Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 83
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2009
Print publication year:
2008
Online ISBN:
9780511509605
Subjects:
Sociology: General Interest, Applied Psychology, Psychology, Sociology

Book description

How does a telecommunications company function when its right hand often doesn't know what its left hand is doing? How do rapidly expanding, interdisciplinary organizations hold together and perform their knowledge work? In this book, Clay Spinuzzi draws on two warring theories of work activity - activity theory and actor-network theory - to examine the networks of activity that make a telecommunications company work and thrive. In doing so, Spinuzzi calls a truce between the two theories, bringing them to the negotiating table to parley about work. Specifically, about net work: the coordinative work that connects, coordinates, and stabilizes polycontextual work activities. To develop this uneasy dialogue, Spinuzzi examines the texts, trades, and technologies at play at Telecorp, both historically and empirically. Drawing on both theories, Spinuzzi provides new insights into how net work actually works and how our theories and research methods can be extended to better understand it.

Reviews

“And you thought theory was boring. Read this book to change your mind. Spinuzzi’s snazzy prose is part hardcore social theory, part corporate soap opera. He takes theoretical discussion of actor-network theory and activity theory in new directions, bringing them together in a productive tension to illuminate critical issues in human-computer interaction, computer-supported collaborative work, and organizational design. The empirical substrate for the theoretical work is a tour de force ethnography of a large telecommunications company. Spinuzzi talks and listens to the little people, he delves fearlessly into the complexities (and muddles) of the big theories, and is kind and generous to all. A must read.”
—Bonnie Nardi, School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine

“In this marvelously readable and yet theoretically challenging case study of work in a telecommunications company, Spinuzzi rethinks the (post)modern workplace—distributed, networked, spliced, improvised. He puts two of the leading explanations of such workplaces—actor-network theory and activity theory—into dialog as he follows workers and managers doing what he terms 'net work.' Through his fine-grained and always fascinating stories of their daily attempts to make sense and make do, he shows a way beyond earlier theories to a new understanding of (post)modern work and workplace learning. This is one of those rare books that is both a must-read for researchers and a good read for anyone looking for insight into how work actually gets done today.”
—David R. Russell, Professor, Rhetoric and Professional Communication, Iowa State University

"Network is a well written, very useful organizational ethnography, raising a series of significant issues about how to conceptualize organizations."
Canadian Journal of Sociology, Alex Preda, University of Edinburgh

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Works Cited
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akrich, M. (1993). A gazogene in Costa Rica: An experiment in techno-sociology. In Lemonnier, P. (Ed.), Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic (pp. 289–337). New York: Routledge.
Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002a). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.
Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002b). The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–255.
Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the edge. Available from: http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_Power.pdf.
Allen, D. (2003). Getting things done: The art of stress-free productivity. New York: Penguin.
,Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (2004). Network. Available from: http://www.atis.org/glossary/definition.aspx?id=3457.
Amidon, S. R. (2005). Writing the learning organization: A framework for teaching and research. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(4), 406–428.
Antunes, P., & Costa, C. J. (2003). From genre analysis to the design of meetingware. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 302–310). New York: ACM Press.
Aristotle, (1991). The art of rhetoric. New York: Penguin.
Aristotle, (1992). The politics. New York: Penguin.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001a). The advent of netwar (revisited). In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 1–28). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001b). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Atkinson, S. R., & Moffat, J. (2005). The agile organization: From informal networks to complex effects and agility. Available from: http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Atkinson_Agile.pdf.
Aufderheide, P. (1999). Communications policy and the public interest: The Telecommunications Act of 1996. New York: Guilford Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bazerman, C. (2003). What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity assessable, accountable, and plannable. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies.
Beniger, J. (1989). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society (reprint ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Berg, M. (1996). The fruitful a-modernism of a lingering modernist: Commentary on Bruno Latour's “On Interobjectivity.”Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 252–258.
Berg, M. (1997). Rationalizing medical work: Decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Berg, M. (1998). The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(4), 456–490.
Berg, M. (1999). Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(4), 373–401.
Berg, M. (2000). Lessons from a dinosaur: Mediating is research through an analysis of the medical record. HOIT '00: Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics: IF at home: Virtual influences on everyday life (pp. 487–506). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2003). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 126–150). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Blackler, F., & McDonald, S. (2000). Power, mastery and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 833–851.
Boczkowski, P. J. (2005). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353–402.
Boot, M. (2007). War made new: Weapons, warriors, and the making of the modern world. New York: Gotham.
Bowker, G. (1987). A well ordered reality: Aspects of the development of Schlumberger, 1920–39. Social Studies of Science, 17, 611–655.
Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bowker, G. C. (1994). Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Brull, S. V., & Elstrom, P. (1997, December). At 7 1/2 cents a minute, who cares if you can't hear a pin drop?Business Week, 46.
Callon, M. (1986a). The sociology of an actor–network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). London: Macmillan.
Callon, M. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Boston: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In Law, J. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters? Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1992). The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 72–102). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Callon, M. (2002). Writing and (re)writing devices as tools for managing complexity. In Law, J. & Mol, A. (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 191–217). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Callon, M. (2004). The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design. Journal of the Center for Information Studies, 5(3), 3–10. Available from: http://www.yc.musashi-tech.ac.jp/∼cisj/05/5_01.pdf.
Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.
Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). How to study the force of science. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 3–15). London: Macmillan.
Callon, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2003). Research “in the wild” and the shaping of social identities. Technology in Society, 25, 193–204.
Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). Socio-technical graphs and cognitive maps: A response to Latour, Mauguin and Teil. Social Studies of Science, 22, 81–89.
Carroll, L. (2003). Alice in Wonderland. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.
Carter, L. (Ed.). (2005). Market matters: Applied rhetoric studies and free market competition. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Charlton, B. G. (2006). The rise of the boy-genius: Psychological neoteny, science and modern life. Medical Hypotheses, 67(4), 679–681.
Clark, D. (2007). Rhetoric of empowerment: Genre, activity, and the distribution of capital. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 155–180). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Covey, S. R. (1990). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York: Free Press.
Crandall, R. W. (1991). After the breakup: U.S. telecommunications in a more competitive era. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 175–182). New York: ACM Press.
Davis, D. D. (2000). Breaking up (at) totality: A rhetoric of laughter. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Armond, P. (2001). Netwar in the Emerald City: WTO protest strategy and tactics. In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 201–238). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Devitt, A. J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In Bazerman, C. & Paradis, J. G. (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336–357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Drucker, P. F. (2003). The essential Drucker: The best of sixty years of Peter Drucker's essential writings on management (reprint ed.). New York: Collins.
Duesterberg, T., & Gordon, K. (1997). Competition and deregulation in telecommunications: The case for a new paradigm. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
Edwards, S. J. A. (2000). Swarming on the battlefield: Past, present, and future. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Ehn, P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Engels, F. (1954). Dialectics of nature. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Engels, F. (1975). Socialism: Utopian and scientific. New York: International Publishers.
Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–214.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed working intelligence. University of Helsinki.
Engeström, Y. (1996a). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16(3), 131–143.
Engeström, Y. (1996b). Interobjectivity, ideality, and dialectics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 259–265.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Available from: http://is2.lse.ac.uk/events/ESRCseminars/engestrom.pdf.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähääho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 345–374). Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Escalante, V. (1996). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the Postal Buddy. In Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 325–374). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Engeström, Y., Puonti, A., & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151–186). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Fitzpatrick, G. (2000). Centres, peripheries, and electronic communication: Changing work practice boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 115–148.
Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. New York: Westview Press.
Geisler, C. (2001). Textual objects: Accounting for the role of texts in the everyday life of complex organizations. Written Communication, 18(3), 296–325.
Geisler, C. (2003). When management becomes personal: An activity-theoretic analysis of Palm technologies. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies
Gerlach, L. P. (2001). The structure of social movements: Environmental activism and its opponents. In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 289–310). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Gonzalez, V., & Mark, G. (2005). Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. European Conference in Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Paris: Springer-Verlag.
Gonzalez, V. M., & Mark, G. (2004). “Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness”: Managing multiple working spheres. CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 113–120). New York: ACM Press.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Can cognitive explanations be eliminated?Science & Education, 12, 671–689.
,Handbook of Texas Online (2005). s.v. “Telephone Service.” Available from: http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/view/TT/egt2.html.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1996). Modest_witness@second_millenium.femaleman_meets_oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challenges and opportunities. SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 70–77). New York: ACM Press.
Häyrynen, Y.-P. (1999). Collapse, creation, and continuity in Europe: How do people change? In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 115–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heldman, P. K., Heldman, R., & Bystrzycki, T. A. (1997). Competitive telecommunications: How to thrive under the Telecommunications Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Helle, M. (2000). Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 81–114.
Hewitt, H. (2005). Blog: Understanding the information reformation that's changing your world. Nashville, TN: Nelson Business.
Holland, D., & Reeves, J. (1996). Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 257–282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hughes, M. W. (1996). Telecommunications reform and the death of the local exchange monopoly. Florida State University Law Review, 24, 179–217.
Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., & Robertson, G. (2004). Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. AVI '04: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 32–39). New York: ACM Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 19–36.
Ilyenkov, E. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.
Ilyenkov, E. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow: Progress.
Johnson-Eilola, J. (1998). Living on the surface: Learning in the age of global communication networks. In Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 185–210). New York: Routledge.
Johnson-Eilola, J. (2001). Datacloud: Expanding the roles and locations of information. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 47–54). New York: ACM Press.
Johnson-Eilola, J. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In Nardi, B. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
King, J. L., & Frost, R. L. (2002). Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. In Hinds, P. J. & Kiesler, S. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Korpela, M., Mursu, A., & Soriyan, H. (2002). Information systems development as an activity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 111–128.
Korpela, M., Soriyan, H., & Olifokunbi, H. (2000). Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 191–210.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Latour, B. (1988a). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1988b). The politics of explanation: An alternative. In Woolgar, S. (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 155–176). London: Sage.
Latour, B. (1988c). The Prince for machines as well as machinations. In Elliott, B. (Ed.), Technology and social processes (pp. 20–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters? Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1992a). A reply to Carlson and Gorman. Social Studies of Science, 22, 91–95.
Latour, B. (1992b). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1993a). Ethnography of a “high-tech” case: About Aramis. In Lemonnier, P. (Ed.), Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic (pp. 372–398). New York: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1993b). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1995). Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. In Orlikowski, W., Walsham, G., Jones, M., & DeGross, J. (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 285–307). London: Chapman & Hall.
Latour, B. (1996a). Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1996b). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–251.
Latour, B. (1996c). Pursuing the discussion of interobjectivity with a few friends. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 266–289.
Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Blackwell.
Latour, B. (1999b). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2002). Morality and technology: The end of the means. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5), 247–260.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2006). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., Mauguin, P., & Teil, G. (1992). A note on socio-technical graphs. Social Studies of Science, 22, 33–57.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Law, J. (1986a). The heterogeneity of texts. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 67–83). London: Macmillan.
Law, J. (1986b). On the methods of long distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 234–263). Boston: Routledge.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2002a). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Law, J. (2002b). On hidden heterogeneities: Complexity, formalism, and aircraft design. In Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 116–141). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Law, J. (2004a). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.
Law, J. (2004b). And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity, and the baroque. Environment and Planning, 22(1), 13–26.
Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.
Lektorsky, V. A. (1999). Activity theory in a new era. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 65–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lenert, E. M. (1998). A communication theory perspective on telecommunications policy. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 3–23.
Leont'ev, A. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13 (2), 4–33.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1994). The age of the network: Organizing principles for the 21st century. Essex Junction, VT: Omneo.
Locke, C., Levine, R., Searls, D., & Weinberger, D. (2001). The cluetrain manifesto: The end of business as usual. New York: Perseus Books.
Longaker, M. G. (2006). Back to basics: An apology for economism in technical writing scholarship. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 9–29.
Ludvigsen, S. R., Havnes, A., & Chr. Lahn, L. (2003). Workplace learning across activity systems: A case study of sales engineers. In Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 291–310). Boston: Pergamon.
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development, its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Machiavelli, N. (2001). The art of war (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
Machiavelli, N. (2003a). The discourses. New York: Penguin Books.
Machiavelli, N. (2003b). The prince. New York: Penguin Books.
Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style and your life. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 321–330). New York: ACM Press.
Marx, K. (1990). Capital: Volume 1. New York: Penguin Books.
McCarthy, J. F., & Boyd, Danah M. (2005). Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces: Experiences at an academic conference. CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1641–1644). New York: ACM Press.
McMaster, S. (2002). The telecommunications industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 423–463.
Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(3), 170–195.
Miettinen, R. (2005). Object of activity and individual motivation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 52–69.
Miettinen, R., & Hasu, M. (2002). Articulating user needs in collaborative design: Towards an activity-theoretical approach. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 129–151.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 157–178.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(1), 641–671.
Mueller, M. L. (1997). Universal service: Competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996a). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A. (1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A. (2005). Objects of desire: Power and passion in collaborative activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 37–51.
Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541–574.
Paltridge, S. (1995). Telecommunication infrastructure: The benefits of competition. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Holloway-Attaway, L. (2007). Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: A case study of collaboration between U.S. and Swedish students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 327–352.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polodny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.
,Public Utilities Commission of Texas. (1999, April). Meeting new challenges: Fiscal year 1999 annual report. Austin: Public Utilities Commission of Texas.
Reynolds, G. (2006). An army of Davids: How markets and technology empower ordinary people to beat big media, big government, and other goliaths. Nashville, TN: Nelson Current.
Ronfeldt, D. (2007). In search of how societies work: Tribes – the first and forever form. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2007/RAND_WR433.pdf.
Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. (2007, August). The promise of noöpolitik. Available from: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/ronfeldt/index.html.
Rhodes, L., & Hadden, S. G. (1995). The evolution of universal service in Texas: A report. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.
Russell, D. R. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In Petraglia, J. (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Russell, D. R. (1997a). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554.
Russell, D. R. (1997b). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces: A review of studies that use cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(4), 224–237.
Russell, D. R., & Yañez, A. (2003, February). “Big picture people rarely become historians”: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/
Saarelma, O. (1993). Descriptions of subjective networks as a mediator of developmental dialogue. The quarterly newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 15, 102–112.
Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200–234.
Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., & Spafford, M. (2007). Regularized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 21–44). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Scott, J. K. (1992). Exploring socio-technical analysis: Monsieur Latour is not joking!Social Studies of Science, 22, 59–80.
Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Serres, M. (1982). The parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Serres, M. (1983). Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Serres, M. (1995). The natural contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Serres, M., & Latour, B. (1995). Conversations on science, culture, and time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sheller, M. (2004). Mobile publics: Beyond the network perspective. Environment and Planning, 22, 39–52.
Slattery, S. (2005). Technical writing as textual coordination: An argument for the value of writers' skill with information technology. Technical Communication, 52(3), 353–360.
Sless, D. (1994). The telecomm bill: Redesigning a computer generated report. In Penman, R. & Sless, D. (Eds.), Designing information for people: Proceedings from the symposium (2nd ed., pp. 77–97). Fyshwick, Australia: Goanna Print.
Spasser, M. A. (2000). Articulating collaborative activity: Design-in-use of collaborative publishing services in the flora of North America project. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 140–172.
Spasser, M. A. (2002). Realist activity theory for digital library evaluation: Conceptual framework and case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 81–110.
Spinuzzi, C. (2002a). Modeling genre ecologies. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 200–207). New York: ACM Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2002b). Toward a hermeneutic understanding of programming languages. Currents in Electronic Literacy, 6. Available from: http://currents.cwrl.utexas.edu/spring02/spinuzzi.html.
Spinuzzi, C. (2003a). Knowledge circulation in a telecommunications company: A preliminary survey. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (pp. 178–183). New York: ACM Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2003b). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2003c). Using a handheld PC to collect and analyze observational data. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (pp. 73–79). New York: ACM Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. SIGDOC '04: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 110–116). New York: ACM Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2005). Lost in the translation: Shifting claims in the migration of a research technique. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 411–446.
Spinuzzi, C. (2007a). Introduction to TCQ special issue: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 265–277.
Spinuzzi, C. (2007b). Who killed Rex? Tracing a message through three kinds of networks. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 45–66). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Spinuzzi, C. (in press). The genie's out of the bottle: Leveraging mobile and wireless technologies in qualitative research. In Hea, A. Kimme (Ed.), Going wireless: A critical exploration of wireless & mobile technologies for composition teachers and scholars. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Spinuzzi, C., Hart-Davidson, W., & Zachry, M. (2006). Chains and ecologies: Methodological notes toward a communicative-mediational model of technologically mediated writing. SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 43–50). New York: ACM Press.
Star, S. L. (1995). Introduction. In Star, S. L. (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp. 1–35). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Stone, L. (2006). Continuous partial attention. Available from: http://continuouspartialattention.jot.com/WikiHome.
Suchman, L. (2003). Organizing alignment: The case of bridge-building. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 187–203). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Sumner, T., & Stolze, M. (1997). Evolution, not revolution: Participatory design in the toolbelt era. In Kyng, M. & Mathiassen, I. (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sun, H. (2004). Expanding the scope of localization: A cultural usability perspective on mobile text messaging use in American and Chinese contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 483–504.
Swarts, J. (2004). Textual grounding: How people turn texts into tools. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(1&2), 67–89.
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.
Temin, P. (1987). The fall of the Bell system: A study in prices and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thévenot, L. (2002). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an “equipped” humanity. In Law, J. & Mol, A. (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 53–87). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2003). Developmental transfer as a goal of internship in practical nursing. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 199–232). Boston: Pergamon.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Boston: Pergamon.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1–15). Boston: Pergamon.
Tzu, S. (2002). The art of war. New York: Penguin.
Victor, B., & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wells, G. (2001). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2003). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 76–99). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilde, L. (1991). Logic: Dialectic and contradiction. In The Cambridge companion to Marx (pp. 275–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, C. (1971). A consumer viewpoint on Texas telephone utilities: Report of the chairman. Texas Senate.
Witte, S. P. (2005). Research in activity: An analysis of speed bumps as mediational means. Written Communication, 22(2), 127–165.
Wolfe, J. (2002). Annotation technologies: A software and research review. Computers and Composition, 19, 471–497.
Xavier, P. (1995). Universal service obligations in a competitive telecommunications environment. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 13–35.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zachry, M. (1999). Constructing usable documentation: A study of communicative practices and the early uses of mainframe computing in industry. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 22–25). New York: ACM Press.
Zachry, M. (2000). The ecology of an online education site in professional communication. Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 433–442). New York: IEEE Educational Activities Department.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1996). Developing activity theory: The zone of proximal development and beyond. In Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 283–324). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
Zuboff, S., & Maxmin, J. (2004). The support economy: Why corporations are failing individuals and the next episode of capitalism. New York: Penguin Books.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.