Book contents
- Nanotechnology and Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction to Nanotechnology and Participation of Developing Countries
- Part II Winning and Losing in Nanotech: Case Studies from Developed Countries
- Part III Placing Bets on Nanotech: Case Studies of Emerging Countries
- CHAPTER 5 Sure Bet or Mirage?
- CHAPTER 6 Dancing with the Scientists or How NST Emerged in Brazil
- CHAPTER 7 NST without NII?
- CHAPTER 8 On India’s Plunge into Nanotechnology
- Part IV Conclusions
- Contributors
- Index
- References
CHAPTER 7 - NST without NII?
The Mexican Case Study
from Part III - Placing Bets on Nanotech: Case Studies of Emerging Countries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Nanotechnology and Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction to Nanotechnology and Participation of Developing Countries
- Part II Winning and Losing in Nanotech: Case Studies from Developed Countries
- Part III Placing Bets on Nanotech: Case Studies of Emerging Countries
- CHAPTER 5 Sure Bet or Mirage?
- CHAPTER 6 Dancing with the Scientists or How NST Emerged in Brazil
- CHAPTER 7 NST without NII?
- CHAPTER 8 On India’s Plunge into Nanotechnology
- Part IV Conclusions
- Contributors
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Nanotechnology and DevelopmentWhat's in it for Emerging Countries?, pp. 176 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
CONACYT. 2004. Mixed Funds. CONACYT – Government of the State of Puebla. Call for projects 2004. Date of access: February 25, 2009. (URL: http://www.conacyt.mx/FONDOS/MIXTOS/Puebla/2004/Puebla_Convocatoria_2004.pdf).Google Scholar
Delgado Ramos, G.C. 2007. “Nanotecnología, paradigma tecnológico de vanguardia.” Contribuciones a la Economía, febrero 2007. Date of access: January 1, 2007. (URL: http://www.eumed.net/ce/).Google Scholar
Foladori, Guillermo and Zayago, E.. 2007. “Tracking nanotechnology in Mexico.” Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal, 4(2): 211–22. Date of access: October 8, 2007. (URL: http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans/documentos/Tracking-nano-in-MEXesp.pdf). (versión en español, consultada el 08/10/07).Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., Meyer, M., Du Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., Schlemmer, B., Debackere, K., and Veugelers, R.. 2003. “Nanotechnology: Analysis of an emerging of scientific and technological endeavour.” Steunpunt O&O Statistieken Report. (URL: www.steunpuntoos.be).Google Scholar
Huang, C., Notten, A., and Rasters, N.. 2008. “Nanotechnology publications and patents: A review of social science studies and search strategies.” Working Paper Series #2008-058, UNU-MERIT.Google Scholar
Hullmann, A. and Meyer, M.. 2003. “Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art.” Scientometrics, 58(3): 507–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, L. and Shapira, P.. 2008. “Developing nanotechnology in Latin America.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(2): 259–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Kostoff, R.N., Barth, R.B., and Lau, C.G.. 2008. “Relation of seminal nanotechnology document production to total nanotechnology document production – South Korea.” Scientometrics, 76(1): 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogoutov, A. and Kahane, B.. 2007. “Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking.” Research Policy, 36(6): 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, C. 2006. Evaluation comparative de logiciels d’analyse de données textuelles dans un contexte de veille appliquée aux nanotechnologies. Thèse Professionnelle, Ecole Supérieure des Ingénieurs en Electronique et Electrotechnique (ESIEE), Mastère Spécialisé, Innovation Technologique et Management de Projet, Paris.Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., and Rangnow R., R. 2003. ‘Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology.’ Report of project EC-PPN CT 2002-0001 to the European Commission.Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., and Schoeneck, D.J.. 2008. “Refining search terms for nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5): 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. K. R., Rip, A., and Mangematin, V.. 2007. “Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology.” Research Policy, 36(6): 871–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles-Belmont, E., Vinck, D., and Rabiela, R. Gortari. 2008. Desarrollo de las nanociencias en México: una visión a partir de las publicaciones científicas. Conference at NanoMex08, Mexico City, November.Google Scholar
Robles-Belmont, E. 2009. “Las redes científicas como respuesta a la emergencia de las nanociencias y nanotecnologías.” REDES, 15(29): 93–111.Google Scholar
Robles-Belmont, E. and Vinck, D.. 2011. “A panorama of nanoscience developments in Mexico based on the comparison and crossing of nanoscience monitoring methods.” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11(6): 5499–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed