Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:40:28.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Vortex Sheet Formulations and Initial Value Problems: Analysis and Computing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

By
David M. Ambrose
Edited by
Thomas J. Bridges ,
Mark D. Groves  and
David P. Nicholls
David M. Ambrose
Affiliation:
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Thomas J. Bridges
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Mark D. Groves
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
David P. Nicholls
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We place the irrotational water wave problem in the larger context of vortex sheets. We describe the evolution equations for vortex sheets in 2D or in 3D. The numerical method of Hou, Lowengrub, and Shelley (HLS) for the solution of the initial value problem for the vortex sheet with surface tension in 2D is discussed; furthermore, we indicate how the HLS formulation of the problem is useful for a proof of well-posedness. We then show how one may take the zero surface tension limit in the water wave case. We close with a brief discussion of the extension of the HLS ideas to 3D, for both analysis and computing.

Introduction

The irrotational water wave is a special case of the irrotational vortex sheet. For the vortex sheet problem, two fluids whose motions are described by the incompressible, irrotational Euler equations meet at an interface. This interface, the vortex sheet, is free to move, and moves according to the velocities of the two fluids restricted to the interface. Each fluid has its own non-negative, constant density. Different geometries are possible, but to be definite, at present we consider the case in which the fluids are two-dimensional and such that each fluid region has one component, which is of infinite vertical extent and horizontally periodic. Thus, we may say that we have an upper fluid and a lower fluid. In the water wave case, the density of the upper fluid is equal to zero.

Without surface tension, if each of the two fluids has positive density, then the vortex sheet is known to have an ill-posed initial value problem; this has been demonstrated by several authors. We note that when discussing ill-posedness of a problem, to be precise, one should mention the function spaces under consideration; for example, Caflisch and Orellana have shown that the vortex sheet initial value problem is ill-posed in Sobolev spaces [1]. In analytic function spaces, however, solutions of the vortex sheet problem have been shown to exist by a Cauchy-Kowalewski argument [2].

The ill-posedness of the vortex sheet initial value problem (when the two fluids have positive densities) is caused by the presence of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lectures on the Theory of Water Waves , pp. 140 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Caflisch, R.E., and Orellana, O.F. 1989. Singular solutions and ill-posedness for the evolution of vortex sheets. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20(2), 293-307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Sulem, C., Sulem, P.-L., Bardos, C., and Frisch, U. 1981. Finite time analyticity for the two- and three-dimensional Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. Comm. Math. Phys., 80(4), 485-516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Duchon, J., and Robert, R. 1988. Global vortex sheet solutions of Euler equations in the plane. J. Diff. Eq., 73(2), 215-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Ambrose, D.M., Bona, J.L., and Milgrom, T. 2014. Global solutions and ill-posedness for the Kaup system and related Boussinesq systems. Preprint.
[5] Milgrom, T., and Ambrose, D.M. 2013. Temporal boundary value problems in interfacial fluid dynamics. Appl. Anal., 92(5), 922-948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Beck, T., Sosoe, P., and Wong, P. 2014. Duchon-Robert solutions for the Rayleigh-Taylor and Muskat problems. J. Diff. Eq., 256(1), 206-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kamotski, V., and Lebeau, G. 2005. On 2D Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities. Asymptot. Anal., 42(1-2), 1-27.Google Scholar
[8] Lebeau, G. 2002. Régularité du problème de Kelvin-Helmholtz pour 1'équation d'Euler 2d. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 8, 801-825 (electronic). A tribute to J. L. Lions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Wu, S. 2006. Mathematical analysis of vortex sheets. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 59(8), 1065-1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Nalimov, V.I. 1974. The Cauchy-Poisson problem. Dinamika Splošn. Sredy, 104-210, 254.Google Scholar
[11] Yosihara, H. 1982. Gravity waves on the free surface of an incompressible perfect fluid of finite depth. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 18(1), 49-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Craig, W. 1985. An existence theory for water waves and the Boussinesq and Korteweg-de Vries scaling limits. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 10(8), 787-1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Wu, S. 1997. Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the full water wave problem in 2-D. Invent. Math., 130(1), 39-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Wu, S. 1999. Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the full water wave problem in 3-D. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 12(2), 445-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Alazard, T., Burq, N., and Zuily, C. 2014. On the Cauchy problem for gravity water waves. Invent. Math., 198(1), 71-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Ambrose, D.M., and Masmoudi, N. 2005. The zero surface tension limit of two-dimensional water waves. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58(10), 1287-1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Ambrose, D.M., and Masmoudi, N. 2009. The zero surface tension limit of three-dimensional water waves. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 58(2), 479-521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Córdoba, A., Córdoba, D., and Gancedo, F. 2010. Interface evolution: water waves in 2-D. Adv. Math., 223(1), 120-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Lannes, D. 2005. Well-posedness of the water-waves equations. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 18(3), 605-654 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Lannes, D. 2013. The water waves problem. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 188. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Mathematical analysis and asymptotics.Google Scholar
[21] Beyer, K., and Gunther, M. 1998. On the Cauchy problem for a capillary drop. I. Irrotational motion. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 21(12), 1149-1183.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Iguchi, T. 2001. Well-posedness of the initial value problem for capillary-gravity waves. Funkcial. Ekvac., 44(2), 219-241.Google Scholar
[23] Yosihara, H. 1983. Capillary-gravity waves for an incompressible ideal fluid. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 23(4), 649-694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Ambrose, D.M. 2007a. Regularization of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability by surface tension. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 365(1858), 2253-2266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[25] Iguchi, T., Tanaka, N., and Tani, A. 1997. On the two-phase free boundary problem for two-dimensional water waves. Math. Ann., 309(2), 199-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Ambrose, D.M. 2003. Well-posedness of vortex sheets with surface tension. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35(1), 211-244 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Ambrose, D.M., and Masmoudi, N. 2007. Well-posedness of 3D vortex sheets with surface tension. Commun. Math. Sci., 5(2), 391-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Ming, M., and Zhang, Z. 2009. Well-posedness of the water-wave problem with surface tension. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 92(5), 429-455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] Hou, T.Y., Lowengrub, J.S., and Shelley, M.J. 1994. Removing the stiffness from interfacial flows with surface tension. J. Comput. Phys., 114(2), 312-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Hou, T.Y., Lowengrub, J.S., and Shelley, M.J. 1997. The long-time motion of vortex sheets with surface tension. Phys. Fluids, 9(7), 1933-1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Ambrose, D.M. 2004. Well-posedness of two-phase Hele-Shaw flow without surface tension. European J. Appl. Math., 15(5), 597-607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Christianson, H., Hur, V.M., and Staffilani, G. 2010. Strichartz estimates for the water-wave problem with surface tension. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 35(12), 2195-2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33] Córdoba, A., Córdoba, D., and Gancedo, F. 2011. Interface evolution: the Hele-Shaw and Muskat problems. Ann. of Math. (2), 173(1), 477-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34] Düll, W.-P. 2012. Validity of the Korteweg-de Vries approximation for the two-dimensional water wave problem in the arc length formulation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 65(3), 381-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Guo, Y., Hallstrom, C., and Spirn, D. 2007. Dynamics near unstable, interfacial fluids. Comm. Math. Phys., 270(3), 635-689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36] Ye, J., and Tanveer, S. 2011. Global existence for a translating near-circular Hele-Shaw bubble with surface tension. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 43(1), 457-506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] Ye, J., and Tanveer, S. 2012. Global solutions for a two-phase Hele-Shaw bubble for a near-circular initial shape. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 57(1), 23-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38] Ambrose, D.M. 2007b. Well-posedness of two-phase Darcy flow in 3D. Quart. Appl. Math., 65(1), 189-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[39] Córdoba, A., Córdoba, D., and Gancedo, F. 2013. Porous media: the Muskat problem in three dimensions. Anal. PDE, 6(2), 447-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40] Wang, W., Zhang, P., and Zhang, Z. 2012. Well-posedness of hydrodynamics on the moving elastic surface. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 206(3), 953-995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[41] Hou, T.Y., and Zhang, P. 2002. Convergence of a boundary integral method for 3-D water waves. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 2(1), 1-34.Google Scholar
[42] Nie, Q. 2001. The nonlinear evolution of vortex sheets with surface tension in axisymmetric flows. J. Comput. Phys., 174(1), 438-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[43] Ambrose, D.M., and Siegel, M. 2012. A non-stiff boundary integral method for 3D porous media flow with surface tension. Math. Comput. Simulation, 82(6), 968-983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[44] Ambrose, D.M., Siegel, M., and Tlupova, S. 2013b. A small-scale decomposition for 3D boundary integral computations with surface tension. J. Comput. Phys., 247, 168-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[45] Cheng, C.-H.A., Coutand, D., and Shkoller, S. 2008. On the motion of vortex sheets with surface tension in three-dimensional Euler equations with vorticity. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61(12), 1715-1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[46] Coutand, D., and Shkoller, S. 2007. Well-posedness of the free-surface incompressible Euler equations with or without surface tension. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 20(3), 829-930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[47] Lindblad, H. 2005. Well-posedness for the motion of an incompressible liquid with free surface boundary. Ann. of Math. (2), 162(1), 109-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[48] Ogawa, M., and Tani, A. 2002. Free boundary problem for an incompressible ideal fluid with surface tension. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 12(12), 1725-1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[49] Schweizer, B. 2005. On the three-dimensional Euler equations with a free boundary subject to surface tension. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 22(6), 753-781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[50] Shatah, J., and Zeng, C. 2011. Local well-posedness for fluid interface problems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 199(2), 653-705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[51] Zhang, P., and Zhang, Z. 2008. On the free boundary problem of three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations. Comm. PureAppl. Math., 61(7), 877-940.Google Scholar
[52] Zhang, P., and Zhang, Z.-F. 2007. On the local wellposedness of 3-D water wave problem with vorticity. Sci. China Ser. A, 50(8), 1065-1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[53] Alazard, T., and Delort, J.-M. 2013a. Global solutions and asymptotic behavior for two dimensional gravity water waves. Preprint. arXiv: 1305.4090.
[54] Alazard, T., and Delort, J.-M. 2013b. Sobolev estimates for two dimensional gravity water waves. Preprint. arXiv: 1307.3836.
[55] Germain, P., Masmoudi, N., and Shatah, J. 2009. Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 347(15-16), 897-902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[56] Germain, P., Masmoudi, N., and Shatah, J. 2012. Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3. Ann. of Math. (2), 175(2), 691-754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[57] Germain, P., Masmoudi, N., and Shatah, J. 2014. Global Existence for Capillary Water Waves. Comm. PureAppl. Math., n/a-n/a.
[58] Hunter, J., Ifrim, M., and Tataru, D. 2014. Two dimensional water waves in holomorphic coordinates. Preprint. arXiv:1401.1252.
[59] Ifrim, M., and Tataru, D. 2014a. The lifespan of small data solutions in two dimensional capillary water waves. Preprint. arXiv:1406.5471.
[60] Ifrim, M., and Tataru, D. 2014b. Two dimensional water waves in holomorphic coordinates II: global solutions. Preprint. arXiv:1404.7583.
[61] Ionescu, A.D., and Pusateri, F. 2013. Global solutions for the gravity water waves system in 2d. Preprint. arXiv: 1303.5357.
[62] Wu, S. 2009. Almost global wellposedness of the 2-D full water wave problem. Invent. Math., 177(1), 45-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[63] Wu, S. 2011. Global wellposedness of the 3-D full water wave problem. Invent. Math., 184(1), 125-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[64] Castro, A., Cordoba, D., Fefferman, C., Gancedo, F., and Gomez-Serrano, J. 2012a. Finite time singularities for water waves with surface tension. J. Math. Phys., 53(11),-.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[65] Castro, A., Córdoba, D., Fefferman, C.L., Gancedo, F., and Gómez-Serrano, J. 2012b. Splash singularity for water waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109(3), 733-738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[66] Coutand, D., and Shkoller, S. 2014a. On the Finite-Time Splash and Splat Singularities for the 3-D Free-Surface Euler Equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 325(1), 143-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[67] Coutand, D., and Shkoller, S. 2014b. On the impossibility of finite-time splash singularities for vortex sheets. Preprint. arXiv:1407.1479.
[68] Fefferman, C., Ionescu, A.D., and Lie, V. 2013. On the absence of “splash” singularities in the case of two-fluid interfaces. Preprint. arXiv.1312.2917.
[69] Fefferman, C.L. 2014. No-splash theorems for fluid interfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111(2), 573-574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[70] Alazard, T., Burq, N., and Zuily, C. 2010. Cauchy problem and Kato smoothing for water waves with surface tension. Pages 1-14 of: Harmonic analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations. RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu, B18. Res.Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto.Google Scholar
[71] Alazard, T., Burq, N., and Zuily, C. 2011. On the water-wave equations with surface tension. Duke Math. J., 158(3), 413-499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[72] Christianson, H., Hur, V.M., and Staffilani, G. 2009. Local smoothing effects for the water-wave problem with surface tension. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 347(3-4), 159-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[73] Kinsey, R.H., and Wu, S. 2014. A priori estimates for two-dimensional water waves with angled crests. Preprint. arXiv:1406.7573.
[74] Saffman, P.G. 1992. Vortex dynamics.Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
[75] Majda, A.J., and Bertozzi, A.L. 2002. Vorticity and incompressible flow.Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[76] Caflisch, R.E., and Li, X.-F. 1992. Lagrangian theory for 3D vortex sheets with axial or helical symmetry. Transport Theory Statist. Phys., 21(4-6), 559-578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[77] Muskhelishvili, N.I. 1992. Singular integral equations.Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Boundary problems of function theory and their application to mathematical physics, Translated from the second (1946) Russian edition and with a preface by J. R. M. Radok, Corrected reprint of the 1953 English translation.Google Scholar
[78] Ablowitz, M.J., and Fokas, A.S. 1997. Complex variables: introduction and applications.Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[79] Helson, H. 1983. Harmonic analysis.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Advanced Book Program.Google Scholar
[80] Beale, J.T., Hou, T.Y., and Lowengrub, J.S. 1993. Growth rates for the linearized motion of fluid interfaces away from equilibrium. Comm. PureAppl. Math., 46(9), 1269-1301.Google Scholar
[81] Ascher, U.M., Ruuth, S.J., and Wetton, B.T.R. 1995. Implicit-explicit methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 32(3), 797-823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[82] Ambrose, D.M. 2009. Singularity formation in a model for the vortex sheet with surface tension. Math. Comput. Simulation, 80(1), 102-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[83] Ambrose, D.M., Kondrla, M., and Valle, M. 2013a. Computing time-periodic solutions of a model for the vortex sheet with surface tension. Quart. Appl. Math. To appear.
[84] Ambrose, D.M. 2014. The zero surface tension limit of two-dimensional interfacial Darcy flow. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 16(1), 105-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[85] Ambrose, D.M., and Siegel, M. 2014. Well-posedness of two-dimensional hydroelastic waves. Preprint.
[86] Baker, G.R., Meiron, D.I., and Orszag, S.A. 1982. Generalized vortex methods for free-surface flow problems. J. Fluid Mech., 123, 477-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[87] Ebin, D.G. 1987. The equations of motion of a perfect fluid with free boundary are not well posed. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 12(10), 1175-1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[88] Siegel, M., and Tanveer, S. 1996. Singular perturbation of smoothly evolving Hele-Shaw solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(Jan), 419-422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[89] Siegel, M., Tanveer, S., and Dai, W.-S. 1996. Singular effects of surface tension in evolving Hele-Shaw flows. J. FluidMech., 323, 201-236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[90] Ceniceros, H.D., and Hou, T.Y. 2000. The singular perturbation of surface tension in Hele-Shaw flows. J. Fluid Mech., 409, 251-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[91] Ceniceros, H.D., and Hou, T.Y. 2001. Numerical study of interfacial problems with small surface tension. Pages 63-92 of: First International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians (Beijing, 1998). AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., vol. 20. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×