Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Akrich, M. (1993). A gazogene in Costa Rica: An experiment in techno-sociology. In Lemonnier, P. (Ed.), Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic (pp. 289–337). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002a). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002b). The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the edge. Available from: http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_Power.pdf.

Allen, D. (2003). Getting things done: The art of stress-free productivity. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

,Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (2004). Network. Available from: http://www.atis.org/glossary/definition.aspx?id=3457.

Amidon, S. R. (2005). Writing the learning organization: A framework for teaching and research. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(4), 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antunes, P., & Costa, C. J. (2003). From genre analysis to the design of meetingware. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 302–310). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1991). The art of rhetoric. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1992). The politics. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001a). The advent of netwar (revisited). In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 1–28). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001b). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Atkinson, S. R., & Moffat, J. (2005). The agile organization: From informal networks to complex effects and agility. Available from: http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Atkinson_Agile.pdf.

Aufderheide, P. (1999). Communications policy and the public interest: The Telecommunications Act of 1996. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. (2003). What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity assessable, accountable, and plannable. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies.

Beniger, J. (1989). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society (reprint ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Berg, M. (1996). The fruitful a-modernism of a lingering modernist: Commentary on Bruno Latour's “On Interobjectivity.”Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, M. (1997). Rationalizing medical work: Decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berg, M. (1998). The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(4), 456–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, M. (1999). Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(4), 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, M. (2000). Lessons from a dinosaur: Mediating is research through an analysis of the medical record. HOIT '00: Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics: IF at home: Virtual influences on everyday life (pp. 487–506). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2003). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 126–150). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Blackler, F., & McDonald, S. (2000). Power, mastery and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 833–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boczkowski, P. J. (2005). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boot, M. (2007). War made new: Weapons, warriors, and the making of the modern world. New York: Gotham.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. (1987). A well ordered reality: Aspects of the development of Schlumberger, 1920–39. Social Studies of Science, 17, 611–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C. (1994). Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Brull, S. V., & Elstrom, P. (1997, December). At 7 1/2 cents a minute, who cares if you can't hear a pin drop?Business Week, 46.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986a). The sociology of an actor–network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In Law, J. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters? Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1992). The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 72–102). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2002). Writing and (re)writing devices as tools for managing complexity. In Law, J. & Mol, A. (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 191–217). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2004). The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design. Journal of the Center for Information Studies, 5(3), 3–10. Available from: http://www.yc.musashi-tech.ac.jp/∼cisj/05/5_01.pdf.Google Scholar

Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). How to study the force of science. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 3–15). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2003). Research “in the wild” and the shaping of social identities. Technology in Society, 25, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). Socio-technical graphs and cognitive maps: A response to Latour, Mauguin and Teil. Social Studies of Science, 22, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, L. (2003). Alice in Wonderland. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.Google Scholar

Carter, L. (Ed.). (2005). Market matters: Applied rhetoric studies and free market competition. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Charlton, B. G. (2006). The rise of the boy-genius: Psychological neoteny, science and modern life. Medical Hypotheses, 67(4), 679–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, D. (2007). Rhetoric of empowerment: Genre, activity, and the distribution of capital. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 155–180). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Covey, S. R. (1990). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Crandall, R. W. (1991). After the breakup: U.S. telecommunications in a more competitive era. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 175–182). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Davis, D. D. (2000). Breaking up (at) totality: A rhetoric of laughter. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Armond, P. (2001). Netwar in the Emerald City: WTO protest strategy and tactics. In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 201–238). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Devitt, A. J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In Bazerman, C. & Paradis, J. G. (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336–357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Drucker, P. F. (2003). The essential Drucker: The best of sixty years of Peter Drucker's essential writings on management (reprint ed.). New York: Collins.Google Scholar

Duesterberg, T., & Gordon, K. (1997). Competition and deregulation in telecommunications: The case for a new paradigm. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.Google Scholar

Edwards, S. J. A. (2000). Swarming on the battlefield: Past, present, and future. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Ehn, P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1954). Dialectics of nature. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1975). Socialism: Utopian and scientific. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed working intelligence. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1996a). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16(3), 131–143.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1996b). Interobjectivity, ideality, and dialectics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Available from: http://is2.lse.ac.uk/events/ESRCseminars/engestrom.pdf.

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähääho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 345–374). Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., & Escalante, V. (1996). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the Postal Buddy. In Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 325–374). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., Puonti, A., & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151–186). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, G. (2000). Centres, peripheries, and electronic communication: Changing work practice boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 115–148.Google Scholar

Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Geisler, C. (2001). Textual objects: Accounting for the role of texts in the everyday life of complex organizations. Written Communication, 18(3), 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geisler, C. (2003). When management becomes personal: An activity-theoretic analysis of Palm technologies. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies

Gerlach, L. P. (2001). The structure of social movements: Environmental activism and its opponents. In Arquilla, J. & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 289–310). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, V., & Mark, G. (2005). Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. European Conference in Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Paris: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, V. M., & Mark, G. (2004). “Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness”: Managing multiple working spheres. CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 113–120). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Can cognitive explanations be eliminated?Science & Education, 12, 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Handbook of Texas Online (2005). s.v. “Telephone Service.” Available from: http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/view/TT/egt2.html.

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. J. (1996). Modest_witness@second_millenium.femaleman_meets_oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challenges and opportunities. SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 70–77). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Häyrynen, Y.-P. (1999). Collapse, creation, and continuity in Europe: How do people change? In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 115–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heldman, P. K., Heldman, R., & Bystrzycki, T. A. (1997). Competitive telecommunications: How to thrive under the Telecommunications Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Helle, M. (2000). Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 81–114.Google Scholar

Hewitt, H. (2005). Blog: Understanding the information reformation that's changing your world. Nashville, TN: Nelson Business.Google Scholar

Holland, D., & Reeves, J. (1996). Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 257–282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, M. W. (1996). Telecommunications reform and the death of the local exchange monopoly. Florida State University Law Review, 24, 179–217.Google Scholar

Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., & Robertson, G. (2004). Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. AVI '04: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 32–39). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar

Johnson-Eilola, J. (1998). Living on the surface: Learning in the age of global communication networks. In Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 185–210). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnson-Eilola, J. (2001). Datacloud: Expanding the roles and locations of information. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 47–54). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Eilola, J. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In Nardi, B. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

King, J. L., & Frost, R. L. (2002). Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. In Hinds, P. J. & Kiesler, S. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Korpela, M., Mursu, A., & Soriyan, H. (2002). Information systems development as an activity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korpela, M., Soriyan, H., & Olifokunbi, H. (2000). Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 191–210.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1988a). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1988b). The politics of explanation: An alternative. In Woolgar, S. (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 155–176). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1988c). The Prince for machines as well as machinations. In Elliott, B. (Ed.), Technology and social processes (pp. 20–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters? Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1992a). A reply to Carlson and Gorman. Social Studies of Science, 22, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1992b). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993a). Ethnography of a “high-tech” case: About Aramis. In Lemonnier, P. (Ed.), Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic (pp. 372–398). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993b). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1995). Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. In Orlikowski, W., Walsham, G., Jones, M., & DeGross, J. (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 285–307). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996a). Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996b). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1996c). Pursuing the discussion of interobjectivity with a few friends. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 266–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1999b). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2002). Morality and technology: The end of the means. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2006). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B., Mauguin, P., & Teil, G. (1992). A note on socio-technical graphs. Social Studies of Science, 22, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (1986a). The heterogeneity of texts. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 67–83). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Law, J. (1986b). On the methods of long distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 234–263). Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Law, J. (2002a). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (2002b). On hidden heterogeneities: Complexity, formalism, and aircraft design. In Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 116–141). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (2004a). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Law, J. (2004b). And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity, and the baroque. Environment and Planning, 22(1), 13–26.Google Scholar

Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Law, J., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lektorsky, V. A. (1999). Activity theory in a new era. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 65–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lenert, E. M. (1998). A communication theory perspective on telecommunications policy. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leont'ev, A. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13 (2), 4–33.Google Scholar

Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1994). The age of the network: Organizing principles for the 21st century. Essex Junction, VT: Omneo.Google Scholar

Locke, C., Levine, R., Searls, D., & Weinberger, D. (2001). The cluetrain manifesto: The end of business as usual. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar

Longaker, M. G. (2006). Back to basics: An apology for economism in technical writing scholarship. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludvigsen, S. R., Havnes, A., & Chr. Lahn, L. (2003). Workplace learning across activity systems: A case study of sales engineers. In Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 291–310). Boston: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development, its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2001). The art of war (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2003a). The discourses. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2003b). The prince. New York: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style and your life. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 321–330). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: Volume 1. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. F., & Boyd, Danah M. (2005). Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces: Experiences at an academic conference. CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1641–1644). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

McMaster, S. (2002). The telecommunications industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 423–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(3), 170–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miettinen, R. (2005). Object of activity and individual motivation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miettinen, R., & Hasu, M. (2002). Articulating user needs in collaborative design: Towards an activity-theoretical approach. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(1), 641–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, M. L. (1997). Universal service: Competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996a). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nardi, B. A. (1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nardi, B. A. (2005). Objects of desire: Power and passion in collaborative activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paltridge, S. (1995). Telecommunication infrastructure: The benefits of competition. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Holloway-Attaway, L. (2007). Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: A case study of collaboration between U.S. and Swedish students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 327–352.Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polodny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.Google Scholar

,Public Utilities Commission of Texas. (1999, April). Meeting new challenges: Fiscal year 1999 annual report. Austin: Public Utilities Commission of Texas.Google Scholar

Reynolds, G. (2006). An army of Davids: How markets and technology empower ordinary people to beat big media, big government, and other goliaths. Nashville, TN: Nelson Current.Google Scholar

Ronfeldt, D. (2007). In search of how societies work: Tribes – the first and forever form. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2007/RAND_WR433.pdf.

Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. (2007, August). The promise of noöpolitik. Available from: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/ronfeldt/index.html.

Rhodes, L., & Hadden, S. G. (1995). The evolution of universal service in Texas: A report. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Russell, D. R. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In Petraglia, J. (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Russell, D. R. (1997a). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. R. (1997b). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces: A review of studies that use cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(4), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. R., & Yañez, A. (2003, February). “Big picture people rarely become historians”: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. Available from: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/

Saarelma, O. (1993). Descriptions of subjective networks as a mediator of developmental dialogue. The quarterly newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 15, 102–112.Google Scholar

Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., & Spafford, M. (2007). Regularized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 21–44). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar

Scott, J. K. (1992). Exploring socio-technical analysis: Monsieur Latour is not joking!Social Studies of Science, 22, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1982). The parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1983). Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1995). The natural contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serres, M., & Latour, B. (1995). Conversations on science, culture, and time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sheller, M. (2004). Mobile publics: Beyond the network perspective. Environment and Planning, 22, 39–52.Google Scholar

Slattery, S. (2005). Technical writing as textual coordination: An argument for the value of writers' skill with information technology. Technical Communication, 52(3), 353–360.Google Scholar

Sless, D. (1994). The telecomm bill: Redesigning a computer generated report. In Penman, R. & Sless, D. (Eds.), Designing information for people: Proceedings from the symposium (2nd ed., pp. 77–97). Fyshwick, Australia: Goanna Print.Google Scholar

Spasser, M. A. (2000). Articulating collaborative activity: Design-in-use of collaborative publishing services in the flora of North America project. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 140–172.Google Scholar

Spasser, M. A. (2002). Realist activity theory for digital library evaluation: Conceptual framework and case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2002a). Modeling genre ecologies. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 200–207). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2002b). Toward a hermeneutic understanding of programming languages. Currents in Electronic Literacy, 6. Available from: http://currents.cwrl.utexas.edu/spring02/spinuzzi.html.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2003a). Knowledge circulation in a telecommunications company: A preliminary survey. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (pp. 178–183). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2003b). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2003c). Using a handheld PC to collect and analyze observational data. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (pp. 73–79). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. SIGDOC '04: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 110–116). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2005). Lost in the translation: Shifting claims in the migration of a research technique. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2007a). Introduction to TCQ special issue: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2007b). Who killed Rex? Tracing a message through three kinds of networks. In Zachry, M. & Thralls, C. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 45–66). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (in press). The genie's out of the bottle: Leveraging mobile and wireless technologies in qualitative research. In Hea, A. Kimme (Ed.), Going wireless: A critical exploration of wireless & mobile technologies for composition teachers and scholars. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Spinuzzi, C., Hart-Davidson, W., & Zachry, M. (2006). Chains and ecologies: Methodological notes toward a communicative-mediational model of technologically mediated writing. SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 43–50). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Star, S. L. (1995). Introduction. In Star, S. L. (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp. 1–35). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, L. (2006). Continuous partial attention. Available from: http://continuouspartialattention.jot.com/WikiHome.

Suchman, L. (2003). Organizing alignment: The case of bridge-building. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 187–203). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Sumner, T., & Stolze, M. (1997). Evolution, not revolution: Participatory design in the toolbelt era. In Kyng, M. & Mathiassen, I. (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sun, H. (2004). Expanding the scope of localization: A cultural usability perspective on mobile text messaging use in American and Chinese contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar

Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 483–504.Google Scholar

Swarts, J. (2004). Textual grounding: How people turn texts into tools. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(1&2), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar

Temin, P. (1987). The fall of the Bell system: A study in prices and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thévenot, L. (2002). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an “equipped” humanity. In Law, J. & Mol, A. (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 53–87). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2003). Developmental transfer as a goal of internship in practical nursing. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 199–232). Boston: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Boston: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1–15). Boston: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Tzu, S. (2002). The art of war. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Victor, B., & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, G. (2001). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenger, E. (2003). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 76–99). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilde, L. (1991). Logic: Dialectic and contradiction. In The Cambridge companion to Marx (pp. 275–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, C. (1971). A consumer viewpoint on Texas telephone utilities: Report of the chairman. Texas Senate.Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. (2005). Research in activity: An analysis of speed bumps as mediational means. Written Communication, 22(2), 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfe, J. (2002). Annotation technologies: A software and research review. Computers and Composition, 19, 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xavier, P. (1995). Universal service obligations in a competitive telecommunications environment. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Zachry, M. (1999). Constructing usable documentation: A study of communicative practices and the early uses of mainframe computing in industry. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 22–25). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Zachry, M. (2000). The ecology of an online education site in professional communication. Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 433–442). New York: IEEE Educational Activities Department.Google Scholar

Zinchenko, V. P. (1996). Developing activity theory: The zone of proximal development and beyond. In Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 283–324). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Zuboff, S., & Maxmin, J. (2004). The support economy: Why corporations are failing individuals and the next episode of capitalism. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar