Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:05:45.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Typologizing templates: comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Jeff Good
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

Comparing templatic descriptions

Chapter 2 developed a rich formal description language for templatic constructions, and Chapter 3 described a number of templates using that language. A major goal of this study is, however, not merely to describe templates but also to investigate their typology. The description language can, in fact, be understood as a claim regarding the descriptive typology of templatic constructions, but, as discussed in Section 1.6, templates are, in some sense, a wastebasket class. This makes knowing if a given descriptive typology is reasonably exhaustive, or, in some sense, “accurate,” more difficult than for phenomena (e.g., word order) where our approaches to their analysis make laying out a logical space of possibilities more straightforward.

Accordingly, it is important to find some way to rigorously compare the templates described here, since it is by means of such comparison that we can begin to detect unexpected similarities and differences and determine which templatic descriptions deserve further scrutiny, perhaps because they are especially deviant from other descriptions. The process of such comparison is, therefore, further likely to allow for testing of the plausibility of existing templatic descriptions and to indicate where refinements are needed to the descriptive typology. Moreover, to the extent that it may permit the descriptive typology to “stabilize,” it will lay the groundwork for the coding of a sufficiently large number of desmemes that the templatic patterns of the world's languages can be quantitatively explored in a systematic way, with an ultimate goal of determining the limits of templaticity and detecting universals in the patterning of templatic structures.

The present study is not able to achieve these latter goals, of course: the current database contains an insufficient number of templates. Moreover, work needs to be done on understanding what kinds of information can be reliably gleaned from logically possible approaches to comparison of the complex formal structures employed here. However, it is possible to work on a more limited problem which, nevertheless, represents a crucial step towards understanding the larger research questions posed by patterns of linear stipulation. Recent advances in data processing technology allow us to develop the means through which the formal characterizations employed in this study can be rigorously compared for different purposes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Typologizing templates: comparison
  • Jeff Good, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: The Linguistic Typology of Templates
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057479.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Typologizing templates: comparison
  • Jeff Good, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: The Linguistic Typology of Templates
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057479.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Typologizing templates: comparison
  • Jeff Good, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: The Linguistic Typology of Templates
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057479.004
Available formats
×