Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T15:30:04.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - ESG Risks and Opportunities

A Fiduciary Duty Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

By
Will Martindale ,
Elodie Feller  and
Rory Sullivan
Edited by
Paul G. Fisher
Paul G. Fisher
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Interpretations of fiduciary duty have recently undergone rapid evolution. It is now widely accepted that investors need to take account of ESG or sustainability issues in their investment practices. This chapter analyses the changes in the interpretation of fiduciary duty and the implications for investment practice. It discusses of the traditional definition of fiduciary duty (in particular, the duties of loyalty and care). It then identifies 4 factors – the work of the UNEP and the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), the changing legal and policy landscape for responsible investment, the understanding of the financial significance of ESG issues to investment performance, and changes in investment practice – that have challenged and led to change in this traditional definition of fiduciary duty. The chapter then proposes a modern definition of fiduciary duty, a definition where ESG issues are at the heart of the duties owed by investors to their beneficiaries. The chapter concludes with some reflections on whether this modern definition of fiduciary duty is a sufficient response to the social and environmental challenges faced by society today.

Keywords

fiduciary dutyESGregulationpublic policyinvestment performanceaccountabilitybeneficiariesclimate changesustainability
Type
Chapter
Information
Making the Financial System Sustainable , pp. 168 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance’, Strategic Management Journal 35(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Eccles, R., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014), ‘The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance’, Management Science 60(11), 2835–2857.Google Scholar
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. and Mishra, D. (2011), ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?’, Journal of Banking and Finance 35(9), 2388–2406.Google Scholar
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (2005), ‘A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment’. Geneva: UNEP. www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/freshfields_legal_resp_20051123.pdf.Google Scholar
Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015), ‘ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 5(4), 210–233.Google Scholar
Khan, M., Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A. (2016), ‘Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality’, The Accounting Review 91(6), 1697–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen-Taylor, K. and Martindale, M. (2018), ‘Financial Performance of ESG Integration in US Investing’. www.unpri.org/download?ac=4218.Google Scholar
Nguyen-Taylor, K., Naranjo, A. and Roy, C. (2015), ‘The ESG Advantage in Fixed Income Investing: An Empirical Analysis’. Bethesda, MD: Calvert Investments. www.environmental-finance.com/assets/files/WP10011.pdf.Google Scholar
Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) (2016), ‘How Asset Owners Can Drive Responsible Investment: Beliefs, Strategies and Mandates’. www.unpri.org/asset-owners/how-asset-owners-can-drive-responsible-investment-beliefs-strategies-and-mandates/277.article.Google Scholar
PRI (2019), ‘Taking Stock: Sustainable Finance Policy Engagement and Policy Influence’. https://d8g8t13e9vf2o.cloudfront.net/Uploads/c/j/u/pripolicywhitepapertakingstockfinal_335442.pdf.Google Scholar
PRI, UNEP FI and The Generation Foundation (2016), ‘Investor Duties and Obligations in 6 Asian Markets’. www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/Investor_obligations_and_duties_in_six_asian_markets.pdf.Google Scholar
PRI, UNEP FI and The Generation Foundation (2019), ‘Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century’. www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Fiduciary-duty-21st-century-final-report.pdf.Google Scholar
PRI, UNEP FI, UN Global Compact and UNEP Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System (2015), ‘Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century’. www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/fiduciary_duty_21st_century.pdf.Google Scholar
Sparkes, R. (2002), Socially Responsible Investment: A Global Revolution. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S., Suzuki, D., Makedon, A. et al. (2017), ‘ESG Part II: A Deeper Dive’. New York: Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research. www.iccr.org/sites/default/files/page_attachments/esg_part_2_deeper_dive_bof_of_a_june_2017.pdf.Google Scholar
UN Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2014), ‘World Investment Report 2014 – Investing in SDGs’. Geneva: UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2014_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UNEP FI (2009), ‘Fiduciary Responsibility: Legal and Practical Aspects of Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment’. Geneva: UNEP FI. www.unepfi.org/publications/investment-publications/fiduciary-responsibility-legal-and-practical-aspects-of-integrating-environmental-social-and-governance-issues-into-institutional-investment.Google Scholar
University of Oxford and Arabesque Partners (2015), ‘From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustainability Can Drive Financial Outperformance’, March. Oxford: University of Oxford. https://arabesque.com/research/From_the_stockholder_to_the_stakeholder_web.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×