Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T17:06:16.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - New organizational forms for knowledge creation in biotechnology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2009

Amalya Lumerman Oliver
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

As suggested in Chapter 2, the most important organizational form that emerged in the biotechnology industry is that of the new biotechnology firms (NBFs) or, alternatively titled, dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs). The emergence of this form has attracted many scholars, who gave various explanations for it. The present chapter will introduce the concept of new organizational forms, and will illustrate this by use of a few examples of organizational structures that aim at enhancing learning and knowledge creation in the biotechnology industry. The first part of this chapter (based on Oliver & Montgomery (2000)) suggests an account of NBFs as a new organizational form. Further, the chapter introduces additional new forms for conducting biotechnology research, such as consortia, university spin-offs, and incubators, and will highlight their central internal features.

NBFs

The biotechnology industry is characterized by the emergence of a new form of knowledge organization: NBFs. In the early stages of this industry, the new form was developed through a creative collaboration between leading scientists and venture capital entrepreneurs to capture the new opportunity (Kenney 1986; Kornberg 1995). In this way, venture capital provided the mechanism for introducing the new technologies important for future economic growth. This direction of organizational evolution is consistent with the observation of Van de Ven et al. (1989) that environmental niches do not preexist but are constructed through a continuous interaction of entrepreneurs and organizations toward the establishment of new organizations which take advantage of underutilized and non-redundant opportunities of a “structural hole” (Burt 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×