Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Literature, Science, and Public PolicyFrom Darwin to Genomics, pp. 223 - 243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Works Cited
6th Day, The. Film. Dir. Spottiswoode, Roger. Perf. Tony Goldwyn, Michael Rapaport, and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Sony Pictures, 2000.Google Scholar
2001: A Space Odyssey. Film. Dir. Kubrick, Stanley. Perf. Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1968.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. 3rd printing. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Academy of Medical Sciences, The. Animals Containing Human Material. London: Academy of Medical Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
Achenbach, Joel. “Ethicists Advise Caution in Applying Crispr Gene Editing to Humans.” Washington Post, February 14, 2017. www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/02/14/ethicists-advise-caution-in-applying-crispr-gene-editing-to-humans/Google Scholar
Adamson, Judith. Charlotte Haldane: Woman Writer in a Man’s World. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguirre, Robert D. Informal Empire: Mexico and Central America in Victorian Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Aldhous, Peter. “Genetic Mugshot Recreates Faces from Nothing but DNA.” NewScientist, March 20, 2014.Google Scholar
Alter, Alexandra. “The World Is Ending, and Readers Couldn’t Be Happier: ‘Station Eleven’ Joins Fall’s Crop of Dystopian Novels.” New York Times, September 6, 2014.Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Education: A Practical Guide. Washington, DC: AAAS, 2012. www.aaas.org/report/facilitating-interdisciplinary-research-and-education-practical-guide.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda, and Valente, Joseph, eds. Disciplinarity at the Fin De Siècle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, George J. “Genism, Racism, and the Prospect of Genetic Genocide.” The New Aspects of Racism in the Age of Globalization and the Gene Revolution, UNESCO 21st Century Talks, World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. Durban, South Africa (September 3, 2001). www.gjga.org/inside.asp?a=1&action=item&source=documents&id=19.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: Norton, 2006.Google Scholar
Arata, Stephen. Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin De Siecle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. “Byron.” In Poetry and Criticism of Matthew Arnold. Ed. Culler, A. Dwight. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961, 347–62.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. “Dover Beach.” In Culler, A. Dwight. Poetry and Criticism of Matthew Arnold. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961, 161–62.Google Scholar
Association of American Universities. “AAU Announces Major Initiative to Improve Undergraduate Stem Education.” Washington, DC: AAU, 2011.Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination. New York: Doubleday, 2011.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Figura.” Trans. Willard R. Trask. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. 1946. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. Woman and the Demon: The Life of a Victorian Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Baker, Robert S. Brave New World: History, Science, and Dystopia. Boston: Twayne, 1990.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry, and Dupré, John. Genomes and What to Make of Them. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. S. “Chimera and the Continuum of Humanity: Erasing the Line of Constitutional Personhood.” Emory Law Journal 55:2 (2006): 347–87.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan. The American Jeremiad. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Bernet, William, Vnencak-Jones, Cindy L., Farahany, Nita, and Montgomery, Stephen A.. “Bad Nature, Bad Nurture, and Testimony Regarding Maoa and Slc6a4 Genotyping at Murder Trials.” Journal of Forensic Science 52:6 (2007): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besant, Annie. The Evolution of Life and Form: Four Lectures Delivered at the Twenty-Third Anniversary Meeting of the Theosophical Society at Adyar, Madras 1898. 2nd ed. London: Theosophical Publishing Society, 1900.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108 (2009): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Adrian. “Perceptions of Epigenetics.” Nature 447:7143 (May 24, 2007): v, 396–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, Shaheem. “Ishiguro’s Inhuman Aesthetics.” Modern Fiction Studies 55 (2009): 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blade Runner. Film. Dir. Scott, Ridley. Perf. Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young. Warner Bros., 1982, rev. 1992.Google Scholar
Bonnicksen, Andrea L. Chimeras, Hybrids, and Interspecies Research: Politics and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bould, Mark, et al., eds. The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. London: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. Evolution: The History of an Idea. 1983; Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys from Brazil, The. Film. Dir. Schaffner, Franklin J.. Perf. Gregory Peck, Laurence Olivier, and James Mason. 20th Century-Fox, 1978.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David. “Open Conspirators: Huxley and H. G. Wells 1927–35.” The Hidden Huxley: Contempt and Compassion for the Masses 1920–36. Ed. Bradshaw, David. London: Faber and Faber, 1994.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David. “Modern Life, Fiction and Satire.” The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature. Ed. Marcus, Laura and Nicholls, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 218–31.Google Scholar
Bradway, Tyler. Queer Experimental Literature: The Affective Politics of Bad Reading. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. Rule of Darkness: British Literature and Imperialism, 1830–1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Brem, Sarah, and Anijar, Karen Z.. “The Bioethics of Fiction: The Chimera in Film and Print.” American Journal of Bioethics (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brey, Philip A. E. “Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies.” Nanoethics 6 (2012): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brint, Steven. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulwer-Lytton, Edward. The Coming Race. Ed. Seed, David. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Burdett, Carolyn. “Romance, Reincarnation and Rider Haggard.” The Victorian Supernatural. Ed. Bown, Nicola, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, xv, 305.Google Scholar
Butler, Octavia E. Dawn. The Xenogenesis Series, Vol. 1. New York: Warner Books, 1987.Google Scholar
Butler, Octavia E. Adulthood Rites. The Xenogenesis Series, Vol. 2. New York: Warner Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Butler, Octavia E. Imago. The Xenogenesis Series, Vol. 3. New York: Warner Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Byron, Glennis, and Ogston, Linda. “Educating Kathy: Clones and Other Creatures in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” 21st-Century Gothic: Great Gothic Novels since 2000. Ed. Olson, Danel. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cannon, Susan Faye. Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period. New York: Dawson and Science History Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
Carter, Adrian, Bartlett, Perry, and Hall, Wayne. “Scare-Mongering and the Anticipatory Ethics of Experimental Technologies.” American Journal of Bioethics 9:5 (2009): 47–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Rebecca, Waldahl, Ragnar, and Beivik, Jarle. “Frame That Gene. A Tool for Analysing and Classifying the Communication of Genetics to the Public.” Science and Society 9:10 (2008): 943–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Caspi, Avshalom, et al. “Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children.” Science 297 (2002): 851–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35:2 (2009): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Richard. The American Novel and Its Tradition. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1957.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Clark, Ronald W. JBS: The Life and Work of J. B. S. Haldane. New York: Coward-McCann, 1968.Google Scholar
Clarke, Bruce. Posthuman Metamorphosis: Narrative and Systems. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caserio, Robert. “Modernist Fiction, Modernist Science.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Casey, Marcie, and Clayton, Jay. “Queer Kinship: Privacy Concerns in Orphan Black.” Journal of Literature and Science 14:1–2 (2021). 125–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Clayton, Ellen Wright. “Policy Challenges: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genetics.” Genetics and Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Study. Ed. Magill, Gerard. St. Louis: St. Louis University Press, 2004. 23–34.Google Scholar
Clayton, Ellen Wright. “Be Ready to Talk with Parents about Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing,” JAMA Pediatrics 174:2 (2020): 117–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, Jay. Romantic Vision and the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Clayton, Jay. Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Jay. “Frankenstein’s Futurity: Replicants and Robots.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley. Ed. Schor, Esther. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Jay, and King, Claire Sisco. “How Can Literary and Film Studies Contribute to Science Policy? The Case of Henrietta Lacks.” The Palgrave Handbook of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Literature and Science. Ed. Ahuja, Neel, et al. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2020, 201–19.Google Scholar
Clinton, William J. “June 2000 White House Event.” National Human Genome Research Institute. www.genome.gov/10001356/june-2000-white-house-event.Google Scholar
Coger, Dal. “The Legendary Slan Shack.” Mimosa 22 (1998): 28–30. http://jophan.org/mimosa/m22/coger.htm.Google Scholar
Colman, Andrew M. A Dictionary of Psychology. 2008. Online ed. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Condit, Celeste. The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Condit, C., Ofulue, N., and Sheedy, K.. “Determinism and Mass Media Portrayals of Genetics.” American Journal of Human Genetics 62 (1998): 979–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook-Deegan, Robert M. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York: Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
Cowan, Tadlock, and Becker, Geoffrey S.. “Biotechnology in Animal Agriculture: Status and Current Issues.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2010.Google Scholar
Coyne, Jerry A. Faith versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. New York: Viking, 2015.Google Scholar
Craig, Claire, and Dillon, Sarah. “‘Storylistening’ in the Science Policy Ecosystem.” Science 13 (January 2023): 134–36.Google Scholar
Crawford, Kate. “Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem.” Opinion. New York Times, June 25, 2016.Google Scholar
Csicsery-Ronay, Istvan. The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. Amnesiac Selves: Nostalgia, Forgetting, and British Fiction, 1810–1870. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. Ed. Beer, Gillian, 1859. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics, 1996.Google Scholar
Davis, Bernard. The Genetic Revolution: Scientific Prospects and Public Perceptions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. “Intentional Structure of the Romantic Image.” Romanticism and Consciousness. Ed. Bloom, Harold. New York: Norton, 1970, 65–77.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. Ed. Calder, Angus, 1861. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Michael J. “Closing the Gap: Inverting the Genetics Curriculum to Ensure an Informed Public.” American Journal of Human Genetics 85:1 (2009): 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John. Darwin’s Legacy: What Evolution Means Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Eatough, Matthew. “The Time That Remains: Organ Donation, Temporal Duration, and Bildung in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Literature and Medicine 29 1 (2011): 132–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. “Religion and Science.” The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing. Ed. Dawkins, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 235–39.Google Scholar
Etherington, Norman. “Critical Introduction.” The Annotated She: A Critical Edition of H. Rider Haggard’s Victorian Romance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991, xv–xliii.Google Scholar
Evans, J. P., Skrzynia, C., and Burke, W.. “The Complexities of Predictive Genetic Testing.” British Medical Journal 322:7293 (2001), 1052–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FDA. “Guidance for Industry: Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals Containing Heritable Rdna Constructs.”. Washington, DC: Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States Government, 2008. www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/09/19/E8-21917/guidance-for-industry-regulation-of-genetically-engineered-animals-containing-heritable-rdna.Google Scholar
FDA. “FDA Allows Marketing of First Direct-to-Consumer Tests That Provide Genetic Risk Information for Certain Conditions.” Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration, 2017. www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-allows-marketing-first-direct-consumer-tests-provide-genetic-risk-information-certain-conditions.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Peter E. Aldous Huxley: Satirist and Novelist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Firchow, Peter E. The End of Utopia: A Study of Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.” Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Firchow, Peter E. “Aldous and Julian: Men of Letters, Men of Science.” Aldous Huxley Annual: A Journal of Twentieth-Century Thought and Beyond 4 (2004): 205–30.Google Scholar
Franklin, H. Bruce. Robert A. Heinlein: America as Science Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. Jeffrey. The Lotus and the Lion: Buddhism and the British Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Freeman, Elizabeth. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fricke, Stefanie. “Reworking Myths: Stereotypes and Genre Conventions in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Work.” Kazuo Ishiguro in a Global Context. Ed. Wong, Cynthia F. and Yildiz, Hülya. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015, 23–37.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Planetarity: Musing Modernist Studies.” Modernism/modernity 17 (2010): 471–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. “Transhumanism: The World’s Most Dangerous Ideas.” Foreign Policy 144 (2004): 42–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “Undoing.” Rereading the Present: Time and the Literary. Ed. Newman, Karen, Clayton, Jay, and Hirsch, Marianne. New York: Routledge. 11–29.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. 2nd ed. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1907.Google Scholar
Garreau, Joel Radical Evolution: The Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies – And What It Means to Be Human. New York: Doubleday, 2004.Google Scholar
Gattaca. Dir. Niccol, Andrew. Perf. Ethan Hawke, Uma Thurman, Jude Law. Columbia Pictures, 1997.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Ethan, Stovall, Isaac, and Clayton, Jay. “Genetics in Film and TV, 1912–2020.” Journal of Literature and Science 14:1–2 (2021). 1–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. No Man’s Land: The Place of the Woman Writer in the Twentieth Century. Vol. 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander. “Collaboration, the Economy, and the Future of the Humanities.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2004): 384–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goleman, Daniel. “New Storm Brews on Whether Crime Has Roots in Genes.” New York Times, September 15, 1992.Google Scholar
Gordijn, Bert, and ten Have, Henk. “The Methodological Rigor of Anticipatory Bioethics.” Medical Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2014): 323–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottschall, Jonathan, and Wilson, David Sloan. The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. “Dolly’s Fashion and Louis’s Passion.” Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning. Ed. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sunstein, Cass R.. New York: Norton, 1998, 41–53.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. “A Darwinian Gentleman at Marx’s Funeral.” Natural History 108:7 (1999): 32–41.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine, 1999.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. “Introduction: Thomas H. Huxley.” Man’s Place in Nature. New York: Modern Library, 2001, vii–x.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T., and Farahany, Nita A.. “Neuroscience and the Criminal Justice System.” Annual Review of Criminology 2 (2019): 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Ronald M. Babies by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Choice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Greene, Mark, et al. “Moral Issues of Human-Nonhuman Primate Neural Grafting.” Science 309 (2005): 385–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Dustin. Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1994.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Devin. The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature between the Darwins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Groes, Sebastian, and Lewis, Barry. “Introduction: ‘It’s Good Manners, Really’ – Kazuo Ishiguro and the Ethics of Empathy.” Kazuo Ishiguro: New Critical Visions of the Novels. Ed. Groes, Sebastian and Lewis, Barry. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2011, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, Richard. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens, and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. “The Sokal Affair and the History of Criticism.” Critical Inquiry 28 (2002): 470–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. “Literary Study and the Modern System of the Disciplines.” Ed. Anderson and Valente. Disciplinarity at the Fin De Siècle. 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, H. Rider. The Days of My Life, an Autobiography. Ed. Longman, C. J.. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green, 1926.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. Jack. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Halberstam, , “Antagonism, Negativity, and the Subject of Queer Theory.” PMLA 121 (2006): 823–24.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. The Causes of Evolution. 1932. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. Possible Worlds. 1927. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Hamner, Everett. Editing the Soul: Science and Fiction in the Genome Age. Penn State University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.Femaleman©_Meets_OncomouseTM. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Harmon, Amy. “Human Gene Editing Receives Science Panel’s Support.” New York Times, February 14, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/health/human-gene-editing-panel.html.Google Scholar
Harris, John. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Harris, John. “Taking the ‘Human’ out of Human Rights.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20:1 (2011): 9–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazel, James, and Slobogin, Christopher. “Who Knows What, and When? A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 28:1 (2018): 35–66.Google Scholar
Haynes, Roslynn. H. G. Wells: Discoverer of the Future: The Influence of Science on His Thought. New York: New York University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Haynes, Roslynn. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Haynes, Roslynn. “Frankenstein: The Scientist We Love to Hate.” Public Understanding of Science 4 (1995): 435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlitt, William. The Collected Works of William Hazlitt. Ed. Waller, A. R. and Glover, Arnold. Vol. 9. London: J. M. Dent, 1903.Google Scholar
Heinlein, Robert A. “Methuselah’s Children.” Astounding Science Fiction 28:1 (September 1941): 133–62.Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula K. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, Ursula K. “Extinction/Adaptation.” Time: A Vocabulary of the Present. Ed. Elias, Amy J. and Burges, Joel. New York: New York University Press, 2016, 51–65.Google Scholar
Hensley, Nathan K., and Steer, Philip. “Ecological Formalism; or, Love among the Ruins.” Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in the Age of Empire. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hertz, Rosanna, and Nelson, Margaret K.. Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hinterberger, Amy. “Marked ‘H’ for Human: Chimeric Life and the Politics of the Human.” BioSocieties 13 (2017): 453–69.Google Scholar
Hoeffel, Janet C. “The Dark Side of DNA Profiling: Unreliable Scientific Evidence Meets the Criminal Defendant.” Stanford Law Review 42 (1990): 465–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. “Spring and Fall.”The Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1967.Google Scholar
Houghton, Frank, et al. “Concerns with Entertainment-Education: Zombie Pandemic Preparedness and the Unanticipated Promotion of a Weapons Culture.” Health Education & Behavior (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, T. E. Speculations: Essays on Humanism and the Philosophy of Art. Ed. Read, Herbert. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Inc., 1924.Google Scholar
Huml, Anne M., Sullivan, Catherine, Figueroa, Maria, Scott, Karen, and Sehgal, Ashwini R.. “Consistency of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Results among Identical Twins.” American Journal of Medical Genetics 133:1 (2020): 143–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Huxley, Aldous. “Introduction.” The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Ed. Huxley, Aldous. New York: Viking, 1932.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. “Science and Civilization.” The Hidden Huxley: Contempt and Compassion for the Masses 1920-36. Ed. Bradshaw, David. 1932. London: Faber & Faber, 1994, 105–16.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. “Foreword to Brave New World.” Brave New World. 1946. New York: Bantam, 1955, vii–xiv.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. Letters of Aldous Huxley. Ed. Smith, Grover. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. Complete Essays of Aldous Huxley, Volume 2, 1920–1925. Ed. Baker, Robert S. and Sexton, James. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. “The Modern Spirit and a Family Party.” Complete Essays of Aldous Huxley, Volume 1, 1920–1925. Ed. Baker, Robert S. and Sexton, James. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. “Aldous Huxley.” Aldous Huxley 1894–1963: A Memorial Volume. Ed. Julian Huxley. 1965, 21–25.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Evolution and Ethics, and Other Essays. Authorized Edition. Vol. 9. New York: Appleton, 1902.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Science and Education: Essays. Authorized Edition. Vol. 3. New York: Appleton, 1902.Google Scholar
Huyssen, Andreas. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Institute of Medicine, Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. www.nap.edu/catalog/11278/guidelines-for-human-embryonic-stem-cell-research.Google Scholar
The Institute of Medicine Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nature/Nurture Debate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006. www.nap.edu/catalog/11693/genes-behavior-and-the-social-environment-moving-beyond-the-naturenurture.Google Scholar
Island, The . Film. Dir. Bay, Michael. Perf. Scarlett Johansson, Ewan McGregor, and Djimon Hounsou. DreamWorks, Warner Bros., 2005.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
James, David, and Seshagiri, Urmila. “Metamodernism: Narratives of Continuity and Revolution. PMLA 129 (2014): 87–100.Google Scholar
James, Edward. Science Fiction in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
James, Edward, and Mendlesohn, Farah, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. New York: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Johnson, Steven. Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. New York: Scribner, 2001.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. A Short History of Medical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Judson, Horace Freeland. “Talking about the Genome.” Nature 409 (2001): 769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karpowicz, Phillip, Cohen, Cynthia B., and van der Kooy, Derek. “Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Boundaries.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15:2 (2005): 107–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karpowicz, Phillip, Cohen, Cynthia B., and van der Kooy, Derek. “It Is Ethical to Transplant Human Stem Cells into Nonhuman Embryos.” Nature Medicine 10:4 (2005): 331–35.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon R. “The Wisdom of Repugnance.” The New Republic 216:22 (1997): 17–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Kass, Leon R. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon R. “Introduction: The Search for Perfection. Reading: Nathanial Hawthorne’s ‘The Birth-mark.’” Being Human: Readings from the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics, 2003. https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kass, Leon R. Being Human: Core Readings in the Humanities. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
Katz, Wendy R. Rider Haggard and the Fiction of Empire: A Critical Study of British Imperial Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kay, Lily. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Christopher. “Probability, Reality and Sensation in the Novels of Wilkie Collins.” Wilkie Collins to the Forefront: Some Reassessments. Ed. Smith, Nelson and Terry, R. C.. New York: AMS Press, 1995. 53–74.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
King, Michael, Whitaker, Maja, and Jones, Gareth. “Speculative Ethics, Valid Enterprise or Tragic Cul-De-Sac?” Bioethics in the 21st Century. Ed. Abraham Rudnick. London: IntechOpen, 2011. www.intechopen.com/books/bioethics-in-the-21st-century/speculative-ethics-valid-enterprise-or-tragic-cul-de-sac.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan. “Against Literary Darwinism.” Critical Inquiry 37:2 (2011): 315–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklick, Henrika. “Professional Status and the Moral Order.” Ed. Anderson and Valente. Disciplinarity at the Fin De Siècle. 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan. Preserving the Self in the South Seas, 1680–1840. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Langbaum, Robert. The Poetry of Experience: The Dramatic Monologue in Modern Literary Tradition. New York: Norton, 1957.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. Ray. Degeneration. A Chapter in Darwinism. London: Macmillan, 1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Ed. Huxley, Aldous. New York: Viking, 1932.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015Google Scholar
Levine, George. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Levine, George. “By Knowledge Possessed: Darwin, Nature, and Victorian Narrative.” New Literary History 24:2 (1993): 363–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, George. Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Robert J. “The Institutional Review Board.” Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1986, 321–63.Google Scholar
Lewisohn, Ludwig. “Yellow for Green, a Review in the Nation (March 22, 1922).” In Watt. 62–63.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. “In the Beginning Was the Word [Rev. of Lily E. Kay, Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code].” Science 291 (2001): 1263–64.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. Friending the Past: The Sense of History in the Digital Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History 41 (2010): 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckhurst, Roger. “Pseudoscience.” The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. Ed. Bould, Mark, Butler, Andrew, Roberts, Adam, and Vint, Sherryl. London: Routledge, 2009, 403–12.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. 1920. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lynch, Lisa. “‘Not a Virus, but an Upgrade’: The Ethics of Epidemic Evolution in Greg Bear’s Darwin’s Radio.” Literature and Medicine 20 (2001): 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Douglas, and Walkowitz, Rebecca L.. “The New Modernist Studies.” PMLA 123:3 (2008): 737–48.Google Scholar
Margolis, Jonathan. A Brief History of Tomorrow: The Future, Past and Present. London: Bloomsbury, 2000.Google Scholar
Maxwell, James Clerk. "On Governors." Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (March 5, 1868): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst, and Provine, William B., eds. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuffin, Peter, Riley, Brien, and Plomin, Robert. “Toward Behavioral Genomics.” Science 291:5507 (2001): 1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendlesohn, Farah. “Introduction: Reading Science Fiction.” In James and Mendlesohn, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merril, Judith. “That Only a Mother.” Astounding Science Fiction 41:4 (June 1948): 88–95.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. “The Normative Structure of Science.” The Sociology of Science. Ed. Merton, Robert K.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, 267–78.Google Scholar
Milburn, Colin. Nanovision: Engineering the Future. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, and Bentham, Jeremy. Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Ed. Ryan, Alan. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon D. “The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 7 (1998): 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon D. “Civic Scientific Literacy: A Necessity in the 21st Century.” FAS Public Interest Report: The Journal of the Federation of American Scientists 55:1 (2002).Google Scholar
Mitchison, Naomi. As It Was: An Autobiography (1897–1918). Glasgow: Richard Drew, 1988.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. The Way of the World: The “Bildungsroman” in European Culture. Trans. Albert Sbragia. London: Verso, 1987.Google Scholar
Morrell, Jack, and Thackray, Arnold. Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Morton, Peter. The Vital Science: Biology and the Literary Imagination, 1860–1900. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Moylan, Tom. Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Multiplicity. Film. Dir. Ramis, Harold. Perf. Michael Keaton, Andie MacDowell, and Zack Duhame. Columbia Pictures, 1996.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Jose Esteban. Crusing Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Murphy, Heather. “Most White Americans’ DNA Can Be Identified through Genealogy Databases.” New York Times, October 11, 2018.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patricia. “The Gendering of History in She.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 39 (1999): 747–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Naam, Ramez More Than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement. New York: Broadway Books, 2005.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2017. www.nap.edu/catalog/24623/human-genome-editing-science-ethics-and-governance.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branches from the Same Tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Neill, Anna. “The Made Man and the ‘Minor’ Novel: Erewhon, ANT, and Empire.” Victorian Studies 60 (2018): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, D. “Promotional Metaphors and Their Popular Appeal.” Public Understanding of Science 3 (1994): 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Susan Lindee, M.. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alondra. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Newfield, Christopher. Ivy and Industry: Business and the Making of the American University, 1880–1980. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Non, Amy L., Binder, Alexandra M., Kubzansky, Laura D., and Michels, Karin B.. “Genome-Wide DNA Methylation in Neonates Exposed to Maternal Depression, Anxiety, or SSRI Medication During Pregnancy.” Epigenetics: Official Journal of the DNA Methylation Society 9:7 (2014): 964–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordmann, Alfred, and Rip, Arie. “Mind the Gap Revisited.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2009): 273–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Little C.” Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning. Ed Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sunstein, Cass R.. New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Janet. The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Orphan Black. Television series. Dir. Fawcett, John and Manson, Graeme. Perf. Tatiana Maslany, Dylan Bruce, and Jordan Gavaris. Temple Street Productions, 2013–2016.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, José. The Dehumanization of Art. Trans. Helene Weyl. 1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Ostherr, Kirsten. “Humanities as Essential Services.” Inside Higher Ed. May 21, 2020. www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/05/21/how-humanities-can-be-part-front-line-response-pandemic-opinion.Google Scholar
Otis, Laura. Organic Memory: History and the Body in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ourednik, Václav, et al. “Segregation of Human Neural Stem Cells in the Developing Primate Forebrain.” Science 293:5536 (2001): 1820–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pääbo, Svante. “The Human Genome and Our View of Ourselves.” Science 291:5507 (2001): 1219–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulson, Ronald. The Fictions of Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Frederik and Kornbluth, C. M.. The Space Merchants. New York: Ballantine Books, 1953.Google Scholar
Polenberg, Richard, ed. In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer: The Security Clearance Hearing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. Catastrophe: Risk and Response. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and Owen-Smith, Jason. “The New World of Knowledge Production in the Life Sciences.” The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Ed. Brint, Steven. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002, 107–30.Google Scholar
President’s Council on Bioethics. Being Human: Readings from the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: Author, 2003.Google Scholar
President’s Council on Bioethics. “Transcript: Session 2: Science and the Pursuit of Perfection.” January 17, 2002. www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/jan02/jan17session2.html.Google Scholar
President’s Council on Bioethics. “Transcript: Session 6: Human-Animal Chimeras.” March 4, 2005.Google Scholar
Racine, Eric, Rubio, Tristana Martin, Chandler, Jennifer, Forlini, Cynthia, and Lucke, Jayne. “The Value and Pitfalls of Speculation about Science and Technology in Bioethics: The Case of Cognitive Enhancement.” Medical Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2014): 325–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Reeves-Evison, Theo. “The Art of Disciplined Imagination: Prediction, Scenarios, and Other Speculative Infrastructures.” Critical Inquiry 47 (2021): 719–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regaldo, Antonio. “More Than 26 Million People Have Taken an at-Home Ancestry Test.” MIT Technology Review, February 11, 2019. www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/11/103446/more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. Predicting the Future: An Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Richardson, Sarah S., et al. “Society: Don’t Blame the Mothers.” Nature 512:7513 (2014): 131–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, Bruce. “Cruelty Is Bad: Banality and Proximity in Never Let Me Go.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 40:3 (2007): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. “Isherwood, Huxley, and the Thirties.” The Columbia History of the British Novel. Ed. Richetti, John. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994, 740–64.Google Scholar
Rothman, David J. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, Natalie, and Clayton, Jay. “Science and Society in Recent Fiction.” Under the Literary Microscope: Science and Society in the Contemporary Novel. Ed. Farzin, Sina, Gaines, Susan M., and Haynes, Roslynn D.. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2021, 21–36.Google Scholar
Samuel, Lawrence R. Future: A Recent History. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterwhite, Marc. “Program Notes.” American Images: Crystal Records, 2017. http://marcsatterwhite.com/works/time-considered-as-a-helix-of-semi-precious-stones/.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schell, Heather. “The Big Bad Wolf: Masculinity and Genetics in Popular Culture.” Literature and Medicine 26 (2007): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schick, Ari. “Whereto Speculative Bioethics? Technological Visions and Future Simulations in a Science Fictional Culture.” Medical Humanities 42 (2016): 225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeink, Lars. Biopunk Dystopias: Genetic Engineering, Society, and Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Cannon. Darwin and the Memory of the Human: Evolution, Savages, and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schulman, Adam. Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics, 2008. https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/human_dignity/.Google Scholar
Schwab, Gabriele. “Ethnographies of the Future: Personhood, Agency, and Power in Octavia Butler’s Xenogenesis.” Accelerating Possession: Global Futures of Property and Personhood. Ed. Schwab, Gabriele and Maurer, Bill. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006, 204–28.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You.” Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, David. American Science Fiction and the Cold War: Literature and Film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Selin, Cynthia. “Time Matters: Temporal Harmony and Dissonance in Nanotechnology Networks.” Time & Society 15 (2006): 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Send in the Clones.” The Simpsons. Television series, Season 14, Episode 1. Dir. David Silverman. November 3, 2002.Google Scholar
Serpieters, Tom. “The Writer as a Poet of Thought or as an Algebrist? A Comparative Account of Aldous Huxley’s and Paul Valéry’s Conception of Literature.” Aldous Huxley Annual: A Journal of Twentieth-Century Thought and Beyond 15 (2015): 227–41.Google Scholar
Sexton, James. “Aldous Huxley’s Bokanovsky.” Science Fiction Studies 16:47 (1989): 85–89.Google Scholar
Sexton, James. “Brave New World and the Rationalization of Industry.” Critical Essays on Aldous Huxley. Ed. Meckier, Jerome. New York: G. K. Hall, 1996, 88–102.Google Scholar
Shah, Hetan. “Global Problems Need Social Science.” Nature 577 (2020): 295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapin, Steven. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. Back to Methuselah. A Metabiological Pentateuch. 1921. Auckland: The Floating Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Silver, Lee M. Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family. 1998. New York: Harper Perennial, 2007.Google Scholar
Slonczewski, Joan, and Levy, Michael. “Science Fiction and the Life Sciences.” In James and Mendlesohn, 174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeele, Wietske. “Epigenetics and Blaming Mothers: Working with Dr. Amy Non.” Bioculture Seminars, Ed. Jay Clayton (2015). https://biocultures.wordpress.com/2015/04/20/epigenetics-and-blaming-mothers-working-with-dr-amy-non.Google Scholar
Smith, David C. H. G. Wells: Desperately Mortal. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip E. “The Evolution of Politics and the Politics of Evolution: Social Darwinism in Heinlein’s Fiction.” Robert A. Heinlein. Ed. Olander, Joseph D. and Greenberg, Martin Harry. New York: Taplinger, 1978, 137–71.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Snaza, Nathan. “The Failure of Humanizing Education in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 26:3 (2015): 215–34.Google Scholar
Squier, Susan M. “Sexual Biopolitics in Man’s World: The Writings of Charlotte Haldane.” Rediscovering Forgotten Radicals: British Women Writers, 1889–1939. Ed. Ingram, Angela and Patai, Daphne. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Squier, Susan M. Babies in Bottles: Twentieth-Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Squier, Susan M. “Reproducing the Posthuman Body: Ectogenetic Fetus, Surrogate Mother, Pregnant Man.” Posthuman Bodies. Ed. Halberstam, Judith and Livingston, Ira. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Squier, Susan M. “Conflicting Scientific Feminisms: Charlotte Haldane and Naomi Mitchinson.” Natural Eloquence: Women Reinscribe Science. Ed. Gates, Barbara T. and Shteir, Ann B.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1997, 179–95.Google Scholar
Sterling, Bruce. “Cicada Queen.” Schismatrix Plus. New York: Ace Books, 1996, 272–300.Google Scholar
Stern, Alexandra Minna. Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Stiles, Anne. “Literature in ‘Mind’: H. G. Wells and the Evolution of the Mad Scientist.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70 (2009): 317–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Gregory Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Future. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.Google Scholar
Stone, R. “HHS ‘Violence Initiative’ Caught in a Crossfire.” Science 258:5080 (1992): 212–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Rebecca. The Fabrication of the Late-Victorian Femme Fatale. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suk, J., et al. “Dolly for Dinner? Assessing Commercial and Regulatory Trends in Cloned Livestock.” Nature Biotechnology 25 (2007): 47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surrogates. Film. Dir. Mostow, Jonathan. Perf. Bruce Willis. Touchstone Pictures, 2009.Google Scholar
Suvin, Darko. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Tandy-Connor, Stephany, et al. “False-Positive Results Released by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests Highlight the Importance of Clinical Confirmation Testing for Appropriate Patient Care.” Genetics in Medicine 20:12 (2018): 1515–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Jenny Bourne. In the Secret Theatre of Home: Wilkie Collins, Sensation Narrative, and Nineteenth-Century Psychology. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Thacker, Eugene. “Three Lessons on Pop Biotech: Popular Culture Provides Insights into Biotechnology and Society.” Genewatch 17:4 (2004): 3–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Thody, Philip. Aldous Huxley: A Biographical Introduction. London: Studio Vista, 1973.Google Scholar
Tsao, Tiffany. “The Tyranny of Purpose: Religion and Biotechnology in Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Literature & Theology: An International Journal of Religion, Theory, and Culture 26 (2012): 214–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, Gaye. Wannabe U: Inside the Corporate University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Frank H. “Major Political and Social Elements in Heinlein’s Fiction.” Robert A. Heinlein. Ed. Olander, Joseph D. and Greenberg, Martin Harry. New York: Taplinger, 1978, 172–93.Google Scholar
Uchida, Nobuko, et al. “Direct Isolation of Human Central Nervous System Stem Cells.” Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 97:26 (2000): 14720–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vayena, Effy, and Blasimme, Alessandro. “Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.” Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 46 (2018): 119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, Nicholas. “Chimeras on the Horizon, but Don’t Expect Centaurs.” New York Times, April 3, 2005: D1.Google Scholar
Wagar, W. Warren. “H.G. Wells and the Genesis of Future Studies.” WNRF, January. 30, 1983. www.wnrf.org/cms/hgwells.shtml.Google Scholar
Wailoo, Keith, Nelson, Alonda, and Lee, Catherine. Genetics and the Unsettled Past: The Collision of DNA, Race, and History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wald, Priscilla. “Future Perfect: Grammar, Genes, and Geography.” New Literary History 31 (2000): 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Priscilla. “What’s in a Cell? John Moore’s Spleen and the Language of Bioslavery.” New Literary History 36 (2005): 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Priscilla. Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Waldby, Catherine, and Mitchell, Robert. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wallace, Alfred Russel. The Alfred Russel Wallace Reader: A Selection of Writings from the Field. Ed. Camerini, Jane R.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, Molly. “Reading Octavia Butler’s Xenogenesis after Seattle.” Contemporary Literature 50:1 (2009): 94–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Donald, ed. Aldous Huxley: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan, 1975.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Science as a Vocation.” Trans. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., 1922. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970, 129–56.Google Scholar
Webster, Gerry, and Goodwin, Brian C.. “The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach.” Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Ed. Neumann-Held, Eva M. and Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006, 99–134.Google Scholar
Wegner, Philip. Life between Two Deaths, 1989–2001: U.S. Culture in the Long Nineties. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Sara, and Greenbaum, Dov. “Genetic Technology to Prevent Disabilities: How Popular Culture Informs Our Understanding of the Use of Genetics to Define and Prevent Undesirable Traits.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15:6 (2015): 32–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weismann, August. Essays upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems. Ed. Poulton, Edward Bagnall. 2 ed. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1891.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “The Literature of the Future: The Horoscope of Books.” Pall Mall Gazette 11 (1893).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “Science: In School, and after School.” Nature 50 (1894): 525–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. G. “Science Teaching – An Ideal and Some Realities.” The Educational Times 48 (1895): 23–29.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. Anticipations and Other Papers. 1901. Atlantic Edition. Vol. 4. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1924.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “Human Evolution, An Artificial Process.” In Early Writings in Science and Science Fiction. Ed. Philmus, Robert M. and Hughes, David Y.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975. 211–19.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Anne. “Writing with Care: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Contemporary Literature 52 (2011): 54–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism. London: Verso, 1989.Google Scholar
Williams-Ellis, Amabel Strachey. “Review in Spectator (December 3, 1921).” In Watt. 60–61.Google Scholar
Winickoff, David, et al. “Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 30 (2005): 81–123.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Gary K. “Science Fiction and Its Editors.” In James and Mendlesohn. 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollaeger, Mark, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, Paul Root, and McGee, Glenn. “‘Expert Bioethics’ as Professional Discourse: The Case of Stem Cells.” Pragmatic Bioethics. Ed. McGee, Glenn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, 181–91Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “Intimations Ode” and “Tintern Abbey.” Poetical Works. Ed. Hutchinson, Thomas and de Selincourt, Ernest. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wuchty, Stefan, et al. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316:5827 (2007): 1036–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, Chao, Xu, Haifeng, Vorobeychik, Yevgeniy, et al. “To Warn or Not to Warn: Online Signaling in Audit Games.” Proceedings of the 36th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (2020). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2020. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9101660?casa_token=zbkO-Zve7fUAAAAA:CytmsODWgMaHXyqe_v_OolOp6H-1le-DZNJIb6QmZD2eW8KvXcZKKdcS3HqTObB7GpoRmq_9.Google Scholar
Yaszek, Lisa, and Ellis, Jason W.. “Science Fiction.” The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Ed. Clarke, Bruce and Rossini, Manuela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, Richard. Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge, and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemka, Sue. Time and the Moment in Victorian Literature and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemka, Sue. “Sacred and Secular Time in Literature.” Time and Literature. Ed. Allen, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zola, Émile. The Experimental Novel and Other Essays. Trans. Belle M. Sherman. 1880. New York: Cassell Publishing, 1893.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access