Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:36:22.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

12 - It's Okay to Be Square If You're a Flexagon

from III - Flexagons and Catalan Numbers

Ethan J. Berkove
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Jeffrey P. Dumont
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Michael Henle
Affiliation:
Oberlin College
Brian Hopkins
Affiliation:
Saint Peter's University
Get access

Summary

It has been said that a mathematician can be content with only paper and pencil. In fact, there are times when one doesn't even need the pencil. From a simple strip of paper it is possible to make a surprisingly interesting geometric object, a flexagon. The flexagon can credit its creation to the difference in size between English-ruled paper and American binders. The father of the flexagon, Arthur Stone, was an English graduate student studying at Princeton University in 1939. To accommodate his smaller binder, Stone removed strips of paper from his notebook sheet. Not being wasteful, he creased these lengths of paper into strips of equilateral triangles, folded them in a certain way, and taped their ends. Stone noticed that it was possible to flex the resulting figure so that different faces were brought into view—and the flexagon was born [1]. Stone and his colleagues, Richard Feynman, Bryant Tucker, and John Tukey, spent considerable time cataloging flexagons but never published their work.

Like many geometric objects, flexagons can be appreciated on many levels of mathematical sophistication (the first author remembers folding flexagons in elementary school). With so adaptable a form, it is not surprising that flexagons have been studied from points of view that vary from art to algebra. Our interest in flexagons was sparked by a question posed in a paper by Hilton, Pedersen, and Walser [9]. They studied one of the hexaflexagons, so-named because the finished model has the shape of a hexagon.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Mathematical Association of America
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×