Abi-Saab, Georges, “Fragmentation or Unification: Some Concluding Remarks” (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 4: 919–934.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, “The Rise of World Constitutionalism” (1997) 83 Virginia Law Review 4: 771-797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ager, Sheila L., “Treaties, Archaic and Classical Greece,” in Bagnall, Roger S. et al. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ancient History (1st ed.) (Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2013), 6837–6838.Google Scholar

Ago, Roberto, “The Concept of ‘International Community as a Whole’: A Guarantee to the Notion of State Crimes,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cassese, Antonio, and Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State – A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989), 252–253.Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo, “The Importance of Legal Criteria for Statehood: A Response to Jure Vidmar” (2013) EJIL: Talk!, at www.ejiltalk.org/the-importance-of-legal-criteria-for-statehood-a-response-to-jure-vidmar/Google Scholar

Akashi, Kinji, “Hobbes’ Relevance to the Modern Law of Nations” (2000) 2 Journal of the History of International Law: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, “The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law” (1976) 47 British Yearbook of International Law: 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Larry, “Law and Exclusionary Reasons” (1990) 18 Philosophical Topics 1: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: How Compulsory Is It?” (2006) 5 Chinese Journal of International Law 1: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert, “Hans Kelsens Begriff des Relativen Apriori,” in Alexy, Robert et al. (eds.), Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002), 179–202.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, “On the Concept and the Nature of Law” (2008) 21 Ratio Juris 3: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert, “Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights” (2012) 25 Ratio Juris 1: 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aljaghoub, Mahasen M., The Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice: 1946−2005 (Heidelberg: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar

Altman, Amnon, Tracing the Earliest Recorded Concepts of International Law – The Ancient Near East (2500–330 BCE) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E., International Organizations as Law-makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Anaya, S. James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik, “Introduction: From Fragmentation to Convergence in International Law,” in Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation – Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, , Rhetoric (translated by John Henry Freese) (London: William Heinemann and G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1926), Book I.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Politics (translated, with introduction and notes, by C. D. C. Reeve) (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (translated, with an interpretative essay, notes, and glossary by Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins) (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011), Book V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, David R., “Globalizing Jeremy Bentham” (2011) 32 History of Political Thought 1: 63–82.Google Scholar

Asamoah, Obed Y., The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (edited by Rumble, Wilfrid E.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ávila, Humberto, Certainty in Law (Basel: Springer, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, David A., Bhavnani, Ravi and Huth, Paul K. (eds.), Peace and Conflict 2017 (New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar

Baker, Alan, “The Dangers of UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016)” (2016), at http://jcpa.org/dangers-un-security-council-resolution-2334-2016/Google Scholar

Baker, Lynne Rudder, “The Ontology of Artifacts” (2004) 7 Philosophical Explorations 2: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Lynne Rudder, “The Metaphysics of Malfunction” (2009) 13 Techne 2: 82.Google Scholar

Baltzly, Dirk, “Stoicism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 ed.), at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/stoicism/Google Scholar

Banaś, Paweł, “The Philosophy of Legal Philosophy: An Introduction,” in Banaś, Paweł, Dyrda, Adam and Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz (eds.), Metaphilosophy of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), 1–8.Google Scholar

Barboza, Julio, “Legal Injury: The Tip of the Iceberg in the Law of State Responsibility,” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartha, Paul, “Analogy and Analogical Reasoning,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasoning-analogy/).Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard R., “International Law in ‘Her Infinite Variety’” (1980) 29 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 4: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, Michael, “Analysis,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 ed.), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/analysis/Google Scholar

Beaulac, Stéphane, The Power of Language in the Making of International Law – The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westpahila (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).Google Scholar

Beckett, Jason A., “The Hartian Tradition in International Law” (2008) The Journal Jurisprudence: 51–83.Google Scholar

Bederman, David J., International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bederman, David J., Custom as a Source of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, “Anarchical Fallacies,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2 (edited by Sir Bowring, John ) (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843), 483–534.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, A Fragment on Government (with an introduction by F.C. Montague) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1891).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1780/1789) (Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, “Customary International Law as a Judicial Tool for Promoting Efficiency,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Hirsh, Moshe (eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation – Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 85–116.Google Scholar

Berman, Franklin Sir, “The International Court of Justice as an ‘Agent’ of Legal Development,” in Tams, Christian J. and Sloan, James (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil” (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 3: 343–380.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Theorizing the Sources of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 164–185.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “International Judges as Dispute-Settlers and Law Enforcers: From International Law without Courts to International Courts without Law” (2011). 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 1: 33–52.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “International Legality – A Response to Hathaway & Shapiro” (2011), at http://opiniojuris.org/2011/11/15/international-legality-a-response-to-hathaway-shapiro/Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty, International Law and Democracy” (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 2: 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Sources of International Law – Introduction,” in Besson, Samantha and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, “Introduction,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–32.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, “Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 3: 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bix, Brian H., “Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory,” in Beltrán, Jordi Ferrer, Moreso, José Juan, and Papayannis, Diego M. (eds.), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bix, Brian, “Kelsen and Normativity Revisited,” at ssrn.com/abstract=2287870 (Published in Spanish, Bix, Brian H., “De Nuevo sobre Kelsen y la normatividad,” in Bernal, Carlos and Porciuncula, Marcelo (eds.), Kelsen para erizos. Ensayos en honor a Stanley L. Paulson (Bogota: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2017), 273–296).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bix, Brian, “The Nature of Legal Obligation,” in Himma, Kenneth Einar, Jovanović, Miodrag, and Spaić, Bojan (eds.), Unpacking Normativity: Conceptual, Normative, and Descriptive Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar, Das moderne Volkerrecht der civilisirten Staaten als Rechtsbuch dargestellt (Nordlingen: Druck und Verlag der C.H. Beck’schen Buckhandlung, 1872).Google Scholar

Bos, Maarten, “The Recognized Manifestations of International Law” (1977) 20 German Year Book of International Law, 9–76.Google Scholar

Bos, Maarten, “The Identification of Custom in International Law” (1982) 25 German Yearbook of International Law: 9–53.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, “Legal and Non-Legal Norms – A Meaningful Distinction in International Relations?” (1980) 11 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowcott, Owen, “Was the War Legal? Leading Lawyers Give Their Verdict” www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/mar/02/uk.internationaleducationnewsGoogle Scholar

Brake, Elizabeth, Minimizing Marriage – Marriage, Morality, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockmöller, Annette, Die Entstehung der Rechtstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert in Deutschland (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997).Google Scholar

Bross, Siegfried, “Reflections on the Execution of Constitutional Court Decisions in a Democratic State under the Rule of Law on the Basis of the Constitutional Law Situation in the Federal Republic of Germany” (2009), European Commission for Democracy through Law, CDL- JU(2009)001, at www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-JU(2009)001-eGoogle Scholar

Brown, Bartram S., “Human Rights, Sovereignty, and the Final Status of Kosovo” (2005) 80 Chicago-Kent Law Review 3: 235–272.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, “The Reality and Efficacy of International Law” (1981) 51 British Yearbook of International Law: 1–8.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, “International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations,” The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, “Reforming the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention,” in Holzgrefe, J. L. and Jeohane, Robert E. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention – Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 130–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, “The Legitimacy of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 79–96.Google Scholar

Buerganthal, Thomas, “Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad?” (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law 2: 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio, “An Antinomy in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law,” in Paulson, Stanley L. and Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski (eds.), Normativity and Norms – Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 297–315.Google Scholar

Burazin, Luka, “Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?” (2016) 29 Ratio Juris 3: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, Tony, Aristotle and Natural Law (London: Continuum International Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Bustamante, Thomas, “Revisiting Dworkin’s Philosophy of International Law: Could the Hedgehog Have Done It Any Other Way?” (2017) 30 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 2: 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, Daniel, Rectifying International Injustice – Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Çali, Bașak, “On Interpretivism and International Law” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 3: 805–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Çali, Başak, The Authority of International Law – Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trindade, Cançado, Judge, Antônio A., The Construction of a Humanized International Law: A Collection of Individual Opinions (1991–2013), Vol. 3 (Brill: Leiden, 2017).Google Scholar

Capps, Patrick, Human Dignity and the Foundations of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf, Hahn, Hans and Neurath, Otto (eds.) Logischer Empirismus – der Wiener Kreis. Ausgewählte Texte mit einer Einleitung (München: Fink, 1975).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Self-determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?” (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 1: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia” (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 4: 649−668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “For an Enhanced Role of Jus Cogens,” in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia – The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castaneda, Jorge, Legal Effects of United Nations Resolutions (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Cheng, Bin, Studies in International Space Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon, Johnstone, Ian and Malone, David M., Law and Practice of the United Nations – Documents and Commentary (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiassoni, Pierluigi, “Supporting The Force of Law: A Few Complementary Arguments Against Essentialist Jurisprudence,” in Bezemek, Christoph and Ladavac, Nicoletta (eds.), The Force of Law Reaffirmed – Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics (Cham: Springer, 2016), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, Adam S., “A Reply to Dworkin’s New Theory of International Law” (2013) 80 The University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue: 105–115.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine M., “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law” (1989) 38 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 4: 850–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiano, Tom, “Authority,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 ed.), at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/authority/Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas, “Ronald Dworkin, State Consent, and Progressive Cosmopolitanism,” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicero, , On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (edited by Zetzel, James E. G.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Cohen, Harlan G., “Methodology and Misdirection: Custom and the ICJ,” EJIL: Talk!, 1 December 2015, at www.ejiltalk.org/methodology-and-misdirection-a-response-to-stefan-talmon-on-custom-and-the-icj/Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: Stoicism in Classical Latin Literature (Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1985).Google Scholar

Collins, Richard, “Classical Legal Positivism in International Law Revisited,” in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Richard, The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Commager, Henry Steel and Cantor, Milton (eds.), Documents of American History (since 1898), Vol. II (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1988).Google Scholar

Conforti, Benedetto, The Law and Practice of the United Nations (3rd revised ed.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James R., The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James and Nicholson, Rowan, “The Continued Relevance of Established Rules and Institutions Relating to the Use of Force,” in Weller, Marc, Solomou, Alexia, and Rylatt, Jake William (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 96–113.Google Scholar

Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumings, Bruce, Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History (New York: W.W. Norton, 2005).Google Scholar

Dagger, Richard and Lefkowitz, David, “Political Obligation,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/political-obligationGoogle Scholar

Dahlman, Christian, “The Function of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law” (2012) 81 Nordic Journal of International Law 3: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony, “Does International Law Bind Superpowers?,” at http://opiniojuris.org/2005/08/14/does-international-law-bind-superpowers/Google Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony, “The Neo-Positivist Concept of International Law” (1965) 59 American Journal of International Law: 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony, “It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s a Jus Cogens!” (1990) 6 Connecticut Journal of International Law 1: 1–6.Google Scholar

Darcy, Shane, Judges, Law and War: The Judicial Development of International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean, “Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 5: 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law – A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean and Aalberts, Taanja, “Which Future for the Scholarly Concept of Soft International Law? Editors’ Introductory Remarks” (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 2: 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean, “Bindingness” (2015) ACIL Research Paper 2015–19, at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2690155, 1. (forthcoming in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds.), Concepts for International Law ‐ Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (London: Edward Elgar, 2019).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Decay of Modern Customary International Law in Spite of Scholarly Heroism” (2015) The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Doctrine of Fundamental Rights of States and the Functions of Anthropomorphic Thinking in International Law” (2015) 4 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 3: 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delacroix, Sylvie, Legal Norms and Normativity – An Essay in Genealogy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

den Heijer, Maarten and van der Wilt, Harmen, “Jus Cogens and the Humanization and Fragmentation of International Law” (2015) 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deplano, Rosanna, The Strategic Use of International Law by the United Nations Security Council – An Empirical Study (Cham: Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desta, Melaku Geboye, “Soft Law in International Law: An Overview,” in Bjorklund, Andrea K. and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 39–50.Google Scholar

de Vattel, Emmerich, The Law of Nations; Or Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Philadelphia: T& J. W. Johnson Law Booksellers, 1844).Google Scholar

Dicke, Klaus, “Weltgesetzgeber Sicherheitsrat” (2001) 49 Vereinte Nationen 5: 163–168.Google Scholar

Dickson, Julie, Evaluation and Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Dickson, Julie, “Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law?,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian and Bankowski, Zenon (eds.), Law as Institutional Normative Order (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 161–183.Google Scholar

Dickson, Julie, “Ours is a Broad Church: Indirectly Evaluative Legal Philosophy as a Facet of Jurisprudential Inquiry” (2015) 6 Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 2: 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, Julie, “Interpretation and Coherence in Legal Reasoning,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/legal-reas-interpret/Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, “The Thirteenth Waldemar A. Solf Lecture in International Law” (2000) 166 Military Law Review: 93–108.Google Scholar

Divac Öberg, Marko, “The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ” (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 5: 879–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Rosalind and Stone, Adrienne (eds.), The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörr, Oliver, “Article 31,” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Heidelberg:, Springer, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Droubi, Sufyan, Resisting United Nations Security Council Resolutions (London: Routledge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duarte D’Almeida, Luís, “Legal Statements and Normative Language” (2011) 30 Law and Philosophy 2: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “International Law: Torn between Coexistence, Cooperation and Globalization. General Conclusions” (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 2: 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “The Place and Role of Unilateralism in Contemporary International Law” (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 1: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duxbury, Neil, “The Basic Norm: An Unsolved Murder Mystery” (2007) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 17–2007: 1–10, at www.lse.ac.uk/law/working-paper-series/2007-08/WPS17-2007Duxbury.pdfGoogle Scholar

Duxbury, Neil, “Judicial Disapproval as a Constitutional Technique” (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, “Hart’s Postscript and the Character of Legal Philosophy” (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Justice in Robes (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, “A New Philosophy for International Law” (2013) 41 Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde, “Covenant of the League of Nations and Charter of the United Nations: Points of Difference” (1945) 13 The Department of State Bulletin 321: 263–269.Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonah, “An Emerging Norm – Determining the Meaning and Legal Status of the Responsibility to Protect” (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law 4: 765–804.Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, Kenneth M., “Defending the Possibility of a Neutral Functional Theory of Law” (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenberg, Kenneth, “Critical Reception of Raz’s Theory of Authority” (2011) 6 Philosophy Compass 11: 777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenberg, Kenneth, “Joseph Raz’s Theory of Authority” (2011) 6 Philosophy Compass 12: 884–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenberg, Kenneth M., The Functions of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugene, Die juristische Logik (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1918).Google Scholar

Eng, Svein, “Fusion of Descriptive and Normative Propositions. The Concepts of ‘Descriptive Proposition’ and ‘Normative Proposition’ as Concepts of Degree” (2000) 13 Ratio Juris 3: 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esakov, Gennady, “International Criminal Law and Russia: From ‘Nuremberg’ Passion to ‘The Hague’ Prejudice” (2017) 69 Europe-Asia Studies 8: 1184–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estreicher, Samuel, “Rethinking the Binding Effect of Customary International Law” (2003) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 1: 5–17.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law” (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 4: 999–1046.Google Scholar

Focarelli, Carlo, International Law as Social Construct – The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., “Lessons of Kosovo” (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 4: 857–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedmann, Wolfgang, The Changing Structure of International Law (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Finnis, John, “Grounds of Law and Legal Theory: A Response” (2007) 13 Legal Theory 3–4: 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John, “Marriage: A Basic and Exigent Good” (2008) 91 Monist 3–4: 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis., John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays Volume IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John, “Revolutions and Continuity of Law,” in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays Volume IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 407–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald G., Special Rapporteur, “Second Report on the Law of Treaties” (1957) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald G. Sir, “Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law,” in van Asbek, Frederick Mari (ed.), Symbolae Verzijl (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1958), 153–186.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen Abraham, “Jus Cogens,” in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 7 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984).Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, The Origins of Political Order – From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon, Legal Fictions (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (revised ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gagarin, Michael and Woodruff, Paul, “Early Greek Legal Thought,” in Miller, Fred D. Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 7–34.Google Scholar

García-Salmones Rovira, Mónica, The Project of Positivism in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, John, “Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths” (2001) 46 The American Journal of Jurisprudence 1: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, John, “Why Study Jurisprudence?” (2006) The Inner Temple Yearbook 2006/2007, at www.dropbox.com/s/rz9l4n8nlgzk7yv/whystudyjurisprudence.pdf?dl=0Google Scholar

Gardner, John, Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, John, “Why Law Might Emerge: Hart’s Problematic Fable,” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 81–96.Google Scholar

Garibaldi, Oscar M., “The Legal Status of General Assembly Resolutions: Some Conceptual Observations” (1979) 73 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law): 324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garlicki, Lech, “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts” (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Paul, The Philosophy of Nationalism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Giudice, Michael, “Hart and Kelsen on International Law,” in Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 148–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giudice, Michael, Understanding the Nature of Law: A Case for Constructive Conceptual Explanation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giudice, Michael, “Sources and the Systematicity of International Law – A Philosophical Perspective,” in Besson, Samantha and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 583–603.Google Scholar

Glennon, Michael J., “How International Rules Die” (2005) 93 Georgetown Law Journal 3: 939–991.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack and Levinson, Daryl, “Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law” (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 7: 1791–1868.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Camille, “Acta Sunt Servanda? A Regime for Regulating the Unilateral Acts of States at International Law” (2006) 25 Australian Year Book of International Law: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodrich, Leland M., “From League of Nations to United Nations” (1947) 1 International Organization 1: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabowski, Andrzej, Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law – A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graebner, Norman A. and Bennett, Edward M., The Versailles Treaty and Its Legacy – The Failure of the Wilsonian Vision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Green, James A., The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “Legal Positivism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 ed.), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/legal-positivism/Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals” (2008) 83 New York University Law Review 4: 1035–1058.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “The Germ of Justice” (2010) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, Paper No. 60/2010, at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1703008Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “The Morality in Law,” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 177–209.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion and Power” (2016) 29 Ratio Juris 2: 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, Mark, “How to Explain Things with Force” (2016) 129 Harvard Law Review 7: 1932–1979.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher Sir, “Unity and Diversity in International Law,” in Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation – Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, Leo, “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948” (1948) 42 American Journal of International Law 1: 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace (edited and with an Introduction by Tuck, Richard) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005), Prolegomena to the first edition of De Iure Belli ac Pacis, 1746.Google Scholar

Gruchalla-Wesierski, Tadeusz, “A Framework for Understanding ‘Soft Law’” (1984) 30 McGill Law Journal 1: 37–88.Google Scholar

Guastini, Riccardo, “A Realistic View on Law and Legal Cognition” (2015) 27 Revus – Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law: 45–54.Google Scholar

Guastini, Riccardo, “Preface,” in Ávila, Humberto, Certainty in Law (Basel: Springer, 2016), v–ix.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallpike, Christopher Robert, On Primitive Society: And Other Forbidden Topics (Bloomington: Author House, 2011).Google Scholar

Hampton, James A., “The Role of Similarity in Natural Categorization,” in Hahn, Ulrike and Ramscar, Michael (eds.), Similarity and Categorization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnad, Steven, “To Cognize Is to Categorize: Cognition Is Categorization,” in Cohen, Henry and Lefebvre, Claire (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005), 20–45.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, Social Being (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

Harrison, Ross, “The Equal Extent of Natural and Civil Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Hobbes and The Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert L. A., “Are There Any Natural Rights?” (1955) 64 The Philosophical Review 2: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert, “Analytical Jurisprudence in Mid-twentieth Century: A Reply to Professor Bodeheimer” (1957) 105 University of Pennsylvania Law Review: 953–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert, “Kelsen Visited” (1963) 10 UCLA Law Review 4: 709–728.Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L. A., “Commands and Authoritative Reasons,” in Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), 243–268.Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert, The Concept of Law (with an Introduction by Leslie Green, 3rd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert, “Answers to Eight Questions,” in Duarte d’Almeida, Luís, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 279–297.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona and Shapiro, Scott J., “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law” (2011) 121 The Yale Law Journal 2:252–348.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan, Humanitarian Intervention – An Introduction (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar

Heinsch, Robert, Die Weiterentwicklung des humanitären Völkerrechts durch die Strafgerichtshöfe für das ehemalige Jugoslawien und Ruanda (Zur Bedeutung von internationalen Gerichtsentscheidungen als Rechtsquelle des Völkerstrafrechts) (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, “Kosovo and the Law of ‘Humanitarian Intervention’” (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 4: 824–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herren, Madeleine, “International Organizations, 1865–1945,” in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 91–112.Google Scholar

Hershey, Amos S., “The History of International Relations during Antiquity and the Middle Ages” (1911) 5 American Journal of International Law 4: 901–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, “The International Court of Justice: Selected Issues of State Responsibility,” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillier, Tim, Sourcebook on Public International Law (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpinen, Risto, “Artifact,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/Google Scholar

Hilpold, Peter, “The EU Law and the UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case” (2009) 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law: 141–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Do Philosophy and Sociology Mix? A Non-Essentialist Socio-Legal Positivist Analysis of the Concept of Law” (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4: 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Final Authority to Bind with Moral Mistakes: On the Explanatory Potential of Inclusive Legal Positivism” (2005) 24 Law and Philosophy 1: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Conceptual Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Conceptual Analysis and Methodology in Legal Theory” (2015) 26 Revus – Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law: 65–92.Google Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Can There Really Be Law in a Society of Angels?” (2016), at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2839942Google Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “The Authorization of Coercive Enforcement Mechanisms as a Conceptually Necessary Feature of Law” (2016) 7 Jurisprudence 3: 593–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Authority,” in Bongiovanni, Giorgio et al. (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation (Dordrecht: Springer, 2018), 191–217.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (London: Andrew Crooke, 1651). Electronic version at socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobbes/Leviathan.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hobe, Stephan, “Evolution of the Principle on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: From Soft Law to a Customary Law Principle?,” in Bungenberg, Marc and Hobe, Stephan (eds.), Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (Cham: Springer, 2015).Google Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919).Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra V., “Compliance with International Court Judgments and Decisions,” in Alter, Karen J., Romano, Cesare, and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 437–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan, Governance of Consumer Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurd, Heide M., Moral Combat (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew, “International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries,” in Buchanan, Allen and Moore, Margaret (eds.), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar

Itzkowitz, Norman, Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Jabloner, Clemens and Stadler, Friedrich (eds.), Logischer Empirismus und Reine Rechtslehre –Beziehungen zwischen dem Wiener Kreis und der Hans Kelsen-Schule (Wien: Springer, 2001).Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank, From Metaphysics to Ethics – A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Janis, M. W., “Jeremy Bentham and the Fashioning of ‘International Law’” (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law 2: 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jellinek, Georg, Ein Verfassungsgericht für Österreich (Wien: Alfred Hölder, 1885).Google Scholar

Jellinek, Georg, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law: Volume 1 Peace (9th ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeutner, Valentin, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, Constitutionalizing Secession in Federalized States: A Procedural Approach (Utrecht: Eleven Publishing International, 2007).Google Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “Is Kosovo and Metohija Indeed a ‘Unique Case’?”, in Summers, James (ed.), Kosovo: A Precedent? The Declaration of Independence, the Advisory Opinion and Implications for Statehood, Self-Determination and Minority Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), 345–374.Google Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, Collective Rights – A Legal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “Dworkin on International Law: Not Much of a Legacy?” (2015) 28 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 2: 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “Is Legal Positivism Tenable Beyond Moral Relativism?” (2015) 9 Problema – Anuario de Filosofia y Teoría del Derecho: 193–252.Google Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “Responsibility to Protect and the International Rule of Law” (2015) 14 Chinese Journal of International Law 4: 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “Theorizing ‘Unidentified Normative Objects’ of Global Regulatory Regimes,” in Himma, , Jovanović, , and Spaić, (eds.), Unpacking Normativity: Conceptual, Normative, and Descriptive Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018), 227–250.Google Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag, “‘Global/Transnational Law’ Challenges to Theorizing About Law,” in Fabra-Zamora, Jorge Luis (ed.), Jurisprudence in a Globalized World (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2019).Google Scholar

Joyner, Dan, “Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions Generally, and Resolution 2334 on the Israeli Settlements in Particular” (2017) EJIL: Talk!, at www.ejiltalk.org/legal-bindingness-of-security-council-resolutions-generally-and-resolution-2334-on-the-israeli-settlements-in-particular/Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan, “Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and other Rules – The Identification of Fundamental Norms,” in Tomuschat, Christian and Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental rules of the International Legal Order – Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg, “The Benefits of the Pure Theory of Law for International Lawyers, or: What use is Kelsenian Theory?” (2006) 12 International Legal Theory: 5–54.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in International Law – A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean, “Introduction – The Future of International Legal Positivism,” in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Hamburg: Felix Mainer, 1956).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 93–131.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Arthur, “Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie,” in Kaufmann, Arthur, Hassemer, Winfried, and Neumann, Ulfried (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphhilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2004), 26–147.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Arthur, “Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtstheorie, Rechtsdogmatik,” in Kaufmann, Arthur, Hassemer, Winfried, and Neumann, Ulfried (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 2004), 1–25.Google Scholar

Kazui, Tashiro, “Foreign Relations during the Edo Period: Sakoku Reexamined” (1982) 8 Journal of Japanese Studies 2: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keay, Andrew, “Comply or Explain in Corporate Governance Codes: In Need of Greater Regulatory Oversight?” (2014) 34 Legal Studies 2: 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, J. Patrick, “The Twilight of Customary International Law” (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 2: 449–543.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [P. Siebeck], 1920).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence” (1941) 55 Harvard Law Review 1: 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Law and Peace in International Relations, The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 1940–41 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1942).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Science and Politics” (1951) 45 The American Political Science Review 3: 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations – A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems (With Supplement) (London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1951).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company Inc., 1952).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “On the Pure Theory of Law” (1966) 1 Israel Law Review 1: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (trans. by Max Knight) (Berkeley: University of California Press: 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, On the Issue of the Continental Shelf – Two Legal Opinions (Wien: Springer, 1986).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Naturrechtslehre und Rechtspositivismus” in Koja, Friedrich (ed.), Hans Kelsen oder Die Reinheit der Rehtslehre (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag 1988), 231–247.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Was ist Gerechtigkeit? (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2000).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (with a new introduction by A. Javier Treviño) (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “On the Theory of Juridic Fictions. With Special Consideration of Vaihinger’s Philosophy of the As-If,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian and Twining, William (eds.), Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice (Cham: Springer, 2015), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Validity and Efficacy of the Law” (1967), in Bernal, Carlos et al. (eds.), Essays in Legal Philosophy – Eugenio Bulygin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 52–68.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, “State of Nature versus Commercial Sociability as the Basis of International Law: Reflections on the Roman Foundations and Current Interpretations of the International Political and Legal Thought of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 33–52.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “The Redundancy of Soft Law” (1996) 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 2: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Institutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “(I Can’t Get No) Recognition: Subjects Doctrine and the Emergence of Non-State Actors,” in Petman, Jarna and Klabbers, Jan (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitanism – Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Virtuous Interpretation,” in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia et. al. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on, Vol. 1 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Setting the Scene,” in Jan Klabbers, Anne Peters, and Geir Ulfstein, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 1–44.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Klass, Gregory, “Efficient Breach,” in Klass, Gregory, Letsas, George, and Saprai, Prince (eds.), The Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 362–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline and Brown, Eric, “Cosmopolitanism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/cosmopolitanism/CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinton, Alexander W., “NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo: The Legal Case for Violating Yugoslavia’s National Sovereignty in the Absence of Security Council Approval” (2000) 22 Houston Journal of International Law 3: 403–449.Google Scholar

Klosko, George, Political Obligations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, Robert, Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: A General Inventory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations – The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870– 1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia – The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with a new Epilogue) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Into Positivism: Georg Friedrich von Martens (1756–1821) and Modern International Law” (2008) 15 Constellations 2: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law,” in The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Methodology of International Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A., Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, “Unilateral Enforcement of Collective Will: Kosovo, Iraq, and the Security Council” (1999) 3 Max Planck Yearbook of International Law: 59–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism – The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacey, Nicola, A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Lalonde, Suzanne, Determining Boundaries in a Conflicted World – The Role of Uti Possidetis (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Lamond, Grant, “Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/legal-reas-prec/Google Scholar

Langford, Peter, Bryan, Ian and McGarry, John, “Introduction: Kelsen, Legal Science and Positive Law,” in Langford, Peter, Bryan, Ian, and McGarry, John (eds.), Kelsenian Legal Science and the Nature of Law (Cham: Springer, 2017), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lansing, Robert, The Peace Negotiations – A Personal Narrative (Orlando: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1921).Google Scholar

Larkins, Jeremy, From Hierarchy to Anarchy – Territory and Politics before Westphalia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laursen, Andreas, “NATO, the War over Kosovo, and the ICTY Investigation” (2002) 17 American University International Law Review 4: 765–814.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Westlake and Present Day International Law” (1925) 15 Economica: 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law: With Special Reference to International Arbitration (Hamden: Archon Books, 1927).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Covenant as the Higher Law” (1936) 17 British Year Book of International Law: 54–65.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch Sir, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch Sir, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch Sir, Recognition in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1947] 2013).Google Scholar

Leben, Charles, “Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law” (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 2: 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian, “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence” (2003) 48 American Journal of Jurisprudence 1: 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian, Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism and Legal Formalism: What Is the Issue?” (2010) 16 Legal Theory 2: 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian, “The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism” (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4: 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepard, Brian D., Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, “Normative Conflict and the Fuzziness of the International ius cogens Regime” (2009) 69 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: 961–977.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, “Understanding the Jus Cogens Debate: The Pervasive Influence of Legal Positivism and Legal Idealism” (2015) 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernando, Llano Alonso, “Cosmopolitanism and Natural Law in Cicero,” in Contreras, Francisco José (ed.), The Threads of Natural Law – Unravelling a Philosophical Tradition (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013), 27–36.Google Scholar

Long, Roderick T., “Hellenistic Philosophers of Law,” in Miller, Fred D. Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 111–131.Google Scholar

Loquai, Heinz, “Kosovo – A Missed Opportunity for a Peaceful Solution to the Conflict?” (1999) OSCE Yearbook: 79–92.Google Scholar

Loquai, Heinz, Der Kosovo-Konflikt – Wege in einen vermeidbaren Krieg (Die Zeit von Ende November 1997 bis März 1999) (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000).Google Scholar

Luck, Edward C., “Remarks to the General Assembly on the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP)’”(New York, 23 July 2009), at 2, www.ipacademy.org/images/pdfs/luck_ga_statement23july2009.pdfGoogle Scholar

Luhman, Niklas, Law as a Social System (translated by Klaus A. Ziegert) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, A Systems Theory of Religion (translated by David A. Brenner with Adrian Hermann) (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lyons, David, “On Formal Justice” (1973) 58 Cornell Law Review 5: 833–861.Google Scholar

MacCormack, Geoffrey, “Anthropology and Legal Theory” (1978) The Juridical Review: 216–232.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (with a revised foreword) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, “Institutional Normative Order: A Conception of Law” (1997) 82 Cornell Law Review 5: 1051–1070.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Institutions of Law – An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince (Translated and edited by Peter Bondanella) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei, Law in the Age of Pluralism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmor, Andrei, “The Conventional Foundations of Law,” in Bertea, Stefano and Pavlakos, George (eds.), New Essays on the Normativity of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), 143–157.Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei, “Farewell to Conceptual Analysis (in Jurisprudence),” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), Philosophical Foundations to the Nature of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martenczuk, Bernd, “The Security Council, the International Court and Judicial Review: What Lessons from Lockerbie?” (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 3: 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martens, Georg Friedrich, Summary of the Law of Nations, Founded on the Treaties and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe (translated by William Cobbett) (Philadelphia: Thomas Bradford, 1795).Google Scholar

Martin, Elizabeth A. (ed.), A Dictionary of Law (4th ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Martinez, Jenny S., The Slave Trade and the Origins of International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massa, Anne-Sophie, “NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo and the Decision of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Not to Investigate: An Abusive Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion?” (2006) 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law 2: 610–649.Google Scholar

McCaffrey, Stephen, “Lex Lata or the Continuum of State Responsibility,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cassese, Antonio, and Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State – A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989), 242–244.Google Scholar

McCormick, Alison, “From Sovereignty to Responsibility: An Emerging International Norm and Its Call to Action in Burma” (2011) 18 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 1: 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, “Globalization,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 493–507.Google Scholar

Merrills, John G., International Dispute Settlement (5th ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrills, John, “The Place of International Litigation in International Law,” in Klein, Natalie (ed.), Litigating International Law Disputes – Weighing the Balance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyerson, Denise, “The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers” (2004) 4 Macquarie Law Journal 1: 1–6.Google Scholar

Michelon, Claudio, “The Public Nature of Private Law?,” in Michelon, Claudio et al. (eds.), The Public in Law Representations of the Political in Legal Discourse (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), 195–204.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred D. Jr., “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Law,” in Miller, Fred D. Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 79–110.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred D. Jr., “Near Eastern Antecedents of Western Legal Thought,” in Miller, Fred D. Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 1–5.Google Scholar

Miller, Seumas, “Social Institutions,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), at.Google Scholar

Moral Soiano, Leonor, “A Modest Notion of Coherence in Legal Reasoning. A Model for the European Court of Justice” (2003) 16 Ratio Juris 3: 296–323.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (2nd ed.) (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar

Morpeth, Neil, “Autarkeia: Notes on its Cultural and Historical Context” (1993) 25 Prudentia (Supplementary Number: Multarum Artium Scientia): 126–130.Google Scholar

Munzer, Stephen, Legal Validity (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Liam, What Makes Law? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Mark C., “Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence” (2015) 60 The American Journal of Jurisprudence 2: 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Sean D., “Assessing the Legality of Invading Iraq” (2004) 92 Georgetown Journal of International Law 2: 173–257.Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean D., “Identification of Customary International Law and other Topics: The Sixty-Seventh Session of the International Law Commission” (2015) 109 American Journal of International Law 4: 822–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nader, Laura and Sursock, Andrée, “Anthropology and Justice,” in Cohen, Ronald L. (ed.), Justice – Views from the Social Sciences (New York: Plenum Press, 1986), 205–233.Google Scholar

Neiberg, Michael S., The Treaty of Versailles – A Concise History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Newey, Glen, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan (London: Routledge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, Karin “Lawmaking through Advisory Opinions?” (2011) 12 German Law Journal 5: 1033–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Acts of the Security Council: Meaning and Standards of Review” (2007) 11 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law: 143–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osherson, Daniel N. and Smith, Edward E., “On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as the Theory of Concepts” (1981) 9 Cognition 1: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Palladini, Fiammetta, “Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas” (2008) 34 History of European Ideas 1: 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C., “The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law” (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law 3: 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Passerin d’Entreves, Alexander, The Notion of the State – An Introduction to Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, “Introduction,” in Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payan deh, Mehrdad, Internationales Gemeinschaftsrecht – Zur Herausbildung gemeinschaftsrechtlicher Strukturen im Völkerrecht der Globalisierung (Heidelberg: Springer, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payandeh, Mehrdad, “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart” (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 4: 967–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payandeh, Mehrdad, “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept of the Responsibility To Protect Within the Process of International Lawmaking” (2010) 35 Yale Journal of International Law 2: 469–516.Google Scholar

Pelc, Krzysztof J., “Eluding Efficiency: Why Do We Not See More Efficient Breach at the WTO?” (2010) 9 World Trade Review 4: 629–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellet, Alain, “Brief Remarks on the Unilateral Use of Force” (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 2: 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellet, Alain, “Article 38,” in Zimmerman, Andreas, Tomuschat, Christian, and Frahm, Karin Oellers- (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 677–792.Google Scholar

Peristiany, John George, “Law,” in Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan et al. (eds.), The Institutions of Primitive Society (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954), 39–49.Google Scholar

Perreau-Saussine, Amanda, “Immanuel Kant on International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 53–78.Google Scholar

Perry, Stephen, “Second Order Reasons, Uncertainty, and Legal Theory” (1989) 62 Southern California Law Review: 913–994.Google Scholar

Perry, Stephen R., “On the Relationship Between Corrective and Distributive Justice,” in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Fourth Series) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 237–263.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, “Statehood after 1989: ‘Effectivités’ between Legality and Virtuality,” in Crawford, James and Nouwen, Sarah (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Vol III (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), 171–183.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Anne, “International Organizations and International Law,” in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 33–59.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne and Pagotto, Isabella, “Soft Law as a New Mode of Governance: A Legal Perspective” (2006) New Modes of Governance Project, Paper n. 04º/D11: 1–35.Google Scholar

Peters, Christopher J. (ed.), Precedent in the United States Supreme Court (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Ronald M., The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780: A Social Compact (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Pettersson, Therese and Wallensteen, Peter. “Armed Conflicts, 1946–2014” (2015) 52 Journal of Peace Research 4: 536–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer, A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Eric and Sykes, Alan O., “Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, Legalized Noncompliance, and Related Issues” (2011) 110 Michigan Law Review 2: 243–294.Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe, “Philosophical Theory and International Law,” in Bibliotheca Visseriana dissertationum ius internationale illustrantium Vol. 1 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1923).Google Scholar

Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence and Necessity” (2007) 20 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence and Psychology,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence Between Science and the Humanities” (2012) 4 Washington University Jurisprudence Review: 269–323.Google Scholar

Priel, Dan, “The Misguided Search for the Nature of Law” (2015) Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 34/2015: 41. at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2642461Google Scholar

Primmer, Jennifer W., “Beyond the Law-State: The Adequacy of Raz’s Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra-State and Supra-State Legality” (2015) 28 Ratio Juris 1: 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pütter, Johann Stephan and Achenwall, Gottfried, Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa juris naturae) (edited by Schröder, Jan) (Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav, “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)” (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav, Rechtsphilosophie (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Evangelos, The Inadequacy of the Contractual Analogy in the Law of Treaties (Athens: Publications of the Hellenic Institute of International and Foreign Law, 1990).Google Scholar

Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Rainioa, J., Lalu, K. and Penttila, A., “Independent Forensic Autopsies in an Armed Conflict: Investigation of the Victims from Racak, Kosovo” (2001) 116 Forensic Science International 2: 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ralston, Jackson Harvey, International Arbitration from Athens to Locarno (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1929).Google Scholar

Ramsey, William M., “Prototypes and Conceptual Analysis” (1992) 11 Topoi 1: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, William M., Representation Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauschning, Dietrich, “Georg Friedrich von Martens (1756–1821) Lehrer des praktischen Europäischen Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie zu Göttingen,” in Loos, Fritz (ed.), Rechtswissenschaft in Göttingen: Göttinger Juristen aus 250 Jahren (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987), 123–145.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Authority, Law, and Morality” (1985) 68 The Monist 3: 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Facing Up: A Reply” (1989) 62 Southern California Law Review 3–4: 1135–1235.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Rights and Politics” (1995) 71 Indiana Law Journal 1: 27–44.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, Ethics in Public Domain – Essays in Morality of Law and Politics (revised ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison” (1998) 4 Legal Theory 3: 249–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, Engaging Reason – On the Theory of Value and Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Incorporation by Law” (2004) 10 Legal Theory 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Can There Be a Theory of Law?,” in Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Theory and Concepts: Responding to Alexy and Bulygin,” in Una Discusion Sobre la Teoria del Derecho (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2007) (in Spanish) English version at josephnraz.googlepages.com/TheoryandConcepts-finalversion.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Respect for Law,” in The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 250–261.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “The Purity of the Pure Theory,” in The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 293–312.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Reasons: Explanatory and Normative,” in Sandis, Constantine (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Human Rights in the Emerging World Order” (2010) 1 Transnational Legal Theory 1: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Human Rights Without Foundations,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 321–337.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “On the Guise of the Good,” in Tenenbaum, Sergio (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Why the State?” (2014) Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 2014–38: 1-23. at ssrn.com/abstract=2339522Google Scholar

Regan, Donald H., “Reasons, Authority, and the Meaning of ‘Obey’: Further Thoughts on Raz and Obedience to Law” (1990) 3 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichler, Paul S. and Parkhomenko, Yuri B., “Nicaragua v. United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice,” in Obregon, Edgardo Sobenes and Samson, Benjamin (eds.), Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice – Impacts on International Law (Cham: Springer, 2018), 43–56.Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, “Kosovo Antinomies” (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 4: 860–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, “Sanctions and International Law” (2009) 4 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 1: 9–20.Google Scholar

Rigaux, Francois, “Hans Kelsen on International Law” (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 2: 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, “Is Finnis Wrong? Understanding Normative Jurisprudence” (2007) 13 Legal Theory 3–4: 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, Law and Authority under the Guise of the Good (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, “Legal Authority and the Paradox of Intention in Action,” in Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle” (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 4: 709–751.Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., “The Shift From the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent” (2007) 39 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 4: 791–872.Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions” (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1: 241–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., “Litigating International Law Disputes: Where To?,” in Klein, Natalie (ed.), Litigating International Law Disputes – Weighing the Balance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 461–471.Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, “Reclaiming Concepts,” in Núñez, Rafael and Freeman, Walter J. (eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion (Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 1999), 61–76.Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor and Mervis, Carolyn B., “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories” (1975) 7 Cognitive Psychology: 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Alf, A Textbook of International Law – General Part (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1947).Google Scholar

Rüthers, Bernd, Rechtstheorie (3. Auflage) (München: Verlag. C.H. Beck, 2007).Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila N. and Drumbl, Mark A., “The United States and the International Criminal Court: A Complicated, Uneasy, Yet at Times Engaging Relationship” (2016) Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper Series, at https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1504&context=wlufacCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sancin, Vasilka (ed.), Responsibility to Protect: Where Do We Stand Ten Years After? (Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Sandis, Constantine (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandro, Paolo, “An Axiomatic Theory of Law” (2011) 17 Res Publica 4: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scarffe, Eric J., “‘A New Philosophy for International Law’ and Dworkin’s Political Realism” (2016) 29 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 1: 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, Playing By the Rules – A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, The Force of Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G. and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law – Unity within Diversity (5th revised ed.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schill, Stephan W., “System‐Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking” (2011) 12 German Law Journal 5: 1083–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlütter, Birgit, Developments in Customary International Law (Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar

Schrijver, Nico, Sovereignty over Natural Resources – Balancing Rights and Duties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John R., “How to Derive ‘Ought’ From ‘Is’” (1964) 73 The Philosophical Review 1: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidler, Michael, “Pufendorf’s Moral and Political Philosophy,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/pufendorf-moralGoogle Scholar

Sender, Omri and Wood, Michael, “The International Court of Justice and Customary International Law: A Reply to Stefan Talmon,” EJIL: Talk!, 30 November 2015, at www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-court-of-justice-and-customary-international-law-a-reply-to-stefan-talmon/Google Scholar

Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, International Criminal Justice at the Yugoslav Tribunal: A Judge’s Recollection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm, Title to Territory in Africa – International Legal Issues (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (6th ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shea, Nicholas and Bayne, Tim, “The Vegetative State and the Science of Consciousness” (2010) 61 The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3: 459–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shelton, Dinah, “International Law and ‘Relative Normativity,’” in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law (1st ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 141–171.Google Scholar