Book contents
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Classification of Written Languages
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Learning to Read Chinese
- 3 Learning to Read Japanese
- 4 Learning to Read Korean
- 5 Learning to Read Kannada and Other Languages of South Asia
- 6 Learning to Read Arabic
- 7 Learning to Read Hebrew
- 8 Learning to Read Greek
- 9 Learning to Read Italian
- 10 Learning to Read French
- 11 Learning to Read Spanish
- 12 Learning to Read German
- 13 Learning to Read Dutch
- 14 Learning to Read English
- 15 Learning to Read Czech and Slovak
- 16 Learning to Read Russian
- 17 Learning to Read Finnish
- 18 Learning to Read Turkish
- 19 Epilogue: Universals and Particulars in Learning to Read across Seventeen Orthographies
- Appendix
- Index
- References
15 - Learning to Read Czech and Slovak
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2017
Book contents
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Classification of Written Languages
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Learning to Read Chinese
- 3 Learning to Read Japanese
- 4 Learning to Read Korean
- 5 Learning to Read Kannada and Other Languages of South Asia
- 6 Learning to Read Arabic
- 7 Learning to Read Hebrew
- 8 Learning to Read Greek
- 9 Learning to Read Italian
- 10 Learning to Read French
- 11 Learning to Read Spanish
- 12 Learning to Read German
- 13 Learning to Read Dutch
- 14 Learning to Read English
- 15 Learning to Read Czech and Slovak
- 16 Learning to Read Russian
- 17 Learning to Read Finnish
- 18 Learning to Read Turkish
- 19 Epilogue: Universals and Particulars in Learning to Read across Seventeen Orthographies
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems , pp. 347 - 370Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alegria, J. & Mousty, P. (1996). The development of spelling procedures in French-speaking, normal and reading-disabled children: Effects of frequency and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 312–338.Google Scholar
Bartoš, J. & Gagnaire, J. (1972). Grammaire de la langue slovaque. Bratislava: Matica Slovenská.Google Scholar
Berger, T. (2012). Religion and diacritics: The case of Czech orthography. In Baddeley, S. & Voeste, A. (Eds.), Orthographies in early modern Europe (pp. 255–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children’s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1–30.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. & Landerl, K. (2010). The influences of syllable structure and reading ability on the development of phoneme awareness: A longitudinal, cross-linguistic study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 464–484.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G. & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612473122.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G. & Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. & Mikulajová, M. (2008). Effects of letter-sound consistency, letter-form complexity, and frequency in learning canonical and contextually conditioned letter spellings in Slovak. Phonetica Pragensia, 11, 21–30.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M. & Vencelová, L. (2008a). Súbor testov na hodnotenie pravopisných schopností [Battery of tests for the assessment of orthographic skills]. Bratislava: SAL, s.r.o.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M. & Vencelová, L. (2008b). Spelling of Slovak children with dyslexia. Paper presented at the International Conference of the British Dyslexia Association, Harrogate, UK.Google Scholar
Salas, N., Caravolas, M., Efrim, C. & Schöffelová, M. (2010). The acquisition of derivation in English, Spanish, French and Slovak. Paper presented at Barcelona Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. & Volín, J. (2001). Spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: The case of Czech. Dyslexia, 7, 229–245.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. & Volín, J. (2005). Baterie diagnostických testů gramotnostních dovedností pro žáky 2. až 5. ročníku ZŠ [Battery of diagnostic tests of literacy skills for pupils in 2nd to 5th grades of primary school]. Prague: IPPP.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Volín, J. & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2007). Introduction. In Laaha, S. & Gillis, S. (Eds.), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112 (pp. 3–10). University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Dobrovský, J. (1809). Ausführliches Lehrgebäude der böhmischen Sprache [Detailed grammar of the Czech language]. Prague: Johann Herrl.Google Scholar
Hanka, V. (1817). Pravopis české podle základů gramatiky Josefa Dobrovského [Czech orthography according to Josef Dobrovský’s foundations of grammar]. Prague: U Bohumila Háze.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Caravolas, M., Málková, G. & Brigstocke, S. (2005). Phoneme isolation ability is not simply a consequence of letter-sound knowledge. Cognition, 97, B1–B11.Google Scholar
Kessler, B. & Caravolas, M. (2011). Weslalex: West Slavic lexicon of child-directed printed words. Retrieved from http://spell.psychology.wustl.edu/weslalex.Google Scholar
Kučera, H. & Monroe, G. K. (1968). A comparative, quantitative phonology of Russian, Czech, and German. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.Google Scholar
Ústav pro jazyk český ČSAV (1993). Pravidla Českého pravopisu [Rules of the Czechorthography]. Prague: ČSAV.Google Scholar
Volín, J. (2010). Fonetika a fonologie [Phonetics and phonology]. In Cvrček, V. (Ed.), Mluvnice současné čestiny [The grammar of contemporary Czech] (pp. 35–64). Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 80–90.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In Perfetti, C., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 81–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by