References

Asif Agha

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618284.012

Agha, Asif. 1993a. Structural Form and Utterance Context in Lhasa Tibetan: Grammar and Indexicality in a Non-configurational Language: Monographs in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1993b. Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(2): 1–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1994. Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 277–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1995. Process and personality. Semiotica, 107 (1/2): 125–46.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1996a. Schema and superposition in spatial deixis. Anthropological Linguistics, 38 (4): 643–82.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif.1996b. Rhetoric. In Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, ed. by Levinson, David and Ember, Melvin. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1997. Tropic aggression in the Clinton-Dole presidential debate. Pragmatics, 7(4): 461–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1998a. Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society, 27: 151–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 1998b. Form and function in Urdu-Hindi verb inflection. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1: 105–33.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif.2002. Honorific registers. In Culture, Interaction and Language, ed. by Ide, S. and Kataoka, K., pp. 21–63. Tokyo: Hituzisyobo.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23: 231–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agha, Asif.2004. Registers of Language. In A Companion To Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 23–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 38–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alford, H. 1866. A Plea for The Queen's English. London and New York: Alexander Strahan Publisher.Google Scholar

Alrabaa, Sami. 1985. The use of address pronouns by Egyptian adults. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 645–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anonymous. 1839. Advice to a Young Gentleman on Entering Society. By the Author of “The Laws of Etiquette”. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard. [Reprinted in London, 1839, with slightly different pagination].

Appadurai, Arjun (ed.) 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The Dialogic Imagination, ed. by Holquist, M, pp. 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bateman, H. M. 1969. The Man Who Drew the 20th Century: The Drawings of H. M. Bateman. Introduced by Michael Bateman. London: Macdonald and Co.Google Scholar

Beeman, William O. 1986. Language, Status and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Benzie, W. 1972. The Dublin Orator: Thomas Sheridan's Influence on Eighteenth Century Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Yorkshire: The University of Leeds Press.Google Scholar

Bex, Tony. 1996. Cohesion, coherence and register. In Variety in Written English, pp. 90–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1994. An analytic framework for register studies. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 31–56. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John J. 1986 [1972]. Social Meaning in Linguistic Structure: Code-Switching in Norway. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 407–34. New York: Blackwell. [Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1972]Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1996 [1911]. Introduction to Handbook of American Indian Languages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [Handbook of American Indian Languages. Bulletin 40, Part 1, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington DC]Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990a. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990b. The social uses of kinship. In The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Briggs, Charles L. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., pp. 253–76. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger and Ford, Marguerite. 1964. Address in American English. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 234–44. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bucholz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2004. Language and Identity. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 369–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carsten, Janet, ed. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carsten, Linda. 2004 [1995]. The substance of kinship and the heat of the hearth: Feeding, personhood and relatedness among Malayans in Pulau Langkawi. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 309–27. Oxford: Blackwell. [American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–242]Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald. 1988. Front pages: lexis, style and newspaper reports. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M, pp. 8–16. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Caton, Steven C. 1986. Salaam tahiiyah: Greetings from the highlands of Yemen. American Ethnologist, 13: 290–308.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, A. 1970. Personal pronouns and pronominal forms in Malayalam. Anthropological Linguistics, 12(7): 246–255.Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, A. 1977. Degrees of politeness in Malayalam. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 6(1): 85–96.Google Scholar

Choy, Hyen-Pay. 1955. Wuli Malpon [Our Grammar]. Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar

Cicourel, Aaron V. 1974. Interpretive procedures and normative roles in the negotiation of status and role. In Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, pp. 11–41. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2): 406–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese: University of California Publications in Linguistics, 52. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel and Lettieri, Michael. 1983. The pronouns of address in Italian: Sociolinguistic and pedagogical considerations. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, 12: 323–33.Google Scholar

Das, S. K. 1968. Forms of address and terms of reference in Bengali. Anthropological Linguistics, 10(4): 19–31.Google Scholar

Diller, Anthony. 1993. Diglossic grammaticality in Thai. In The Role of Theory in Language Description, ed. by Foley, William A., pp. 393–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1990 [1966]. Reference and definite descriptions. In The Philosophy of Language, ed. by Martinich, A. P.. New York: Oxford. [Philosophical Review 75: 281–304]Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. Language and bodies in social space: Samoan ceremonial greetings. American Anthropologist, 94: 657–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eble, Connie. 1996. Slang and Sociability: In-group Language Among College Students. Chapel Hill: University Of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Errington, J. Joseph. 1985. Language and Social Change in Java. Monographs in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, no. 65. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar

Errington, J. Joseph. 1988. Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Errington, J. Joseph. 1998. Shifting languages: Interaction and Identity in Javanese Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1986. On Sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and Co-occurrence. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 213–50. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In Exceptional language and Linguistics, ed. by Obler, L. K. and Menn, L., pp. 49–66. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Sports Announcer Talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12: 153–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A.1994. Dialect, register and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 15–30. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. L. 1964. Words for self and other in some Japanese families. American Anthropologist, 66(6): 115–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fliegelman, J. 1993. Declaring Independence: Jefferenson, Natural Language and the Culture of Performance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul. 1966. Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage. In Sociolinguistics, ed. by Bright, William, pp. 214–59. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul.1986. Social context and semantic feature: The Russian pronominal usage. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 270–300. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 1992. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies: A commentary. Pragmatics, 2(3): 445–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gal, Susan.1998. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi, et al., pp. 317–332. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Gass, William. 1979. The anatomy of mind. In The World Within The Word, pp. 208–52. Boston: Godine.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford H. 1960. The Religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.) 1988. Registers of Written English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 23: 211–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 1971. Patterns of evaluation to R. P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3): 280–1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58: 473–502.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981a. Footing. In Forms of Talk, pp. 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981b. Replies and responses. In Forms of Talk, pp. 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Golding, R. 1985. Idiolects in Dickens. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Rethinking Context: Language as Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 147–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, David P. 1983. Hospital slang for patients: Crocks, gomers, gorks and others. Language in Society, 13: 173–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Gustafson, T. 1992. Representative Words: Politics, Literature and the American Language, 1776–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary R. 1964. Men's and women's speech in Koasati. In Language in Culture and Society, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 228–33. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. The users and uses of language. In The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching, ed. by Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, Angus and Strevens, Peter, pp. 75–110. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K.1988. On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 162–78. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Hanks, William F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hanks, William F.1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 43–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hanks, William F.1996. Exorcism and the description of participant roles. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 160–200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Haviland, John B. 1979a. Guugu-Yimidhirr brother-in-law language. Language in Society, 8: 365–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haviland, John B.1979b. How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In Languages and Their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, T., pp. 161–239. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Haviland, John B. 1993. Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1): 3–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haviland, John B. 2005. “Whorish old man” and “One (animal) gentleman” The intertextual construction of enemies and selves. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 81–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. 1998. ‘Today there is no respect’: Nostalgia, ‘respect’ and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 68–86. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Holy, Ladislav. 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London and Chicago: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Honey, John. 1989a. Does Accent Matter? The Pygmalion Factor. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Honey, John.1989b. Acrolect and hyperlect: Education and class as foci of linguistic identity. In Status and Function of Language and Language Varieties, ed. by Ammon, U, pp. 581–91. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hope, J. 2000. Rats, bats, sparrows and dogs: biology, linguistics, and the nature of Standard English. In The Development of Standard English, ed. by Wright, L, pp. 49–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Susan M. 1993. Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: imaginary and literal footings. In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, pp. 114–45. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Hudson, Kenneth. 1983. Pop music as cultural carrier. In The Language of the Teenage Revolution, pp. 36–52. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hughes, A. and Trudgill, P. 1987. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to the Social and Regional Varieties of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kyoko. 1979. Japanese: a story of language and people. In Languages and their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, pp. 241–300. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith. 1989. When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16 (2): 248–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith.1989 [1974]. Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel, pp. 167–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith.1990. Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Language and the Politics of Emotion, ed. by Lutz, Catherine A. and Abu-Lughod, Lila, pp. 126–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith.1996. Shadow conversations. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith.1998. Ideologies of honorific language. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 51–67. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith.2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R., pp. 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language, ed. by Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Susan M. 2004. Eggs and wombs: The origins of Jewishness. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 362–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Keenan, Elinor Ochs. 1996. Norm makers, norm breakers: uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In The Matrix of Language, pp. 99–115, Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald K. S., eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kingston-Oliphant, T. 1873. The Sources of Standard English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Koyama, Wataru. 2004. The linguistic ideologies of modern Japanese honorifics and the historic reality of modernity. Language and Communication, 24(4): pp. 413–435.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V. 2004. Language ideologies. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 497–517. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund. 1966. Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse. In New Directions in the Study of Language, Lenneberg, E., ed., pp. 23–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Benjamin. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Linton, Ralph. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar

Listen, Paul. 1999. The Emergence of German Polite Sie: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. (ed.) 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lucy, John A.1997. The linguistics of ‘color’. In Color Categories in Thought and Language, ed. by Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, Luisa, pp. 320–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Luong, Hy. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 15(2): 239–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Luong, Hy. 1990. Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lutz, William. 1990. Doublespeak. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistics Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Macaulay, R. K. S. 1977. Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, S. E. 1964. Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, Hymes, Dell H., ed., pp. 407–415. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Matoesian, Gregory M. 1999. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28: 491–521.CrossRef Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. The rise and fall of Japanese nonsubject honorifics; the case of “o-Verb-suru.”Journal of Pragmatics, 28(6): 719–740.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maurer, David. 1955. Whiz Mob: A Correlation of the Technical Argot of Pickpockets With Their Behavior Pattern. Gainsville, FL: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar

McGregor, William. 1996. Dyadic and polyadic kin terms in Gooniyandi. Anthropological Linguistics, 38(2): 216–247.Google Scholar

Mehrotra, R. R. 1977. Sociology of Secret Languages. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar

Mertz, Elizabeth. 1998. Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. Law School classrooms. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 149–62. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mintz, Sidney and Eric R. Wolf. 1967. An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (Compadrazgo). In Peasant Society: A Reader, ed. by Diaz, Mary N.Potter, Jack M., Foster, George M., pp. 174–99. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. 1977. The forgotten woman of the period: Penny Weekly family magazines of the 1840's and 1850's. In A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women, ed. by Vicinus, M., pp. 29–51. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Mitford, Nancy. 1956. Noblesse Oblige. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar

Mohrmann, G. P. 1969. Introduction. In A Discourse Being Introductory To His Course of Lectures on Elocution an the English Language, by Thomas Sheridan, 1759. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

Morford, Janet. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1): 3–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morrison, T. 1863. Manual of School Management. London.Google Scholar

Mugglestone, Lynda. 1995. “Talking Proper”: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom, Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity: Language in Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Nadel, S. F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View From Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nash, Walter. 1993. Jargon: Its Uses and Abuses. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Newbrook, M. 1999. West Wirral: norms, self-reports and usage. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. by Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J., pp. 90–106. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Ogino, T., et al. 1985. Diversity of honorific usage in Tokyo: A sociolinguistic approach based on a field survey. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 55: 23–39.Google Scholar

Parmentier, Richard. 1994. The naturalization of convention. In Signs in Society, pp. 175–92. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott and Shils, Edward A. (eds.) 1951. Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Paulston, Christina B. 1976. Pronouns of address in Swedish: social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society, 5: 359–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pei, J. C.Honorific usage in spoken Korean in Yanbian. 1992. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 97: 87–95.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (2 vols.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Perrino, Sabina M. 2002. Intimate Hierarchies and Quar'anic Saliva (Tëfli): Textuality in a Senegalese ethnomedical encounter. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2): 225–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Phillipps, K. C. 1984. Language and Class in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1968. Javanese speech levels. Indonesia, 6: 54–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1969. Wordlist of Javanese non-Ngoko vocabularies. Indonesia, 7: 165–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2., pp. 215–71. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Puttenham, G. 1589. The Arte of English Poesie. London.Google Scholar

Quinn, Arthur. 1982. Figures of Speech. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph and Svartvik, Jan. 1966. Investigating Linguistic Acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ramanujan, A. K. 1968. The structure of variation: A study in caste dialects. In Structure and Change in Indian Society, ed. by Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., pp. 461–74. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 2003. Hegemony, social class and stylization. Pragmatics, 13(1): 49–83.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reid, I. 1977. Social Class Differences in Britain. London: Open Books.Google Scholar

Reid, T. B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8(1): 28–37.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1915. Kin, kinship. In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. by Hastings, J., pp. 700–07. Edinburgh and New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society, 11: 203–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara B., pp. 27–48. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rosewarne, D. 1984. Estuary English. The Times Literary Supplement, 19 October.Google Scholar

Rosewarne, D. 1994. Estuary English: Tomorrow's RP?English Today, 37(10.1): 3–8.Google Scholar

Ross, A. S. C. 1954. Linguistic class indicators in present-day English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 55: 20–56.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward.1949a. Communication. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 104–10. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward.1949b. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 179–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice. In Language and Social Context, ed. by Giglioli, Pier Paolo, pp. 95–135. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Schieffelin, Bambi et al. eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schottman, Wendy. 1995. The daily ritual of greeting among the Baatombu of Benin. Anthropological Linguistics, 37(4): 487–523.Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, John.1975. Indirect speech acts. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5: 1–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Senft, Gunter. 1997. Magical conversation on the Trobriand islands. Anthropos, 92: 369–91.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1756. British Education. Dublin: Printed by George Faulkner.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1761. A Dissertation on the Causes of the Difficulties Which Occur in Learning the English Tongue. With a Scheme for Publishing an English Grammar and Dictionary Upon a Plan Entirely New. The Object of Which Shall be, to Facilitate the Attainment of the English Tongue, and establish a Perpetual Standard of Pronunciation. London: Printed for R. and J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1762. A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: printed by W. Strahan, for A. Millar, R. and J. Dodsley, T. Davies, C. Henderson, J. Wilkie, and E. Dilly.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1769. A Plan of Education for the Young Nobility and Gentry of Great Britain. London: Printed for E. and C. Dilly.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1775. Lectures on the Art of Reading. London: printed for J. Dodsley, J. Wilkie, E. and C. Dilly, and T. Davies.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Thomas 1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. One main object of which, is, to establish a plain and permanent standard of pronunciation. To which is prefixed a rhetorical grammar. London: Printed by William Strahan for J. Dodsley; C. Dilly; and J. Wilkie.Google Scholar

Shibamoto, Janet S. 1987. The womanly woman: manipulation of stereotypical and non-stereotypical features of Japanese female speech. In Language, Gender and Sex in a Comparative Perspective, ed. by Phillips, Susan, Steele, Susan and Tanz, Christine, pp. 26–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Basso, Keith and Selby, Ellen, pp. 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F. and Hofbauer, Carol L., pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1981. The limits of awareness. In Sociolinguistic Working Paper, no. 84. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Silverstein, Michael.1985. On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: parallelism, repetition and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Schiffrin, Deborah, pp. 181–99. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1987. Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought, ed. by Hickman, Maya, pp. 125–64. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1988. Demeanor indexicals and honorific register. Unpublished paper, presented at the conference on honorifics, Reed College, 1988.

Silverstein, Michael.1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by Lucy, John A., pp. 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1996a. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. SALSA, 3: 266–95.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1996b. Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language, ed. by Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald, pp. 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, Rita S. 1997. Metapragmatic discourse and the ideology of impolite pronouns in Thai. JLA, 7(1): 38–62.Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1988. Compressed English. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 130–36. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Singh, U. N. 1989. How to honor someone in Maithili. Int. J. Soc. Lang., 75: 87–107.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1963. Some aspects of the use of pronouns of address in Yiddish. Word, 19(2): 193–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 1988. The linguistic socialization of Javanese children in two communities. Anthropological Linguistics, 30(2): 166–98.Google Scholar

Stone, Linda. 2004. Introduction: The demise and revival of kinship. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 241–56. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Takao. 1984. Words for Self and Others. In Words in Context: A Japanese Perspective on Language and Culture, pp. 111–69. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Toolan, Michael. 1988. The language of press advertising. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 52–64. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Trechter, Sara. 1995. Categorial gender myths in Native America: Gender deictics in Lakhota. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(1): 5–22.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What it isn't. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 117–28. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Urban, Greg. 1996. Metaphysical Community: The Interplay of the Senses and the Intellect. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Gennep, Arnold. 1961 [1909]. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Paris, E Nourry, 1909].CrossRef Google Scholar

Vatuk, Sylvia. 1982. Forms of address in the North Indian family: An exploration of the cultural meaning of kin terms. In Concepts of Person: Kinship, Caste and Marriage in India, ed. by Oster, Akos et al., pp. 56–98. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, John. 1791. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson and Cadell.Google Scholar

Walker, John. 1806. Elements of Elocution. London: Printed for J. Johnson in St Paul's Churchyard.Google Scholar

Wang, H.-S. 1990. Towards a description of the organization of Korean speech levels. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82: 25–39.Google Scholar

Watterson, Bill. 1995. The Calvin and Hobbes Tenth Anniversary Book. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 1999. The social construction of Standard English: Grammar writers as a discourse community. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 40–68. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1978 [1956]. Economy and Society, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 4th edition, Tubingen, 1956]Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wortham, Stanton E. F. 2005. Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 95–112.CrossRef Google Scholar