Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:39:55.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Noninvasive Analysis of Embryo Nutrient Utilization for Embryo Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2023

Catherine Racowsky
Affiliation:
Hôpital Foch, France
Jacques Cohen
Affiliation:
IVF 2.0, New York
Nicholas Macklon
Affiliation:
London Women's Clinic
Get access

Summary

Embryo health and viability are related to metabolic activity during the preimplantation period, with higher viability being related to amino acid utilisation and being positively correlated with glucose uptake. Metabolic stress, such as that induced by atmospheric oxygen and media lacking amino acids, leads to compromised transfer outcomes, and culture conditions have therefore been designed to minimise such metabolic trauma. It is feasible to assess the metabolic state of an individual embryo through the analysis of spent culture media. Platforms which have proved most effective in this include ultramicrofluorescence, high performance liquid chromatography, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and microfluidic devices. Here we provide details around the technologies most commonly used and look to the future in which novel microscopies may provide insight into the metabolic state of cells.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gardner, DK, Balaban, B. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and ‘OMICS’: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:704–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basile, N, Vime, P, Florensa, M, Aparicio Ruiz, B, Garcia Velasco, JA, Remohi, J, et al. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tran, D, Cooke, S, Illingworth, PJ, Gardner, DK. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1011–18.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Stevens, J, Schoolcraft, WB. Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:1175–80.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK, Wale, PL. Analysis of metabolism to select viable human embryos for transfer. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1062–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Harvey, AJ. Blastocyst metabolism. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27:638–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donohoe, DR, Bultman, SJ. Metaboloepigenetics: interrelationships between energy metabolism and epigenetic control of gene expression. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:3169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, AJ, Rathjen, J, Gardner, DK. Metaboloepigenetic regulation of pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016;1816525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, JP, Philippon, A, Menezo, Y. In-vitro uptake of glucose by bovine blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil. 1980;58:161–4.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK, Leese, HJ. Assessment of embryo viability prior to transfer by the noninvasive measurement of glucose uptake. J Exp Zool. 1987;242:103–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Wale, PL, Collins, R, Lane, M. Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1981–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrick, L, Lee, YSL, Gardner, DK. Metabolic activity of human blastocysts correlates with their morphokinetics, morphological grade, KIDScore and artificial intelligence ranking. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:2004–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, M, Gardner, DK. Selection of viable mouse blastocysts prior to transfer using a metabolic criterion. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1975–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, M, Gardner, DK. Amino acids and vitamins prevent culture-induced metabolic perturbations and associated loss of viability of mouse blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:991–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK. Dissection of culture media for embryos: the most important and less important components and characteristics. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20:918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghton, FD, Hawkhead, JA, Humpherson, PG, Hogg, JE, Balen, AH, Rutherford, AJ, et al. Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:9991005.Google Scholar
Brison, DR, Houghton, FD, Falconer, D, Roberts, SA, Hawkhead, J, Humpherson, PG, et al. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2319–24.Google Scholar
Picton, HM, Elder, K, Houghton, FD, Hawkhead, JA, Rutherford, AJ, Hogg, JE, et al. Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:557–69.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK, Kelley, RL. Impact of the IVF laboratory environment on human preimplantation embryo phenotype. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8:418–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wale, PL, Gardner, DK. Oxygen regulates amino acid turnover and carbohydrate uptake during the preimplantation period of mouse embryo development. Biol Reprod. 2012;87:24.Google Scholar
Wale, PL, Gardner, DK. Oxygen affects the ability of mouse blastocysts to regulate ammonium. Biol Reprod. 2013;89:75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conaghan, J, Hardy, K, Handyside, AH, Winston, RM, Leese, HJ. Selection criteria for human embryo transfer: a comparison of pyruvate uptake and morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10:2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, HJ, Hooper, MA, Edwards, RG, Ashwood-Smith, MJ. Uptake of pyruvate by early human embryos determined by a non-invasive technique. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:181–2.Google Scholar
Leary, C, Sturmey, RG. Metabolic profile of in vitro derived human embryos is not affected by the mode of fertilization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2020;26:277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrick, L, Lee, YSL, Gardner, DK. Reducing time to pregnancy and facilitating the birth of healthy children through functional analysis of embryo physiology. Biol Reprod. 2019;101:1124–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalas, C, Seli, E, Scott, RT, Jr. Key metrics and processes for validating embryo diagnostics. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Lane, M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:377–85.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK. Non-invasive metabolic assessment of single cells. Methods Mol Med. 2007;132:19.Google Scholar
Choi, BI, Harvey, AJ, Green, MP. Bisphenol A affects early bovine embryo development and metabolism that is negated by an oestrogen receptor inhibitor. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerif, F, McKeegan, P, Leese, HJ, Sturmey, RG. A simple approach for COnsumption and RElease (CORE) analysis of metabolic activity in single mammalian embryos. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thouas, GA, Potter, DL, Gardner, DK. Microfluidic devices for the analysis of gamete and embryo physiology. In: Gardner, DK, Sakkas, D, Seli, E, Wells, D, editors. Human gametes and preimplantation embryos: assessment and diagnosis. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 281–99.Google Scholar
Urbanski, JP, Johnson, MT, Craig, DD, Potter, DL, Gardner, DK, Thorsen, T. Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos. Anal Chem. 2008;80:6500–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Reineck, P, Gibson, BC, Thompson, JG. Microfluidics and microanalytics to facilitate quantitative assessment of human embryo physiology. In: Agarwal, A, Varghese, A, Nagy, ZP, editors. Practical manual of in vitro fertilization: advanced methods and novel devices. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2019. p. 557–66.Google Scholar
Seli, E, Sakkas, D, Scott, R, Kwok, SC, Rosendahl, SM, Burns, DH. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1350–7.Google Scholar
Seli, E, Bruce, C, Botros, L, Henson, M, Roos, P, Judge, K, et al. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of day 5 morphology grading and metabolomic Viability Score on predicting implantation outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:137–44.Google Scholar
Hardarson, T, Ahlstrom, A, Rogberg, L, Botros, L, Hillensjo, T, Westlander, G, et al. Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:8996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krisher, RL, Heuberger, AL, Paczkowski, M, Stevens, J, Pospisil, C, Prather, RS, et al. Applying metabolomic analyses to the practice of embryology: physiology, development and assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27:602–20.Google Scholar
Cinco, R, Digman, MA, Gratton, E, Luderer, U. Spatial characterization of bioenergetics and metabolism of primordial to preovulatory follicles in whole ex vivo murine ovary. Biol Reprod. 2016;95:129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidler, EA, Sanchez, T, Venturas, M, Sakkas, D, Needleman, DJ. Non-invasive imaging of mouse embryo metabolism in response to induced hypoxia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:1797–805.Google Scholar
Gosnell, ME, Anwer, AG, Mahbub, SB, Menon Perinchery, S, Inglis, DW, Adhikary, PP, et al. Quantitative non-invasive cell characterisation and discrimination based on multispectral autofluorescence features. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23453.Google Scholar
Sutton-McDowall, ML, Gosnell, M, Anwer, AG, White, M, Purdey, M, Abell, AD, et al. Hyperspectral microscopy can detect metabolic heterogeneity within bovine post-compaction embryos incubated under two oxygen concentrations (7% versus 20%). Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2016–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, HJ. Quiet please, do not disturb: a hypothesis of embryo metabolism and viability. Bioessays. 2002;24:845–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leese, HJ, Guerif, F, Allgar, V, Brison, DR, Lundin, K, Sturmey, RG. Biological optimization, the Goldilocks principle, and how much is lagom in the preimplantation embryo. Mol Reprod Dev. 2016;83:748–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×