The Hellenistic philosophers, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lucretius, 1947 (50 BC), De rerum natura (On the nature of natural things), tr. Bailey, C, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lundstedt, VA 1956, Legal thinking revised: my views on law, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Luscombe, 1982, ‘Natural morality and natural law’, in The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lyotard, F 1984, The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N 1979, Legal reasoning and legal theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, CA 1987, Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Macneil, IR 1980, The new social contract: an inquiry into modern contractual relations, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.Google Scholar
Mailath, GJ 1998, ‘Evolutionary game theory’, in Newman, P (ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, vol. 1, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B 1922, Argonauts of the Western Pacific: an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B 1924 (1733), The fable of the bees, or private vices, publick benefits, vols 1 & 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Markby, W 1905, Elements of law with reference to the principles of general jurisprudence, 6th edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marx, K 1968 (1875), ‘Critique of the Gotha Programme’, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: selected works in one volume, Lawrence & Wishart, London, 319–35.Google Scholar
Marx, K & Engels, F 1973 (1845), The German ideology, International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Menger, C 1963, Problems of economics and sociology (Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere), University of Illinois Press, Urbana IL.Google Scholar
Menger, C 1985, Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mill, JS 1997 (1869), Subjection of women, Dover Publications, Mineola NY.Google Scholar
Mill, JS 2002 (1869), On Liberty, Dover Publications, Mineola NY.Google Scholar
Miller, FD Jr 1995, Nature justice, and rights in Aristotle's politics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, FW 1954, The portable Nietzsche, selected and tr. Kaufmann, W with introduction, prefaces and notes, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
North, DC 1990, Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R 1974, Anarchy, state and utopia, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, K 1939, Law as fact, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Olson, M 1965, The logic of collective action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Olson, M 1982, The rise and decline of nations, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.Google Scholar
Paulsen, SL 1998, ‘Hans Kelsen's earliest legal theory: critical constructivism’, in Paulsen, SL & Paulsen, BL (eds), Normativity and norms: critical perspectives on Kelsenian themes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 23–43.Google Scholar
Plato, 1974 (360 BC), The republic, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Plato, 1980 (360 BC), The laws, tr. Pringle, TL, The Chicago University Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sir Frederick 1890, Oxford lectures and other discourses, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Popper, KR 1963, Conjectures and refutations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London; Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Popper, KR 1972, Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Popper, KR 1993, The open society and its enemies, vol. 1, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Posner, AR 1990, The problems of jurisprudence, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Posner, AR 1998, Economic analysis of law, 5th edn, Aspen Law & Business, New York.Google Scholar
Pospisil, L 1958, Kapauku Papuans and their law, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.Google Scholar
Poster, M 1989, ‘Why not to read Foucault’, 31 Critical Review, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, R 1930, ‘The new feudal system’, 25 Commercial Law Journal, 397–403.Google Scholar
Pound, R 1940, Contemporary juristic theory, Pamona College, Claremont CA.Google Scholar
Pound, R 1943, ‘’Sociology of law and sociological jurisprudence', V(1) The University of Toronto Law Journal, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, R 1954, An introduction to the philosophy of law, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.Google Scholar
Priest, GL 1977, ‘The common law process and the selection of efficient rules’, 6 Journal of Legal Studies, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, S 1991 (1673), On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law, tr. Silverthorne, M, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Radbruch, G 1950 (1932), Legal philosophy in the legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin, tr. Wilk, K, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Radbruch, G 2006 (1946), ‘Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law’, 26(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J 1963, ‘Constitutional liberty and the concept of justice’, in Friedrich, CJ & Chapman, JW (eds), Nomos, VI Justice, Atherton Press, New York, 98–125.Google Scholar
Rawls, J 1999, A theory of justice, rev. edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford (first published 1971).Google Scholar
Raz, J 1979, The authority of law: essays in law and morality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J 1980, The concept of a legal system: an introduction to the theory of legal system, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J 1986, ‘The purity of the pure theory’, in Tur, R & Twining, W (eds), Essays on Kelsen, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 79–97.Google Scholar
Raz, J 1995, Ethics in the public domain, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rock, P 1974, ‘The sociology of deviancy and conceptions of moral order’, 142 The British Journal of Criminology, 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommen, HA 1955, The natural law, B Herder Book Co., St Louis and London.Google Scholar
Rorty, R 1982, Consequences of pragmatism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Ross, A 1968, Directives and norms, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M 1985, For a new liberty: the libertarian manifesto, Libertarian Review Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J-J 1968 (1762), The social contract, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Rubin, EL 1995, ‘The nonjudicial life of contract: beyond the shadow of the law’, 90 Northwestern University Law Review, 107–31.Google Scholar
Rubin, PH 1977, ‘Why is the common law efficient’, 6 Journal of Legal Studies, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhl, JB 1996a, ‘The fitness of law: using complexity theory to describe the evolution of law and society and its practical meaning for democracy’, 49 Vanderbilt Law Review, 1407–90.Google Scholar
Ruhl, JB 1996b, ‘Complexity theory as a paradigm for the dynamical law-and-society system: a wake up call for legal reductionism and the modern administrative state’, 45(5) Duke Law Journal, 849–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B 1962, History of Western philosophy, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Sandel, MJ 1982, Liberalism and the limits of justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Saussure, F 1989, Course in general linguistics, Open Court, La Salle IL.Google Scholar
Savigny, FK 1867, System of the modern Roman law, Hyperion Press, Westport CT.Google Scholar
Seckler, D 1975, Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists: a study in the social philosophy of economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Smith, A 1976 (1759), The theory of moral sentiments, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, A 1981 (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vols I & II, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, BH 1988, Contingencies of value, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Smith, SA 1977, Constitutional and administrative Law, 3rd edn, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Smith, SA 1980, Judicial review of administrative action, 4th edn by Evans, JM, Stevens, London.Google Scholar
Smith, SA & Brazier, R 1998, Constitutional and administrative law, 8th edn, Penguin Books, London and New York.Google Scholar
Sophocles, 1984 (c. 441 BC), The three Theban plays, tr. Fagles, R, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Starke, JG 1998, ‘Monism and dualism in the theory of international law’, in Paulsen, SL & Paulsen, BL (eds), Normativity and norms: critical perspectives on Kelsenian themes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 537–52.Google Scholar
Suarez, F 1944 (1612), De legibus ac deo legislatore: selections from three works of Francisco Suarez, SJ, vol. 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sumner, LW 1987, The moral foundation of rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tooby, J & Cosmides, L 1992, ‘The psychological foundations of culture’, in Barkow, JH, Cosmides, L & Tooby, J (eds), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Triepel, H 1958 (1899), Völkerrecht und Landesrecht, CL Hirschfeld, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tullock, G 1971, The logic of the law, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Twining, W 1973, ‘The Bad Man revisited’, 58 Cornell Law Review, 275–303.Google Scholar
Ullman, W 1966, Principles of government and politics in the Middle Ages, 2nd edn, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Unger, RM 1983, The critical legal studies movement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V 1994, ‘Hayek's legacy and the future of liberal thought: rational liberalism vs. evolutionary agnosticism’, 5(4) Journal des Economistes et Etudes Humaines, 451–81.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V 1997, ‘Institutional evolution though purposeful selection: the constitutional economics of John R Commons’, 8 Constitutional Political Economy, 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T 1898, ‘Why is economics not an evolutionary science?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, July (1898) vol. 14, no. 4, 373–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradoff, P 1927, Commonsense in law, Williams & Northgate, London.Google Scholar
Vromen, JJ 1995, Economic evolution: an enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics, Routledge, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M 1968, Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, Bedminster Press, New York.Google Scholar
West, R 1988, ‘Jurisprudence and gender’, 55 Chicago Law Review, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, AR 1984, Rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
William, Ockham 1992 (1340), A short discourse on the tyrannical government over things divine and human, but especially over the Empire and those subject to the Empire, usurped by some who are called highest pontiffs, ed. McGrade, AS, tr. Kilcullen, J, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G 1956, ‘The concept of liberty’, 56 Columbia Law Review, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W 1989, ‘Notes from a first generation’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 99–113.
Williamson, OE 1979, ‘Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations’, 22 Journal of Law and Economics, 233–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, A 1992, ‘Algorithmic justice’, in Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Wolff, RP 1960, ‘Kant's debt to Hume via Beattie’, 21(1) Journal of the History of Ideas, 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Suri Ratnapala, University of Queensland
  • Book: Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168427.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Suri Ratnapala, University of Queensland
  • Book: Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168427.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Suri Ratnapala, University of Queensland
  • Book: Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168427.013
Available formats
×