Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
If peripatetic myths do not transcend the ideals of a settled order, they do not unquestioningly accept the terms of that order either. Marked by a deep ambiguity, they embody the predicament of those who are both inside as well as outside settled society, those who are seen as a normal part of the social landscape, yet strangers----accepted as well as censured.
In the contemporary Thar region, a number of mobile groups continue to follow very old routines of migration, despite drastic social and political transformation, particularly over the past century. Even as the Indian states of Rajasthan and Gujarat rapidly urbanize, it is still common to come across large herds of sheep or camels using the roads meant for modern transport, or to find the carts of Gadiya Luhars parked in the heart of the city. These communities form a part of the long history of this region and represent its lived past. They also represent the struggle and the dynamism for survival in a system that acknowledges their existence with increasing unease.
The previous chapter explored the rise of Rajputs as territorial rulers and the resulting political marginalization of itinerant groups as itinerancy posited a challenge to the emerging territorial political culture. However, whileitinerancy was marginalized in the political structures, itinerants of several kinds continued to travel on, and exercise control over networks of travel and circulation on the frontiers of the Thar. They also continued to challenge social boundaries created by the emerging genealogical orthodoxy and thus in a sense represented the social frontiers of the Thar. A perusal of complex mythologies and histories of these groups questions the fixity of caste identities. In fact, the oppositions between ‘mythologies’ and ‘histories’ are pointers towards the fluidity and ambivalence of caste and occupational identities, and the processes through which they were essentialised.
In the Thar, the existence of a vast population of peripatetics throughout its human history and the political compulsions of settlement, signify a struggle that cannot merely be understood by placing settlement and mobility in bipolar opposition. Mobility formed the core livelihood practice of the region, as its fragile ecology demanded a constant circulation of people and resources. Pastoralists, traders, carriers, peddlers, travelling artisans, bards and genealogists, ascetics and also some scattered hunting and gathering groups were occupationally mobile groups in the Thar Desert.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.