Aalberts, T. Constructing Sovereignty between Politics and Law (London: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, T. R. S. Constitutional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Allott, P. ‘The Concept of International Law’. European Journal of International Law 10 (1999): 31–50.Google Scholar

Allott, P. The Health of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Alston, P., and Goodman, R.. International Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Alter, K. ‘The New International Courts: A Bird’s Eye View’ (Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies Working Paper Series No. 09-001, 2009).Google Scholar

Alter, K. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Alter, K., Helfer, L. and Madsen, M. R.. ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’. Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (2016): 1–36.Google Scholar

Alter, K., Helfer, L. and Madsen, M. R.. ‘The Variable Authority of International Courts’. Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (2016): 1–314.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. International Organizations as Lawmakers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Alvik, I., Emberland, M. and Eriksen, C., eds. The New International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).Google Scholar

Anghie, A. ‘Angola: A New Cease-Fire – A New Opportunity for Human Rights’. Amnesty International, 5 April 2002. www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/angola-new-cease-fire-new-opportunity-human-rights.Google Scholar

Anghie, A. ‘The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities’. Third World Quarterly 27 (2006): 739–53.Google Scholar

Applbaum, A. ‘Legitimacy without the Duty to Obey’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (2010): 215–39.Google Scholar

Arajärvi, N. The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Arendt, H. Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Arendt, H. ‘What Is Authority?’ In Between Past and Future, edited by Arendt, H. and Kohn, J. (New York: Penguin Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Armitage, D. Foundations of Modern International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Austen, J. Persuasion. The World Classics, vol. 356 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C. ‘Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law and Other Serious Violations of Human Rights.’ In Post-conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni, (New York: Transnational, 2002).Google Scholar

Baum, L. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Beitz, C. The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennet, N. ‘Health Concerns Raised over EU-US Trade Deal’. The Lancet 384 (2014): 843–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bentham, J. A Fragment on Government and an Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, edited by W. Harrison, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Benton, L., and Ford, L.. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E., and Downs, G. W.. ‘National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2009): 59–72.Google Scholar

Berman, M. ‘Two Types of Retributivism’. In The Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, edited by Duff, R. A. and Green, S. P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Berman, P. S. Global Legal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Berman, P. S. ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’. Yale Journal of International Law 32 (2007): 301–29.Google Scholar

Bertea, S. The Normative Claim of Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Besson, S. ‘The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil’. Sydney Law Review 31 (2009): 343–80.Google Scholar

Besson, S. ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law Making: Dissolving the Paradox’. Leiden Journal of International Law 29 (2016): 289–316.Google Scholar

Besson, S. ‘Theorizing the Sources of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Besson, S., and Tasioulas, J., eds. The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bibas, S., and Burke-White, W. W.. ‘International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism’. Duke Law Journal 59 (2010): 637–704.Google Scholar

Bingham, T. The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar

Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C.. International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E. The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. ‘The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law’. In Legitimacy in International Law, edited by Wolfrum, R. and Roben, V. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. ‘Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’. In International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons, edited by de Chazournes, L. and Sands, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Borgwardt, E. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2005).Google Scholar

Boucher, D., and Kelly, P. J., eds. The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. ‘Authorized Language: The Social Conditions for the Effectiveness of Ritual Discourse’. In Language and Symbolic Power, edited by P. Bourdieu, , translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’. Hastings Law Journal 38 (1987): 814–53.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. The Logic of Practice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., and Chinkin, C.. The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Brandom, R. ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel’s Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1999): 164–89.Google Scholar

Brownlie, I. The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar

Brudner, A. Constitutional Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Brudner, A. The Unity of the Common Law: Studies in Hegelian Jurisprudence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Brunée, J., and Toope, S. J.. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Buchanan, A. The Heart of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Buchanan, A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Buckle, S. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Byers, M. Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Çali, B. The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect and Rebuttal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Capps, P. Human Dignity and the Foundations of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Capps, P. ‘Legal Idealism and Global Law’. In Ethical Rationalism and the Law, edited by Capps, P. and Pattinson, S. D. (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar

Capps, P. ‘The Rejection of the Universal State’. In Transnational Constitutionalism, edited by N. Tsagourias, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Capps, P., and Rivers, J.. ‘Kant’s Concept of International Law’. Legal Theory 16 (2010): 229–57.Google Scholar

Carruba, et al., ‘Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice’. American Political Science Review 102 (2008): 435.Google Scholar

Carty, A. The Decay of International Law: A Reappraisal of the Limits of Legal Imagination in International Affairs (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ed. Realizing Utopia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Charney, J. I. ‘Universal International Law’. American Journal of International Law 83 (1993): 523–53.Google Scholar

Chehtman, A. The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Christiano, T. ‘Authority’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2013 ed., edited by Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/authority/.Google Scholar

Christiano, T. ‘The Authority of Democracy’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2004): 266–90.Google Scholar

Christiano, T. ‘The Legitimacy of International Institutions’. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by Marmor, A. (New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J. Fair Balance: A Study of Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. R., eds. The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Metaphysics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Philosophical Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. The New Leviathan or Man, Society, Civilization and Barbarism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1942).Google Scholar

Collins, R. ‘Classical Legal Positivism in International Law Revisited’. In International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World, edited by Kammerhofer, J. and d’Aspremont, J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Collins, R. The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Collins, R. ‘Mapping the Terrain of Institutional “Lawmaking”: Form and Function in International Law’. In The Actors of Postnational Rule-Making: Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law, edited by Fahey, E. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Collins, R. ‘No Longer at the Vanishing Point? International Law and the Analytical Tradition in Jurisprudence’. Jurisprudence 5 (2014): 265–98.Google Scholar

Combacau, J., and Sur, S.. Droit International Public (Paris: Montchrestien, 2010).Google Scholar

Coşeriu, E. Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. Das Problem des Sprachwandels (München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1974).Google Scholar

Cover, R. M. ‘The Folktales of Justice: Tales of Jurisdiction’. Capital University Law Review 14 (1985): 179–203.Google Scholar

Cover, R. M. ‘Nomos and Narrative’. Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68.Google Scholar

Craig, P., and de Burca, G.. EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Crawford, J. ‘The Problems of Legitimacy Speak’. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 98 (2004): 271.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J. Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J. Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-state Actors in International Law (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Dai, X. ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’. International Organization 59 (2005): 363–98.Google Scholar

de Chazournes, L. B., and Sands, P., eds. International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

de Goede, M. Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Goede, M., and Sullivan, G.. ‘The Politics of Security Listing’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (2015): 67–88.Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, N. Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, N. Implementing the Precautionary Principle (London: Earthscan, 2007).Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B. Toward a New Legal Common Sense (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B., and Rodriguez-Garavito, C., eds. Law and Globalization from Below (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

de Vattel, E. The Law of Nations. Edited by Kapossy, B. and Whitmore, R. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar

DeGuzman, M. ‘Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court’. Michigan Journal of International Law 33 (2012): 265–320.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., and Garth, B. G.. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., and Madsen, M. R.. ‘The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012): 433–52.Google Scholar

Domingo, R. The New Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Dothan, S. Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Doyle, M. ‘The UN Charter – A Global Constitution’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtmann, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A. ‘The Curious Criminality of Mass Atrocity: Diverse Actors, Multiple Truths, and Plural Responses’ (Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-33, October 4, 2012). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2156512.Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A. ‘Juridical and Jurisdictional Disconnects’ (Washington & Lee Public Law Research Paper No. 02-02, 2003).Google Scholar

Dunn, J. ‘Contractualism’. In The History of Political Theory and Other Essays, edited by J. Dunn, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Dunn, J. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Dunoff, J. L., and Trachtmann, J. P., eds. Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. ‘A New Philosophy for International Law’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2013): 2–30.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. ‘Thirty Years On’. Harvard Law Review 115 (2002): 1655–87.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. Legality and Legitimacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, K. The Functions of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E. Freie Rechtsfindung und freie Rechtswissenschaft. Translated by I. Venzke (Leipzig, 1903). http://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/can/rec/ehrlich1frei.html.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (1913; London: Transaction, 2001).Google Scholar

Engle, K. ‘Anti-impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights’. Cornell Law Review 100 (2015): 1069–1127.Google Scholar

Eschenburg, T. Über Autorität (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1969).Google Scholar

Estlund, D. Democratic Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Fassbender, J. ‘Rediscovering a Forgotten Constitution: Notes on the Place of the UN Charter in the International Legal Order’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Liste, P.. ‘Völkerrechtspolitik. Zu Trennung und Verknüpfung von Politik und Recht der Weltgesellschaft’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 12 (2005): 209–49.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G. ‘The General Principles of International Law considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’. Recueil des Cours 92 (1957-II): 1–227.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M. ‘Third Parties and the Law of Treaties’. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 (2002): 37–137.Google Scholar

Flanders, C. ‘Toward a Theory of Persuasive Authority’. Oklahoma Law Review 62 (2009): 55–88.Google Scholar

Flathman, R. E. The Practice of Political Authority: Authority and the Authoritative (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Franck, T. Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, T. ‘Lessons of Kosovo’. American Journal of International Law 93 (1999): 857–60.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, J. ‘The Neomedieval Renaissance: Global Governance and International Law in the New Middle Ages’. In Governance and International Legal Theory, edited by Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L. The Morality of Law, rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S. ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Gardner, J. Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Geuss, R. Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Geuss, R. Public Goods, Private Goods (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1979).Google Scholar

Gillroy, J. M. The Assent of Public Order Principles in International Law: Philosophical Method, G. W. F. Hegel and Legal Right through Recognition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Gillroy, J. M. An Evolutionary Paradigm for International Law: Philosophical Method, David Hume and the Essence of Sovereignty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Gillroy, J. M. Justice and Nature: Kantian Philosophy, Environmental Policy and the Law (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Gillroy, J. M. ‘Justice-as-Sovereignty: David Hume and the Origins of International Law’. British Year Book of International Law 78 (2008): 429–79.Google Scholar

Gillroy, J. M. ‘Philosophical Policy and International Dispute Settlement: Process Principle and the Ascendance of the WTO’s Concept of Justice’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 53 (2012): 3.Google Scholar

Glenn, H. P. ‘Persuasive Authority’. McGill Law Journal 32 (1986–87): 261–98.Google Scholar

Godard, O. ‘Social Decision-Making under Conditions of Scientific Controversy’. In Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making, edited by Joerges, C., Ladeur, K.-H. and Vos, E. (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgessellschaft, 1997).Google Scholar

Goldmann, M. ‘Inside Relative Normativity: From Sources to Standard Instruments for the Exercise of International Public Authority’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 1865–1908.Google Scholar

Goldmann, M. ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’. January 15, 2015. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2260293.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. L., and Posner, E. A.. The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2007): 40–68.Google Scholar

Green, L. ‘Legal Obligation and Authority’. In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 ed., edited by Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/legal-obligation/.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. On the Law of War and Peace, vol. 1. Translated by G. L. Williams (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Gur, N. ‘Are Legal Rules Content-Independent Reasons?’ Problema 5 (2011): 175–210.Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (1989; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. The Postnational Constellation (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hachez, N., and Wouters, J.. ‘A Glimpse at the Democratic Legitimacy of Private Standards: Assessing the Public Accountability of GLOBALG.A.P’. Journal of International Economic Law 14 (2011): 677–710.Google Scholar

Hale, R. ‘Our Equivocal Constitutional Guarantees’. Columbia Law Review 39 (1939): 563–94.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R.. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Harrison, R. Hobbes, Locke and Confusion’s Masterpiece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Science V1: Logic. Translated by W. Wallace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Science V3: Philosophy of Mind. Translated by W. Wallace and A. V. Wallace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Natural Law. Translated by T. M. Knox (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox and S. Houlgate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by W. Wallace and A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Millers (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1976).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Werke in 20 Bänden mit Registerband (Frankfurt: Surkamp, 1986).Google Scholar

Held, D. Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Helfer, L. ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 125–59.Google Scholar

Henkin, L. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Hernandez, G. The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Higgins, R. ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17 (1968): 58–84.Google Scholar

Himma, K. E. ‘Law’s Claim to Legitimate Authority’. In Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law, edited by Coleman, J. (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. De Cive (Whitefish: Kessinger, 2004).Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited by E. Curley, (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994).Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited by M. Oakeshott, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957).Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, edited by Cromartie, A. and Skinner, Q. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W. ‘The Path of the Law’. Harvard Law Review 10 (1897): 457–78.Google Scholar

Holtermann, J. v. H. ‘A “Slice of Cheese” – a Deterrence-Based Argument for the International Criminal Court’. Human Rights Review 11 (2010): 289–315.Google Scholar

Hovell, D. ‘Kadi: King-Slayer or King-Maker? The Shifting Allocation of Decision-making Power between the UN Security Council and Courts’. Modern Law Review 79 (2016): 147–82.Google Scholar

Hume, D. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, 5th ed. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Hurd, H. ‘Challenging Authority’. Yale Law Journal 101 (1991): 1611–77.Google Scholar

Hurd, H. ‘Expressing Doubts about Expressivism’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1 (2005): 405–35.Google Scholar

Hurd, H. ‘The International Rule of Law and the Domestic Analogy’. Global Constitutionalism 4 (2015): 365–95.Google Scholar

Hurd, H. ‘The International Rule of Law: Law and the Limits of Politics’. Ethics and International Affairs 28 (2014): 39–51.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, ‘Policy Paper on the Interests of Justice’. September 2007. https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/772C95C9-F54D-4321-BF09-73422BB23528/143640/ICCOTPInterestsOfJustice.pdf.Google Scholar

International Law Association, ‘Final Report of the Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law’. 2000. http://www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/A709CDEB-92D6-4CFA-A61C4CA30217F376.Google Scholar

International Law Commission. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law.’ Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682. Geneva, 13 April 2006. http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf.Google Scholar

Jabloner, C. ‘Verrechtlichung und Rechtsdynamik’. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 54 (1999): 261–78.Google Scholar

Jansen, N. The Making of Legal Authority (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Joerges, C. ‘Good Governance through Comitology’. In Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, edited by Joerges, C. and Vos, E. (Oxford: Hart, 1999).Google Scholar

Joerges, C. ‘Unity in Diversity as Europe’s Vocation and Conflicts Law as Europe’s Constitutional Form’. LSE Europe in Question Discussion Paper No. 28, 2010.Google Scholar

Joerges, C., and Glinski, C., eds. The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Joerges, C., Sand, I. J. and Teubner, G., eds. Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Joseph, S. ‘Trade Law and Investment Law’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, edited by Shelton, D. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., and d’Aspremont, J., eds. International Legal Positivism in a Postmodern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Kaul, H.-P. ‘The International Criminal Court: Current Challenges and Perspectives’. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 6.3 (2007): 575–82.Google Scholar

Keller, R. Sprachwandel (Tübingen: Francke, 2003).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. Law and Peace in International Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942).Google Scholar

Kendall, S. ‘Commodifying Global Justice: Economies of Accountability at the International Criminal Court’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (2015): 113–34.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order’. In Cambridge Companion to International Law, edited by Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law’. European Journal of International Law 13 (2002): 401–37.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2009): 23–57.Google Scholar

Kirgis, , F. L. Jr. ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’. American Journal of International Law 81 (1987): 146–51.Google Scholar

Kiyani, A. G. ‘Group-Based Differentiation and Local Repression: The Custom and Curse of Selectivity’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 14.4 (2016): 939–57.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’. Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001): 403–21.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’. Nordic Journal of International Law 65 (1996): 167–82.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G.. The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. ‘Transnational Legal Process’. Nebraska Law Review 75 (1996): 181–207.Google Scholar

Kolb, R. ‘Repères historiques dans l’évolution de l’occupation de guerre’. The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (2007): 65–102.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘Between Commitment and Cynicism: Outline for a Theory of International Law as Practice’. In Collection of Essays by Legal Advisrers of States, Legal Advisers of International Organizations and Practitioners in the Field of International Law, edited by United Nations (New York: United Nations Publication, 1999).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’. Modern Law Review 70 (2007): 1–32.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’. UN Doc A/CN4/L.682, 2006.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education’. European Journal of Legal Studies 1 (2007): 1–18.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Ideology: Notes towards a Critique of the New Moral Internationalism’. Associations: Journal for Legal and Social Theory 7 (2003): 349–374.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’. European Journal of International Relations 15 (2009): 395–422.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Krahmann, E. States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. ‘The Limits of Contract’. European Journal of International Law 5 (1994): 465–91.Google Scholar

Krisch, N. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kron, J. ‘Rwandan Is Convicted in 1994 Killings’. New York Times, 17 November 2011. www.nytimes.com/2011/11/18/world/africa/former-rwandan-mayor-convicted-in-tutsi-massacre.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Kulovesi, K. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Challenges of the Environment, Legitimacy and Fragmentation (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar

Lewis, D. Conventions: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Lim, C. L., and Elias, O. A.. The Paradox of Consensualism in International Law (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar

Lincoln, B. Authority: Construction and Corrosion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Llewellyn, K. ‘What Price Contract? An Essay in Perspective’. Yale Law Journal 40 (1931): 704–51.Google Scholar

Loeb, J. ‘Talking to the Other Side: Humanitarian Engagement with Armed Non-state Actors in Darfur’. Humanitarian Policy Group Working Paper, 2013, 1–48.Google Scholar

Luban, D. ‘Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law’. Georgetown Law Faculty Working Paper, 2008. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1154177.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft (Germany: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1994).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Law as a Social System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Legitimation durch Verfahren (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Risk: A Socological Theory (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1993).Google Scholar

Maduro, M. P. We, the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar

Mahoney, P. ‘The Relationship between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts’. Law Quarterly Review 130 (2014): 568–86.Google Scholar

Martin, M. ‘International Criminal Law: Between Utopian Dreams and Political Realities’. In Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law, edited by Tanguay-Renaud, F. and Stribopoulos, J. (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Martin, M. Judging Positivism (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Martin, M. ‘Reflections on Punishment from a Global Perspective: An Exploration of Chehtman’s The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment’. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8.3 (2014): 693–712.Google Scholar

Mashaw, J. L. ‘Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787–1801’. Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1256–1344.Google Scholar

McDougal, M. ‘International Law, Power, and Policy: A Contemporary Conception’. Recueil des Cours 82 (1954): 137–259.Google Scholar

McDougal, M. Studies in World Public Order (New Haven: Yale University Press 1960).Google Scholar

Mégret, F. ‘The Anxieties of International Criminal Justice’. Leiden Journal of International Law 29 (2016): 197–221.Google Scholar

Meidinger, E. ‘The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry’. European Journal of International Law 17 (2006): 47–87.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. Die Abenteuer der Dialektik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968).Google Scholar

Merrills, J. ‘International Adjudication and Autonomy’. In International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, edited by Collins, R. and White, N. D. (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Mian, M. ‘The Curious Case of Exclusionary Reasons’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (2002): 99–124.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. Römisches Staatsrecht, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Moyn, S. The Last Utopia (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Murphy, C. ‘The Dynamics of Transnational Counter-terrorism Law: Towards a Methodology, Map, and Critique’. In Constitutionalism across Borders in the Struggle against Terrorism, edited by Fabbrini, F. and Jackson, V. (London: Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar

Musielak, H. J., and Schurig, K., eds. Festschrift für Gerhard Kegel (Berlin: Kohlhammer, 1987).Google Scholar

Neff, S. Justice among Nations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Neuhouser, F. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Newman, D. G. ‘The Rome Statute, Some Reservations Concerning Amnesties, and a Distributive Problem’. American University International Law Review 20.2 (2004): 293–357.Google Scholar

Nouwen, S., and Kendell, S.. ‘Representational Practices at the International Criminal Court: The Gap between Juridified and Abstract Victimhood’. Law and Contemporary Problems 76 (2013): 235–62.Google Scholar

Nouwen, S., and Werner, W.. ‘Doing Justice to the Political: The International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan’. European Journal of International Law 21 (2011): 941–65.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, M. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991).Google Scholar

Olsen, H. P. ‘Fidelity to International Law: On International Law and Politics’. In Ethical Rationalism and the Law, edited by Capps, P. and Pattinson, S. D. (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar

Olsen, H. P. ‘International Courts and the Doctrinal Channels of Legal Diplomacy’. Transnational Legal Theory 6 (2015): 661–80.Google Scholar

Olsen, H. P., and Toddington, S.. ‘The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in International Courts’. International Criminal Law Review 14 (2014): 1–26.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A. Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Palma, M. ‘The Possible Contribution of International Civil Society to the Protection of Human Rights’. In Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law, by A. Cassese, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Pattinson, S. D. ‘The Human Rights Act and the Doctrine of Precedent’. Legal Studies 35 (2015): 142–64.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. Conflicts of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., and Elsig, M.. ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals’. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Payandeh, M. ‘The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H. L. A. Hart’. The European Journal of International Law 21 (2011): 967–91.Google Scholar

Peat, D., and Windsor, M.. ‘Playing the Game of Interpretation: On Meaning and Metaphor in International Law’. In Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Pelc, K. ‘The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application’. American Political Science Review 108 (2014): 547–64.Google Scholar

Perry, S. R. ‘Law and Obligation’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (2005): 263–95.Google Scholar

Perry, S. R. ‘Second Order Reasons, Uncertainty, and Legal Theory’. Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 913–94.Google Scholar

Peters, A. ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’. Leiden Journal of International Law 19 (2006): 579–610.Google Scholar

Peters, B., and Schaffer, J. K.. ‘The Turn to Authority beyond States’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 315–33.Google Scholar

Petersmann, E. ‘Human Rights, International Economic Law and “Constitutional Justice”’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 955–60.Google Scholar

Petman, J. ‘Deformalization of International Organizations Law’. In Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations, edited by Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, Å. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar

Pettit, P. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Postema, G. J. ‘Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of the Law’. The Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 165–203.Google Scholar

Postema, G. J. ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’. In The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical, and Philosophical Accounts, edited by Murphy, J. B. and Perreau-Saussine, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Postema, G. J.‘Law’s Autonomy and Public Practical Reason’. In The Autonomy of Law, edited by George, R. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Pound, R. ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’. American Law Review 44 (1910): 12–36.Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M. The Concept of International Obligations Omnes, Erga, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ratner, S. R. The Thin Justice of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Rawls, J. The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Raz, J. ‘Authority, Law and Morality’. Monist 86 (1985): 295–324.Google Scholar

Raz, J. The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Raz, J. The Authority of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Raz, J. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, rev. ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Raz, J. ‘Legitimate Authority’. In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, edited by Raz, J (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Raz, J. Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson, 1975).Google Scholar

Raz, J. ‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’. Minnesota Law Review 90 (2006): 1003–44.Google Scholar

Reisman, M. ‘International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication’. American Society of International Law Proceedings 75 (1981): 101–20.Google Scholar

Reisman, M. ‘Unilateral Action and the Transformations of the World Constitutive Process: The Special Problem of Humanitarian Intervention’. European Journal of International Law 11 (2000): 3–18.Google Scholar

Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 65 (2006): 174–207.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. E. ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’. American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 757–91.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. ‘After Government? On Representing Law without the State’. Modern Law Review 68 (2005): 1–24.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. ‘Inescapable Dyads: Why the ICC Cannot Win’. Leiden Journal of International Law 28 (2015): 323–47.Google Scholar

Roughan, N. Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Roughan, N. ‘Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law’. European Journal of International Law 27 (2016): 329–51.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. International Organization 36 (1982): 379–415.Google Scholar

Rundle, K. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L. Fuller (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Sand, I. J. ‘Hybridization, Change and the Expansion of Law’. In Hybrid Forms of Governance, edited by Andersen, Å and Sand, I. J. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Sandholtz, W. ‘Creating Authority by the Council: The International Criminal Tribunals’. In The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority, edited by Cronin, B. and Hurd, I. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Sassen, S. Territory, Authorities, Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Schachter, O. ‘The Nature and Process of Legal Development in International Society’. In The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine, and Theory, edited by Macdonald, R St. J and Johnston, D. M. ( Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983).Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. ‘Introduction: Practice Theory’. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, T. R., Knorr, Centina K. and Savigny, von E. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Schauer, F. ‘Authority and Authorities’. Virginia Law Review 94 (2008): 1931.Google Scholar

Scholte, J. A. ‘Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance’. Government and Opposition 39 (2004): 211–33.Google Scholar

Schöndorf-Haubold, B. ‘The Administration of Information in International Administrative Law: The Example of Interpol’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 1719–52.Google Scholar

Schrijver, N. The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Sciaraffa, S. ‘On Conent-Independent Reasons: It’s Not in the Name’. Law and Philosophy 28 (2009): 233–60.Google Scholar

Shany, Y. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Shany, Y. ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach’. American Journal of International Law 106 (2012): 225–70.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. ‘Authority’. In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, edited by Coleman, J., Himma, K. and Shapiro, S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. ‘Hart’s Way Out’. In Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law, edited by Coleman, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Shklar, J. N. Legalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Simmons, A. J. ‘Associative Political Obligations’. Ethics 106 (1996): 247–73.Google Scholar

Simmons, A. J. Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Skouteris, T. The Notion of Progress in International Law Discourse (Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M. A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Somek, A. ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law: A Reply to Benedict Kingsbury’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2010): 985–95, esp. 993–94.Google Scholar

Somek, A. ‘The Owl of Minerva: Constitutional Discourse before Its Conclusion’. Modern Law Review 71 (2008): 473–89.Google Scholar

Sorel, J. M., and Eveno, V. B.. ‘Article 31’. In The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, edited by Corten, O. and Klein, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Stein, E. ‘International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight’. American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 489–534.Google Scholar

Stewart, R. ‘Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness’. American Journal of International Law 108 (2014): 211–70.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. Globalization and Its Discontents (New York: Norton, 2002).Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., and Brunell, T.. ‘Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Union, and the World Trade Organization’. Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2013): 61–88.Google Scholar

Suganami, H. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Sullivan, G., and de Goede, M.. ‘Between Law and the Exception: The UN1267 Ombudsperson as a Hybrid Model of Legal Expertise’. Leiden Journal of International Law 26 (2013): 833–54.Google Scholar

Swart, M. ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the Ad Hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and “Adventurous Interpretation”’. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 (2010): 459.Google Scholar

Tams, C. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J. ‘Human Rights, Legitimacy, and International Law’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 58 (2013): 1–25.Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J. ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Taylor, C. ‘To Follow a Rule …’ In Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone, M. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Teubner, G. ‘Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks beyond Contract and Organization’. In Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation, edited by Teubner, G. and Amstutz, M. (Oxford, Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Teubner, G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Teubner, G. Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar

Teubner, G. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law and Society Review 17 (1983): 239–86.Google Scholar

Thomas, C. A. ‘The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2014): 729–58.Google Scholar

Thornhill, C. A Sociology of Constitutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C. Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Torrance, M. ‘Persuasive Authority beyond the State: A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility Norms as Legal Reasons within Positive Legal Systems’. German Law Journal 12 (2011): 1573–1636.Google Scholar

Tucker, A. ‘The Limits of Razian Authority’. Res Publica 18 (2012): 225–40.Google Scholar

Tuori, K., Maduro, M. and Sankari, S.. Transnational Law. Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

v. Gestel, R., Micklitz, H. W. and Maduro, M. P.. ‘Methodology in the New Legal World’. European University Institute Working Paper, 2012, 13.Google Scholar

v. Jhering, R. Der Kampf um’s Recht (1913; Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1948).Google Scholar

v. Wijk, J. ‘Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola: Principled for a Day?’ International Criminal Law Review 12.4 (2012): 743–61.Google Scholar

van der Vossen, B. ‘Assessing Law’s Claim to Authority’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2011): 481–501.Google Scholar

Van Hoof, G. J. H. Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Deventer: Kluwer, 1983).Google Scholar

van Mulligen, A. ‘Framing Deformalisation in International Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 3–4 (2015): 635–60.Google Scholar

Venzke, I. ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 354–73.Google Scholar

Venzke, I. How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Venzke, I. ‘Is Interpretation in International Law a Game?’ In Interpretation in International Law, edited by Bianchi, A. et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Venzke, I. ‘Legal Contestation about “Enemy Combatants”: On the Exercise of Power in Legal Interpretation’. Journal of International Law & International Relations 5 (2009): 155–84.Google Scholar

Venzke, I., and Von Bernstorff, J.. ‘Ethos, Ethics, and Morality in International Relations’. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Wolfrum, R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Verdirame, G. ‘A Normative Theory of Sovereignty Transfers’. Stanford Journal of International Law 49 (2013): 371–424.Google Scholar

Verdirame, G. ‘Rescuing Human Rights from Proportionality’. In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Cruft, R., Liao, S. M. and Renzo, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A. ‘Globalization and Europe: How to Square Democracy, Globalization, and International Law’. European Journal of International Law 15 (2004): 885–906.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M. and Venzke, I.. ‘From Public International Law to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority’. European Journal of International Law 28 (2017): 115–45.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I.. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Voyiakis, E. ‘Customary International Law and the Place of Normative Considerations’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 55 (2010): 163–200.Google Scholar

Vulliamy, E., and Hartmann, F.. ‘How Britain and the US Decided to Abandon Srebrenica to Its Fate,’ The Guardian, 4 July 2015. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/04/how-britain-and-us-abandoned-srebrenica-massacre-1995.Google Scholar

Walker, N. ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3–4 (2008): 373–396.Google Scholar

Weber, M. ‘Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der Soziologischen und Ökonomischen Wissenschaften’. Logos 7 (1917): 40.Google Scholar

Weber, M. Economy and Society. Edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Weber, M. ‘Politics as a Vocation’. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, by Weber, M., translated and edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Wei, D. L. T. ‘Rethinking Erdemović: Beyond the Clash of Laws’. Singapore Law Review 23 (2003): 71–84.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. ‘The Geology of International Law: Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’. Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64 (2004): 547–62.Google Scholar

Wheatley, S. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Willaschek, M. ‘Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-prescriptive Character of Juridical Law in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals’. In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, edited by Timmons, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Winkler, M. ‘Die Normativität des Praktischen’. Juristenzeitung 64 (2009): 821.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R. ‘Legitimacy of International Law and the Exercise of Administrative Functions: The Example of the International Seabed Authority, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the International Fisheries Organizations’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 2039–59.Google Scholar