Amarasekare, P. and Nisbet, R. M.. 2001. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. American Naturalist 158, 572–84.Google ScholarPubMed

Baguette, M. and Schtickzelle, N.. 2003. Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 40, 404–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bender, D. J. and Fahrig, L.. 2005. Matrix heterogeneity can obscure the relationship between inter-patch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86, 1023–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabeza, M. and Moilanen, A.. 2003. Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss. Conservation Biology 17, 1402–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, L. W. and Fahrig, L.. 2001. Impact of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conservation Biology 15, 1071–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casagrandi, R. and Gatto, M.. 1999. A mesoscale approach to extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Nature 400, 560–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comins, H. N., Hamilton, W. D., and May, R. M.. 1980. Evolutionary stable dispersal strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 82, 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, J. T. 2003. Matrix heterogeneity and host-parasitoid interactions in space. Ecology 84, 1506–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drechsler, M., Frank, K., Hanski, I., O'Hara, R. B., and Wissel, C.. 2003. Ranking metapopulation extinction risk: from patterns in data to conservation management decisions. Ecological Applications 13, 990–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahrig, L. 1990. Interacting effects of disturbance and dispersal on individual selection and population stability. Comments on Theoretical Biology 1, 275–97.Google Scholar

Fahrig, L. 1998. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival?Ecological Modelling 105, 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahrig, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough?Biological Conservation 100, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahrig, L. 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 12, 346–53.Google Scholar

Flather, C. H. and Bevers, M.. 2002. Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement. American Naturalist 159, 40–56.Google ScholarPubMed

Gibbs, J. P. 1998. Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landscape Ecology 13, 263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, J. P. 2001. Demography versus habitat fragmentation as determinants of genetic variation in wild populations. Biological Conservation 100, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, B. J. and Fahrig, L.. 2002. How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?Oikos 99, 552–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustafson, E. J. and Gardner, R. H.. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77, 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanski, I. 1994. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 131–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hanksi, I. and Ovaskainen, O.. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theoretical Population Biology 64, 119–27.Google Scholar

Henein, K., Wegner, J., and Merriam, G.. 1998. Population effects of landscape model manipulation on two behaviourally different woodland small mammals. Oikos 81, 168–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, S. I. and Cain, M. L.. 2002. Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization–competition trade-off. Journal of Ecology 90, 616–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinkhamer, P. G., Jong, T. J., Metz, J. A. J., and Val, J.. 1987. Life history tactics of annual organisms: the joint effects of dispersal and delayed germination. Theoretical Population Biology 32, 127–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Léon-Cortés, J. L., Lennon, J. J., and Thomas, C. D.. 2003. Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 1. The role of habitat pattern and quantity, stochasticity and dispersal. Oikos 102, 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, S. A., Cohen, D., and Hastings, A.. 1984. Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theoretical Population Biology 26, 165–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15, 237–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levins, R. 1970. Extinction. Pages 77–107 in Gerstenhaber, M. (ed.). Lecture Notes on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 2. Providence, RI: American Mathematics Society.Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. B., Burgman, M. A., Akçakaya, H. R., Lacy, R. C., and Possingham, H. P.. 1995. A review of the generic computer programs ALEX, RAMAS-space and VORTEX for modelling the viability of wildlife metapopulations. Ecological Modelling 82, 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovaskainen, O. and Hanski, I.. 2003. How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence?Theoretical Population Biology 64, 481–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ovaskainen, O., Sato, K., Bascompte, J., and Hanski, I.. 2002. Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 215, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Risser, P. G., J. R. Karr, and R. T. T. Forman. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Special Publication Number 2. Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey.

Tischendorf, L., Bender, D. J., and Fahrig, L.. 2003. Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landscape Ecology 18, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Topping, C. J. and Sunderland, K. D.. 1994. A spatial population dynamics model for Lepthyphantes tenuis (Araneae: Linyphiidae) with some simulations of the spatial and temporal effects of farming operations and land-use. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 48, 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandermeer, J. and Carvajal, R.. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. American Naturalist 158, 212–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Venier, L. and Fahrig, L.. 1996. Habitat availability causes the species abundance–distrubution relationship. Oikos 76, 564–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A., and Hanski, I.. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273, 1536–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, R. S., Novaro, A. J., and Branch, L. C.. 2003. Effects of patch attributes, barriers, and distance between patches on the distribution of a rock-dwelling rodent (Lagidium viscacia). Landscape Ecology 18, 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar