Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T09:47:29.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Phonetic and Phonological Variation in England

from Part I - English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2024

Susan Fox
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

The chapter deals with segmental and suprasegmental features of English spoken by residents of England without a recent migration history – though two major new varieties, British Asian English and Multicultural London English, are briefly discussed. While the emphasis is on the period since the turn of the twenty-first century, the chapter also deals with changes since the 1960s. The chapter begins with a presentation of recent technological advances, such as magnetic resonance imaging and innovative quantitative cartographic techniques. This is followed by a discussion of consonants, vowels, rhythm, stress, intonation and voice quality. The chapter goes on to show how some features are involved in levelling at the national or regional level, while other local and regional features are maintained. Using older dialectological sources as well as contemporary sociolinguistic methods, four regions are discussed, those centred on London, Newcastle, Liverpool and Manchester. The evidence shows similarities (a general reduction in variation) and differences (maintenance of differences between neighbouring cities). Levelling in the South East involves a shift of vowels towards Received Pronunciation-like variants, while consonants do not take part in this change; the exception is the rapid loss of traditional h-dropping. Finally, the influence of standardisation is discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altendorf, U. (2017). Estuary English. In Bergs, A. and Brinton, L. (eds.), Varieties of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 169–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110525045.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2021). Measuring speech rhythm. In Setter, J. and Knight, R.-A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 312–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. and Przedlacka, J. (2011). The stops that aren’t. Journal of the English Phonetic Society of Japan 14–15: 4662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. and Przedlacka, J. (2014). Measuring incompleteness: Acoustic correlates of glottal articulations. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(3): 283–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510031400019X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. and Hinskens, F. (1996). The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe: New and not so new developments in an old area. Sociolinguistica, International Yearbook of European Sociolinguistics 10: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G. (2019). Ki(ng) in the North: Effects of duration, boundary and pause on post-nasal [ɡ]-presence. Laboratory Phonology 10(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.115.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., Nichols, S., Turton, D. and Baranowski, M. (2022). Affrication as the cause of /s/-retraction: Evidence from Manchester English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 7(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.8026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, M. (2017). Class matters: The sociolinguistics of goose and goat in Manchester English. Language Variation and Change 29(3): 301–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, M. and Turton, D. (2015). Manchester English. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Researching Northern Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 292316.Google Scholar
Baranowski, M. and Turton, D. (2020). td-deletion in British English: New evidence for the long-lost morphological effect. Language Variation and Change 32(1): 123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394520000034.Google Scholar
Barras, W. (2018). Residual rhoticity and emergent r-sandhi in the North West and South West of England: Different approaches to hiatus-resolution? In Braber, N. and Jansen, S. (eds.), Sociolinguistics in England. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 363–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, J., Burbano Elizondo, L. and Llamas, C. (2012). Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teesside. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Blaxter, T., Beeching, K., Coates, R., Murphy, J. and Robinson, E. (2019). Each p[ɚ]son does it th[ɛː] way: Rhoticity variation and the community grammar. Language Variation and Change 31(1): 91117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.05. URL www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Braber, N. and Jansen, S. (eds.) (2018). Sociolinguistics in England. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braber, N. and Robinson, J. (2018). East Midlands English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502354.Google Scholar
Britain, D. (1997). Dialect contact and phonological reallocation: ‘Canadian Raising’ in the English Fens. Language in Society 26: 1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (2010a). Supralocal regional dialect levelling. In Llamas, C. and Watt, D. (eds.), Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 193204.Google Scholar
Britain, D. (2010b). Contact and dialectology. In Hickey, R. (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. New Jersey: Wiley, pp. 208–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (2012). English in England. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 2352. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110279429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (2014). Where North meets South? Contact, divergence, and the routinisation of the Fenland dialect boundary. In Watt, D. and Llamas, C. (eds.), Languages, Borders and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D., Blaxter, T. and Leemann, A. (2021). Dialect levelling in England: Evidence from the English Dialects App. In Thibault, A., Avanzi, M. and Millour, A. (eds.), Nouveaux regards sur la variation dialectale / New Ways of Analyzing Dialectal Variation. TraLiPhi, pp. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, I. and Evans Wagner, S. (2018). Introduction: Using panel data in the sociolinguistic study of variation and change. In Buchstaller, I. and Evans Wagner, S. (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change. London: Routledge, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Butcher, K.-A. (2020). Dialect maintenance in East Anglia: Singin’ the same old tune. English Today 36: 4858. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078420000231.Google Scholar
Carignan, C., Coretta, S., Frahm, J., Harrington, J., Hoole, P., Joseph, A., Kunay, E. and Voit, D. (2021). Planting the seed for sound change: Evidence from real-time MRI of velum kinematics in German. Language 97(2): 333–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0020.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J., Fox, S., Kerswill, P. E. and Torgersen, E. (2008). Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica 22(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. (2018). Priming as a motivating factor in sociophonetic variation and change. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 729–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. and Watson, K. (2016). Phonological leveling, diffusion, and divergence: /t/ lenition in Liverpool and its hinterland. Language Variation and Change 28: 3162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, U. and Asprey, E. (2013). West Midlands English: Birmingham and the Black Country. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. and Kawahara, S. (2013). Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1): 4789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. and Pater, J. (2011). The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. and Yu, A. (eds.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 401–34.Google Scholar
Cole, A. and Strycharczuk, P. (2022). Dialect levelling and Cockney diphthong shift reversal in South East England: The case of the Debden Estate. English Language and Linguistics 26(4): 621–43.Google Scholar
Collins, B. and Mees, I. M. (1996). Spreading everywhere? How recent a phenomenon is glottalisation in Received Pronunciation? English World-Wide 17: 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallaston, K. and Docherty, G. J. (2020). The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, H. (2019). Productions and Perceptions of BATH and TRAP Vowels in Cornish English. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J. and Foulkes, P. (1999). Newcastle upon Tyne and Derby: Instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J. and Foulkes, P. (2005). Glottal variants of /t/ in the Tyneside variety of English. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Mackenzie Beck, J. (eds.), A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J., Foulkes, P., Milroy, J., Milroy, L. and Walshaw, D. (1997). Descriptive adequacy in phonology: A variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics 33: 275310.Google Scholar
Drager, K. and Hay, J. (2012). Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24(1): 5978.Google Scholar
Drummond, R. (2018). Maybe it’s a grime [t] ing: th-stopping among urban British youth. Language in Society 47(2): 171–96.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. (2002). ‘We all speak the same round here’: Dialect levelling in a Scottish-English community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1): 99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1: 245–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Eckert, P. (2000). Language Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. (1889). On Early English Pronunciation. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Esling, J., Moisik, S., Benner, A. and Crevier-Buchman, L. (2019). Voice Quality: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, A. (2002). Ongoing change in modern RP: Evidence for the disappearing stigma of t-glottalling. English World-Wide 23(1): 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, C. (2013). Ethnicity. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 388406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.) (1999). Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34: 409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., Shattuck Hufnagel, S. and Hughes, V. (2018). Three steps forward for predictability. Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory. Linguistics Vanguard 4(s2). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, E., Kochanski, G. and Coleman, J. (2005). The intonation of native accent varieties in the British Isles: Potential for miscommunication? In Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. and Przedlacka, J. (eds.), English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Linguistic Insights Series. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. (1980). Variation in the group and individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Haddican, B., Foulkes, P., Hughes, V. and Richards, H. (2013). Interaction of social and linguistic constraints on two vowel changes in northern England. Language Variation and Change 25(3): 371403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000197.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Kleber, F. and Reubold, U. (2008). Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in Standard Southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5): 2825–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazenberg, E. (2021). Gender, sexuality and the English language. In Aarts, B., McMahon, A. and Hinrichs, L. (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics, 2nd ed. Newark: Wiley, pp. 585600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heselwood, B. and McChrystal, L. (2000). Gender, accent features and voicing in Panjabi–English bilingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R. (ed.) (2015). Researching Northern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, S. (2019a). Levelling processes and social changes in a peripheral community. Prevocalic /r/ in West Cumbria. In Jansen, S. and Siebers, L. (eds.), Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, S. (2019b). Change and stability in goose, goat and foot: Back vowel dynamics in Carlisle English. English Language and Linguistics 23(1): 129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, S. (2021). Social meaning and the obsolescence of traditional local structures: Loss of h-dropping in Maryport, West Cumbria. English World-Wide 42(1): 128.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 359–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00108.x.Google Scholar
Kendall, T. and Fridland, V. (2021). Sociophonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. (1984). Social and linguistic aspects of Durham (eː). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 14: 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. (1987). Levels of linguistic variation in Durham. Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 2549.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. (2003). Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Britain, D. and Cheshire, J. (eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. (2018). Contact and new varieties. In Hickey, R. (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 241–60.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. and Williams, A. (2000). Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29(1): 65115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. and Williams, A. (2005). New towns and koineization: Linguistic and social correlates. Linguistics 43(5): 1023–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. E. and Wright, S. (1990). On the limits of auditory transcription: A socio-phonetic perspective. Language Variation and Change 2: 255–75.Google Scholar
King, H. and Ferragne, E. (2020). Loose lips and tongue tips: The central role of the /r/-typical labial gesture in Anglo-English. Journal of Phonetics 80: 100978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, S. (2017). Ethnicity and phonetic variation in Sheffield English liquids. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 47(1): 1735.Google Scholar
Kirkham, S., Turton, D. and Leemann, A. (2020). A typology of laterals in twelve English dialects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148(1): EL72EL76.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. (1978). The nature of phonological variables in Scouse. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Arnold, pp. 8090.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B. and Upton, C. (eds.) (2008). Varieties of English: The British Isles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. (2008). Intonational Phonology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leemann, A. and Hilton, N. (eds.) (2021). Using smartphones to collect linguistic data for linguistic research. Special Collection in Linguistics Vanguard 7(s1).Google Scholar
Leemann, A., Kolly, M. J. and Britain, D. (2018). The English Dialects App: The creation of a crowdsourced dialect corpus. Ampersand 5: 117.Google Scholar
Levon, E. (2020). Same difference: The phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London. English Language and Linguistics 24(1): 4973.Google Scholar
Lin, S. (2021). Observing and measuring speech articulation. In Knight, R. and Setter, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 362–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108644198.015.Google Scholar
Llamas, C. (2007). ‘A place between places’: Language and identities in a border town. Language in Society 36(4): 579604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070455.Google Scholar
Llamas, C., Watt, D., French, P., Braun, A. and Robertson, D. (2019). Assessing listener sensitivity to spatially highly localised accent features using the Geographical Association Test (GAT). Paper presented at Conference on Experimental Approaches to Perception and Production of Language Variation (ExApp), Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. (2013). Discourse variation. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 220–36.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, L., Bailey, G. and Turton, D. (2016). Our Dialects: Mapping Variation in English in the UK. www.ourdialects.uk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, L., Bailey, G. and Turton, D. (2022). Towards an updated dialect atlas of British English. Journal of Linguistic Geography 10(1): 4666. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2022.2.Google Scholar
Maguire, W. (2017). Variation and change in the realisation of /r/ in an isolated Northumbrian dialect. In Montgomery, C. and Moore, E. (eds.), Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87104. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. (2004). Language Change and Sociolinguistics: Rethinking Social Networks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., Milroy, L., Hartley, S. and Walshaw, D. (1994). Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6(3): 327–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987). Language and Social Networks, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nance, C., Kirkham, S. and Groarke, E. (2018). Studying intonation in varieties of English: Gender and individual variation in Liverpool. In Braber, N. and Jansen, S. (eds.), Sociolinguistics in England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. J. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. J. and Kerswill, P. E. (1990). The description of connected speech processes. In Ramsaran, S. (ed.), Studies in the Pronunciation of English: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of A.C. Gimson. London: Routledge, pp. 295316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, H., Sanderson, S. and Widdowson, J. (1978). The Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Przedlacka, J. (2002). Estuary English? A Sociophonetic Study of Teenage Speech in the Home Counties. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purse, R. (2019). The articulatory reality of coronal stop ‘deletion’. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M. and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 1595–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queen, R. (2013). Gender, sex, sexuality and sexual identities. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nded. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 368–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanarayanan, V., Tilsen, S., Proctor, M., Töger, J., Goldstein, L., Nayak, K. S. and Narayanan, S. (2018). Analysis of speech production real-time MRI. Computer Speech and Language 52: 122.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, I., Fruehwald, J., Evanini, K. and Yuan, J. (2011). FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite. http://fave.ling.upenn.edu.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosewarne, D. (1994a). Estuary English: Tomorrow’s RP? English Today 37, 10(1): 38.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. (1994b). Pronouncing Estuary English. English Today 40, 10(4): 37.Google Scholar
San Segundo, E., Foulkes, P., French, P., Harrison, P., Hughes, V. and Kavanagh, C. (2019). The use of the Vocal Profile Analysis for speaker characterization: methodological proposals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 49(3): 353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S. and Miles, A. (2013). A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey experiment. Sociology 47(2): 219–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleef, E. (2013). Glottal replacement of /t/ in two British capitals: Effects of word frequency and morphological compositionality. Language Variation and Change 25(2): 201–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000094.Google Scholar
Schleef, E. and Flynn, N. (2015). Ageing meanings of (ing): Age and indexicality in Manchester, England. English World-Wide 36(1): 4890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D. (2018). Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me’. Language in Society 47(1): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, H. and Foulkes, P. (2015). Real time change in Prince William’s speech. Paper presented at UK Language Variation and Change 10, University of York.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Holmes-Elliott, S. (2018). The unstoppable glottal: Tracking rapid change an iconic British variable. English Language and Linguistics 22(3): 323–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000459.Google Scholar
Smith, R. and Rathcke, T. (2020). Dialectal phonology constrains the phonetics of prominence. Journal of Phonetics 78: 100934.Google Scholar
Sóskuthy, M. (2021). Evaluating generalised additive mixed modelling strategies for dynamic speech analysis. Journal of Phonetics 84: 101017.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, P., Brown, G., Leemann, A. and Britain, D. (2019). Investigating the foot-strut distinction in northern Englishes using crowdsourced data. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M. and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 1337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strycharczuk, P, López-Ibáñez, M., Brown, G. and Leemann, A. (2020). General Northern English: Exploring regional variation in the North of England with machine learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3: 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J. (1999). Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 203–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2004). Somethi[ŋ]’s goi[n] on! Variable (ing) at ground zero. In Gunnarsson, B.-L., Bergström, L., Eklund, G., Fidell, S., Hansen, L.H., Karstadt, A., Nordberg, B., Sundgren, E. and Thelander, M. (eds.), Language Variation in Europe: Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Universitet, pp. 390403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. and Temple, R. (2005). New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17(3): 281302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394505050118.Google Scholar
Tanner, J., Sonderegger, M., Stuart-Smith, J. and Fruehwald, J. (2020). Toward ‘English’ phonetics: Variability in the pre-consonantal voicing effect across English dialects and speakers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollfree, L. F. (1999). South-east London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgersen, E. N. and Kerswill, P. (2004). Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: Dialect levelling outcomes for an English vowel shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 2453.Google Scholar
Torgersen, E. N. and Szakay, A. (2012). An investigation of speech rhythm in London English. Lingua 122(7): 822–40.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Sociolinguistic Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1999a). Norwich: Endogenous and exogenous change. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 124–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1999b). The Dialects of England, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2001). Two hundred years of dedialectalisation: The East Anglian short vowel system. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 33–9.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2021). East Anglian English. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512155.Google Scholar
Turton, D. (2017). Categorical or gradient? An ultrasound investigation of /l/-darkening and vocalization in varieties of English. Laboratory Phonology 8(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, D. and Baranowski, M. (2021). Not quite the same: The social stratification and phonetic conditioning of the foot-strut vowels in Manchester. Journal of Linguistics 57(1): 163201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E., Li, F. and Kong, E. J. (2018). Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction. Journal of Phonetics 71: 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, P. (2016). Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, K. (2007). Liverpool English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37(3): 351–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100307003180.Google Scholar
Watson, K. and Clark, L. (2013). How salient is the nurse~square merger? English Language and Linguistics 17: 297323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431300004X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, K. and Clark, L. (2017). The origins of Liverpool English. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279865.007.Google Scholar
Watson, K., Honeybone, P., Clark, L. and Cardoso, A. (2022). Liverpool English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Watt, D. J. L. (1998). Variation and Change in the Vowel System of Tyneside English. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Watt, D. J. L. (2002). ‘I don’t speak with a Geordie accent, I speak, like, the Northern accent’: Contact-induced levelling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1): 4463.Google Scholar
Watt, D. J. L. and Milroy, L. (1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Tyneside vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 2546.Google Scholar
Watt, D. J. L., Llamas, C., French, P., Braun, A. and Robertson, D. (2016). Forensic aspects of spectral and durational variability in English schwa at the individual, community and regional levels. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. University of York, July.Google Scholar
Watt, D. J. L., Llamas, C., French, P., Braun, A., Robertson, D. and Kendall, T. (2019). Correspondences between vowel phoneme boundary locations in production and perception in dialects of North-East England. Paper presented at International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE) 10. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1999). British English pronunciation preferences: A changing scene. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 29(1): 3350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510030000640X.Google Scholar
Whisker-Taylor, K. and Clark, L. (2019). Yorkshire assimilation: Exploring the production and perception of a geographically restricted variable. Journal of English Linguistics 47(3): 221–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219849093.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, S. (2018). Segmental and suprasegmental change in North West Yorkshire: A new case of supralocalisation? Corela HS-24. https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.5203.Google Scholar
Williams, A. and Kerswill, P. E. (1999). Dialect levelling: Continuity vs. change in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 141–62.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×