Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown PublishersGoogle Scholar

Albrechtslund, A. (2007). Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9: 63–72Google Scholar

Alchian, A. A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il Politico, 30 (4): 816–819. Reprinted in Economic Forces at Work (1977). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty PressGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62 (5): 777–795Google Scholar

Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. American Heritage Dictionary (2011). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar

Aoki, M. (2001). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62 (5): 777–795Google Scholar

Arbib, J., and Seba, T. (2017). Rethinking Transportation 2020–2030, pp. 143–144. Report from RethinkX. Available at www.rethinkx.comGoogle Scholar

Arentsen, M. J., and Künneke, R. W. (eds.) (2003). National Reforms in European Gas. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1): 39–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J. (2008). Strategic alliances: bridges between islands of conscious power. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22 (2): 146–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barabasi, A. L. (2003). Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means. New York, NY: PlumeGoogle Scholar

Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Barzel, Y. (2002). A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State. Cambridge, NY and UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bauer, J. M., and Herder, P. (2009). Designing Socio-technical Systems. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North HollandGoogle Scholar

Baumol, W., Willig, R., and Panzar, J. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure. Boston, MA: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar

Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., and Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 136–147Google Scholar

Beermann, J., and Tews, K. (2016). Decentralised laboratories in the German energy transition. Why local renewable energy initiatives must reinvent themselves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169: 125–134Google Scholar

Berle, A. E., and Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Commerce Clearing House; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers (1991)Google Scholar

Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Boston, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Birk, M., Chayes-Avila, J. P., Gomez, T., and Tabors, R. (2017). TSO/ DSO Coordination in a Context of Distributed Energy Resource Penetration. Boston, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Working Paper Series, 2017-017. Boston: MITGoogle Scholar

Bose, T., Reina, A., and Marshall, J. (2017). Collective decision making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16: 30–34Google Scholar

Brandstätt, C., Brunekreeft, G., Buchmann, M., and Friedrichsen, N. (2014). Information Governance in Smart Grids: A Common Information Platform (CIP). Bremen, Germany: Jacobs University Bremen, Energy Working Papers no. 18.Google Scholar

Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., and Gravila, D. (2019). EuroCity persons: a novel benchmark for person detection in traffic scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41 (8): 1844–1861. Available at https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2897684Google Scholar

Brunekreeft, G., Buchmann, M., and Meyer, R. (2016). The rise of third parties and the fall of incumbents driven by large-scale integration of renewable energies: the case of Germany. Energy Journal, 37 (special issue)Google Scholar

Bush, P. D. (2009). The neoinstitutionalist theory of value. Journal of Economic Issues, 43 (2): 293–307Google Scholar

Bush, P. D., and Tool, M. R. (2003). Foundational concepts for institutionalist policy making. In Bush, P. D. and Tool, M. R. (eds.), Institutional Analysis and Economic Policy. New York, NY: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Cabral, L. M. B. (2000). Introduction to Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Canguilhem, G. (2019). Gaston Bachelard et les philosophes. Sciences, 24 (mars–avril): 7–10. Reprinted in C. Limoges (ed.), Georges Canguilhelm, Œuvres Complètes, tome 3: Écrits d’histoire des sciences et d’épistémologie. Paris, France: Éditions VrinGoogle Scholar

CBS Statistics Netherlands (2017). Aardgasbaten op laagste niveau in ruim 40 jaar. Available at www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/17/aardgasbaten-op-laagste-niveau-in-ruim-40-jaarGoogle Scholar

Chor Boon, G., and Gopinathan, S. (2008). The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In Lee, S.-K., Chor Boon, G., Fredriksen, B., and Tan, J. P. (eds.), Toward a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development in Singapore since 1965, pp. 12–38. Washington, DC: World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1938). Review: British Experiments in Public Ownership and Control by Terence H. O’Brien. Economica, 5 (20): 485–487Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1947). The origin of the monopoly of broadcasting in Great Britain. Economica, (n. s.) 14: 189–210Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1959 ). The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2 (October): 1–40Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October): 1–44Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1972). Industrial organization: a proposal for research. In Fuchs, V. R. (ed.), Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Volume 3, Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, pp. 59–73. Cambridge, MA: NBERGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1998). New institutional economics. American Economic Review, 88 (2): 72–74Google Scholar

Connolly, D., Lund, H., and Mathiesen, B. V. (2016). Smart energy Europe: the technical and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy scenario for the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 60: 1634–1653Google Scholar

Correljé, A. F. (2013). Markets for Natural Gas: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correljé, A. F., and Groenewegen, J. (2009). Public values in utility sectors: economic perspectives. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5): 395–413Google Scholar

Correljé, A., Groenewegen, J., Künneke, R., and Scholten, D. (2014). Design for values in economics. In van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P. E., and van de Poel, I. (eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Dordrecht, Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Correljé, A. F., Van der Linden, C., and Westerwoudt, T. (2003). Natural Gas in the Netherlands: From Cooperation to Competition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Orange Nassau Group BVGoogle Scholar

Davis, L. E., and North, D. C. (1971). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

De Bruijne, M., Steenhuisen, B., Correljé, A. F., Ten Heuvelhof, E., E., and de Vries, L. (2011). How to design a new gas bid price ladder? Exploring market design issues in the new Dutch gas balancing regime. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 12 (1): 83–97Google Scholar

De Carne, G., Zou, Z., Butuicchi, G., Liserre, M., and Vournas, C. (2017). Overload control in smart transformer-fed grid. Applied Sciences, 7(2): 208Google Scholar

Denzau, A., and North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1): 3–31Google Scholar

Depuru, S. S. S. R., Wang, L., and Devabhaktuni, V. (2011). Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 15(6): 2736–2742Google Scholar

De Vries, P., and Yehoue, E. B. (2013). The Routledge Companion to Public–Private Partnerships. London, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Domanski, A., and Ménard, C. (2011). Liberalization in the water sector: three leading models. In Künneke, R. and Finger, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructures, chapter 18, pp. 310–327. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147–162Google Scholar

Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (2017). On our Way Towards Connected and Automated Driving in Europe. Outcome of the first High Level Meeting held in Amsterdam, February 15. The Hague, Netherlands: MIE. Available at www.government.nl/documents/leaflets/2017/05/18/on-our-way-towards-connected-and=automated-driving-in-EuropeGoogle Scholar

Dutton, K., Thompson, S., and Barraclough, B. (1997). The Art of Control Engineering. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar

Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14 (6): 673–699Google Scholar

ENTSO-E (2015). Towards Smarter Grids: ENTSO-E Position Paper on Developing TSO and DSO Roles for the Benefit of Consumers. Brussels, Belgium: ENTSO-E, ENTSOE-E Position PaperGoogle Scholar

ENTSOG (2019 ). Transparency Platform, European Gas Transport Network. Available at https://transparency.entsog.euGoogle Scholar

European Commission (2008). Modern rail modern Europe. Towards an integrated European railway area. Luxembourg: European CommissionGoogle Scholar

European Union/European Commission (2019). 2020 Targets, EU Policy, Strategy and Legislation for 2020 Environmental, Energy and Climate Targets. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/energy-climate-change-environment/overall-targets/2020-targets_enGoogle Scholar

Faulconbridge, I. R., and Ryan, M. J. (2014). Systems Engineering Practice. Canberra, Australia: Argos PressGoogle Scholar

Finger, M., Groenewegen, J., and Künneke, R. W. (2005). The quest for coherence between technology and institutions in infrastructures. Journal of Network Industries, 6(4): 227–259Google Scholar

Finger, M., and Finon, D. (2011). From “service public” to universal service: the case of the European Union. In Finger, M. and Künneke, R. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructure, pp. 54–69. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Finger, M., and Messulam, P. (eds.) (2015). Rail Economics, Policy and Regulation in Europe. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Friedman, B. (1996). Value-sensitive design. Interactions, 3(6): 17–23Google Scholar

Funcke, S., and Bauknecht, D. (2016). Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure. Utilities Policy, 40: 67–74Google Scholar

Gabert, J. (ed.) (2018). Memento de l’assainissement: Mettre en œuvre un service d’assainissement complet, durable et adapté, 844 pp. Paris, France: Éditions du Gret et QuæGoogle Scholar

Gasunie Transport Services (2019). The Transmission Network. Available at www.gasunietransportservices.nl/en/network-operations/the-transmission-networkGoogle Scholar

Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33: 897–920Google Scholar

Gerard, H., Rivero Puente, E. I., and Six, D. (2018). Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: a conceptual framework. Utilities Policy, 50: 40–48Google Scholar

Gerxhani, K., and Van Breemen, J. (2019 ). Social values and institutional change: an experimental study. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15 (2): 259–280Google Scholar

Gibbons, R., and Henderson, R. (2012). Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 23 (5): 1350–1364Google Scholar

Gilsing, V., and Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35 (1): 1–23Google Scholar

Glachant, J.-M. (2012). Regulating networks in the new economy. Review of Economics and Institutions, 3 (1): 1–27. Available at https://DOI.10.5202/rei.v3il.49Google Scholar

Glachant, J.-M., and Hallack, M. (2010). The Gas Transportation Network as a “Lego” Game: How to Play with It? Florence, Italy: European University Institute, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/42Google Scholar

Goodman, B., and Flaxman, S. (2016). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanantion.” ArXiv e-prints (June)Google Scholar

Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: the Maghribi traders. American Economic Review, 83 (3): 525–547Google Scholar

Greif, A., Milgrom, P., and Weingast, B. (1994). Coordination, commitment and enforcement. The case of Merchant Guild. Journal of Political Economy, 102: 45–76Google Scholar

Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion, and markets: the nature and dynamics of institutions supporting exchange. In Menard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 28, pp. 725–786. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Groenewegen, J. P. M. (2011). The Bloomington School and American institutionalism. The Good Society, 20 (1): 15–36Google Scholar

Groenewegen, J. P. M., and Künneke, R. W. (2005). Process and outcomes of the infrastructure reform: an evolutionary perspective. In Künneke, R. W., Correljé, A. F., and Groenewegen, J. P. M. (eds.), Institutional Reform, Regulation, and Privatization, chapter 1, pp. 1–35. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Groenewegen, J. P. M., and van der Steen, M. (2007). The evolutionary policy maker. Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (2): 351–358Google Scholar

Groenewegen, J. P. M., van Spithoven, A., and van der Berg, A. (2010). Institutional Economics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Hadjipaschalis, I., Poullikkas, A., and Efthimiou, V. (2009). Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 13 (6–7): 1513–1522Google Scholar

Helm, D. (2009a). Utility Regulation, the RAB and the Cost of capital. Working Paper. Available at www.dieterhelm.co.ukGoogle Scholar

Helm, D. (2009b). Infrastructure investment, the cost of capital, and regulation: an assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3): 307–326Google Scholar

Hewitson, L., Brown, M., and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Practical Power System Protection. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Hines, P., and Blumsack, S. (2008). A centrality measure for electrical networks. Proceedings of the 41st Annual International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEEGoogle Scholar

Ho, P. (2013). In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development: institutional functionalism and Chinese property rights. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40 (6): 1087–1118Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Hodgson, G. (2015a). On defining institutions: rules versus equilibria. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11 (3): 497–505Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. M. (2015b). Conceptualizing Capitalism. Institutions, Evolution, Future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Holstein, T., Dodig-Crnkovic, G., and Pelliccione, P. (2018). Ethical and social aspects of self-driving cars. ArXiv 18, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar

Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms. Japanese Economic Review, 47: 113–133Google Scholar

Hurwicz, L., and Reiter, S. (2008). Designing Economic Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011). Harnessing Renewables: A Guide to the Balancing Challenge. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014). Technology Road Map: Energy Storage. Paris, France: O. I. E. AgencyGoogle Scholar

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017). World Energy Outlook. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018). System Integration of Renewables. An Update on Best Practice. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2018). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IRENAGoogle Scholar

International Union of Railways (UIC) (2015). High Speed Rail: Fast Track to Sustainable Mobility. Paris, France: UICGoogle Scholar

Jaag, C., and Trinkner, U. (2011). A general framework for regulation and liberalization in network industries. In Finger, M. and Künneke, R. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries. The Liberalization of Infrastructure. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Jensen, O. (2017). Public–private partnership for water in Asia: a review of two decades of experience. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33 (1): 4–30Google Scholar

Jensen, O., and Wu, H. (2018). Urban water security indicators: development and pilot. Environmental Science & Policy, 83: 33–45Google Scholar

Joskow, P. L. (1985). Vertical integration and long-term contracts: the case of coal-burning electric generating plants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1 (1): 33–80Google Scholar

Joskow, P. L. (1996). Introducing competition into regulated network industries: from hierarchies to markets in electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2): 341–382Google Scholar

Joskow, P. L. (2008 [2005]). Vertical integration. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 13. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Joskow, P. L., Polinsky, A. M., and Shavell, S. (2007). Regulation of natural monopoly. In Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S. (eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, pp. 1227–1348. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Kessides, I. (2004). Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation and Competition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Klein, P. (2008 [2005]). The make-or-buy decision: lessons from empirical studies. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 17, pp. 435–464. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Kooij, H.-J., Oteman, M., Veenman, S., Sperling, K., Magnusson, D., Palm, J., and Hvelplund, F. (2018). Between grassroots and treetops: community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 37(supplement C): 52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroes, P., Franssen, M., van de Poel, I., and Ottens, M. (2006). Treating socio-technological systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23: 803–814Google Scholar

Künneke, R. W. (2008). Institutional reform and technological practice: the case of electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265Google Scholar

Künneke, R. W., Groenewegen, J., and Auger, J. F. (2009). The Governance of Network Industries. Institutions, Technology and Policy in Reregulated infrastructures. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Künneke, R. W., Groenewegen, J., and Ménard, C. (2010). Aligning modes of organization with technology: critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75: 494–505Google Scholar

Künneke, R. W. (2018). Interrelated technical and institutional coordination: the case of network infrastructures. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Research Agenda of New Institutional Economics, chapter 8, pp. 72–79. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Laffont, J.-J., and Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Boston, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Laffont, J.-J. (2005). Regulation and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Lafontaine, F., and Slade, M. (2007). Vertical integration and firm boundaries: the evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 629–685Google Scholar

Lemstra, W., Hayes, V., and Groenewegen, J. (2011). The Innovation Journey of Wi-Fi – The Road to Global Success. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Levinson, M. (2006). The Box, How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Levy, B., and Spiller, P. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 9 (fall): 201–246Google Scholar

Levy, B., and Spiller, P. (1996). Regulations, Institutions and Commitments. A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J., and Margolis, S. E. (2003). Network effects. In Cave, M. E., Majumda, S. K., and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, pp. 75–96. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Long, C. (2018). The China experience: an institutional approach. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Research Agenda of New Institutional Economics, chapter 15, pp. 135–143. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Lund, H., Ostergaard, P. A., Connolly, D., and Mathiesen, B. V. (2017). Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy, 137: 556–565Google Scholar

Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28 (1): 55–67Google Scholar

Maier, M. W., and Rechtin, E. (2000). The Art of System Architecting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420058529Google Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2001). Individual, Institutions and Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Marshall, A. (1908). Principles of Economics. London, UK: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, and of Their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations, 2 vols. London, UK: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Marshall, W., and Weingast, B. R. (1988). The industrial organization of congress. Journal of Political Economy, 96 (February): 132–163.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. (2016). Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital Or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

McNeill, W. H. (1982). The Pursuit of Power. Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160 (3): 345–376Google Scholar

Ménard, C. (2008 [2005]). A new institutional approach to organization. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 12, pp. 281–318. Boston-New York-Berlin-Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C., and Domanski-Peeroo, A. (2011). Liberalization in the water sector: three leading models. In Künneke, R. and Finger, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructures, chapter 18, pp. 310–327. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C., and Ghertman, M. (eds.) (2009). Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: An Institutional Approach. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C., (2012). Risk in urban water reform: a challenge to public–private partnership. In Gunawansa, A. and Bhular, L. (eds.), Water Governance: An Evaluation of Alternative Architectures, chapter 12, pp. 290–320. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C. (2013). Hybrid modes of organization. Alliances, joint ventures, networks, and other “strange” animals. In Gibbons, R. and Roberts, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics, chapter 26, pp. 1066–1108. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Ménard, C. (2017). Meso-institutions: the variety of regulatory arrangements in the water sector. Utilities Policy, 49: 6–19Google Scholar

Ménard, C., Jimenez, A., and Tropp, H. (2018). Addressing the policy-implementation gaps in water services: the key role of meso-institutions. Water International, 43 (1): 13–33Google Scholar

Ménard, C. (2019). Dimensionalizing Institutions. In Gagliardi, F. and Gindis, D. (eds.), Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey M. Hodgson, chapter 8, pp. 110–126. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Milakis, J. D., van Arem, B., and van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21 (4): 324–348Google Scholar

Milchram, C., Van de Ka, G., Doorn, N., and Künneke, R. W. (2018). Moral values as factors for social acceptance of smart grids. Sustainability, 10 (8): 1–23. Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082703Google Scholar

Milgrom, P., North, D. C., and Weingast, B. (1989). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 2: 1–23Google Scholar

Mockyr, J. (2014). Culture, institutions, and modern growth. In Sened, I. and Galiani, S. (eds.), Economic Institutions, Rights, Growth, and Sustainability: The Legacy of Douglass North, pp. 151–191. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Mockyr, J. (2016). A Culture of Growth: Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)/Department of Transportation (DOT) (2018). Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). October 3, Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95. Available at www.federalregister.govGoogle Scholar

National Research Council (2006). Drinking Water Distribution Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks. Washington, DC: National Academies PressGoogle Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2018). Preliminary Report Released for Crash Involving Pedestrian, Uber Technologies, Inc. Test Vehicle. May 24Google Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2019a). Inadequate Safety Culture Contributed to Uber Automated test Vehicle Crash – NTSB Calls for Federal Review Process for Automated Vehicle Testing on Public Roads. NTSB Office of Public Affairs News Release, November 19Google Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2019b). Testimony of the Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, III Chairman National Transportation Safety Board, before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. United States Senate on Highly Automated Vehicles: Federal Perspectives on the Deployment of Safety Technology. November 20, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Nightingale, P., Brady, T., Davies, A., and Hall, J. (2003). Capacity utilization revisited: software, control and the growth of large technical systems. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (3): 477–517Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1968). Sources of productivity change in ocean shipping, 1600–1850. Journal of Political Economy, 76 (5): 953–970Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York, NY: Norton & Co.Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1990a). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

North, D. C. (1990b). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (4): 355–367Google Scholar

North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

OECD (2011). Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach. Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

OECD (2012). Water Governance in Latin America and the Carribean. Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

OECD (2015a). Principles on Water Governance (coordinated by Akhmouch, A.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

OECD (2015b). The Governance of Water Regulators (coordinated by Kauffmann, C.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

OECD (2015c). Inventory: Water Governance Indicators and Measurement Frameworks (collected by Akhmouch, A. and Romano, O.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

OECD/G20 (2015). Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48: 3–25Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address. American Political Science Review, 92 (1): 1–22Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419–422Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2014a). Institutions and sustainability of ecological systems. In Sened, I. and Galiani, S. (eds.), Economic Institutions, Rights, Growth, and Sustainability: The Legacy of Douglass North, pp. 151–191. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2014b). Do institutions for collective action evolve? Journal of Bioeconomics, 16 (1): 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perennes, P. (2014). Use of combinatorial auctions in the railway industry: can the “invisible hand” draw the railway timetable? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67: 175–187Google Scholar

Pezon, C., Fonseca, C., and Butterworth, J. (2011). Pumps, pipes, and promises. Costs, finances and accountability for sustainable WASH services. IRC Symposium, November 18–20, 2010, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar

Public Utilities Board (PUB) (2019). PUB Annual Report 2018–2019. Available at www.pub.gov.sg/annualreports/annualreport2019.pdfGoogle Scholar

Public Utilities Board (PUB) (2020). Singapore’s National Water Agency: Singaport Water Story. Available at www.pub.gov.sg/watersupply/singaporewaterstoryGoogle Scholar

Ray, K., and Skorup, B. (2019). Smart Cities, Dumb Infrastructure: Policy-Induced Competition in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Systems. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Mercatus Working PaperGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, D. (2008). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Royal Academy of Engineering (2012). Smart Infrastructure: The Future. London, UK: Royal Academy of EngineeringGoogle Scholar

Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Antitrust enforcement in dynamic network infrastructures. Antitrust Bulletin, 48: 859–882Google Scholar

Sandel, M. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London, UK: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Savedoff, W. D., and Spiller, P. (1999). Spilled Water: Institutional Commitment in the Provision of Water Services. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar

Saviotti, P. P. (2005). The coevolution of technologies and institutions. In Weber, M. and Hemmelskamp, J. (eds.), Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, chapter 2, pp. 9–31. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Schotter, A. (1981). The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13 (1): 25–35Google Scholar

Shapiro, C., and Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Shelanski, H. A., and Klein, P. (1995). Empirical research in transaction costs economics. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11 (2): 335–361Google Scholar

Shelanski, H. A. (2007). Adjusting regulation to competition: toward a new model for U.S. telecommunications policy. Yale Journal on Regulation, 24: 55–62. Available at https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol24/iss1/3Google Scholar

Shirley, M. S. (ed.) (2002). Thirsting for Efficiency. The Economics and Politics of Urban Water Reform. London, UK: Pergamon and the World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar

Shirley, M. S. (2008). Institutions of Development. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Shleifer, A., Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., and Djankov, S. (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 595–619Google Scholar

Siemens (2016). Planning of Electric Power Distribution. Technical Principles. Erlangen, Germany: Siemens AGGoogle Scholar

SiemensSingapore Post (n. d.). Anti-bribery and corruption policy. Available at www.singpost.com/sites/default/files/SingPost ABC Policy.pdfGoogle Scholar

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (2014). Levels of Driving Automation are Defined in New SAE International Standard J3016. Available at www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdfGoogle Scholar

Spiller, P. T. (2009). An institutional theory of public contracts. In Ménard, C. and Ghertman, M. (eds.), Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: An Institutional Approach. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Spiller, P. T. (2013). Transaction cost regulation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89: 232–242Google Scholar

Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 (1): 3–21Google Scholar

Tadelis, S., and Williamson, O. E. (2013). Transaction costs economics. In Gibbons, R. and Roberts, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics, chapter 4, pp. 159–189. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Tropp, H. (2007). Water governance: trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy, 9 (S2): 19–30Google Scholar

UNICEF (2015). WASH and Accountability: Explaining the Concept. Stockholm and New York: Accountability for Sustainability Partnership, UNDP Water Governance Facility at SIWI and UNICEF. Available at http://www.watergovernance.orgGoogle Scholar

United Nations (2019). 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2016a). Vehicle Cybersecurity. Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-16-350. Available at www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-350Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2016b). Vehicle Cybersecurity: DOT and Industry have Efforts under Way, but DOT Needs to Define its Role in Responding to a Real-world Attack. Available at https://bit.ly/1ruZi09Google Scholar

US Secretary of Energy (2004). Final Report on the August 14 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations. Washington, DC. Available at www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/BlackoutFinal-Web.pdfGoogle Scholar

Van der Wal, W. (2003). The technological infrastructure of the gas chain. In Arentsen, M. and Künneke, R. W. (eds.), National Reforms in European Gas, chapter 2, pp. 13–29. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Vazquez, M., Hallack, M., and Perez, Y. (2018). The dynamics of institutional and organizational change in emergent industries: the case of electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 18 (3): 187–208Google Scholar

Verzijlberg, R. A., De Vries, L. J., Dijkema, G. P. J., and Herder, P. M. (2017). Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75: 660–667Google Scholar

Villar, J., Bessa, R., and Matos, M. (2018). Flexibility products and markets: literature review. Electric Power Systems Research, 154: 329–340Google Scholar

Wahaab, R. Abdel (2018). Water and Sanitation in Egypt. Overview Report (based on a partially updated and complemented report to the African Development Bank (AFDB), Côte d’Ivoire, 2015)Google Scholar

Water International (2018). The OECD principles on water governance: from policy standards to practice. 43 (1): 1–132Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press-MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works, where it is headed. De Economist, 146 (January): 23–58Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15 (1): 306–342Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (3): 595–613Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2018). Co-production in distributed generation: renewable energy and creating space for fitting infrastructure within landscapes. Landscape Research, 43(4): 542–561Google Scholar

World Bank (2017). Governance and the Law. World Bank Annual Report. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Special working session. Our Common Future, no. 17, pp. 1–91. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Wu, X., and Malaluan, N. A. (2008). A tale of two concessionaires: a natural experiment of water privatization in Metro Manilla. Urban Studies, 45(1): 207–229.Google Scholar

Xenias, D., Axon, C. J., Whitmarsh, L., Connor, P. M., Balta-Ozkan, N., and Spence, A. (2015). UK smart grid development: an expert assessment of the benefits, pitfalls and functions. Renewable Energy, 81: 89–102Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, S. L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., and Rognli, J. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 59–73Google Scholar

Zhang, F. (2018). The Institutional Evolution of China. Government vs Market. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar