Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:14:06.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Asif Agha
Asif Agha
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language and Social Relations , pp. 408 - 418
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif. 1993a. Structural Form and Utterance Context in Lhasa Tibetan: Grammar and Indexicality in a Non-configurational Language: Monographs in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1993b. Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1994. Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1995. Process and personality. Semiotica, 107 (1/2): 125–46.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1996a. Schema and superposition in spatial deixis. Anthropological Linguistics, 38 (4): 643–82.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif.1996b. Rhetoric. In Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, ed. by Levinson, David and Ember, Melvin. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1997. Tropic aggression in the Clinton-Dole presidential debate. Pragmatics, 7(4): 461–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1998a. Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society, 27: 151–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1998b. Form and function in Urdu-Hindi verb inflection. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1: 105–33.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif.2002. Honorific registers. In Culture, Interaction and Language, ed. by Ide, S. and Kataoka, K., pp. 21–63. Tokyo: Hituzisyobo.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23: 231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif.2004. Registers of Language. In A Companion To Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 23–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, H. 1866. A Plea for The Queen's English. London and New York: Alexander Strahan Publisher.Google Scholar
Alrabaa, Sami. 1985. The use of address pronouns by Egyptian adults. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 645–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1839. Advice to a Young Gentleman on Entering Society. By the Author of “The Laws of Etiquette”. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard. [Reprinted in London, 1839, with slightly different pagination].
Appadurai, Arjun (ed.) 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The Dialogic Imagination, ed. by Holquist, M, pp. 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bateman, H. M. 1969. The Man Who Drew the 20th Century: The Drawings of H. M. Bateman. Introduced by Michael Bateman. London: Macdonald and Co.Google Scholar
Beeman, William O. 1986. Language, Status and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Benzie, W. 1972. The Dublin Orator: Thomas Sheridan's Influence on Eighteenth Century Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Yorkshire: The University of Leeds Press.Google Scholar
Bex, Tony. 1996. Cohesion, coherence and register. In Variety in Written English, pp. 90–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1994. An analytic framework for register studies. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 31–56. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John J. 1986 [1972]. Social Meaning in Linguistic Structure: Code-Switching in Norway. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 407–34. New York: Blackwell. [Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1972]Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1996 [1911]. Introduction to Handbook of American Indian Languages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [Handbook of American Indian Languages. Bulletin 40, Part 1, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington DC]Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990a. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990b. The social uses of kinship. In The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., pp. 253–76. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Ford, Marguerite. 1964. Address in American English. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 234–44. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2004. Language and Identity. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 369–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet, ed. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Linda. 2004 [1995]. The substance of kinship and the heat of the hearth: Feeding, personhood and relatedness among Malayans in Pulau Langkawi. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 309–27. Oxford: Blackwell. [American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–242]Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 1988. Front pages: lexis, style and newspaper reports. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M, pp. 8–16. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Caton, Steven C. 1986. Salaam tahiiyah: Greetings from the highlands of Yemen. American Ethnologist, 13: 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, A. 1970. Personal pronouns and pronominal forms in Malayalam. Anthropological Linguistics, 12(7): 246–255.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, A. 1977. Degrees of politeness in Malayalam. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 6(1): 85–96.Google Scholar
Choy, Hyen-Pay. 1955. Wuli Malpon [Our Grammar]. Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1974. Interpretive procedures and normative roles in the negotiation of status and role. In Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, pp. 11–41. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2): 406–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese: University of California Publications in Linguistics, 52. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel and Lettieri, Michael. 1983. The pronouns of address in Italian: Sociolinguistic and pedagogical considerations. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, 12: 323–33.Google Scholar
Das, S. K. 1968. Forms of address and terms of reference in Bengali. Anthropological Linguistics, 10(4): 19–31.Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony. 1993. Diglossic grammaticality in Thai. In The Role of Theory in Language Description, ed. by Foley, William A., pp. 393–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1990 [1966]. Reference and definite descriptions. In The Philosophy of Language, ed. by Martinich, A. P.. New York: Oxford. [Philosophical Review 75: 281–304]Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. Language and bodies in social space: Samoan ceremonial greetings. American Anthropologist, 94: 657–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eble, Connie. 1996. Slang and Sociability: In-group Language Among College Students. Chapel Hill: University Of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1985. Language and Social Change in Java. Monographs in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, no. 65. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1988. Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1998. Shifting languages: Interaction and Identity in Javanese Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1986. On Sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and Co-occurrence. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 213–50. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In Exceptional language and Linguistics, ed. by Obler, L. K. and Menn, L., pp. 49–66. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Sports Announcer Talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12: 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.1994. Dialect, register and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 15–30. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. L. 1964. Words for self and other in some Japanese families. American Anthropologist, 66(6): 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliegelman, J. 1993. Declaring Independence: Jefferenson, Natural Language and the Culture of Performance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1966. Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage. In Sociolinguistics, ed. by Bright, William, pp. 214–59. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul.1986. Social context and semantic feature: The Russian pronominal usage. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 270–300. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1992. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies: A commentary. Pragmatics, 2(3): 445–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan.1998. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi, et al., pp. 317–332. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Gass, William. 1979. The anatomy of mind. In The World Within The Word, pp. 208–52. Boston: Godine.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford H. 1960. The Religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.) 1988. Registers of Written English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 23: 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1971. Patterns of evaluation to R. P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3): 280–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58: 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981a. Footing. In Forms of Talk, pp. 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981b. Replies and responses. In Forms of Talk, pp. 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, R. 1985. Idiolects in Dickens. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Rethinking Context: Language as Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 147–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, David P. 1983. Hospital slang for patients: Crocks, gomers, gorks and others. Language in Society, 13: 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gustafson, T. 1992. Representative Words: Politics, Literature and the American Language, 1776–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1964. Men's and women's speech in Koasati. In Language in Culture and Society, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 228–33. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. The users and uses of language. In The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching, ed. by Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, Angus and Strevens, Peter, pp. 75–110. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.1988. On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 162–78. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 43–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.1996. Exorcism and the description of participant roles. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 160–200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1979a. Guugu-Yimidhirr brother-in-law language. Language in Society, 8: 365–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.1979b. How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In Languages and Their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, T., pp. 161–239. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1993. Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1): 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2005. “Whorish old man” and “One (animal) gentleman” The intertextual construction of enemies and selves. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 1998. ‘Today there is no respect’: Nostalgia, ‘respect’ and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 68–86. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Holy, Ladislav. 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London and Chicago: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Honey, John. 1989a. Does Accent Matter? The Pygmalion Factor. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Honey, John.1989b. Acrolect and hyperlect: Education and class as foci of linguistic identity. In Status and Function of Language and Language Varieties, ed. by Ammon, U, pp. 581–91. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, J. 2000. Rats, bats, sparrows and dogs: biology, linguistics, and the nature of Standard English. In The Development of Standard English, ed. by Wright, L, pp. 49–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Susan M. 1993. Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: imaginary and literal footings. In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, pp. 114–45. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hudson, Kenneth. 1983. Pop music as cultural carrier. In The Language of the Teenage Revolution, pp. 36–52. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. and Trudgill, P. 1987. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to the Social and Regional Varieties of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kyoko. 1979. Japanese: a story of language and people. In Languages and their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, pp. 241–300. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1989. When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16 (2): 248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1989 [1974]. Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel, pp. 167–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1990. Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Language and the Politics of Emotion, ed. by Lutz, Catherine A. and Abu-Lughod, Lila, pp. 126–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1996. Shadow conversations. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1998. Ideologies of honorific language. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 51–67. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R., pp. 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language, ed. by Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Susan M. 2004. Eggs and wombs: The origins of Jewishness. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 362–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs. 1996. Norm makers, norm breakers: uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In The Matrix of Language, pp. 99–115, Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald K. S., eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kingston-Oliphant, T. 1873. The Sources of Standard English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koyama, Wataru. 2004. The linguistic ideologies of modern Japanese honorifics and the historic reality of modernity. Language and Communication, 24(4): pp. 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2004. Language ideologies. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 497–517. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1966. Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse. In New Directions in the Study of Language, Lenneberg, E., ed., pp. 23–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Ralph. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
Listen, Paul. 1999. The Emergence of German Polite Sie: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. (ed.) 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A.1997. The linguistics of ‘color’. In Color Categories in Thought and Language, ed. by Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, Luisa, pp. 320–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 15(2): 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy. 1990. Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, William. 1990. Doublespeak. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistics Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. 1977. Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1964. Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, Hymes, Dell H., ed., pp. 407–415. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1999. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28: 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. The rise and fall of Japanese nonsubject honorifics; the case of “o-Verb-suru.”Journal of Pragmatics, 28(6): 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, David. 1955. Whiz Mob: A Correlation of the Technical Argot of Pickpockets With Their Behavior Pattern. Gainsville, FL: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1996. Dyadic and polyadic kin terms in Gooniyandi. Anthropological Linguistics, 38(2): 216–247.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, R. R. 1977. Sociology of Secret Languages. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1998. Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. Law School classrooms. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 149–62. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney and Eric R. Wolf. 1967. An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (Compadrazgo). In Peasant Society: A Reader, ed. by Diaz, Mary N.Potter, Jack M., Foster, George M., pp. 174–99. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1977. The forgotten woman of the period: Penny Weekly family magazines of the 1840's and 1850's. In A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women, ed. by Vicinus, M., pp. 29–51. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mitford, Nancy. 1956. Noblesse Oblige. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Mohrmann, G. P. 1969. Introduction. In A Discourse Being Introductory To His Course of Lectures on Elocution an the English Language, by Thomas Sheridan, 1759. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Morford, Janet. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, T. 1863. Manual of School Management. London.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 1995. “Talking Proper”: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom, Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity: Language in Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View From Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nash, Walter. 1993. Jargon: Its Uses and Abuses. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Newbrook, M. 1999. West Wirral: norms, self-reports and usage. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. by Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J., pp. 90–106. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ogino, T., et al. 1985. Diversity of honorific usage in Tokyo: A sociolinguistic approach based on a field survey. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 55: 23–39.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard. 1994. The naturalization of convention. In Signs in Society, pp. 175–92. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Shils, Edward A. (eds.) 1951. Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulston, Christina B. 1976. Pronouns of address in Swedish: social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society, 5: 359–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, J. C.Honorific usage in spoken Korean in Yanbian. 1992. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 97: 87–95.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (2 vols.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina M. 2002. Intimate Hierarchies and Quar'anic Saliva (Tëfli): Textuality in a Senegalese ethnomedical encounter. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2): 225–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipps, K. C. 1984. Language and Class in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1968. Javanese speech levels. Indonesia, 6: 54–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1969. Wordlist of Javanese non-Ngoko vocabularies. Indonesia, 7: 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2., pp. 215–71. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttenham, G. 1589. The Arte of English Poesie. London.Google Scholar
Quinn, Arthur. 1982. Figures of Speech. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph and Svartvik, Jan. 1966. Investigating Linguistic Acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, A. K. 1968. The structure of variation: A study in caste dialects. In Structure and Change in Indian Society, ed. by Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., pp. 461–74. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2003. Hegemony, social class and stylization. Pragmatics, 13(1): 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, I. 1977. Social Class Differences in Britain. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
Reid, T. B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8(1): 28–37.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1915. Kin, kinship. In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. by Hastings, J., pp. 700–07. Edinburgh and New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society, 11: 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara B., pp. 27–48. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. 1984. Estuary English. The Times Literary Supplement, 19 October.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. 1994. Estuary English: Tomorrow's RP?English Today, 37(10.1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. 1954. Linguistic class indicators in present-day English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 55: 20–56.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward.1949a. Communication. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 104–10. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward.1949b. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 179–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice. In Language and Social Context, ed. by Giglioli, Pier Paolo, pp. 95–135. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi et al. eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottman, Wendy. 1995. The daily ritual of greeting among the Baatombu of Benin. Anthropological Linguistics, 37(4): 487–523.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John.1975. Indirect speech acts. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1997. Magical conversation on the Trobriand islands. Anthropos, 92: 369–91.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1756. British Education. Dublin: Printed by George Faulkner.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1761. A Dissertation on the Causes of the Difficulties Which Occur in Learning the English Tongue. With a Scheme for Publishing an English Grammar and Dictionary Upon a Plan Entirely New. The Object of Which Shall be, to Facilitate the Attainment of the English Tongue, and establish a Perpetual Standard of Pronunciation. London: Printed for R. and J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1762. A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: printed by W. Strahan, for A. Millar, R. and J. Dodsley, T. Davies, C. Henderson, J. Wilkie, and E. Dilly.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1769. A Plan of Education for the Young Nobility and Gentry of Great Britain. London: Printed for E. and C. Dilly.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1775. Lectures on the Art of Reading. London: printed for J. Dodsley, J. Wilkie, E. and C. Dilly, and T. Davies.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. One main object of which, is, to establish a plain and permanent standard of pronunciation. To which is prefixed a rhetorical grammar. London: Printed by William Strahan for J. Dodsley; C. Dilly; and J. Wilkie.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S. 1987. The womanly woman: manipulation of stereotypical and non-stereotypical features of Japanese female speech. In Language, Gender and Sex in a Comparative Perspective, ed. by Phillips, Susan, Steele, Susan and Tanz, Christine, pp. 26–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Basso, Keith and Selby, Ellen, pp. 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F. and Hofbauer, Carol L., pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1981. The limits of awareness. In Sociolinguistic Working Paper, no. 84. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Silverstein, Michael.1985. On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: parallelism, repetition and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Schiffrin, Deborah, pp. 181–99. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1987. Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought, ed. by Hickman, Maya, pp. 125–64. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1988. Demeanor indexicals and honorific register. Unpublished paper, presented at the conference on honorifics, Reed College, 1988.
Silverstein, Michael.1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by Lucy, John A., pp. 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1996a. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. SALSA, 3: 266–95.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1996b. Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language, ed. by Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald, pp. 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita S. 1997. Metapragmatic discourse and the ideology of impolite pronouns in Thai. JLA, 7(1): 38–62.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1988. Compressed English. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 130–36. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Singh, U. N. 1989. How to honor someone in Maithili. Int. J. Soc. Lang., 75: 87–107.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1963. Some aspects of the use of pronouns of address in Yiddish. Word, 19(2): 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 1988. The linguistic socialization of Javanese children in two communities. Anthropological Linguistics, 30(2): 166–98.Google Scholar
Stone, Linda. 2004. Introduction: The demise and revival of kinship. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 241–56. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao. 1984. Words for Self and Others. In Words in Context: A Japanese Perspective on Language and Culture, pp. 111–69. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 1988. The language of press advertising. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 52–64. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Trechter, Sara. 1995. Categorial gender myths in Native America: Gender deictics in Lakhota. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What it isn't. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 117–28. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1996. Metaphysical Community: The Interplay of the Senses and the Intellect. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold. 1961 [1909]. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Paris, E Nourry, 1909].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatuk, Sylvia. 1982. Forms of address in the North Indian family: An exploration of the cultural meaning of kin terms. In Concepts of Person: Kinship, Caste and Marriage in India, ed. by Oster, Akos et al., pp. 56–98. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1791. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson and Cadell.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1806. Elements of Elocution. London: Printed for J. Johnson in St Paul's Churchyard.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-S. 1990. Towards a description of the organization of Korean speech levels. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82: 25–39.Google Scholar
Watterson, Bill. 1995. The Calvin and Hobbes Tenth Anniversary Book. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 1999. The social construction of Standard English: Grammar writers as a discourse community. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 40–68. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1956]. Economy and Society, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 4th edition, Tubingen, 1956]Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Stanton E. F. 2005. Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1993a. Structural Form and Utterance Context in Lhasa Tibetan: Grammar and Indexicality in a Non-configurational Language: Monographs in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1993b. Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1994. Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1995. Process and personality. Semiotica, 107 (1/2): 125–46.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1996a. Schema and superposition in spatial deixis. Anthropological Linguistics, 38 (4): 643–82.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif.1996b. Rhetoric. In Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, ed. by Levinson, David and Ember, Melvin. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1997. Tropic aggression in the Clinton-Dole presidential debate. Pragmatics, 7(4): 461–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1998a. Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society, 27: 151–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 1998b. Form and function in Urdu-Hindi verb inflection. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1: 105–33.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif.2002. Honorific registers. In Culture, Interaction and Language, ed. by Ide, S. and Kataoka, K., pp. 21–63. Tokyo: Hituzisyobo.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23: 231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif.2004. Registers of Language. In A Companion To Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 23–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, H. 1866. A Plea for The Queen's English. London and New York: Alexander Strahan Publisher.Google Scholar
Alrabaa, Sami. 1985. The use of address pronouns by Egyptian adults. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 645–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1839. Advice to a Young Gentleman on Entering Society. By the Author of “The Laws of Etiquette”. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard. [Reprinted in London, 1839, with slightly different pagination].
Appadurai, Arjun (ed.) 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The Dialogic Imagination, ed. by Holquist, M, pp. 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bateman, H. M. 1969. The Man Who Drew the 20th Century: The Drawings of H. M. Bateman. Introduced by Michael Bateman. London: Macdonald and Co.Google Scholar
Beeman, William O. 1986. Language, Status and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Benzie, W. 1972. The Dublin Orator: Thomas Sheridan's Influence on Eighteenth Century Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Yorkshire: The University of Leeds Press.Google Scholar
Bex, Tony. 1996. Cohesion, coherence and register. In Variety in Written English, pp. 90–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1994. An analytic framework for register studies. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 31–56. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John J. 1986 [1972]. Social Meaning in Linguistic Structure: Code-Switching in Norway. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 407–34. New York: Blackwell. [Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1972]Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1996 [1911]. Introduction to Handbook of American Indian Languages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [Handbook of American Indian Languages. Bulletin 40, Part 1, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington DC]Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990a. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990b. The social uses of kinship. In The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., pp. 253–76. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Ford, Marguerite. 1964. Address in American English. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 234–44. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2004. Language and Identity. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 369–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet, ed. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Linda. 2004 [1995]. The substance of kinship and the heat of the hearth: Feeding, personhood and relatedness among Malayans in Pulau Langkawi. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 309–27. Oxford: Blackwell. [American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–242]Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 1988. Front pages: lexis, style and newspaper reports. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M, pp. 8–16. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Caton, Steven C. 1986. Salaam tahiiyah: Greetings from the highlands of Yemen. American Ethnologist, 13: 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, A. 1970. Personal pronouns and pronominal forms in Malayalam. Anthropological Linguistics, 12(7): 246–255.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, A. 1977. Degrees of politeness in Malayalam. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 6(1): 85–96.Google Scholar
Choy, Hyen-Pay. 1955. Wuli Malpon [Our Grammar]. Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1974. Interpretive procedures and normative roles in the negotiation of status and role. In Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, pp. 11–41. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2): 406–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese: University of California Publications in Linguistics, 52. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel and Lettieri, Michael. 1983. The pronouns of address in Italian: Sociolinguistic and pedagogical considerations. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, 12: 323–33.Google Scholar
Das, S. K. 1968. Forms of address and terms of reference in Bengali. Anthropological Linguistics, 10(4): 19–31.Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony. 1993. Diglossic grammaticality in Thai. In The Role of Theory in Language Description, ed. by Foley, William A., pp. 393–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1990 [1966]. Reference and definite descriptions. In The Philosophy of Language, ed. by Martinich, A. P.. New York: Oxford. [Philosophical Review 75: 281–304]Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. Language and bodies in social space: Samoan ceremonial greetings. American Anthropologist, 94: 657–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eble, Connie. 1996. Slang and Sociability: In-group Language Among College Students. Chapel Hill: University Of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1985. Language and Social Change in Java. Monographs in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, no. 65. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1988. Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph. 1998. Shifting languages: Interaction and Identity in Javanese Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1986. On Sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and Co-occurrence. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 213–50. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In Exceptional language and Linguistics, ed. by Obler, L. K. and Menn, L., pp. 49–66. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Sports Announcer Talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12: 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.1994. Dialect, register and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward, pp. 15–30. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. L. 1964. Words for self and other in some Japanese families. American Anthropologist, 66(6): 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliegelman, J. 1993. Declaring Independence: Jefferenson, Natural Language and the Culture of Performance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1966. Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage. In Sociolinguistics, ed. by Bright, William, pp. 214–59. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul.1986. Social context and semantic feature: The Russian pronominal usage. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, pp. 270–300. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1992. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies: A commentary. Pragmatics, 2(3): 445–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan.1998. Multiplicity and contention among ideologies. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi, et al., pp. 317–332. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Gass, William. 1979. The anatomy of mind. In The World Within The Word, pp. 208–52. Boston: Godine.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford H. 1960. The Religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.) 1988. Registers of Written English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 23: 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1971. Patterns of evaluation to R. P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3): 280–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58: 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981a. Footing. In Forms of Talk, pp. 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981b. Replies and responses. In Forms of Talk, pp. 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, R. 1985. Idiolects in Dickens. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Rethinking Context: Language as Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 147–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, David P. 1983. Hospital slang for patients: Crocks, gomers, gorks and others. Language in Society, 13: 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gustafson, T. 1992. Representative Words: Politics, Literature and the American Language, 1776–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1964. Men's and women's speech in Koasati. In Language in Culture and Society, ed. by Hymes, Dell, pp. 228–33. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. The users and uses of language. In The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching, ed. by Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, Angus and Strevens, Peter, pp. 75–110. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.1988. On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 162–78. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, pp. 43–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.1996. Exorcism and the description of participant roles. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 160–200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1979a. Guugu-Yimidhirr brother-in-law language. Language in Society, 8: 365–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.1979b. How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In Languages and Their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, T., pp. 161–239. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1993. Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1): 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2005. “Whorish old man” and “One (animal) gentleman” The intertextual construction of enemies and selves. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 1998. ‘Today there is no respect’: Nostalgia, ‘respect’ and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 68–86. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Holy, Ladislav. 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London and Chicago: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Honey, John. 1989a. Does Accent Matter? The Pygmalion Factor. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Honey, John.1989b. Acrolect and hyperlect: Education and class as foci of linguistic identity. In Status and Function of Language and Language Varieties, ed. by Ammon, U, pp. 581–91. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, J. 2000. Rats, bats, sparrows and dogs: biology, linguistics, and the nature of Standard English. In The Development of Standard English, ed. by Wright, L, pp. 49–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Susan M. 1993. Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: imaginary and literal footings. In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, pp. 114–45. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hudson, Kenneth. 1983. Pop music as cultural carrier. In The Language of the Teenage Revolution, pp. 36–52. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. and Trudgill, P. 1987. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to the Social and Regional Varieties of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kyoko. 1979. Japanese: a story of language and people. In Languages and their Speakers, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, pp. 241–300. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1989. When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16 (2): 248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1989 [1974]. Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Communication, ed. by Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel, pp. 167–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1990. Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Language and the Politics of Emotion, ed. by Lutz, Catherine A. and Abu-Lughod, Lila, pp. 126–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1996. Shadow conversations. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, pp. 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.1998. Ideologies of honorific language. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 51–67. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith.2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R., pp. 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language, ed. by Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Susan M. 2004. Eggs and wombs: The origins of Jewishness. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 362–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs. 1996. Norm makers, norm breakers: uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In The Matrix of Language, pp. 99–115, Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald K. S., eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kingston-Oliphant, T. 1873. The Sources of Standard English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koyama, Wataru. 2004. The linguistic ideologies of modern Japanese honorifics and the historic reality of modernity. Language and Communication, 24(4): pp. 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2004. Language ideologies. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, pp. 497–517. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1966. Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse. In New Directions in the Study of Language, Lenneberg, E., ed., pp. 23–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Ralph. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
Listen, Paul. 1999. The Emergence of German Polite Sie: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. (ed.) 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A.1997. The linguistics of ‘color’. In Color Categories in Thought and Language, ed. by Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, Luisa, pp. 320–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 15(2): 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy. 1990. Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, William. 1990. Doublespeak. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistics Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. 1977. Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1964. Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, Hymes, Dell H., ed., pp. 407–415. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1999. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28: 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. The rise and fall of Japanese nonsubject honorifics; the case of “o-Verb-suru.”Journal of Pragmatics, 28(6): 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, David. 1955. Whiz Mob: A Correlation of the Technical Argot of Pickpockets With Their Behavior Pattern. Gainsville, FL: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1996. Dyadic and polyadic kin terms in Gooniyandi. Anthropological Linguistics, 38(2): 216–247.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, R. R. 1977. Sociology of Secret Languages. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1998. Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. Law School classrooms. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. by Schieffelin, Bambi K., Woolard, Kathryn and Kroskrity, Paul V., pp. 149–62. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney and Eric R. Wolf. 1967. An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (Compadrazgo). In Peasant Society: A Reader, ed. by Diaz, Mary N.Potter, Jack M., Foster, George M., pp. 174–99. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1977. The forgotten woman of the period: Penny Weekly family magazines of the 1840's and 1850's. In A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women, ed. by Vicinus, M., pp. 29–51. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mitford, Nancy. 1956. Noblesse Oblige. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Mohrmann, G. P. 1969. Introduction. In A Discourse Being Introductory To His Course of Lectures on Elocution an the English Language, by Thomas Sheridan, 1759. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Morford, Janet. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, T. 1863. Manual of School Management. London.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 1995. “Talking Proper”: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom, Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity: Language in Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View From Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nash, Walter. 1993. Jargon: Its Uses and Abuses. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Newbrook, M. 1999. West Wirral: norms, self-reports and usage. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. by Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J., pp. 90–106. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ogino, T., et al. 1985. Diversity of honorific usage in Tokyo: A sociolinguistic approach based on a field survey. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 55: 23–39.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard. 1994. The naturalization of convention. In Signs in Society, pp. 175–92. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Shils, Edward A. (eds.) 1951. Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulston, Christina B. 1976. Pronouns of address in Swedish: social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society, 5: 359–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, J. C.Honorific usage in spoken Korean in Yanbian. 1992. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 97: 87–95.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (2 vols.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina M. 2002. Intimate Hierarchies and Quar'anic Saliva (Tëfli): Textuality in a Senegalese ethnomedical encounter. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2): 225–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipps, K. C. 1984. Language and Class in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1968. Javanese speech levels. Indonesia, 6: 54–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1969. Wordlist of Javanese non-Ngoko vocabularies. Indonesia, 7: 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2., pp. 215–71. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttenham, G. 1589. The Arte of English Poesie. London.Google Scholar
Quinn, Arthur. 1982. Figures of Speech. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph and Svartvik, Jan. 1966. Investigating Linguistic Acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, A. K. 1968. The structure of variation: A study in caste dialects. In Structure and Change in Indian Society, ed. by Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., pp. 461–74. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2003. Hegemony, social class and stylization. Pragmatics, 13(1): 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, I. 1977. Social Class Differences in Britain. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
Reid, T. B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8(1): 28–37.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1915. Kin, kinship. In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. by Hastings, J., pp. 700–07. Edinburgh and New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society, 11: 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara B., pp. 27–48. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. 1984. Estuary English. The Times Literary Supplement, 19 October.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. 1994. Estuary English: Tomorrow's RP?English Today, 37(10.1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. 1954. Linguistic class indicators in present-day English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 55: 20–56.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward.1949a. Communication. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 104–10. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward.1949b. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, David G., pp. 179–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice. In Language and Social Context, ed. by Giglioli, Pier Paolo, pp. 95–135. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi et al. eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottman, Wendy. 1995. The daily ritual of greeting among the Baatombu of Benin. Anthropological Linguistics, 37(4): 487–523.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John.1975. Indirect speech acts. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1997. Magical conversation on the Trobriand islands. Anthropos, 92: 369–91.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1756. British Education. Dublin: Printed by George Faulkner.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1761. A Dissertation on the Causes of the Difficulties Which Occur in Learning the English Tongue. With a Scheme for Publishing an English Grammar and Dictionary Upon a Plan Entirely New. The Object of Which Shall be, to Facilitate the Attainment of the English Tongue, and establish a Perpetual Standard of Pronunciation. London: Printed for R. and J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1762. A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: printed by W. Strahan, for A. Millar, R. and J. Dodsley, T. Davies, C. Henderson, J. Wilkie, and E. Dilly.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1769. A Plan of Education for the Young Nobility and Gentry of Great Britain. London: Printed for E. and C. Dilly.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1775. Lectures on the Art of Reading. London: printed for J. Dodsley, J. Wilkie, E. and C. Dilly, and T. Davies.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. One main object of which, is, to establish a plain and permanent standard of pronunciation. To which is prefixed a rhetorical grammar. London: Printed by William Strahan for J. Dodsley; C. Dilly; and J. Wilkie.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S. 1987. The womanly woman: manipulation of stereotypical and non-stereotypical features of Japanese female speech. In Language, Gender and Sex in a Comparative Perspective, ed. by Phillips, Susan, Steele, Susan and Tanz, Christine, pp. 26–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Basso, Keith and Selby, Ellen, pp. 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F. and Hofbauer, Carol L., pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1981. The limits of awareness. In Sociolinguistic Working Paper, no. 84. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Silverstein, Michael.1985. On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: parallelism, repetition and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Schiffrin, Deborah, pp. 181–99. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1987. Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought, ed. by Hickman, Maya, pp. 125–64. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1988. Demeanor indexicals and honorific register. Unpublished paper, presented at the conference on honorifics, Reed College, 1988.
Silverstein, Michael.1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by Lucy, John A., pp. 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1996a. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. SALSA, 3: 266–95.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.1996b. Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language, ed. by Brenneis, Donald and Macaulay, Ronald, pp. 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita S. 1997. Metapragmatic discourse and the ideology of impolite pronouns in Thai. JLA, 7(1): 38–62.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1988. Compressed English. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 130–36. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Singh, U. N. 1989. How to honor someone in Maithili. Int. J. Soc. Lang., 75: 87–107.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1963. Some aspects of the use of pronouns of address in Yiddish. Word, 19(2): 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 1988. The linguistic socialization of Javanese children in two communities. Anthropological Linguistics, 30(2): 166–98.Google Scholar
Stone, Linda. 2004. Introduction: The demise and revival of kinship. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. by Parkin, Robert and Stone, Linda, pp. 241–56. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao. 1984. Words for Self and Others. In Words in Context: A Japanese Perspective on Language and Culture, pp. 111–69. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 1988. The language of press advertising. In Registers of Written English, ed. by Ghadessy, M., pp. 52–64. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Trechter, Sara. 1995. Categorial gender myths in Native America: Gender deictics in Lakhota. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What it isn't. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 117–28. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1996. Metaphysical Community: The Interplay of the Senses and the Intellect. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold. 1961 [1909]. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Paris, E Nourry, 1909].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatuk, Sylvia. 1982. Forms of address in the North Indian family: An exploration of the cultural meaning of kin terms. In Concepts of Person: Kinship, Caste and Marriage in India, ed. by Oster, Akos et al., pp. 56–98. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1791. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson and Cadell.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1806. Elements of Elocution. London: Printed for J. Johnson in St Paul's Churchyard.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-S. 1990. Towards a description of the organization of Korean speech levels. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 82: 25–39.Google Scholar
Watterson, Bill. 1995. The Calvin and Hobbes Tenth Anniversary Book. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 1999. The social construction of Standard English: Grammar writers as a discourse community. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., pp. 40–68. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1956]. Economy and Society, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 4th edition, Tubingen, 1956]Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Stanton E. F. 2005. Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Asif Agha, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: Language and Social Relations
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618284.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Asif Agha, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: Language and Social Relations
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618284.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Asif Agha, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: Language and Social Relations
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618284.012
Available formats
×