Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T05:45:45.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Reflections on Dialectical Logic in the Mid-1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John Abromeit
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo State
Get access

Summary

Eine Bestimmung der philosophischen Begriffe ist immer zugleich eine Darstellung der menschlichen Gesellschaft in ihrer geschichtlich gegebenen Verfassung.

Max Horkheimer (1938)

In a letter to Erich Fromm on July 20, 1934, Horkheimer mentioned that he was beginning work on a project on dialectical logic. In another, more substantial letter to Fromm nine days later, he went into some detail about his preliminary work on the project. He outlined some of the central problems he planned to address, including the difference between idealist and materialist dialectics, the role of psychology in a critical theory of history, and his critique of the abstract ego of consciousness philosophy. This attempt by Horkheimer to develop a materialist, or dialectical, logic appropriate to current historical conditions remained central to his concerns throughout the 1930s. This project on dialectical logic represented a continuation of his reflections on materialism in the early 1930s; dialectical logic became the most general philosophical concept that linked together and guided Horkheimer’s essays in the 1930s. In fact, in a letter to friend in September 1938, Horkheimer stated clearly that he viewed the essays that he had published until then in the Zeitschrift as “in truth merely preliminary studies for a larger work on a critical theory of the social sciences.” From other letters that Horkheimer sent to friends at this time, it is clear that the work in question here was the “long-planned work on dialectics” that he had intended to write at least since 1934. In September 1938, Horkheimer was traveling through North America, looking for new place to live where he could work on the project uninterrupted. He was frustrated that his activities at the Institute had prevented him from devoting his full attention to it. He had also just received news of the seriousness of the Institute’s financial crisis, which provided further impetus to scale back on Institute activities and turn his attention to the project on dialectical logic. In a letter to a friend from September 1938, Horkheimer wrote, “The necessity to find a less expensive place to live has moved us to look for a small house with a garden in the vicinity of New York. There I will finally find the necessary peace and quiet to realize my long-standing plans for a book. Mr. Marcuse should, if possible, move nearby and provide substantial help.” Horkheimer had been discussing the project from the beginning with Marcuse, as one of his letters to Fromm in July 1934 makes clear; but by 1938, his relationship with Theodor Adorno had improved considerably, such that he was also considering Adorno as a possible collaborator on the project. In a letter to Adorno in September 1938, Horkheimer told him that “my thoughts are revolving around our [work on] dialectics.” The context of the remark leaves no doubt that Horkheimer was referring to the project and alluding to the possibility of Adorno becoming his collaborator. In the end, Horkheimer chose neither a house near New York nor Marcuse as his assistant, but rather a house in Los Angeles and Adorno as his coauthor of what would eventually become Dialectic of Enlightenment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2005
Abromeit, JohnLeft Heideggerianism or Phenomenological Marxism? Reconsidering Herbert Marcuse’s Critical Theory of TechnologyConstellations 17 2010 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noerr, Gunzelin SchmidMax Horkheimer Heute: Werk und WirkungFrankfurt 1986Google Scholar
Phenomenology of SpiritMiller, A.V.Oxford, New York, Toronto and Melbourne 1977Google Scholar
1961
1970
2005
Bundschuh, Stephan“Und weil der Mensch ein Mensch ist…” Anthropologische Aspekte der Sozialphilosophie Herbert MarcusesLüneberg 1998Google Scholar
Marcuse, HerbertTheory and Politics: A DiscussionTelos 1978 128Google Scholar
Schmidt, AlfredKritische Theorie, Humanismus, AufklärungStuttgart 1981Google Scholar
1993
Asbach, OlafKritische Gesellschaftstheorie und Historische Praxis: Entwicklung der Kritischen Theorie bei Max Horkheimer 1930–1942/43Frankfurt and New YorkPeter Lang 1997Google Scholar
Jay, MartinMarxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to HabermasBerkeley and Los Angeles 1984Google Scholar
1956
Demirovic, AlexModelle Kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie: Traditionen und Perspektiven der Kritischen TheorieStuttgart 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küsters, Gerd-WalterDer Kritikbegriff der Kritischen Theorie Max Horkheimers: Historisch-Systematische Untersuchung zur TheoriegeschichteFrankfurt and New York 1980Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×