Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Biodiversity discovery and its importance to conservation
- 2 Gene flow, biodiversity, and genetically modified crops: Weedy rice in Thailand
- 3 A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology and management
- 4 Vertebrate sex-determining genes and their potential utility in conservation, with particular emphasis on fishes
- 5 Historical and contemporary dynamics of adaptive differentiation in European oaks
- 6 Association genetics, population genomics, and conservation: Revealing the genes underlying adaptation in natural populations of plants and animals
- 7 Hybridization in threatened and endangered animal taxa: Implications for conservation and management of biodiversity
- 8 Pollen and seed movement in disturbed tropical landscapes
- 9 Implications of landscape alteration for the conservation of genetic diversity of endangered species
- 10 Integrating evolutionary considerations into recovery planning for Pacific salmon
- 11 Using molecular methods to improve the genetic management of captive breeding programs for threatened species
- 12 Wildlife reintroductions: The conceptual development and application of theory
- 13 Evolutionary toxicology
- Index
- Plates
- References
2 - Gene flow, biodiversity, and genetically modified crops: Weedy rice in Thailand
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Biodiversity discovery and its importance to conservation
- 2 Gene flow, biodiversity, and genetically modified crops: Weedy rice in Thailand
- 3 A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology and management
- 4 Vertebrate sex-determining genes and their potential utility in conservation, with particular emphasis on fishes
- 5 Historical and contemporary dynamics of adaptive differentiation in European oaks
- 6 Association genetics, population genomics, and conservation: Revealing the genes underlying adaptation in natural populations of plants and animals
- 7 Hybridization in threatened and endangered animal taxa: Implications for conservation and management of biodiversity
- 8 Pollen and seed movement in disturbed tropical landscapes
- 9 Implications of landscape alteration for the conservation of genetic diversity of endangered species
- 10 Integrating evolutionary considerations into recovery planning for Pacific salmon
- 11 Using molecular methods to improve the genetic management of captive breeding programs for threatened species
- 12 Wildlife reintroductions: The conceptual development and application of theory
- 13 Evolutionary toxicology
- Index
- Plates
- References
Summary
The domestication of plants and animals and the development of agriculture some 10,000 years ago has led to profound changes in the environment and to biodiversity (Diamond 1997; Smith 1998). As natural communities were replaced by pastures and fields, native species were displaced or their habitats fragmented (Heywood 1995; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). The extirpation of native species began with the earliest agricultural communities in the Middle East and Asia and continues today. Every major advance in agriculture, from the development of new crops to mechanized farming, has environmental consequence. The most recent change in agricultural practice is the planting of genetically modified (GM) crops. First developed and legalized in the 1990s, today the majority of crops in the United States are GM, with approximately 90% of the U.S. soybean crop GM for herbicide tolerance (U.S. Department of Agriculture 2008).
GM crops are varieties that have been transformed by using a biological or physical method to insert specific genes into a genome (Chrispeels & Sadava 2003). The inserted genes, transgenes, can come from another species or from the same species. In contrast, most varieties of nontransgenic crops are produced by traditional and modern methods of crop improvement and selective breeding (Chrispeels & Sadava 2003). Other descriptions for such GM crops are recombinant or genetically engineered crops. The specific methods of genetic manipulation used to produce a GM crop are not thought to have any serious consequences (National Research Council 2002), but rather the consideration of most concern is the specific nature of the introduced transgene. Because the method of crop improvement has little effect, some researchers have argued that the distinction between GM crops and non-GM crops is artificial; crops produced by traditional means of plant breeding are also GM (Federoff & Brown 2004). This point is important: The issues and concerns that have been raised about recently developed GM crops are also of concern regarding traditional crop varieties.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, , et al. (2006) Fitness of hybrids between rapeseed (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica rapa in natural habitats. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1175–1184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecology Letters, 9, 196–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006) Hybrid Fitness and the Potential for Gene Flow Between Cultivated Rice, Oryza sativa and its Wild Relative, Oryza rufipogon. Ph.D Dissertation, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
, , (2007) Landscape gene flow, coexistence and threshold effect: the case of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Ecological Modeling, 205, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (2006) Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of GM crops. New Phytologist, 170, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (2003) Plants, Genes, and Crop Biotechnology. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
(2007) Implications of gene flow in the scale-up and commercial use of biotechnology-derived crops: economic and policy considerations. Issue Paper, 37, 1–24.Google Scholar
(1987) Concluding remarks. Regulatory Considerations: Genetically-Engineered Plants. Center for Science Information, San Francisco.Google Scholar
(2003) Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
, (2004) Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist's View of Genetically Modified Foods. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(2003) A framework for assessing the risk of transgenic crops. BioScience, 53, 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , (2003) Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1879–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , (2008) Potential hybridization of flax with weedy and wild relatives: an avenue for movement of engineered genes. Crop Science, 48, 825–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2008) Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Science, 56, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conservation Biology, 10, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (2007) Origins and population genetics of weedy rice in the United States. Molecular Ecology, 16, 4522–4535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , (2006) Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice Oryza sativa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 9578–9583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2007) Weedy Rice: Problem and Control. Department of Agriculture, Thailand Research Fund and Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
, , (2004) Invasion of weedy rice in rice fields in Thailand: problems and management. International Rice Research Notes, 29, 20–22.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2007) Gene flow and genetic structure in the wild-weedy-domesticated complex of Phaseolus lunatus L. in its Mesoamerican center of domestication and diversity. Crop Science, 47, 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19885–19890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, (2002) Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Research, 11, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002) Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2009) Seed-mediated gene flow in wheat: seed bank longevity in western Canada. Weed Science, 57, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Thailand Agriculture Year Book 2550. OAE, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2008) Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 13456–13461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, (2004) Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2004) A protocol for evaluating the ecological risks associated with gene flow from transgenic crops into their wild relatives: the case of cultivated sunflower and wild Helianthus annuus. In: Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives (eds. , , ), pp. 219–233. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Segregation in F2 Generation of Crosses between Common Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) and Cultivated Rice (O. sativa L.). MSc Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
(2006) Characterization of Common Wild Rice Populations from Main Rice Growing Regions of Thailand. MSc Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
, (1995) Assessing weediness of transgenic crops: industry plays plant ecologist. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 340–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004) Interspecific Hybridization between Cultivated Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Wild Rice (O. rufipogon). MSc Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
(2002) Transgenic crops – why gene flow matters. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecological Applications, 13, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Changes in Flood-Prone Rice Ecosystems in Thailand, Crop Year 2000–2001. Department of Agriculture. Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
2008. Weedy Rice Contamination in Farmers’ Seed. MSc Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2008) The potential for crop-to-wild gene flow in sorghum in Ethiopia and Niger: a geographic survey. Crop Science, 48, 1425–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Available at .
, , et al. (2008) Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1387–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2004) Evidence for landscape level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bent-grass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 14533–14538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2003) Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom. Science, 302, 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Evaluation of Exotic Genes Contamination from Crop Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Common Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) Populations. MSc Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
, , et al. (1996) Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiology, 110, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , (2003) Outcrossing frequency and genetic analysis of hybrids between transgenic glufosinate herbicide resistant rice and the weed, red rice. Euphytica, 130, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by