Bibliography

Kristi Sweet

doi:10.1017/9781009036634.010

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2023

Kristi Sweet

Show author details

Kristi Sweet: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Kant on Freedom, Nature, and Judgment
The Territory of the Third <i>Critique</i>
, pp. 207 - 213

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009036634.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Barry, “The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Kant and Darwin,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20:4 (2003): 373–391.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry, Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste,” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982): 295–302.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, “Kant on Science and Common Knowledge,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 31–52.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Metaphysics (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , On the Soul, in Hett, W. S. (trans.) Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 1957), 2–203.Google Scholar

Arthos, John, “The Paradigmatic Interpenetration of Hermeneutics and Rhetoric,” in Theodore George and Gert-Jan van der Heiden, eds., The Gadamerian Mind (London: Routledge, 2021), 400–417.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, The New Organon (London: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C., The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796–1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans, “Self-Preservation and Intertia: On the Constitution of Modern Rationality,” Contemporary German Philosophy 3 (1983): 209–256.Google Scholar

Breazeale, Daniel, “‘The Summit of Kantian Speculation’: Fichte’s Reception of the Third Critique,” Anuario Filosófico 52:1 (2019): 113–144.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, Angela, “Two Views on Nature: A Solution to the Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16:2 (2008): 351–369.Google Scholar

Bruno, Paul, Kant’s Concept of Genius: Its Origin and Function in the Third Critique (New York: Continuum, 2010).Google Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling, A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Cassirer, H. W., A Commentary of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (New York: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew, “Belief in Kant,” Philosophical Review 116:3 (2007): 323–360.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew, “Rational Hope, Moral Order, and the Revolution of the Will,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Divine Order, Human Order, and the Order of Nature (London: Oxford University Press, 2013), 197–218.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew, “Rational Hope, Possibility, and Divine Action,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 98–117.Google Scholar

Clark, Christopher, Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Clewis, Robert, The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom (London: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Crawford, Donald, Kant’s Aesthetic Theory (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Cureton, Adam, “Reasonable Hope in Kant’s Ethics,” Kantian Review 23:2 (2018): 181–203.Google Scholar

Dante, , The Inferno (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1994).Google Scholar

Debord, Charles, “Geist and Communication in Kant’s Theory of Aesthetic Ideas,” Kantian Review 17:2 (2012): 177–190.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 1–62.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, “Passions of the Soul,” in John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 325–404.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, “Rules for the Direction of the Mind,” in Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 7–78.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeffrey, Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeffrey, “One More Time: Kant’s Metaphysics of Nature and the Idea of Transition,” in Ferrini, Cinzia, ed., Eredita kantiane (Rome: Bibliopolis, 2004), 155–188.Google Scholar

Elden, Stuart, The Birth of Territory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Figal, Günter, Aesthetics as Phenomenology: The Appearance of Things (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Ford, Richard T., “Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction),” Michigan Law Review 97 (1999): 843–930.CrossRef Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart, Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Friedlander, Eli, Expressions of Judgment: As Essay on Kant’s Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Funderbunk, L., “Book Review of Kant’s Concept of Teleology,” Kant-Studien 62:1 (1971): 137–138.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Intuition and Vividness,” in Robert Bernasconi, ed., The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 155–170.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (New York: Continuum Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Gammon, Martin, “‘Exemplary Originality’: Kant on Genius and Imitation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 35:4 (1997): 563–592.Google Scholar

Gasché, Rodolphe, The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Feeling and Freedom,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 278–313.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment,’” in Kant’s System of Natura and Freedom: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 314–342.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant’s Conception of the System of Philosophy,” in Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 278–313.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W., Aristotle’s De Anima Books II and III (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. “‘Koinē Aisthēsis,” The Monist 52 (1968): 195–209.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart, “The Social Spirit of Mankind,” in Eckart Förster, ed., Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus postumum (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 145–156.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Faith and Knowledge (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Heine, Heinrich, Religion and Philosophy in Germany (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the first Critique,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant’s Transcendental Deductions (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 27–46.Google Scholar

Hicks, R.D, “Introduction” in Aristotle De Anima (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, xix–lxxxiii).Google Scholar

Howard, Stephen, “The Transition within the Transition: The Übergang from the Selbstsetzungslehre to the Ether Proofs in Kant’s Opus postumum,” Kant-Studien 110:4 (2019): 595–617.Google Scholar

Huneman, Phillippe, “Purposiveness, Necessity, and Contingency,” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric, eds., Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), 185–202.Google Scholar

Iltis, Carolyn, “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy,” Isis 62:1 (1971): 21–35.Google Scholar

Insole, Christopher, “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good,” Philosophy 83 (2008): 333–351.Google Scholar

Kalar, Brent, “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Sensus Communis: From Aesthetic to Ethical Community,” Idealistic Studies 47:1&2 (2018): 43–58.Google Scholar

Kemal, Salim, Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Kern, Andrea, “Aesthetic Self-Consciousness and Sensus Communis: On the Significance of Ordinary Language in Kant’s Analytic of the Beautiful,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 39:2 (2019): 451–471.Google Scholar

Kneller, Jane, Kant and the Power of Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), cf. Chapters 2–4.Google Scholar

Kreines, James, “The Inexplicability of Kant’s Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation, and Biology,” Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2005): 270–311.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, “Kant’s Teachers in the Exact Sciences,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 11–30.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy (Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried, De Jure Suprematu Principum Germaniae (Caeserinus Fürstenerius), in The Political Writings of Leibniz (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried, Monadology, in Woolhouse, R. S. and Francks, Richard, eds., Philosophical Texts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 267–281.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François, “Sensus Communis,” Paragraph 11 (1988): 1–23.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François, Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

The Online Lidell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Lexicon, via Thesaurus Linguae Graecae.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A., Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A., Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Luft, Sebastian Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Malpas, Jeff and Thiel, Karsten, “Kant’s Geography and Reason,” in Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo, eds., Reading Kant’s Geography (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Martin, Gottfried, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955).Google Scholar

McFarland, J. D., Kant’s Concept of Teleology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

McFarland, J. D., “The Bogus Unity of the Kantian Philosophy,” in Duchesneau, François, Laberge, Pierre & Morrisey, Bryan E., eds., Actes du congres d’ottawa sur Kant dans les traditions Anglo-Americans et Continentales tenu du 10 au 14 octobre 1974/Proceedings of the Ottawa Congress on Kant in the Anglo-american and Continental Traditions Held 10–14 October, 1974 (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1976), 180–196.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Peter, Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Meerbote, Ralf, “Reflection on Beauty,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 55–86.Google Scholar

Mensch, Jennifer, Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRef Google Scholar

Muchnik, Pablo, Kant’s Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-Love and Aprioricity of History (New York: Lexington Books, 2008).Google Scholar

Naas, Michael, Plato and the Invention of Life (New York: Fordham University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia, “Analogical Reflection as a Source for the Science of Life: Kant and the Possibility of the Biological Sciences,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 58 (2016): 57–66.Google Scholar

Neal, Robert J.M., “Kant’s Ideality of Genius,” Kant-Studien 103 (2012): 351–360.Google Scholar

Neiman, Susan, The Unity of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica, Kant and the Unity of Reason (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica, “Leben and Leib in Kant and Hegel,” Hegel-Jahrbuch 2 (2007): 97–101.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica, Ideal Embodiment (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, Kant on Reason and Religion, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1997), 269–308.Google Scholar

Ostaric, Lara, “Kant on the Normativity of Creative Production,” Kantian Review 17:1, (2012): 75–107.Google Scholar

Papineau, David, “The Vis Viva Controversy: Do Meanings Matter?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8:2 (1977): 111–142.Google Scholar

Parmenides, On Nature, Early Greek Philosophy, Volume V: Western Greek Thinkers, Part 2. Edited and translated by André Laks, Glenn W. Most. Loeb Classical Library 528. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Peters, F.E., Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon (New York: New York University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Plato, Theaetetus, in Cooper, John M., ed., Plato: Complete Works (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar

Proulx, Jeremy, “Art and the Fecundity of Nature,” in Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing, eds., Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongress (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013): 191–201.Google Scholar

Rauscher, Fred, Book review of Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, May 7, 2009.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas, An Inquiry into the Human Mind and the Principles of Common Sense (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1764).Google Scholar

Rohlf, Michael, “The Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant’s Third Critique,” Kant-Studien 99 (2008): 339–360.Google Scholar

Ross, David, “Introduction,” in David Ross, ed., Aristotle De Anima (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961 ), 1–59.Google Scholar

Rossi, Philip, “Kant as a Christian Philosopher: Hope and the Symbols of the Christian Faith,” Philosophy Today 25:1 (1981): 24–33.Google Scholar

Sassen, Brigitte, “Artistic Genius and the Question of Creativity,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003).Google Scholar

Schaefer, John D., Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Schaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour, (London: Egbert Sanger, 1709).Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J., The Philosophy of Art (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Schutt, Marie Zermatt, “Kant’s Moral Theology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18:4 (2010): 611–633.Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity,” in Timmermann, Jens, ed., Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009): 102–118.Google Scholar

Sheehan, James, German History 1770–1866 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Smith, John E., “Foreword,” to Kroner, Richard, Kant’s Weltanschauung: The Ethical and Religious Derivation of Kant’s Worldview (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Stevenson, Leslie, “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review, 7 (2003): 72–101.Google Scholar

Stoner, Samuel, “On the Primacy of the Spectator in Kant’s Account of Genius,” The Review of Metaphysics 70 (2016): 87–117.Google Scholar

Sweet, Kristi, “Reflection: Its Structure and Meaning inn Kant’s Judgements of Taste,” Kantian Review 14:1 (2009): 53–80.Google Scholar

Sweet, Kristi, “Kant and the Culture of Discipline: Rethinking the Nature of Nature,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15:1 (2010): 121–138.Google Scholar

Sweet, Kristi, Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Sweet, Kristi, “What Is Philosophical about Kant’s Anthropology,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25:3 (2017): 109–118.Google Scholar

Tarbet, David. W., “The Fabric of Metaphor in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6:3 (1968): 257–270.Google Scholar

Terrall, Mary, “Vis Viva Revisited,” History of Science xlii (2004): 189–209.Google Scholar

Thorndike, Oliver, Kant’s Transition Project and Late Philosophy: Connecting the Opus Postumum and the Metaphysics of Morals (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar

Toyoda, Tetsuya, Theory and Politics of the Law of Nations: Political Bias in International Law Discourse of German Court Councilors in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Leiden: Brill Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Trullinger, Joseph, “Kant’s Two Touchstones for Conviction: The Incommunicable Dimension of Moral Faith,” The Review of Metaphysics 67 (2013): 369–403.Google Scholar

Tuschling, Burkhard, “The System of Transcendental Idealism: Questions Raised and Left Open in the Kritik der Urteilskraft,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1991): 196–210.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric, “Nature in General as a System of Ends,” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric, eds., Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014), 117–130.Google Scholar

Westphal, K.R.,“Epistemic Reflection and Cognitive Reference in Kant’s Transcendental Response to Skepticism,” Kant-Studien 94 (2003): 135–171.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen, Kant’s Rational Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Woolwine, Sarah, “Systematicity in the Critique of Judgment: The Emergence of a Unified Subject,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25:4 (2011): 343–358.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmihau, Kant the Philosophy of History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Ypi, Lea, “The Problem of Systematic Unity in Kant’s Two Definitions of Philosophy,” in Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing, eds., Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 773–785.Google Scholar

Zammito, John, The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Zammito, John, Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Zammito, John, “Kant and the Medical Faculty: One ‘Conflict of the Faculties’,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22:2 (2018): 429–451.Google Scholar

Zammito, John, “The ‘Sublime,’ the ‘Supersensible Substrate,’ and ‘Spirit’—Intuitions of the Ultimate in Kant’s third Critique,” in Palmquist, Stephen, ed., Kant on Intuition: Western and Asian Perspectives on Transcendental Idealism (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Zinkin, Melissa, “Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere Reflection’,” Inquiry 55:5 (2012): 433–453.Google Scholar

Zinkin, Melissa, “Kant’s Supersensible Substratum of Humanity,” in Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Band 4 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 334–342.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel, “Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty,” Inquiry 48:2 (2005): 107–130.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel, Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel, “Hidden Antinomies of Practical Reason, and Kant’s Religion of Hope,” Kant Yearbook 10 (2018): 199–217.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel, “Is Kantian Hope a Feeling?” in Sorenson, Kelly and Williamson, Diane, eds., Kant and the Faculty of Feeling (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 242–259.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive