Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T13:59:52.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Madvocacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Steven P. Lee
Affiliation:
Hobart and William Smith Colleges, New York
Get access

Summary

The missiles have only to exist, and deterrence is the law of their existence.

Leon Wieseltier

We do not need to threaten anything. Their being there is quite enough.

Bernard Brodie

Counterforce strategy does not provide a satisfactory form of nuclear deterrence. Not only is it doubtful that it could solve the credibility problem, but even if it could, it would at the same time weaken nuclear deterrence in the respect in which it is superior to conventional deterrence, and so have little or no net deterrent value in comparison with other forms of nuclear deterrence. As a result, counterforce strategy cannot serve as a basis for a successful rebuttal to the prima facie argument. The superiority of nuclear deterrence over conventional deterrence lies in the reassurance against attack provided to the opponent and the crystal ball effect, both of which are a function of the belief each side has in the fact of mutual vulnerability. This chapter considers countervalue strategy, the approach to deterrence that fully acknowledges the novel implications of mutual vulnerability.

Countervalue strategy, unlike counterforce strategy, embraces the condition of mutual vulnerability or mutual assured destruction. The argument is that mutual vulnerability is the basis for such a strong form of deterrence that the failure of nuclear deterrence to solve the credibility problem is not a bar to its being highly effective. This is the other rebuttal to the prima facie argument that nuclear deterrence is not prudentially preferable to conventional deterrence. Because the rebuttal offered by the counterforce strategists fails, the success of prudential revisionism depends on the failure of the rebuttal offered by countervalue strategists, or madvocates, as they are called.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Madvocacy
  • Steven P. Lee, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, New York
  • Book: Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624650.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Madvocacy
  • Steven P. Lee, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, New York
  • Book: Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624650.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Madvocacy
  • Steven P. Lee, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, New York
  • Book: Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624650.008
Available formats
×