Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:43:35.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Joseph Fewsmith
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has understood the need for some sort of political reform since the 1980s. Deng Xiaoping gave his well-known speech, “Reform of the Party and State Leadership System,” in August 1980, and thereafter, in the early 1980s the party began regularizing party affairs, including inner-party life and retirement. The topic of political reform was hotly debated in 1986, and the People's Daily reprinted the text of Deng's 1980 speech on July 1, 1987, in anticipation of the Thirteenth Party Congress that would be convened that fall. At the congress, Zhao Ziyang outlined the first effort to systematically separate the party from the government apparatus and to create a civil service. In those years, however, the party's focus on political reform centered on increasing economic efficiency, even though liberal intellectuals spoke hopefully of democracy.

The violent suppression of protesters around Tiananmen Square and elsewhere in 1989 led to a reversal of efforts to separate the party from the state; any party groups that had been removed from government bureaucracies were quickly reintroduced. Nevertheless, the topic of political reform never disappeared entirely, and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 forced the CCP to think about the issue systematically. One result of these deliberations was the enactment of regulations on the selection and appointment of cadres, issued on a trial basis in 1995. These regulations were drawn up under the auspices of Zeng Qinghong, a close protégé of Jiang Zemin, who at the time headed the Central Organization Department. The regulations were based on an understanding that the very closely held power to appoint cadres – as laid out in Chapter 1 of this volume – had led to the personalization of power and corruption. The basic solution, as encompassed in these regulations, was a proposal to involve more people in the selection process, in other words to promote “inner-party democracy.” It is very clear that the Central Organization Department supported such an expansion of inner-party democracy and that Sichuan province responded to this appeal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Joseph Fewsmith, Boston University
  • Book: The Logic and Limits of Political Reform in China
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381703.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Joseph Fewsmith, Boston University
  • Book: The Logic and Limits of Political Reform in China
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381703.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Joseph Fewsmith, Boston University
  • Book: The Logic and Limits of Political Reform in China
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381703.007
Available formats
×