Introduction. The general context of this article is an investigation of foundational frameworks for constructive mathematics in the style of Bishop. In the early seventies, prompted by Bishop's monograph Foundations of Constructive Analysis [9], various formal systems emerged to provide a clear and precise basis for the newborn mathematical style. Completely new systems were introduced like Feferman's explicit mathematics [16] and Martin–Löf's type theory [23, 24]. In addition, various systems in the form of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axiomatization but based on intuitionistic logic were put forward for example by Friedman [20, 21], Myhill [27] and Aczel [2, 4, 5]. The latter author was motivated by Myhill's Constructive set theory [28] in which a system of sets and functions was introduced adhering to a (generalized) predicative approach. Constructive set theory thus avoided the use of unbounded forms of separation and of the full axiom of powerset. Aczel brought these ideas in a system expressed in the language of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory and also provided a natural interpretation for it in a version of Martin–Löf's type theory with a universe of small types and an inductive type built over it.