Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T02:04:20.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

21 - Leibniz's Calculus (Real Retro Calc.)

Robert Rogers
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Fredonia
Dick Jardine
Affiliation:
Keene State College
Amy Shell-Gellasch
Affiliation:
Beloit College
Get access

Summary

Introduction

To many students, differential calculus seems like a set of rules to be applied for solving problems such as optimization problems, tangent problems, etc. This really should not be surprising as differential calculus literally is a set of rules for calculating differences. These rules first appeared in Leibniz's 1684 paper Nova methodus pro maximus et minimus, itemque tangentibus, quae nec fractus nec irrationals, quantitates moratur, et singulare pro illi calculi genus (A New Method for Maxima and Minima as Well as Tangents, Which is Impeded Neither by Fractional Nor by Irrational Quantities, and a Remarkable Type of Calculus for This). A translation of this appears in [5, p. 272–80]. As the title suggests, our students' perceptions are not far off. Indeed, Leibniz's differential calculus is very recognizable to modern students and illustrates the fact that this is really a collection of rules and techniques to compute and utilize (infinitesimal) differences. The fact that Leibniz's notation is so modern in appearance, or rather our notation is that of Leibniz, allows these rules to be presented in a typical calculus class. The author has typically done this while covering the differentials section of the course, as the rules are rules for differentials, not derivatives. Doing this reinforces the rules for computing derivatives and introduces the student to the manipulation of differentials that will be necessary in integration.

A bolder approach, which the author has employed, is to replace the typical “limit of difference quotient” derivations with these heuristic arguments and adopt the point of view that is a ratio of infinitesimals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mathematical Time Capsules
Historical Modules for the Mathematics Classroom
, pp. 159 - 168
Publisher: Mathematical Association of America
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×