Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T07:19:53.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Microclimates of Different Vegetated Environments

from Part I - Controls of Microclimate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Roger G. Barry
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Peter D. Blanken
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we consider the primary characteristics of microclimates in different environmental settings. We examine in turn the landscapes of arctic and alpine tundra, grassland, farmland, wetlands, and forests. Small-scale atmospheric and edaphic processes that operate in the surface boundary layer are determined by these local environments, giving rise to contrasts in the radiation balance, temperature, humidity, and wind among the different surfaces and with height above and below the ground surface. It is these microclimates that provide the environmental controls for plants, insects, and other animals inhabiting that region (Monteith, 1976; Jones, 1992). Where appropriate data are available, we will include ecological information.

Tundra

Tundra is a term that originated in northern Finland, where it referred to treeless plateaus. Subsequently it has been extended to designate the land between the northern boundary of the boreal forest and high Arctic ice caps. It is also found on sub-Antarctic islands and in high alpine environments (Wielgolaski, 1997).

Tundra accounts for about 8 percent of the Earth's land surface. Microclimates are responsible for much of the diversity of the tundra environment. Low Sun angles mean that there is a great variety of local exposure to solar radiation. At the regional scale, the presence of a snow cover for nine months of the year has a major impact on the absorbed solar radiation.

Arctic Tundra

Lewis and Callaghan (1976) note that tundra embraces many different vegetation types ranging from dense willow scrub, through scrub heath and wet meadow, to sparse lichen and moss cushions. They selected wet meadow and dry fell field as extremes that were extensively studied during the International Biological Programme (IBP), 1964–1974. Peak LAI reaches unity in the meadow with a maximum canopy height of 20 cm. The full canopy develops within a few weeks of snowmelt. As little as 11 percent of solar insolation and 2–6 percent of PAR penetrate the full canopy. Dead leaves form an increasing portion of the canopy after midseason.

At fell field sites the LAI of higher plants is only about 0.1 m2 m−2. The canopy is discontinuous with large areas of bare ground. Wind is a major factor in fell field sites where the winter snow cover is discontinuous.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addison, P. A., and Bliss, L. C. 1980. Summer climate, microclimate, and energy budget of a polar semidesert on Kimg Christian Island, N.W.T., Canada. Arct. Alp. Res. 12, 161–70.Google Scholar
Baker, I. T. et al. 2013. Surface ecophysiological behavior across vegetation and moisture gradients in tropical South America. Agric. Forest Met. 182–3, 177–88.Google Scholar
Bauer, N., and Kenyeres, Z. 2007. Seasonal changes of microclimatic conditions in grasslands and its influence on orthopteran assemblages. Biologia 62, 742–8.Google Scholar
Bennie, J., Huntley, B., Wiltshire, A., Hill, M.O. and Baxter, R. 2008. Slope, aspect and climate: Spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecol. Modelling 216, 47–59.
Betts, A. K., and Ball, J. H. 1998. FIFE surface climate and site-average dataset: 1987–1989. J. Atmos Sci 55, 1091–1108.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D. 2014. The effect of winter drought on evaporation from a high-elevation wetland. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119. doi:10.1002/2014JG002648.Google Scholar
Blanken, P.D., Black, T.A., Yang, P.C., Neumann, H.H., Nesic, Z., Staebler, R. & den Hartog, G. (2001) The seasonal energy and water exchange above and within a boreal aspen forest. Journal of Hydrology, 245 (1-4), 118-136.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D et al. 2000. Eddy covariance measurements of evaporation from Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada. Water Resour. Res. 35, 1069–77.Google Scholar
Blanken, P.D. and Rouse, W.R. 1995. Modelling evaporation from a high subarctic willow-birch forest. Int. J. Climatol., 15, 97-106.
Blanken, P.D. and Rouese, W.R. 1996, Evidence of water conservation mechanisms in several subarctic wetland species. J. Appl. Ecol, 34, 842-50.
Blanken, P.D., Rouse, W.R., and Schertzer, W.M. (2003) Enhancement of evaporation from a large northern lake by the entrainment of warm, dry air. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 4(4), 680–93.Google Scholar
Blanken, P.D., Williams, M.W., Burns, S.P., Monson, R.K., Knowles, J., Chowanski, K, and Ackerman, T. 2009 A comparison of water and carbon dioxide exchange at a windy alpine tundra and subalpine forest site near Niwot Ridge, Colorado. Biogeochemistry, 95(1), 61–76.
Broadbent, L. 1950. The microclimate of the potato crop. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 76, 439–54.Google Scholar
Brown, K-W. 1976. Vegetation and the atmosphere.New York, Academic Press.
Brown, K. W., and Rosenberg, N,J. 1971. Energy and CO2 balance of an irrigated sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) field in the Great Plains. Agron. J. 63, 207–13.Google Scholar
Bruelheide, H., and Jandt, U. 2007. The relationship between dry grassland vegetation and microclimate along a west-east gradient in central Germany. Hercynia N.F. 40, 153–76.Google Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. 1990. Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion: A state of knowledge review. International Hydrological Programme. Paris: UNESCO.
Burrows, F. J. 1969. The diffusive conductivity of sugar beet and potato leaves. Agric. Met. 6, 211–26.Google Scholar
Caborn, J. M. 1957. Shelterbelts and microclimate. Forestry Commission, Bulletin No. 29. Edinburgh: HMSO.
Canham, C. D. et al. 1990. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical rainforest. Canad. J. Forest Res. 20, 620–31.Google Scholar
Chen, J.M., Blanken, P.D., Black, T.A., Guilbeault, M. & Chen, S. (1997) Radiation regime and canopy architecture in a boreal aspen forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 86 (1-2), 107-25.
Chen, J., Franklin, J. F., and Spies, T. A. 1993. Contrasting microclimates among clearcut, edge, and interior of old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Agric. Forest Met. 63, 219–37.Google Scholar
Crowther, T. W. et al. 2015. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature14967.Google Scholar
de Rocha, H. R. et al. 2009. Patterns of water and heat flux across a biome gradient from tropical forest to savanna in Brazil. J. Geophys. Res. 114, G00B12. doi:10.1029/2007JG000640.Google Scholar
Denmead, O.,T. 1969. Comparative micrometeorology of a wheat field and a forest of Pinus radiata. Agric. Met. 6, 357–72,Google Scholar
Denmead, O.T. 1976. Temperate cereals’, in Monteitg, J.L. (ed.), Vegetation and the atmosphere, Vol. 2. Case studies. London;Academic Press. pp. 1- 31.
Desjardins, R. L. et al. 1994. Airborne flux measurements of CO2 and H2O over the Hudson Bay lowland. J. Geophys. Res., Atmos. 99(D1), 1551–62.Google Scholar
Dymov, A. A., Zhangurov, E. V., and Starcev, V. V. 2013. Microclimatic characteristics of subpolar Ural Soils (National Park Yugyd va). International conference “Earth Cryology: XXI Century” (September 29–October 3, 2013, Pushchino, Moscow region, Russia). The Program and Conference Materials, pp. 78–79
Fetcher, N., Oberbauer, S. F., and Strain, B. R. 1985. Vegetation effects on microclimate in lowland tropical forest in Costa Rica. Int. J. Biomet. 29, 145–55.Google Scholar
Fritschen, L. J. 1966. Evapotranspiration rates of field crops determined by the Bowen ratio method. Agron. J. 58, 339–42.Google Scholar
Fraver, S. 1994. Vegetation responses along edge-to-interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke river basin, North Carolina. Conserv. Biol. 8, 822–32.Google Scholar
Fritz, S. et al. 2015. Mapping global cropland and field size. Global Change Biol. 21(1), 1980–92.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B.A., and Quine, C.P. 2000. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage – a review with particular reference to the effects of strog winds. Forest Ecology and Management, 135, (1-3), 261–277.Google Scholar
Gay, L. W., Vogt, R., and Kessler, A. 1996. The May-October energy budget of a Scots Pine plantation at Hartheim, Germany. Theoret. Appl. Clim. 53, 79–94.Google Scholar
Gonçalves de Gonçalves, L. G. et al., 2013. Overview of the Large-Scale Biosphere–Atmosphere Experiment In Amazonia Data Model Intercomparison Project (LBA-DMIP). Agric. Forest Met. 182–3, 111–27.Google Scholar
Grulois, J. 1968. La variation annuelle du coefficient d'albedo des surfaces superieures du peuplement. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique 101, 141–53.Google Scholar
Ham, J. M., Heilman, J. L., and Lascano, R. J. 1991. Soil and canopy energy balances of a row crop at partial cover. Agron. J. 83, 744–53.Google Scholar
Horton, R. et al. 1996. Crop residue effects on surface radiation and energy balance – review. Theoret. Appl. Clim. 54, 27–37.Google Scholar
HYDE. 2010. History Database of the Global Environment. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. http://themasites.pbl.nl/tridion/en/themasites/hyde/index.html
Jarvis, P. G., James, G. B., and Landsberg, J. J. 1976. Coniferous forest. In Monteith, J. L. (ed.), Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol. 2. Case studies. London: Academic Press: pp. 171–240.
Jones, H. G. 1992. Plants and microclimate. A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kanemasu, E. T., and Arkin, G. F. 1974. Radiant energy and light environment of crops. Agric. Met. 14, 211–25.Google Scholar
Kasurinen, V., et al. 2014. Latent heat exchange in the boreal and arctic biomes. Global Change Biol. 20(11), 3439–56. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12640.Google Scholar
Kinerson, R. S. 1973. Fluxes of visible and net radiation within a forest canopy. J. appl. Ecol. 10, 657–60.Google Scholar
Knowles, J.F., Blanken, P.D., Williams, M.W., and Chowanski, K.M. (2012) Energy and surface moisture seasonally limit evaporation and sublimation from snow-free alpine tundra. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 157, 106-115, doi:10.1016/j.agformet.2012.01.017.
Lafleur, P. 1990. Evaporation from wetlands. Canad. Geogr., 34, 79-82.
Lee, R. 1978. Forest microclimatology.New York: Columbia University Press.
Lewis, M.C. and Callaghan, T.V. 1976. Tundra vegetation and the atmosphere, 2, London Academic Press. pp. 399-433.
Lopushinsky, W. 1969. Stomatal closure in conifer seedlings in response to leaf moisture stress. Bot.Gaz. 130, 258–63.Google Scholar
Ludlow, M.M. and Jarvis, P.G. 1971. Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). I. General characteristics. J. Appl. Ecol., 8, 925-53.
Malhi, Y. et al. 2002. Energy and water dynamics of a central Amazonian rain forest, J. Geophys. Res. 107(D20), 8061.Google Scholar
McCaughey, J. H. 1981. Impact of clearcutting of coniferous forest on the surface radiation balance. J. Appl.Ecol. 18, 815–26.Google Scholar
McCaughey, J. H. et al. 1997. Forest environments. In Bailey, W. G., Oke, T. R., and Rouse, W. R. (eds.), The surface climates of Canada.Montreal: McGill University Press. pp. 247–76.
McGuire, A.D. et al. 2009. Sensivity of the carbon cycle ib the Arctic tundra to climate change. Col. Monogr., 79, 523-55.
Misson, L. et al. 2007. Partitioning forest carbon fluxes with overstory and understory eddy-covariance measurements: A synthesis based on FLUXNET data. Agric. For. Met. 144, 14–31.Google Scholar
Mølgaard, P. 1982. Temperature observations in High Arctic plants in relation to microclimate in the vegetation of Peary Land, north Greenland. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 14, 105–15.Google Scholar
Monteith, J,.L. (ed.) 1976. Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol. 2. Case studies. London: Academic Press.
Mukammal, E. I. 1971. Some aspects of radiant energy in a pine forest. Arch. Met. Geophys. Bioklim. B19, 29–52.Google Scholar
Nielson, R. E., and Jarvis, P. G. 1975. Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). VI. Response of stomata to temperature. J. appl. Ecol. 12, 879–92.Google Scholar
Norman, J. M., and Jarvis, P. G. 1974. Photosyntesis in Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr). III. Measurements of canopy structure and interception of radiation. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 375–98.Google Scholar
Oliver, H. R. 1971. Wind profiles in and above a forest canopy. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 548–53.Google Scholar
Patten, M.A. and Smith-Patten, B.D. 2012. Testing the microclimate hypothesis: Light environment and population trends of Neotropical birds. Biol. Conserv., 155, 85–93.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. 1980. The microclimate of a dry tropical forest. Agric. Met. 22, 249–65Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N. et al. 2008, Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1003Google Scholar
Rauner, Ju.L. 1976. Deciduous forest. In Monteith, J. L. (ed.), Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol.2: Case studies. London: Academic Press: pp. 241–64.
Raynor, G. S. 1971. Wind and temperature structure in a coniferous forest and a contiguous field. Forest Sci. 17, 351–63.Google Scholar
Ripley, E. A. 1972. Man, Matador and meteorology. Atmosphere 10, 113–27.Google Scholar
Ripley, E. A., and Redmarsh, R. E. 1976. Grassland. In Monteith, J. L. (ed.), Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol.2. Case studies. London: Academic Press: pp. 349–98.
Ripley, E. A., Wang, R-Zh., and Zhu, T-Ch. 1996. The importance of microclimate in grassland ecosystems. J. Northeast Normal Univ., Natural Sci. 2,117–37.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. D. et al. 2010. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem title. Phil.Trans. Roy. Soc., B. 365(1555), 3227–46.Google Scholar
Roulet, N. T., Munro, D. S., and Mortsch, L. 1997. Wetlands. In Bailey, W. G., Oke, T. R., and Rouse, W. R. (eds.), The surface climates of Canada.Montreal: McGill UniversityPress. pp. 149–71.
Rouse, W. R. 1984a. Microclimate of Arctic tree line. 1. Radiation balance of tundra and forest. Water Resour. Res. 20, 57–66.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. R. 1984b. Microclimate of Arctic tree line. 2. Soil microclimate of tundra and forest. Water Resour. Res. 20, 67–73.Google Scholar
Rutter, A. J. 1967. Evaporation in forests. Endeavour, 26, 39–43.
Seyednasrollah, B., and Kumar, M. 2014. Net radiation in a snow-covered discontinuous forest gap for a range of gap sizes and topographic configuration. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119. doi:10.1002/2014JD021809.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. H. 1977. Secondary wind speed maxima inside plant canopies. J. Appl. Met. 16, 514–21.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, J. W. 1988. Evaporaion from Amazonian rainforest. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. London 233, 321–46.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, J. W., and Wallace, J. S. 1985. Evaporation from sparse crops – an energy combination theory. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 111, 839–55.Google Scholar
Siebert, S. et al. 2015. A global dataset of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 1521–45.Google Scholar
The World Bank. 2015. Forest area. Washington, DV. www.data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS.
Uchijima, J. 1976. Maize and rice. In Monteith, J,.L. (ed.), Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol. 2. Case studies. London: Academic Press, pp. 30–62.
Van Cleve, K. et al. 1983. Taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska. Biosci. 33, 39–44.Google Scholar
Vourlitis, G. L. et al. 2015. Variations in evapotranspiration and climate for an Amazonian semi-deciduous forest over seasonal, annual, and El Niño cycle. Int. J. Biomet. 59, 217–30.Google Scholar
Weller, G., and Holmgren, B. 1974. The microclimates of the Arctic tundra. J. Appl. Met. 13, 854–62.Google Scholar
Wessel, D. A., and Rouse, W. R. 1994. Modelling evaporation from wetland tundra. Bound.-Layer Met. 68, 109–30.Google Scholar
Wever, L. A., Flanagan, L. B., and Carlson, P. J. 2002. Seasonal and interannual variation in evapotranspiration, energy balance and surface conductance in a northern temperate grassland. Agric. Forest Met. 112, 31–49Google Scholar
Whiting, G.J. and Chanton, I. 1993. Rimary Primary production control of metrhane emission from wetlands. Nature 3445 794-95.
Whitman, W.C. 1969. Microclimate and its importance in grassland ecosystems. In Dix, R. L and Beidleman, R. G. (eds.), The grassland ecostem: a preliminary synthesis. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Range Science Department. pp. 40–64.
Wielgolaski, F. E. (ed.) 1997, Polar and alpine tundra.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Worrall, F. et al. 2015. A 19-year long energy budget of an upland peat bog, northern England. J. Hydrol. 520, 17–29.Google Scholar
Zhang, T-T. et al. 2014. Land-atmospheric water and energy cycle of winter wheat, Loess Plateau, China. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 3044–53. doi:10.1002/joc.3891.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×