Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:35:27.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Beauty, Duty, and Interest: The Moral Significance of Natural Beauty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Henry E. Allison
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

It was suggested in Chapter 9 that the cultivation of taste and the experience of beauty contribute to the development of morality, and therefore help to bring about the required transition from nature to freedom, in two distinct ways: One is by giving rise to an intellectual interest in natural beauty in virtue of the fact that such beauty appears to provide an intimation of nature's moral purposiveness; the other, which applies to both natural and artistic beauty, is by helping to wean us from an excessive attachment to sensuous interests and egocentric involvements with the world, as a result of which it may be said to symbolize morality. The first of these is the subject matter of the present chapter.

In addition to the previously discussed sections II and IX of the Second Introduction, a key text in laying the foundation for Kant's account of the connection between taste and morality is §40. Of particular significance in this regard is Kant's claim that taste has more of a right to be considered a sensus communis than the common human understanding, because it involves a capacity in mere reflection to abstract from private factors and evaluate the formal features of a representation from a universalistic standpoint (KU 5: 293–4; 160). Clearly, already implicit in this characterization are the analogies with moral reflection and decision that make taste suitable both as a preparation for and as a symbol of morality. In other words, the very features that entitle taste to be described as a sensus communis are those that ground its connection with morality.

Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Theory of Taste
A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment
, pp. 219 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×